Adjuvant high-dose rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy post-hysterectomy for endometrial cancer

The role for vaginal cuff brachytherapy boost after external beam radiation therapy in endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the role and technique of a vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VB) boost to adjuvant external beam (EB) radiation for endometrial cancer through a systematic review.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Relevant trials were identified through a systematic search of the literature.

RESULTS

A total of 21 prospective and retrospective studies which had a patient cohort undergoing EB + VB was identified to evaluate for rates of vaginal and pelvic recurrences, overall survival, and toxicity. Additional database studies were utilized to demonstrate differences in local control and overall survival between EB and EB + VB.

CONCLUSIONS

While there is limited prospective evidence to guide the use of a VB boost after EB, the evidence suggests that patients with a higher risk of a vaginal recurrence such as those with cervical stromal involvement in select Stage III patients may derive local control and survival benefits from a VB boost. Additional individual risk factors such as grade, histology, extent of invasion, margin status, age, and the use of lower doses of EB should be considered when deciding when to add a VB boost.

External beam radiotherapy versus vaginal brachytherapy in patients with stage II endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The choice of adjuvant treatment for women with stage II endometrial cancer is challenging, given the known increase in morbidity with external beam radiation compared with vaginal brachytherapy, and the lack of consensus on its benefits. We summarized the evidence on survival and recurrence for stage II endometrial cancer, defined as cervical stromal invasion, after adjuvant postoperative external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases from inception to January 2019 to identify studies that compared adjuvant postoperative external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy and vaginal brachytherapy alone in stage II endometrial cancer. Our primary outcome was the locoregional recurrence rate, defined as recurrence in the pelvis or vagina. Secondary outcomes included the rate of recurrence at any site, distant recurrence rate, vaginal recurrence rate, pelvic recurrence rate, and 5 year overall survival. Study selection, assessment, and data abstraction were performed by an independent set of reviewers. Random effects models were used to synthesize quantitative data.

RESULTS

We included 15 cohort studies reporting data on 1070 women. Most women with stage II endometrial cancer (848/1070, 79.3%) were treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy. Subgroup analysis was stratified by whether >90% of the women included underwent pelvic lymph node assessment (sampling or full dissection). Locoregional recurrence (pelvic and vaginal recurrence) was significantly reduced with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy compared with vaginal brachytherapy alone (14 studies (n=1057); odds ratio (OR) 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.68); I2=5%) regardless of pelvic lymph node assessment. Most women (81.8%) who recurred locoregionally had a least one uterine risk factor (grade 3 tumor, myometrial invasion >50%, or lymphovascular invasion). There was no difference in overall survival with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy compared with vaginal brachytherapy alone (five studies (n=463); OR 0.78 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.80); I2=48%).

CONCLUSIONS

External beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy decreased the locoregional recurrence threefold for stage II endometrial cancer, regardless of pelvic lymph node assessment. Most women who suffered recurrence locoregionally had a least one high risk factor. Vaginal brachytherapy alone may be sufficient therapy for node negative stage II endometrial cancer without uterine risk factors, while those with uterine risk factors should be considered for external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy to improve locoregional control.

[Comparison between Stump Cylinder and custom mold, effect of the shape of the applicator on the dose distribution]

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of two applicators used in high dose rate vaginal brachytherapy. The first is the Stump Cylinder used in the "brachycenter" department at the Middle East Institute of Health in Lebanon and the second is the custom mold used in the radiotherapy department at Tenon Hospital in France.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A comparison of the clinical target volume and the doses received by the rectum and bladder was performed in order to determine the best method of treatment and to optimize the dose distribution. 95 patients were treated in both departments.

RESULTS

The average values of the D95% dose received by the CTV were respectively 89.43% for the Stump Cylinder and 110.16% for the custom mold. The conformity index was 0.84 for the Stump Cylinder while it was 0.97 for the custom mold, which ensures a better dose distribution. For the rectum, the maximum dose D2cc taken by volume was 71.23% for the Stump Cylinder and 79.51% for the custom mold. The bladder was better protected with Stump Cylinder with a D2cc value of 65.81% against 94.88% for the custom mold.

CONCLUSION

The underdosing obtained using the Stump Cylinder was due to the shape of upper part of the cylinder which was not conform with the shape of the vaginal vault in women. A better protection of the organs at risk was observed with the Stump Cylinder since the dose taken by the rectum and bladder using a custom mold can reach the tolerance limits.

[High dose rate vaginal brachytherapy in endometrial cancer after surgery]

PURPOSE

This study aimed at analyzing the evolution and type of recurrence in patients treated for stage I endometrial carcinomas, in order to define the respective roles of adjuvant radiotherapy and brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This monocentric retrospective study was conducted at Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Nancy, France, between January 1995 and December 2000 on all the patients surgically treated for an endometrial cancer, and then treated with high dose rate vaginal brachytherapy. The brachytherapy was delivered in two or three fractions of 7 Gy at 5 mm from the applicator.

RESULTS

In the good prognosis group, the specific and overall survivals at 5 years were respectively 96.5 and 94.2% with no local recurrence demonstrated. In the intermediate prognostic group, the specific and overall survivals at 5 years were respectively 88 and 85%, with six locoregional recurrences observed among those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy; the overall survival at 5 years was significantly decreased in the absence of external radiation. In the group of poor prognosis (stages II and III), the specific survival at 5 years was respectively 72.8 and 67 %, and the overall survival at 5 years 66.7 and 56.4%.

CONCLUSION

Results for local control and survival as well as for tolerance were good. So we have decided to deliver high rate brachytherapy for all intermediate or poor prognosis patients and we have abandoned pelvic radiotherapy for good prognosis tumours (stages IA: no myometrium invasion with grade 3 and >50% of myometrium invasion with grades 1 and 2), whatever the lymph nodes surgery they had. We now propose pelvic radiotherapy only for intermediate prognosis tumours (such as IA>50% of myometrium invasion with grade 3 and IB stages), if patients did not have any lymphatic surgery, or for bad prognosis tumours.

Analysis of toxicity in patients with high risk prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated pelvic radiation therapy and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate area

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the treatment-related morbidity in patients with prostate cancer treated with an optimized pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated dose escalation to prostate/prostate bed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2003 and May 2006, 55 patients with localized prostate cancer and >15% risk of lymph node involvement were treated with pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area. Twenty-four patients received a radical radiation therapy program, and the remaining thirty-one patients received a postoperative irradiation as adjuvant treatment or after biochemical or macroscopic local/regional relapse. After a customized immobilization all patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT. On the CT slices CTV1 and CTV2 were delineated. CTV(1) included the prostate and seminal vesicles or prostate bed. CTV(2) consisted of CTV(1) plus pelvic nodes. CTV(1) and CTV(2) were then expanded by 0.5 and 1cm, respectively, to generate the planning target volumes. IMRT treatment plans were generated using commercial inverse planning software. Total doses of 66-80 Gy and 50-59 Gy in 33-40 fractions were prescribed to the prostate area and pelvis, respectively. The worst acute and late rectal, intestinal and GU toxicities during and after treatment were scored according to the EORTC/RTOG scales.

RESULTS

The IMRT dose distribution provided excellent PTV coverage and satisfying sparing of all the organs at risk, with no patient experiencing >grade 2 acute or late toxicities. Patients without acute grade 2 intestinal, rectal, and GU toxicity were 91%, 71%, and 63%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19 months (interquartile range of 9 to 28 months), late grade 2 toxicity was detected only for rectum, with an actuarial 2-year rate of freedom from G2 rectal bleeding of 92%. (CI 95% 0.83-0.99.)

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic IMRT and simultaneous dose escalation to prostate area is a well-tolerated technique in patients with prostate cancer requiring treatment of pelvic lymph nodes, and seems to be associated with a lower frequency and severity of side effects when compared with conventional techniques reported in other series.

Clinical outcome with adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To assess local control and chronic toxicity with IMRT for adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with endometrial cancer were treated with adjuvant IMRT and HDR brachytherapy (HDRB). The external beam dose was between 45 and 50.4 Gy, and all patients received 10 Gy in 2 fractions of HDRB to the vaginal cuff. Eight of these patients were treated with extended field to include the paraaortic region.

RESULTS

IMRT dosimetry showed excellent coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) with mean PTV 95, PTV 110 and PTV 120 of 97.8%, 8.2% and 0.9% respectively. At a median follow-up of 20 months, four patients have recurred at extra pelvic sites. No patient had pelvic recurrence. The treatment was well tolerated with late toxicities as follows: small bowel grade 1: 25%, rectal grade 1: 2% and bladder grade 1: 13%. One patient had grade 3 small bowel toxicity. The 3-year actuarial rate of grade 2 or greater toxicity, disease-free survival and overall survival rate were 3.3%, 84% and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary analysis of IMRT for adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma shows excellent local control and low toxicity. However, longer follow-up and more patients are needed to ascertain whether the benefits of IMRT treatment seen here translate into long-term reductions in toxicities and local recurrence.

Predictors of vaginal relapse in stage I endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors predictive of vaginal relapse in stage I endometrial cancer, thereby potentially facilitating the selection of patients who may benefit from vaginal brachytherapy.

METHODS

The study population included 632 patients with stage I endometrial cancer managed with hysterectomy at our institution between 1984 and 1996. Median follow-up was 73 months; 122 patients (19%) received adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 2.9% of the stage I cohort developed vaginal relapse at 5 years. Vaginal relapse was observed in 1.7% of patients who received radiotherapy and in 3.0% of those whose treatment did not include radiotherapy (P = 0.36). Cox regression analysis (including radiotherapy) identified only grade 3 differentiation (hazard ratio = 3.83, P = 0.007) as an independent predictor of vaginal relapse. Patients with a low-grade tumor had a 5-year vaginal relapse rate of 2%, compared with 7% for those with a grade 3 tumor. When only patients who did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy were considered, both grade 3 tumor and lymphovascular invasion were significant predictors of vaginal relapse (P < 0.05). When neither variable was present, 2% of patients experienced vaginal relapse at 5 years, compared with 11% when either 1 was present (P < 0.001). Depth of myometrial invasion was not a significant predictor of vaginal recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Histologic grade 3 tumor and lymphovascular invasion were the cogent predictors of vaginal relapse in our population. The cost and morbidity of vaginal brachytherapy should be balanced against the potential risk of vaginal relapse in this group of patients.

Preventing vaginal stenosis after brachytherapy for gynaecological cancer: an overview of Australian practices

Despite advances in brachytherapy techniques in recent years, patients still experience a variety of treatment-related complications. Vaginal stenosis is a recognised toxicity of brachytherapy for the treatment of gynaecological cancer. It can result in long-term sexual dysfunction and painful vaginal examinations; however, it is generally accepted that it may be prevented by regular sexual intercourse or the use of vaginal dilators. The incidence of vaginal stenosis is variably reported in the literature, while preventative strategies and compliance are infrequently described and rarely evaluated. A telephone survey of radiation oncology centres in Australia was undertaken as a quality improvement activity to determine best practice for the use of vaginal dilators for the prevention of vaginal stenosis, by way of identifying similarities of practice. The results revealed a lack of consistency for all variables, including which patients are advised to use vaginal dilators, the time to initiate use, frequency of use, insertion time and duration of use. These findings suggest that current methods for preventing radiation-induced vaginal stenosis warrant formal evaluation in order to establish an evidence base for practice.

Preliminary analysis of chronic gastrointestinal toxicity in gynecology patients treated with intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To provide a preliminary analysis of chronic gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in gynecology patients treated with intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy (IM-WPRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between February 2000 and August 2001, 36 gynecology patients received IM-WPRT. All patients underwent a contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan, and a clinical target volume (CTV) was contoured consisting of the upper vagina, parametria, uterus (if present), and presacral and pelvic lymph node regions. The CTV was expanded by 1 cm to create a planning target volume (PTV). Seven or 9-field IM-WPRT plans were generated. IM-WPRT plans were highly conformal, providing excellent coverage of the PTV and considerable sparing of normal tissues, including the small bowel and rectum. Chronic GI toxicity was scored: 0 (no symptoms), 1 (mild symptoms, no medications required), 2 (moderate symptoms, medications required), and 3 (severe symptoms, hospitalization, surgery required). Chronic GI toxicity in 30 gynecology patients treated with conventional WPRT patients before the implementation of IM-WPRT was also evaluated. Median follow-up in the IM-WPRT and WPRT groups were 19.6 and 30.2 months, respectively.

RESULTS

The IM-WPRT and WPRT groups were well balanced in terms of most patient and treatment factors, including age, site, stage, chemotherapy, WPRT dose, and brachytherapy, except for a higher frequency of surgery (75 vs. 54%, p = 0.02) in the IM-WPRT group. Overall, IM-WPRT patients had a lower rate of chronic GI toxicity (11.1 vs. 50.0%, p = 0.001) than WPRT patients. The percentage of IM-WPRT patients with Grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity were 8.3%, 2.8%, and 0%, respectively. Corresponding percentages in the WPRT group were 30.0%, 16.7%, and 3.3%, respectively. The only other factor correlated with chronic GI toxicity was age (p = 0.02). On multivariate (logistic regression) analysis controlling for age and other clinical factors, IM-WPRT retained its statistical significance (p = 0.01; odds ratio 0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.04, 0.67)

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that IM-WPRT is associated with less chronic GI toxicity than conventional WPRT in patients with gynecologic malignancies. However, longer follow-up and more patients are clearly needed to ascertain whether the benefits of IM-WPRT treatment seen here translate into true long-term reductions in chronic GI toxicity.

Early-stage endometrial cancer

For half a century, adjuvant radiation therapy has been an important component in the treatment of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer believed to be at significant risk of local or regional recurrence. The widespread adoption of up-front surgical treatment and staging, including nodal assessment, has raised new questions about the need for and extent of postoperative adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, in some institutions, even in the absence of complete surgical staging, the extent of postoperative adjuvant treatment is being reassessed. These developments have increased interest in the use of intravaginal brachytherapy (IVRT) alone in selected patients whose major risk of recurrence is at the vaginal cuff. The potential advantages of this approach include lower cost and decreased acute and late toxicity. The use of IVRT alone in select patients was examined through a review of the available literature. The authors conclude that there is a subset of patients in whom adjuvant treatment with IVRT alone is adequate. A clinical approach involving patient selection criteria is proposed which suggests separate selection criteria based on whether or not complete surgical staging information is available.

The morbidity of treatment for patients with Stage I endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To compare the treatment complications for patients with Stage I endometrial cancer treated with surgery and pelvic radiotherapy (RT) or surgery alone in a multicenter randomized trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) trial included patients with endometrial cancer confined to the uterine corpus, either Grade 1 or 2 with more than 50% myometrial invasion, or Grade 2 or 3 with less than 50% myometrial invasion. Surgery consisted of an abdominal hysterectomy and oophorectomy, without lymphadenectomy. After surgery, patients were randomized to receive pelvic RT (46 Gy), or no further treatment. A total of 715 patients were randomized. Treatment complications were graded using the French-Italian glossary.

RESULTS

The analysis was done at a median follow-up duration of 60 months. 691 patients were evaluable. Five-year actuarial rates of late complications (Grades 1-4) were 26% in the RT group and 4% in the control group (p < 0.0001). Most were Grade 1 complications, with 5-year rates of 17% in the RT group and 4% in the control group. All severe (Grade 3-4) complications were observed in the RT group (3%). Most complications were of the gastrointestinal tract. The symptoms resolved after some years in 50% of the patients. Grade 1-2 genitourinary complications occurred in 8% of the RT patients, and 4% of the controls. Bone complications occurred in 4 RT patients (1%). Seven patients (2%) discontinued their RT due to acute RT-related symptoms. Patients with acute morbidity had an increased risk of late RT complications (p = 0.001). The 4-field box technique was associated with a lower risk of late complications (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic RT increases the morbidity of treatment in Stage I endometrial cancer. In the PORTEC trial, severe complications occurred in 3% of treated patients, and over 20% experienced mild (mostly Grade 1) symptoms. Patients with acute RT-related morbidity had an increased risk of late complications. As pelvic RT in Stage I endometrial carcinoma was shown to significantly reduce the rate of locoregional recurrence, but without a survival benefit, its use in the adjuvant setting requires careful patient selection (treating those at increased risk of relapse), and the use of treatment schemes with the lowest risk of morbidity.

Australian high-dose-rate brachytherapy protocols for gynaecological malignancy

There is no consensus over the optimal dose fractionation schedules for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy used for gynaecological malignancy. In Australian public hospital departments of radiation oncology, HDR brachytherapy for gynaecological cancer is being more commonly used. A survey of public departments that are using this technology, or that plan to introduce this technology, was performed. Their current protocols are presented. In general, protocols are similar biologically; however, the practical aspects such as the number of fractions given do vary and may reflect resource restrictions or, alternatively, differences in interpretations of the literature and of the best protocols by clinicians.

The morbidity of surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in the management of endometrial carcinoma

A retrospective review of side effects and complications of treatment in 522 patients with endometrial cancer managed in a gyneoncology unit was conducted. This study evaluated 517 patients who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH BSO). Lymphadendectomy or lymph node sampling was performed with the primary surgery in 264 and 41 cases, respectively. Postoperative radiotherapy was given as external beam or vault brachytherapy. Serious morbidity included lymphedema, hemorrhage, and vaginal stenosis. Lymphadenectomy was associated with lymphedema and lymphocyst formation in 11% of the cases. Vascular injury associated with lymphadenectomy occurred in 0.7% of the cases; however, this was satisfactorily managed through adequate surgical training and experience by staff within the unit. The incidence of vaginal stenosis (54.7%) following postoperative vault brachytherapy was a particular concern for clinical follow-up and sexual function. Although many women were not sexually active prior to treatment, those who were had high levels of sexual dysfunction, even when vaginal stenosis was not present.