Should non-invasive Helicobacter pylori testing replace endoscopy in investigation of dyspepsia?

Phytotherapeutic modalities for the management of Helicobacter pylori associated peptic ulcer

Due to an imbalance between aggressive factors known as hydrochloric acid (HCl), pepsin, leukotrienes, refluxed bile, defensive factors and reactive oxygen species, the peptic ulcer is formed in the stomach and duodenum which mostly include the function of prostaglandins, mucus bicarbonate barrier, enzymatic antioxidants, and some growth factors. H. pylori infection remained one of the considerable causes of peptic ulcer as it caused hypochlorhydria and struck off the defense mechanism of the stomach. The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and stress are the most prevailing causes of peptic ulcer disease. Lack of physical exercise, little rest and due to poor leisure cause the peptic ulcer disease. Candies, chocolate, coffee, cigarettes, stress, and alcohol are the cause of peptic ulceration and suppression of acid in the stomach due to the utilization of antacid medication. Most of the ancient medical practices in the traditional alternative medicinal system include Unani, Ayurveda, Siddha, Homeopathy, Naturopathy, Chinese customary medicine, African conventional medicine, and Native American medicine. Without a hostile effect, the rate of curing the disease is the significance of natural products research. Peptic ulcer disease is the widespread nature of peptic ulcer in all class of population, which mostly may be due to rapidly changing the food habits and stress, causing the imbalance between gastric offensive and defensive factors. Curcuma longa is the most effective plant for the cure of peptic ulcer. Curcuma longa has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity. Curcuma longa remarkably reduces the level of inflammatory mediator (IL1) and (TNF) which was increased during the formation of an ulcer. In the rhizome of Curcuma longa, yellow pigment is present and widely used for the treatment of ulcer and decrease the inflammatory response. Symptoms include abdominal pain after taking a meal, nausea, vomiting, Anorexia and lose weight.

Helicobacter Pylori "Test-and-Treat" Strategy for Management of Dyspepsia: A Comprehensive Review

OBJECTIVES:

Deciding on whether the Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy is an appropriate diagnostic–therapeutic approach for patients with dyspepsia invites a series of questions. The aim present article addresses the test-and-treat strategy and attempts to provide practical conclusions for the clinician who diagnoses and treats patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS:

Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE using the keywords Helicobacter pylori, test-and-treat, and dyspepsia. We focused mainly on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and decision analyses.

RESULTS:

Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy, although we must be cautious when extrapolating the results from one geographical area to another. Many factors determine whether this strategy is appropriate in each particular area. The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease, prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease, and yield symptomatic benefit in a minority of patients with functional dyspepsia. Future studies should be able to stratify dyspeptic patients according to their likelihood of improving after treatment of infection by H. pylori.

CONCLUSIONS:

The test-and-treat strategy will cure most cases of underlying peptic ulcer disease and prevent most potential cases of gastroduodenal disease. In addition, a minority of infected patients with functional dyspepsia will gain symptomatic benefit. Several prospective studies and decision analyses support the use of the test-and-treat strategy. The test-and-treat strategy is being reinforced by the accumulating data that support the increasingly accepted idea that “the only good H. pylori is a dead H. pylori”.

Peptic ulcer disease

Peptic ulcer disease had a tremendous effect on morbidity and mortality until the last decades of the 20th century, when epidemiological trends started to point to an impressive fall in its incidence. Two important developments are associated with the decrease in rates of peptic ulcer disease: the discovery of effective and potent acid suppressants, and of Helicobacter pylori. With the discovery of H pylori infection, the causes, pathogenesis, and treatment of peptic ulcer disease have been rewritten. We focus on this revolution of understanding and management of peptic ulcer disease over the past 25 years. Despite substantial advances, this disease remains an important clinical problem, largely because of the increasingly widespread use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin. We discuss the role of these agents in the causes of ulcer disease and therapeutic and preventive strategies for drug-induced ulcers. The rare but increasingly problematic H pylori-negative NSAID-negative ulcer is also examined.

The TETRA study: a prospective evaluation of Helicobacter pylori 'test-and-treat' strategy on 736 patients in clinical practice

AIMS

To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of the test-and-treat strategy in a large group of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia, < 45 years, without alarm symptoms, were prospectively studied. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed with the 13C-urea-breath-test, and eradication or symptomatic treatment was prescribed accordingly. 'Symptomatic improvement' was defined as the percentage of patients with a decrease of > or = 2 levels in the dyspepsia-severity-score or with no symptoms after treatment. Health status and use of health resources were also assessed. Endoscopy was performed in therapeutic failures.

RESULTS

Out of 736 patients initially included, 422 received eradication, and 314 symptomatic therapy; 87% returned at 6 weeks and 67% at 6 months. At 6 months, 'symptomatic improvement' was achieved in 73% and 54% of the patients, in eradication and symptomatic groups, respectively (p < .001), and overall in 66%. A reduction of 78% in mean self-assessment visual analogical score was observed at 6 months. More than 50% of patients were 'much better' at control visits. Endoscopy (18%) and physician's visits (13%) were the main health resources used. No gastric or oesophageal cancer was diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

This large prospective study shows that the test-and-treat strategy is effective and safe for management of dyspeptic patients in clinical practice.

Low yield of endoscopy in patients with persistent dyspepsia taking proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Options for the evaluation of dyspepsia include a Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategy, empiric acid suppression, and initial endoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine the yield of endoscopy in patients in whom empiric therapy is unsuccessful compared with patients who received no empiric therapy and to identify factors associated with endoscopic findings.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with dyspepsia referred for endoscopy completed a questionnaire that included a query concerning response to therapy. EGD findings were compared in patients taking an H2-receptor antagonist, patients taking a proton pump inhibitor, and those not receiving empiric therapy.

RESULTS

There were fewer endoscopic findings in patients being treated with a proton pump inhibitor compared with those taking an H2-receptor antagonist or those not receiving therapy (p < 0.01). Fewer proton pump inhibitor recipients had esophagitis or ulcer compared with patients in the no therapy group. Lack of symptom relief (<20%) by acid suppression was highly associated with a normal endoscopy (17/17).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with persistent dyspepsia being treated with a proton pump inhibitor have fewer endoscopic abnormalities compared with patients with dyspepsia taking an H2-receptor antagonist and those receiving no therapy. For patients with partial symptom relief, proton pump inhibitor therapy may mask endoscopic findings, particularly esophagitis. Interruption of proton pump inhibitors before endoscopy may increase diagnostic yield. Endoscopy is unlikely to yield a positive finding in patients who experience no symptom relief while taking a proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist.