Can we rely on the size of the lymph node in determining nodal metastasis in ovarian carcinoma?

Prognostic significance and risk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in type I and type II ovarian cancer: a large population-based database analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the prognosis of lymphatic metastasis in type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and to identify the risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastases (PLNs) and para-aortic lymph node metastases (PALNs).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with epithelial OC were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 11,275 patients with OC were enrolled, including 31.2% with type I and 68.8% with type II. Type II and high tumour stage were risk factors for lymph node involvement (p < 0.05). The overall rate of lymph node metastasis in type I was 11.8%, and that in type II was 36.7%. In the type I group, the lymph node metastasis rates in stages T1, T2, T3 and T_XM₁ were 3.2%, 14.5%, 40.4% and 50.0%, respectively. In the type II group, these rates were 6.4%, 20.4%, 54.1% and 61.1%, respectively. Age and tumour size had little effect on lymph node metastasis, and grade 3 was not always a risk factor. For the type I group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 80.6%, 46.6%, 36.3%, and 32.3%, respectively. The prognosis of PLN ( +) was better than that of PALN ( +) in the type I group (p > 0.05). For the type II group, the 10-year CSS rates of LN(-), PLN( +), PALN( +), and PLN + PALN( +) were 55.6%, 18.5%, 25.7%, and 18.2%, respectively. PALN ( +) had a significantly better prognosis than PLN ( +) in the type II group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients with type I and type II OC differed greatly. Patients with type II and higher tumour stages had poorer prognoses. Type I with PALN metastasis and type II with PLN metastasis indicated a worse prognosis. Patients with stage TI did not require lymph node dissection, especially in the type I group.

What can we learn from the 10 mm lymph node size cut-off on the CT in advanced ovarian cancer at the time of interval debulking surgery?

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of a systematic lymphadenectomy is still debated in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) in ovarian cancer (OC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the pre-NACT and post-NACT CT in predicting definitive histological lymph node involvement. The prognostic value of a positive node on the CT was also assessed.

MATERIEL AND METHODS

A retrospective, unicentric cohort study was performed including all patients with ovarian cancer who underwent NACT and IDS with a lymphadenectomy between 2005 and 2018. CT were analyzed blinded to pathology, and nodes with small axis ≥ 10 mm on CT were considered positive. Sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) and their CI95% were calculated. The 2-year recurrence free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) was compared.

RESULTS

158 patients were included, among which 92 (58%) had histologically positive lymph nodes. CT had a Se, Sp, NPV and PPV of 35%, 82%, 47% and 73% before NACT and 20%, 97%, 47% and 91% after NACT, respectively. Patients with nodes considered positive had a non-significant lower 2-year RFS and 5-year OS on the pre-NACT and post-NACT CT. Patients at 'high risk' (nodes stayed positive on the CT or became positive after NACT) also had a non-significant lower 2-year RFS and 5-year OS.

CONCLUSION

Presence of enlarged lymph nodes on CT is a weak indicator of lymph node involvement in patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing NACT. However, it could be used to assess prognosis.

Computed tomography-based radiomic model at node level for the prediction of normal-sized lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer

•

The metastatic status of lymph nodes in cervical cancer patients can be predicted.

•

Computed tomography-based radiomic model can identify the status of the normal-sized lymph node singly.

•

The model may help doctors to make staging and clinical decision, and realize individualized treatment.

Purpose

Radiomic models have been demonstrated to have acceptable discrimination capability for detecting lymph node metastasis (LNM). We aimed to develop a computed tomography–based radiomic model and validate its usefulness in the prediction of normal-sized LNM at node level in cervical cancer.

Methods

A total of 273 LNs of 219 patients from 10 centers were evaluated in this study. We randomly divided the LNs from the 2 centers with the largest number of LNs into the training and internal validation cohorts, and the rest as the external validation cohort. Radiomic features were extracted from the arterial and venous phase images. We trained an artificial neural network (ANN) to develop two single-phase models. A radiomic model reflecting the features of two-phase images was also built for directly predicting LNM in cervical cancer. Moreover, four state-of-the-art methods were used for comparison. The performance of all models was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Among the models we built, the models combining the features of two phases surpassed the single-phase models, and the models generated by ANN had better performance than the others. We found that the radiomic model achieved the highest AUCs of 0.912 and 0.859 in the training and internal validation cohorts, respectively. In the external validation cohort, the AUC of the radiomic model was 0.800.

Conclusion

We constructed a radiomic model that exhibited great ability in the prediction of LNM. The application of the model could optimize clinical staging and decision-making.

Differentiation between endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers and non- endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers based on magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES

Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC) patients show different clinical characteristics compared with non-EAOC patients. However, a few studies are focused on the imaging characteristics of EAOC until now. We assessed MRI characteristics in differentiating EAOC and non-EAOC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and MRI characteristics from 54 patients with 67 lesions diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between January 2012 and October 2020. We studied MRI findings such as maximum diameter, morphology, configuration, locularity, features of mural nodules, lymphadenopathy, peritoneal implants, the presence of hyperintensity on T1WI, and hypointensity on T2WI. We also studied the clinical characteristics. Significant MRI variables in univariate analysis were selected for subsequent multivariate regression analysis. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the significant MRI variables in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

We found that the patients with EAOC, compared with those with non-EAOC, were younger, more unilateral, and had earlier FIGO stage. Univariate analysis revealed that morphology, locularity, growth pattern of mural nodules, and hypointensity on T2WI were factors that significantly differed between EAOC and non-EAOC. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, locularity and hypointensity on T2WI were independent predictors to distinguish EAOC from non-EAOC.

CONCLUSIONS

EAOC typically presented as a unilocular mass with hypointensity on T2WI in cystic components. MRI could help distinguish EAOC from non-EAOC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

MRI is a promising tool for preoperative diagnosis of EAOC.

Intraoperative Clinical Examination for Assessing Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

After the publication of the Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms (LION) trial results, lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with primary complete cytoreductive surgery is considered indicated only for women with suspicious lymph nodes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative clinical examination for detecting lymph node metastases in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer during primary complete cytoreductive surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for January 1990 to May 2019 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative clinical examination for detecting lymph node metastases in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer during primary complete cytoreductive surgery, with histology as the gold standard. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled diagnostic accuracy was calculated, and hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was constructed. The potential sources of heterogeneity were analyzed by meta-regression analysis. Deek’s funnel plot test for publication bias and Fagan’s nomogram for clinical utility were also used. This meta-analysis included five studies involving 723 women. The pooled sensitivity of intraoperative clinical examination for detecting lymph node metastases was 0.79, 95% CI (0.67–0.87), and its specificity 0.85, 95% CI (0.67–0.94); the area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating curve was 0.86, 95% CI (0.83–0.89). In the meta-regression analysis, patient sample size, mean age, and type of cancer included were significant covariates explaining the potential sources of heterogeneity. Deek’s funnel plot test showed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.25). Fagan’s nomogram indicated that intraoperative clinical examination increased the post-test probability of lymph node metastases to 79% when it was positive and reduced it to 16% when negative. This meta-analysis shows that the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative clinical examination during primary complete cytoreductive surgery for detecting lymph node metastases in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer is good.

Gynecologic tumors: how to communicate imaging results to the surgeon

Gynecologic cancers are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for female patients, with an estimated 88,750 new cancer cases and 29,520 deaths in the United States in 2012. To offer the best treatment options to patients it is important that the radiologist, surgeon, radiation oncologist, and gynecologic oncologist work together with a multidisciplinary approach. Using the available diagnostic imaging modalities, the radiologist must give appropriate information to the surgeon in order to plan the best surgical approach and its timing.

Ovarian carcinomatosis: how the radiologist can help plan the surgical approach

Ovarian carcinoma is the most common cause of death due to gynecologic malignancy. Peritoneal involvement is present in approximately 70% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis. The disease spreads abdominally by direct extension, exfoliation of tumor cells into the peritoneal space, and dissemination of tumor cells along lymphatic pathways. Carcinomatosis characterizes an advanced stage of disease in which peritoneal disease has spread throughout the upper abdomen (stage IIIC) or in which diffuse peritoneal disease is accompanied by malignant pleural infiltration or visceral metastases (stage IV). Common sites of intraperitoneal seeding of ovarian carcinoma include the pelvis, omentum, paracolic gutters, liver capsule, and diaphragm. Soft-tissue thickening, nodularity, and enhancement are all signs of peritoneal involvement. Advanced-stage disease is treated either with initial cytoreductive surgery (debulking) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, or with initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the selection of patients who may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before debulking. However, accurate interpretation of the imaging findings is challenging and requires a detailed knowledge of the complex peritoneal anatomy, directionality of flow of peritoneal fluid, and specific disease sites that are likely to present particular difficulties with regard to surgical access and technique. Although there is as yet no clear consensus on the criteria for resectability of peritoneal lesions, extensive involvement of the small bowel or mesenteric root, involved lymph nodes superior to the celiac axis, pleural infiltration, pelvic sidewall invasion, bladder trigone involvement, and hepatic parenchymal metastases or implants near the right hepatic vein are considered indicative of potential nonresectability. Implants larger than 2 cm in diameter in the diaphragm, lesser sac, porta hepatis, intersegmental fissure, gallbladder fossa, or gastrosplenic or gastrohepatic ligament also may represent nonresectable disease.

[Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival of patients treated for an advanced ovarian cancer: the CARACO trial]

The standard management for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is optimum cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum based chemotherapy. However, retroperitoneal lymph node resection remains controversial. The multiple directions of the lymph drainage pathway in ovarian cancer have been recognized. The incidence and pattern of lymph node involvement depends on the extent of the disease and the histological type. Several published cohorts suggest the survival benefit of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A recent large randomized trial have demonstrated the potential benefit for surgical removal of bulky lymph nodes in term of progression-free survival but failed to show any overall survival benefit because of a critical methodology. Further randomised trials are needed to balance risks and benefits of systematic lymphadenectomy in advanced-stage disease. CARACO is a French ongoing trial, built to bring a reply to this important question. A huge effort for inclusion of the patients, and involving new teams, are mandatory.

Celiac lymph node resection and porta hepatis disease resection in advanced or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Prognostic value of complete macroscopic resection of primary disease has been reported and confirmed in several publications. Published data indicate that extensive upper abdominal disease involving the hepatic pedicle and celiac trunk is associated with an abortion of the surgical procedure or with suboptimal residual disease.

METHODS

All patients who had disease at the porta hepatis or celiac lymph node resection as part of cytoreductive surgery were included. Medical and operative records with particular emphasis on extent and distribution of disease spread, number of peritonectomy procedures, visceral resections, and lymphadenectomy procedures were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients who underwent some kind of celiac lymph node resection or resection of metastatic involvement of the porta hepatis were included. Median preoperative serum Ca-125 level was 78U/ml (range, 30-2950U/ml), and median ascites volume was 1900ml (range, 0-10,000ml). Of the 28 patients, 23 underwent supra-radical surgery for diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. Median operative time was 252minutes (range, 100-540minutes). Complete cytoreduction to CCO was achieved in all except one case, who was cytoreduced to millimetric residue. Fifteen patients had positive celiac nodes and nineteen patients had peritoneal disease in the porta hepatis region.

DISCUSSION

Resection of enlarged nodes and metastatic disease to the porta hepatis is feasible with an acceptable morbidity. The decision to undergo an aggressive cytoreductive surgery is based on appropriate patient selection depending on the extension of surgical procedure, on medical comorbidities, and on the potential to tolerate an extensive procedure, rather than on specific anatomic locations.

Radiological staging of ovarian carcinoma

Ovarian cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world, accounting for 4% of all female cancers. An estimated 1 in 71 women in the United States will develop ovarian cancer in their lifetime. Accurate staging of ovarian carcinoma is vital in the appropriate management and counseling of patients. The surgical staging proposed by the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology is the most universally used, and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology encourages the use of imaging techniques to assess prognostic factors, such as resectable disease and lymph node status. Identifying the volume and locations of tumor is valuable in planning percutaneous tissue biopsy, triaging patients to either primary cytoreductive surgery, or primary platinum-based chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is the modality of choice for the staging of ovarian carcinoma, with magnetic resonance imaging being used as a problem-solving tool. In this article we discuss and illustrate the staging of ovarian carcinoma, with emphasis on the current imaging modalities and optimal image acquisition.

Potential Role of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Combined Exploratory Analysis of Three Prospectively Randomized Phase III Multicenter Trials

Purpose

Primary surgery followed by platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy is the standard therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. The prognostic role of complete debulking has been well described; however, the impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and its interaction with biologic factors are still not fully defined.

Methods

This was an exploratory analysis of three prospective randomized trials (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom trials 3, 5, and 7) investigating platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced ovarian cancer conducted between 1995 and 2002.

Results

One thousand nine hundred twenty-four patients were analyzed. Lymphadenectomy was associated with superior survival in patients without gross residual disease. In patients with and without lymphadenectomy, the median survival time was 103 and 84 months, respectively, and 5-year survival rates were 67.% and 59.2%, respectively (P = .0166); multivariate analysis confirmed a significant impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.94; P = .0123). In patients with small residual tumors up to 1 cm, the effect of lymphadenectomy on OS barely reached significance (HR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.00; P = .0497). For patients with small residual tumors and clinically suspect nodes, lymphadenectomy resulted in a 16% gain in 5-year OS (log-rank test, P = .0038).

Conclusion

Lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer might offer benefit mainly to patients with complete intraperitoneal debulking. However, this hypothesis should be confirmed in the context of a prospectively randomized trial.

[Not Available]

D. Salet-Lizée, S. Alsary Ovarian cancer often invades regional lymph nodes but the patterns of involvement are variable; spread to para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes can be unilateral, contralateral or bilateral. For staging purposes, complete lymph node dissection seems more reasonable and effective than simple lymph node sampling. In early stage disease, lymph node dissection has both diagnostic and therapeutic value allowing identification and optimal management of Stage IIIc tumors with retroperitoneal spread; it may also have direct therapeutic value by removing retroperitoneal micrometastatic disease including cell clones which may be resistant to chemotherapy. Therefore, complete lymph node dissection is recommended in early-stage disease with the exception of stage I mucinous ovarian cancer. In advanced-stage disease, lymph node involvement is an additional factor of poor prognosis correlating with increased tumor aggressivity. Optimal debulking resection of all visible tumor offers the best chance for a prolonged disease-free interval if patient condition permits and morbidity can be limited. Survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection has not been evaluated by randomized controlled trials; but several non-randomized studies and two long-term prospective trials have shown objective improvement in disease-free survival and improved quality of life when debulking surgery leaves no residual tumor larger than 1 cm.

[Not Available]

D. Salet-Lizée, S. Alsary Ovarian cancer often invades regional lymph nodes but the patterns of involvement are variable; spread to para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes can be unilateral, contralateral or bilateral. For staging purposes, complete lymph node dissection seems more reasonable and effective than simple lymph node sampling. In early stage disease, lymph node dissection has both diagnostic and therapeutic value allowing identification and optimal management of Stage IIIc tumors with retroperitoneal spread; it may also have direct therapeutic value by removing retroperitoneal micrometastatic disease including cell clones which may be resistant to chemotherapy. Therefore, complete lymph node dissection is recommended in early-stage disease with the exception of stage I mucinous ovarian cancer. In advanced-stage disease, lymph node involvement is an additional factor of poor prognosis correlating with increased tumor aggressivity. Optimal debulking resection of all visible tumor offers the best chance for a prolonged disease-free interval if patient condition permits and morbidity can be limited. Survival benefit for complete lymph node dissection has not been evaluated by randomized controlled trials; but several non-randomized studies and two long-term prospective trials have shown objective improvement in disease-free survival and improved quality of life when debulking surgery leaves no residual tumor larger than 1 cm.

Pattern and clinical predictors of lymph node metastases in epithelial ovarian cancer

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy is part of staging in early epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and could be part of therapy in advanced EOC. However, only a minority of patients receive therapy according to guidelines or have attendance to a specialized unit. We analyzed pattern of lymphatic spread of EOC and evaluated if clinical factors and intraoperative findings reliably could predict lymph node involvement, in order to evaluate if patients could be identified in whom lymphadenectomy could be omitted and who should not be referred to a center with capacity of performing extensive gynecological operations. Retrospective analysis was carried out of all patients with EOC who had systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy during primary cytoreductive surgery. One hundred ninety-five patients underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Histologic lymph node metastases were found in 53%. The highest frequency was found in the upper left para-aortic region (32% of all patients) and between vena cava inferior and abdominal aorta (36%). Neither intraoperative clinical diagnosis nor frozen section of pelvic nodes could reliably predict para-aortic lymph node metastasis. The pathologic diagnosis of the pelvic nodes, if used as diagnostic tool for para-aortic lymph nodes, showed a sensitivity of only 50% in ovarian cancer confined to the pelvis and 73% in more advanced disease. We could not detect any intraoperative tool that could reliably predict pathologic status of para-aortic lymph nodes. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy remains part of staging in EOC. Patients with EOC should be offered the opportunity to receive state-of-the-art treatment including surgery.

The potential therapeutic role of lymph node resection in epithelial ovarian cancer: a study of 13918 patients

The aim of the study is to determine the role of lymphadenectomy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. The data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program reported between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for analysis. Of 13 918 women with stage III–IV epithelial ovarian cancer (median age: 64 years), 87.9% were Caucasian, 5.6% African Americans, and 4.4% Asians. A total of 4260 (30.6%) underwent lymph node dissections with a median number of six nodes reported. For all patients, a more extensive lymph node dissection (0, 1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with an improved 5-year disease-specific survival of 26.1, 35.2, 42.6, 48.4, 47.5, and 47.8%, respectively (P<0.001). Of the stage IIIC patients with nodal metastases, the extent of nodal resection (1, 2–5, 6–10, 11–20, and >20 nodes) was associated with improved survivals of 36.9, 45.0, 47.8, 48.7, and 51.1%, respectively (P=0.023). On multivariate analysis, the extent of lymph node dissection and number of positive nodes were significant independent prognosticators after adjusting for age, year at diagnosis, stage, and grade of disease. The extent of lymphadenectomy is associated with an improved disease-specific survival of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Supra-clavicular lymph node metastatic spread in patients with ovarian cancer disclosed at 18F-FDG-PET/CT: an unusual finding

Tumoral dissemination of ovarian cancer most commonly occurs through the intra-peritoneal route; nevertheless, although it is rare, ovarian cancer may also metastasise through the lymphatic channels. Lymphatic diffusion of ovarian cancer usually involves pelvic and retro-peritoneal lymph nodes. Extra-abdominal lymph nodes are rarely involved and their detection may represent a challenge for the oncologist. We describe here two patients studied for ovarian cancer by [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT): one case during pre-operative staging, the other for restaging after surgery. In both cases PET examination identified extraabdominal lymph node tumoral spread in the left supra-clavicular space; biopsy led to a final diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. Previous reports in the literature on tumoral spread of ovarian cancer to the supra-clavicular nodes are rare, however this possible site of metastatic involvement has to be kept in mind by oncologists and our data show that the 18F-FDG PET/CT may be useful to disclose this unusual supra-diaphragmatic lymphatic diffusion of metastatic lymphatic ovarian cancer.

Lymph node metastasis in ovarian cancer: Difference between serous and non-serous primary tumors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the lymph node sites most susceptible to involvement relative to primary tumor histology in ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The locations of metastatic lymph nodes were investigated in 208 patients with primary ovarian cancer who underwent systemic lymphadenectomy covering both the pelvic and para-aortic regions.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was present in 12.8% (20/156) of patients with stage I (pT1M0), 48.6% (18/37) with stage II (pT2M0), and 60% (9/15) with stage III (pT3M0) disease, thus in 22.6% (47/208) of all study patients. Isolated para-aortic nodal involvement was present in 23.3% (14/60) of patients with serous tumor and 4.1% (6/148) of those with non-serous tumor (P = 0.00002). In an analysis of 35 positive nodes from 25 patients with up to 3 positive nodes, 86.4% (19/22) of metastatic lymph nodes from patients with serous tumor were found in the para-aortic region, with 14 positive nodes located above the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and 5 below it, whereas metastasis to para-aortic lymph nodes accounted for 53.8% (7/13) of metastatic lymph nodes from patients with non-serous tumor (P = 0.0334).

CONCLUSIONS

The locations of metastatic lymph nodes in ovarian cancer depend upon the histologic type of the primary cancer. In cases of serous tumor, the para-aortic region, particularly above the IMA, is the prime site for the earliest lymph node metastasis. However, the likelihood of pelvic node involvement is almost equal to that of para-aortic node involvement in cases of non-serous tumor.

Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The role of systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer is unclear and has not been addressed by randomized studies. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free and overall survival compared with resection of bulky nodes only.

METHODS

From January 1991 through May 2003, 427 eligible patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-C and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were randomly assigned to undergo systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 216) or resection of bulky nodes only (n = 211). Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using a log-rank statistic and a Cox multivariable regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 68.4 months, 292 events (i.e., recurrences or deaths) were observed, and 202 patients had died. Sites of first recurrences were similar in both arms. The adjusted risk for first event was statistically significantly lower in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm (hazard ratio [HR] = .75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 0.94; P = .01) than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm, corresponding to 5-year progression-free survival rates of 31.2 and 21.6% in the systematic lymphadenectomy and control arms, respectively (difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 1.5% to 21.6%), and to median progression-free survival of 29.4 and 22.4 months, respectively (difference = 7 months, 95% CI = 1.0 to 14.4 months). The risk of death was similar in both arms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.29; P = .85), corresponding to 5-year overall survival rates of 48.5 and 47%, respectively (difference = 1.5%, 95% CI = -8.4% to 10.6%), and to median overall survival of 58.7 and 56.3 months, respectively (difference = 2.4 months, 95% CI = -11.8 to 21.0 months). Median operating time was longer, and the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions was higher in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm (300 versus 210 minutes, P<.001, and 72% versus 59%; P = .006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Systematic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free but not overall survival in women with optimally debulked advanced ovarian carcinoma.