Impact of dialyzer membrane selection on cellular responses in acute renal failure: a crossover study

Impact of Haemodialysis on Insulin Kinetics of Acute Kidney Injury Patients in Critical Care

Critically ill patients are occasionally associated with an abrupt decline in renal function secondary to their primary diagnosis. The effect and impact of haemodialysis (HD) on insulin kinetics and endogenous insulin secretion in critically ill patients remains unclear. This study investigates the insulin kinetics of patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) who required HD treatment and glycaemic control (GC). Evidence shows that tight GC benefits the onset and progression of renal involvement in precocious phases of diabetic nephropathy for type 2 diabetes. The main objective of GC is to reduce hyperglycaemia while determining insulin sensitivity. Insulin sensitivity (S_I) is defined as the body response to the effects of insulin by lowering blood glucose levels. Particularly, this study used S_I to track changes in insulin levels during HD therapy. Model-based insulin sensitivity profiles were identified for 51 critically ill patients with severe AKI on specialized relative insulin nutrition titration GC during intervals on HD (OFF/ON) and after HD (ON/OFF). The metabolic effects of HD were observed through changes in S_I over the ON/OFF and OFF/ON transitions. Changes in model-based S_I at the OFF/ON and ON/OFF transitions indicate changes in endogenous insulin secretion and/or changes in effective insulin clearance. Patients exhibited a median reduction of −29 % (interquartile range (IQR): [−58, 6 %], p = 0.02) in measured S_I after the OFF/ON dialysis transition, and a median increase of +9 % (IQR −15 to 28 %, p = 0.7) after the ON/OFF transition. Almost 90 % of patients exhibited decreased S_I at the OFF/ON transition, and 55 % exhibited increased S_I at the ON/OFF transition. Results indicate that HD commencement has a significant effect on insulin pharmacokinetics at a cohort and per-patient level. These changes in metabolic behaviour are most likely caused by changes in insulin clearance or/and endogenous insulin secretion.

Comparison of sustained hemodiafiltration with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration for the treatment of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

Despite improvements in medical care, the mortality of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) who require renal replacement therapy (RRT) remains high. We describe a new approach, sustained hemodiafiltration, to treat patients who suffered from acute kidney injury and were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). In our study, 60 critically ill patients with AKI who required RRT were treated with either continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) or sustained hemodiafiltration (S-HDF). The former was performed by administering a postfilter replacement fluid at an effluent rate of 35 mL/kg/h, and the latter was performed by administering a postfilter replacement fluid at a dialysate-flow rate of 300-500 mL/min. The S-HDF was delivered on a daily basis. The baseline characteristics of the patients in the two treatment groups were similar. The primary study outcome--survival until discharge from the ICU or survival for 30 days, whichever was earlier--did not significantly differ between the two groups: 70% after CVVHDF and 87% after S-HDF. The hospital-survival rate after CVVHDF was 63% and that after S-HDF was 83% (P < 0.05). The number of patients who showed renal recovery at the time of discharge from the ICU and the hospital and the duration of the ICU stay significantly differed between the two treatments (P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference between the mean number of treatments performed per patient, the mean duration of daily treatment in the S-HDF group was 6.5 +/- 1.0 h, which was significantly shorter. Although the total convective volumes--the sum of the replacement-fluid and fluid-removal volumes--did not differ significantly, the dialysate-flow rate was higher in the S-HDF group. Our results suggest that in comparison with conventional continuous RRT, including high-dose CVVHDF, more intensive renal support in the form of postdilution S-HDF will decrease the mortality and accelerate renal recovery in critically ill patients with AKI.

Effect of hemodialysis before transplant surgery on renal allograft function--a pair of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis immediately before kidney transplant surgery has been suggested to adversely affect early graft function. On the other hand, considering its profound antiinflammatory effects, a beneficial impact of regional citrate anticoagulation on the evolution of graft function can be speculated. We sought to assess the clinical impact of preoperative hemodialysis and dialysis anticoagulation in two related randomized trials.

METHODS

Eligible kidney transplant candidates with a serum potassium less than or equal to 5.0 mEq/L were randomized to receive dialysis or no dialysis before deceased donor transplantation. Patients with a potassium more than 5.0 mEq/L were randomized to receive dialysis with heparin or citrate anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at posttransplant day 5.

RESULTS

The first comparison (56 vs. 54 patients) revealed no effect of dialysis on eGFR at day 5 (primary endpoint, 12 [interquartile range 5-36] vs. 13 [5-37] mL/min/1.73 m2, P=0.98), rates of delayed graft function (22% vs. 27%, P=0.66), cellular rejection (20% vs. 24%, P=0.65), and C4d-positive dysfunction (2% vs. 9%, P=0.11) or 1-year death-censored graft survival (89% vs. 91%, P=0.51). Comparing citrate with heparin anticoagulation (44 vs. 66 patients), no differences in eGFR at day 5 (17 [8-31] vs. 14 [6-38] ml/min/1.73 m2, P=0.57), delayed graft function (21% vs. 30%, P=0.28), cellular rejection (23% vs. 33%, P=0.29), and graft survival (90% vs. 88%, P=0.44) were found. For citrate anticoagulation, less C4d-positive rejection episodes (P=0.08) and higher 1-year eGFR levels (P=0.03) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Pretransplant hemodialysis and anticoagulation may not affect early graft function in a meaningful way.

Biocompatible hemodialysis membranes for acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure (ARF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Some studies have reported a survival advantage among patients dialyzed with biocompatible membranes (BCM) compared to bioincompatible membranes (BICM). These findings were not consistently observed in subsequent studies.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain whether the use of BCM confers an advantage in either survival or recovery of renal function over the use of BICM in adult patients with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), the Mexican Index of Latin American Biomedical Journals IMBIOMED (from 1990), the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database LILACS (from 1982), and reference lists of articles. Search date: January 2007

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the use of a BCM with a BICM in patients > 18 years of age with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted the data independently. Cellulose-derived dialysis membranes were classified as BICM, and synthetic dialyzers were considered as BCM. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality and recovery of renal function by type of dialyzer. We further explored these outcomes according to the flux properties (high-flux or low-flux) of each of these dialyzers. A meta-analysis was conducted by combining data using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the primary analysis of mortality, with a total of 1100 patients. None of the pooled risk ratios (RRs) reached statistical significance. The pooled RR for mortality was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 1.07). The overall RR for recovery of renal function, which was inclusive of 1038 patients from nine studies, was 1.09 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.31). The pooled RR for mortality by dialyzer flux property was 1.05 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.37). The pooled RR for recovery of renal function by flux property was 1.30 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.02). A meta-analysis of mortality among kidney transplant recipients was not possible, however the analysis of recovery of renal function in this patient population revealed an RR of 1.05 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.26). Results of sensitivity analyses did not differ significantly from the primary analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no demonstrable clinical advantage to the use of BCM versus BICM in patients with ARF who require intermittent hemodialysis.

Biocompatibility Parameters of Different Dialysis Membranes Assessed during Systemic Inflammation

BACKGROUND

We explored whether biocompatible dialyzer membranes modulate the inflammatory response during blood contact in patients with systemic inflammation.

METHODS

15 patients with end-stage renal disease and systemic inflammation (mean serum C-reactive protein 86 +/- 4 mg/l) were randomly treated with Cuprophan (CU), polyamide (PA) and vitamin-E coated (VEC) membrane-based dialyzers.

RESULTS

Changes in blood pressure, capillary blood oxygen saturation and differential blood counts during the hemodialysis session were not significantly different between the three dialyzers. Baseline blood levels of activated circulating complement (C3a) were more than 100 times above normal, and unlike expected they decreased during hemodialysis treatments (CU: from 7,389 +/- 783 to 5,423 +/- 761 ng/ml; PA: from 7,379 +/- 980 to 5,690 +/- 714 ng/ml; VEC: from 7.377 +/- 714 to 5,360 +/- 1,005 ng/ml; all n.s.). No significant differences between treatments were found with respect to changes in blood concentrations of TNF-alpha, interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist as well as ICAM-1 (CU: from 451 +/- 41 to 477 +/- 41 ng/ml; PA: from 437 +/- 42 to 449 +/- 40 ng/ml; VEC: from 461 +/- 43 to 460 +/- 47 ng/ml). Furthermore, generation of reactive oxygen species by mononuclear blood cells was comparable during hemodialysis with the CU, PA and VEC dialyzer.

CONCLUSION

The choice of dialyzer membrane material does not affect most aspects of biocompatibility when patients have significant systemic inflammation. This confounding variable should be taken into account in studies exploring the effects of biocompatible dialyzer membranes.

Biocompatible hemodialysis membranes for acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure (ARF) is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Some trials have reported a survival advantage among patients dialyzed with biocompatible membranes (BCM) compared to bioincompatible membranes (BICM). These findings were not consistently observed in subsequent studies.

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain whether the use of BCM confers an advantage in either survival or recovery of renal function over the use of BICM in adult patients with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library - Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1980 to January 2004), the Mexican Index of Latin American Biomedical Journals IMBIOMED (1990 to January 2004), the Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database LILACS (1982 to January 2004), and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the use of a BCM with a BICM in patients > 18 years of age with ARF requiring intermittent hemodialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted the data independently. Cellulose-derived dialysis membranes were classified as BICM, and synthetic dialyzers were considered as BCM. The main outcomes were all-cause mortality and recovery of renal function by type of dialyzer. We further explored these outcomes according to the flux properties (high-flux or low-flux) of each of these dialyzers. A meta-analysis was conducted by combining data using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the primary analysis of mortality, with a total of 1062 patients. None of the pooled RR's reached statistical significance. The pooled relative risk (RR) for mortality was 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81 to 1.07). The overall RR for recovery of renal function, inclusive of 1038 patients from nine studies was 1.09 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.31). The pooled RR for mortality by dialyzer flux property was 1.03 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.30). The RR for recovery of renal function by flux property was 0.85 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.31). A meta-analysis of mortality of kidney transplant recipients was not possible, but the analysis of recovery of renal function in this patient population was 1.09 (95% CI 0.91to 1.31). Results of sensitivity analyses did not differ significantly from the primary analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no demonstrable clinical advantage to the use of BCM versus BICM in patients with ARF who require intermittent hemodialysis.

Impaired monocyte cytokine production in critically ill patients with acute renal failure

BACKGROUND

Plasma levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines are predictive of mortality in patients with acute renal failure (ARF). Anti-inflammatory strategies are postulated to be beneficial in treatment. However, there are few studies simultaneously examining monocyte cytokine production and plasma cytokine levels in patients with ARF.

METHODS

Study populations consisted of 20 critically ill patients with ARF, 19 critically ill patients without ARF (CRIT ILL), 28 healthy subjects (HS), 19 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and 15 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Monocyte intracellular content of interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) was determined by flow cytometry in whole blood. Plasma interleukin 6 and TNF-alpha concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

At baseline, there were no differences in intracellular monocyte cytokine levels between groups. After lipopolysaccaride stimulation, monocyte production of IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 in ARF patients was reduced by 41%, 84%, and 45%, respectively, compared to healthy subjects (P < 0.01 in each case), and similarly reduced compared to CKD and ESRD patients, and were similar to CRIT ILL patients. Plasma IL-6 levels were significantly higher in ARF patients than healthy subjects, CKD, and ESRD patients (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Critically ill patients with acute renal failure have impaired monocyte cytokine production and elevated plasma cytokine levels in a pattern that closely resembles critically ill patients without ARF, and that is dissimilar to CKD and ESRD patients.

The change in renal replacement therapy on acute renal failure in a general intensive care unit in a university hospital and its clinical efficacy: a Japanese experience

The aim of our study was to examine renal replacement therapies (RRT) that have been used for acute renal failure (ARF) in our intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to compare their outcomes. Sixteen patients who underwent intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), 14 patients who underwent continuous hemofiltration (CHF) in combination with IHD (CHF + IHD), and 38 patients who underwent continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) were evaluated. Regarding the effects of blood purification on hemodynamics and renal function, the percentage increase in blood pressure and percent rapid increase in urinary output were the greatest in the CHDF group. The hourly urinary output after the start of initial blood purification increased only in the CHDF group. The survival rate was significantly higher in the CHDF group. These results suggest that CHDF should be the first-line therapy for patients with ARF and that we are moving in the right direction regarding the application of RRT to treat ARF in ICU patients.

Postoperative renal insufficiency

The poor clinical outcomes associated with postoperative HARI necessitate increased vigilance for HARI detection and intervention to minimize the progression to dialysis dependency. Patient survival significantly worsens if HARI requires the initiation of dialysis. Postoperative changes, including intravascular volume expansion, SIRS, and reduced lean body mass, frequently confound the detection of HARI. Serum creatinine levels frequently do not reflect the decreased renal function because creatinine production rate is decreased with reduced lean body mass, and the serum creatinine concentration is reduced by increased intravascular volume expansion and increased volume of distribution associated with anasarca. Additional indices of renal function must be used postoperatively, including urine output, net volume status, urinalysis with microscopic examination of the spun pellet, and corrected estimations of creatinine clearance. Few therapeutic interventions currently exist to reverse HARI other than optimization of renal perfusion and limitation of nephrotoxin exposure. Dialysis remains a cornerstone of maintenance therapy for refractory and severe HARI. Selection of dialysis modality continues to be based on modality availability and patient stability.

Immunologic defects and vaccination in patients with chronic renal failure

Patients with chronic renal failure suffer from defective host defenses which are directly the result of the renal impairment, in addition to those dependent on the primary illness leading to the renal failure. The mechanisms underlying the defective responses in phagocytic cells, lymphocytes and antigen processing are likely due to either failure to adequately eliminate suppressive compounds by the defective kidneys or to improper metabolic processing of the factors by the damaged renal parynchema. That some of the defects are reversed by transplantation and not dialysis suggests that renal parenchymal metabolic activities may be involved, although it is also possible that functioning glomerular cells are capable of filtering substances that membranes are not currently capable of eliminating. The current strategy for dealing with the immunodeficiency appears to be totally based on developing means to circumvent the defective function. The other approach, correction of the impaired function, cannot be even considered until the mechanisms underlying the defective function of the cells involved in defenses are better delineated. It seems possible that one or a few compounds are pivotal in altering the function of all the affected cell lines, since, with only a small amount of effort, it is possible to relate the dysfunction to abnormal cell membrane functions in phagocytic cells, dendritic cells and lymphocytes. Until the biochemical basis of the dysfunction of all the cell types affected are better defined, such exercises cannot be translated into better management of patients with chronic renal failure. Proper function of host defenses requires that appropriate cells can properly respond to threats to host viability. For the cells of the immune system (phagocytes and lymphocytes) this means that their response to regulatory molecules be appropriate, that their mobility be normal, that their adherence to substrates be preserved, and that they can generate the appropriate response to the challenge. For neutrophils, for example, it is necessary that they recognize and mobilize appropriately to chemotactic stimuli, that they be able to adhere to and migrate through endothelial lining, that their phagocytic activity be sufficient, and that they can kill and degrade endocytosed particles and generate appropriate secretions. Similar lists of requirements for good function can be generated for any cell type in the immune defense system. Uremia, as well as currently available treatments for uremia, directly or indirectly alters the function of all phases of appropriate immune cell function. Defective host responses in uremia have been recognized for decades and there has been considerable effort in the past decade to better define the extent and mechanisms of impaired defenses. Despite the multitude of major defects in humoral, cellular, and inflammatory processes, uremic patients who are cared for today, although they remain at higher risk of serious infectious complications, can and do maintain a good quality of life, with most remaining free of major infections for years and decades.