The m-chlorophenylpiperazine test in cluster headache: a study on central serotoninergic activity

Biomarkers in cluster headache: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically investigate previously examined biomarkers in blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, tear fluid, and saliva of patients with cluster headache.

BACKGROUND

Cluster headache is a condition with extensive clinical challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Identification of a biomarker with diagnostic implications or as a potential treatment target is highly warranted.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review including peer reviewed full text of studies that measured biochemical compounds in either blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, tear fluid, or saliva of patients with cluster headache diagnosed after the implementation of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (1988) written in English, Danish, Swedish, or Norwegian. Inclusion required a minimum of five participants. The search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE, in September 2022, and extracted data were screened by two authors. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for reporting systematic reviews were followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias in case-controlled studies.

RESULTS

We included 40 studies involving 832 patients with cluster headache and 872 controls, evaluating 80 potential biomarkers. The risk of bias for case-controlled studies was a median of 6 (range: 3-8) and 20 studies out of 40 (50%) were of fair or good quality. Most studies were identified within three groups: hypothalamic-regulated hormones, inflammatory markers, and neuropeptides. Among the hypothalamic hormones, cortisol was the most frequently investigated (N = 7) and was elevated in cluster headache in most of the studies. The most frequently examined inflammatory marker was interleukin 1 (N = 3), but findings were divergent. Calcitonin gene-related peptide was the most investigated neuropeptide (N = 9) and all studies found increased levels during attacks.

CONCLUSION

Biomarker findings have been inconsistent and widely non-specific for cluster headache, which explains why none of the previous studies succeeded in identifying a unique biomarker for cluster headache, but instead contributed to substantiating the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Several of the examined biomarkers could hold promise as markers for disease activity but are unfit for a clear distinction from both controls and other headaches.

The neurobiology of cluster headache

Cluster headache is a primary headache form occurring in paroxysmal excruciatingly severe unilateral head pain attacks usually grouped in periods lasting 1-2months, the cluster periods. A genetic component is suggested by the familial occurrence of the disease but a genetic linkage is yet to be identified. Contemporary activation of trigeminal and cranial parasympathetic systems-the so-called trigemino-parasympathetic reflex-during the headache attacks seem to cause the pain and accompanying oculo-facial autonomic phenomena respectively. At peripheral level, the increased calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) plasma levels suggests trigeminal system activation during cluster headache attacks. The temporal pattern of the disease both in terms of circadian rhythmicity and seasonal recurrence has suggested involvement of the hypothalamic biological clock in the pathophysiology of cluster headache. The posterior hypothalamus was investigate as the cluster generator leading to activation of the trigemino-parasympathetic reflex, but the accumulated experience after 20 years of hypothalamic electrical stimulation to treat the condition indicate that this brain region rather acts as pain modulator. Efficacy of monoclonal antibodies to treat episodic cluster headache points to a key role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of the condition.

Comprehensive clinical phenotyping of nitroglycerin infusion induced cluster headache attacks

Background

Nitroglycerin administration allows the study of cluster headache attacks in their entirety in a standardised way.

Methods

A single-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study using weight-calculated intravenous nitroglycerin administration at 0.5 µg/kg/min over 20 minutes to study cluster headache attacks, including accompanying non-headache symptoms and cranial autonomic symptoms.

Results

Thirty-three subjects with cluster headache were included in the study; 24 completed all three study visits. Nitroglycerin-induced attacks developed in 26 out of 33 subjects (79%) receiving unblinded nitroglycerin infusion, and in 19 out of 25 subjects (76%) receiving single-blinded nitroglycerin infusion, compared with one out of 24 subjects (4%) receiving single-blinded placebo infusion. Episodic cluster headache subjects had a shorter latency period to a nitroglycerin-induced attack compared to the chronic cluster headache (CCH) subjects (U = 15, z = −2.399, p = 0.016). Sixteen of nineteen episodic cluster headache (mean, 84%; 95% confidence interval, 66–100%) and 11 of 14 chronic cluster headache subjects developed a nitroglycerin-induced attack (79%, 54–100%) following the unblinded nitroglycerin infusion. Following the single-blinded nitroglycerin infusion, eight out of 13 episodic cluster headache (62%, 31–92%) and 11 out of 12 chronic cluster headache (92%, 73–100%) subjects developed nitroglycerin-induced attacks. Nitroglycerin induced non-headache symptoms in the majority of subjects receiving it: 91% in the open unblinded nitroglycerin visit and 84% in the single-blinded nitroglycerin visits, compared with 33% in the single-blinded placebo visit. Cranial autonomic symptoms were induced by nitroglycerin infusion, 94% in the open unblinded nitroglycerin visit and 84% in the single-blinded nitroglycerin visit, compared with 17% in the single-blinded placebo visit.

Conclusion

Intravenous weight-adjusted nitroglycerin administration in both episodic cluster headache in bout and chronic cluster headache is effective and reliable in inducing cluster headache attacks, cranial autonomic symptoms and non-headache symptoms.

Pathogenesis of Cluster Headache: From Episodic to Chronic Form, the Role of Neurotransmitters and Neuromodulators

OBJECTIVE

To describe the role of biochemical anomalies of tyrosine (TYR), tryptophan (TRP), and arginine (ARG) metabolism in patients suffering from episodic and chronic cluster headache (CCH).

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of cluster headache (CH) and the process that transforms the episodic into the chronic form are unknown. However, the accompanying symptoms suggest a dysfunction of the sympathetic system and hypothalamus along with anomalies of metabolism of catecholamines, elusive amines, and nitric oxide (NO) metabolism.

METHODS

We describe the results obtained from the last papers published on this issue. The level of metabolites were analyzed by different high-performance liquid chromatography methods.

RESULTS

In both episodic and CH patients, the levels of dopamine and elusive amines are very elevated. The only biochemical difference found in studies between episodic and chronic cluster was that norepinephrine levels were significantly lower in episodic cluster in comparison to control and chronic subjects. In addition, the levels of ARG, homoarginine, and citrulline, precursors of synthesis of NO, were significantly lower in chronic cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

All these results suggest that TYR, TRP, and ARG metabolism is abnormal and may constitute a biochemical fingerprint of CH patients. The increased levels of norepinephrine in chronic cluster constitute a possible cause of chronicity of this primary headache. The high levels of tryptamine and its activity on the central serotoninergic system may explain why the length of CH is brief in comparison to migraine and tension-type headache. The low levels of ARG, homoarginine, and citrulline may be the consequence of high circulating levels of α₁ -agonists, such as epinephrine and norepinephrine, and their biochemical interaction with endothelial trace amine-associated receptor 1 that induces activation of NO synthase, resulting in NO synthesis in the circulation, NO release, intense vasodilation, and as a result, the cluster attack.

The role of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators in the pathogenesis of cluster headache: a review

The pathogenesis underlying cluster headache remains an unresolved issue. Although both the autonomic system and the hypothalamus play a central role, the modality of their involvement remains largely unknown. It is, also, unknown why the duration of the pain attacks is so brief and why their onset and termination are abrupt and extremely painful. This review summarizes the evidence to date accumulated in favor of a possible role of anomalies in the metabolism of tyrosine, tryptophan, and arginine in these unresolved issues.

Cluster headache

Cluster headache is an excruciating, strictly one-sided pain syndrome with attacks that last between 15 minutes and 180 minutes and that are accompanied by marked ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms, such as lacrimation and conjunctival injection. The pain is so severe that female patients describe each attack as worse than childbirth. The past decade has seen remarkable progress in the understanding of the pathophysiological background of cluster headache and has implicated the brain, particularly the hypothalamus, as the generator of both the pain and the autonomic symptoms. Anatomical connections between the hypothalamus and the trigeminovascular system, as well as the parasympathetic nervous system, have also been implicated in cluster headache pathophysiology. The diagnosis of cluster headache involves excluding other primary headaches and secondary headaches and is based primarily on the patient's symptoms. Remarkable progress has been achieved in developing effective treatment options for single cluster attacks and in developing preventive measures, which include pharmacological therapies and neuromodulation.

Advances in the understanding of cluster headache

INTRODUCTION

Cluster headache is the worst primary headache form; it occurs in paroxysmal excruciatingly severe unilateral head pain attacks usually grouped in cluster periods. The familial occurrence of the disease indicates a genetic component but a gene abnormality is yet to be disclosed. Activation of trigeminal afferents and cranial parasympathetic efferents, the so-called trigemino-parasympathetic reflex, can explain pain and accompanying oculo-facial autonomic phenomena. In particular, pain in cluster headache is attributed, at least in part, to the increased CGRP plasma levels released by activated trigeminal system. Posterior hypothalamus was hypothesized to be the cluster generator activating the trigemino-parasympathetic reflex. Efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against CRGP is under investigation in randomized clinical trials. Areas covered: This paper will focus on main findings contributing to consider cluster headache as a neurovascular disorder with an origin from within the brain. Expert commentary: Accumulated evidence with hypothalamic stimulation in cluster headache patients indicate that posterior hypothalamus terminates rather than triggers the attacks. More extensive studies on the genetics of cluster headache are necessary to disclose anomalies behind the increased familial risk of the disease. Results from ongoing clinical trials in cluster headache sufferers using monoclonal antibodies against CGRP will open soon a new era.

Cluster Headache Patients Show Marked Intensity Dependence of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials during and outside the Bout

Central serotonergic neurotransmission was assessed using intensity dependence of cortical auditory evoked potentials (IDAP) in cluster headache (CH) patients during both the active and interictal period. In 15 episodic CH patients and 13 controls previously described methods were used and amplitude-stimulus intensity function (ASF) slopes were computed. In the cluster group mean ASF slope was significantly steeper than in the control group both during the active period (1.53 + 0.90 vs. 0.77 + 0.85, P = 0031) and interictally (1.85 + 1.20 vs. 0.77 + 0.85, P = 0012). In the cluster group IDAPs of active and interictal period did not differ significantly ( P = 0378). Duration of the disease or the present bout, distance from the last attack did not correlate with ASF slopes. In conclusion, our results are compatible with decreased level of serotonergic neurotransmission in raphe-cortical pathways. Diminished serotonergic activity in raphe-hypothalamic serotonergic pathways might be hypothesized influencing the activity of hypothalamic neurons and thus play a role in the genesis of cluster headache.

Pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias

Cluster headache, paroxysmal hemicrania, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) are primary headaches recently classified together as trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs). The causes of these headaches have long been debated, with "peripheral" hypotheses in opposition to "central" hypotheses. The available information indicates that the pain originates from within the brain in cluster headache. The hypothalamic activation observed during TAC attacks by use of functional neuroimaging, and the success of hypothalamic stimulation as a treatment, confirm that the posterior hypothalamus is crucial in the pathophysiology of these headaches. The posterior hypothalamus is now known to modulate craniofacial pain, and hypothalamic activation occurs in other pain disorders, suggesting that this brain area is likely to have a more complex role in the pathophysiology of TACs than that of a mere trigger. Hypothalamic activation might play a part in terminating rather than triggering attacks, and might also give rise to a central permissive state, allowing attacks to take place.

Neuroendocrine response to the serotonin agonist M-chlorophenylpiperazine in women with menstrual status migrainosus

To assess the neuroendocrine correlates of menstrual status migrainosus (MSM) and menstrual migraine (MM), we evaluated the prolactin (PRL) and cortisol responses to the direct central serotoninergic (5-HT) agonist meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) administered orally (0.5 mg/kg) during the follicular (FP: +6, +8) and luteal phases (LP: -4, -6) of the same menstrual cycle. Ten women with MSM (migraine attacks occurring within 2 days of the onset of menstrual bleeding but lasting more than 72 h) and 9 women with MM (migraine occurring within 2 days of the onset of menstrual bleeding with a typical duration of attacks) were studied. Six healthy women served as controls. Blood samples were taken at times -30, 0 and every 30 min over 4 h. Statistical analysis was performed using MANOVA followed by Duncan's post hoc comparisons. We found that the PRL response to the m-CPP test was significantly blunted in MSM compared with MM and controls in both phases of the menstrual cycle (F = 4.6; p < 0.001). Indeed, the PRL area under the curve (AUC) after m-CPP was higher in both MM and controls compared with MSM (F = 12.7; p < 0.001). The m-CPP-induced cortisol response was absent in MSM compared with MM and controls in both FP and LP (F = 4.1; p < 0.001). On the other hand, the pattern of the plasma cortisol response to m-CPP was similar in MM and controls throughout the menstrual cycle. In addition, the basal plasma cortisol levels were significantly higher in MSM compared with controls (p < 0.001) and MM (p < 0.001) during FP, but not in LP, and progressively decreased over time. Thus, no significant effect of the menstrual cycle phase and diagnosis on the cortisol AUC was found, while a significant diagnosis effect (F = 25.6; p < 0.001) on %delta(max) plasma cortisol levels was evident and consistent with the lack of cortisol response to m-CPP in MSM during the FP and LP compared with MM and controls. A derangement in central 5-HT control of pituitary PRL, and even more so in cortisol release, is present in women with MSM, but not with MM, regardless of the phase of the menstrual cycle, suggesting the involvement of some 5-HT(1) and 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes in the occurrence of extremely severe migraine attacks triggered by menstruation.

Abnormal 5-HT1D receptor function in cluster headache: a neuroendocrine study with sumatriptan

The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity of 5-HT(1D) receptors in patients with episodic cluster headache using sumatriptan as a pharmacological probe. The drug, a selective 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist, stimulates the secretion of growth hormone and inhibits the release of prolactin, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol. These effects may be used to explore the function of serotonergic systems in vivo. We administered subcutaneous sumatriptan and placebo to 20 patients with cluster headache (10 in the active phase and 10 in the remission period) and to 12 controls. The sumatriptan-induced increase of growth hormone concentrations was significantly (P < 0.05) blunted in patients with active cluster headache. Prolactin and ACTH responses to the drug were significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in patients with cluster headache, both in the active and in the remission period. Our results suggest that cerebral serotonergic functions mediated by 5-HT(1D) receptors are altered in patients with episodic cluster headache.

Etiology and pathogenesis of cluster headache

This last decade has seen remarkable progress made toward unraveling the mystery of primary headache disorders like migraine and cluster. The vascular theory has been superseded by recognition that neurovascular phenomena seem to be the permissive and triggering factors in migraine and cluster headache. This understanding has been achieved through new imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Prior to these imaging techniques it was impossible to study the primary headache disorders because these had no structural basis. There is now an increasing body of evidence that the brain is involved primarily in cluster and migraine and that vessel dilatation is an epiphenomenon.

Cluster headache: review of the literature

All papers on cluster headaches were reviewed according to preset criteria under the following headings: classification, epidemiology, aetiology, pathophysiology, and clinical features. The management review used the Cochrane systematic review guidelines and so is based on randomized controlled trials wherever possible. A meta-analysis was not done. Other treatments are discussed and their drawbacks are highlighted and guidelines proposed based on the evidence of this review.