1
|
McCann N, Scott P, Parry CM, Brown M. Antimicrobial agents for the treatment of enteric fever chronic carriage: A systematic review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272043. [PMID: 35905082 PMCID: PMC9337697 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Chronic carriage of S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi is an important source of enteric fever transmission. Existing guidance and treatment options for this condition are limited. This systematic review aims to assess the evidence concerning the efficacy of different antimicrobials in treating enteric fever chronic carriage.
Methods
We searched major bibliographic databases using relevant keywords between 1946 and September 2021. We included all interventional studies that included patients with confirmed enteric fever chronic carriage and deployed an antimicrobial that remains in clinical practice today. Case reports and case series of under 10 patients were excluded. Two reviewers screened abstracts, selected articles for final inclusion and quality-assessed the included studies for risk of bias. Extracted data was analysed, with pooling of data and eradication rates for each antimicrobial calculated. As only one randomised controlled trial was identified, no meta-analysis was performed.
Results
Of the 593 papers identified by the initial search, a total of eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. Evidence was identified for the use of fluoroquinolones and amoxicillin/ampicillin in the treatment for enteric fever chronic carriage. Fluoroquinolones were superior to amoxicillin/ampicillin with 92% of patients achieving eradication after one antimicrobial course compared to 68% (p = 0.02). The quality of included studies was poor, and all were carried out before 1990.
Conclusion
This review identified fluoroquinolones and amoxicillin/ampicillin as treatment options for enteric fever chronic carriage, with fluoroquinolones the more effective option. However, this evidence pre-dates rises in antimicrobial resistance in enteric fever and therefore the significance of these findings to today’s practice is unclear. Further research is needed to investigate whether these antimicrobials remain appropriate treatment options or whether alternative interventions are more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naina McCann
- UCL Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Peter Scott
- UCL Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher M. Parry
- Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Brown
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Clinical Research Dept, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nabarro LE, McCann N, Herdman MT, Dugan C, Ladhani S, Patel D, Morris-Jones S, Balasegaram S, Heyderman RS, Brown M, Parry CM, Godbole G. British Infection Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Enteric Fever in England. J Infect 2022; 84:469-489. [PMID: 35038438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Enteric fever (EF) is an infection caused by the bacteria called Salmonella Typhi or Paratyphi. Infection is acquired through swallowing contaminated food or water. Most EF in England occurs in people returning from South Asia and other places where EF is common; catching EF in England is rare. The main symptom is fever, but stomach pain, diarrhoea, muscle aches, rash and other symptoms may occur. EF is diagnosed by culturing the bacteria from blood and/or stool in a microbiology laboratory. EF usually responds well to antibiotic treatment. Depending on how unwell the individual is, antibiotics may be administered by mouth or by injection. Over the past several years, there has been an overall increase in resistance to antibiotics used to treat enteric fever, in all endemic areas. Additionally, since 2016, there has been an ongoing outbreak of drug-resistant EF in Pakistan. This infection is called extensively drug-resistant, or XDR, EF and only responds to a limited number of antibiotics. Occasionally individuals develop complications of EF including confusion, bleeding, a hole in the gut or an infection of the bones or elsewhere. Some people may continue to carry the bacteria in their stool for a longtime following treatment for the initial illness. These people may need treatment with a longer course of antibiotics to eradicate infection. Travellers can reduce their risk of acquiring EF by following safe food and water practices and by receiving the vaccine at least a few weeks before travel. These guidelines aim to help doctors do the correct tests and treat patients for enteric fever in England but may also be useful to doctors and public health professionals in other similar countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E Nabarro
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; United Kingdom Health Security Agency, UK; St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; British Infection Association, UK
| | - N McCann
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - C Dugan
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Ladhani
- United Kingdom Health Security Agency, UK; Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's University, London, UK
| | - D Patel
- National Travel Health Network and Centre (NaTHNaC), UK
| | - S Morris-Jones
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - R S Heyderman
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Brown
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - C M Parry
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; Alder Hey Hospital and Liverpool University Hospitals, Liverpool, UK; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - G Godbole
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; United Kingdom Health Security Agency, UK; British Infection Association, UK.
| |
Collapse
|