The effects of a polyacrylonitrile membrane and a membrane made of regenerated cellulose on the plasma concentrations of erythropoietin during hemodialysis

The Effect of Hemodialysis and Acetate-Free Biofiltration on Anemia

The authors monitored, for a period of 12 months, anemia-, nutrition-, and free radical-related parameters and the rHuEPO dose required to maintain target hemoglobin (Hb) in 20 patients with chronic renal failure. Ten patients each were randomized for treatment by either acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) or low-flux hemodialysis (HD). At baseline, Hb levels were 102±2 (AFB) vs. 98±2 g/L (HD) (not significant difference, NS), the rHuEPO dose was 4050±976 vs. 5100±1538 IU/week (NS). Compared with baseline and with HD, lower rHuEPO doses were required during AFB at months 8, 9, 10 and 11, and 12 when they were 2100±510 (AFB) vs. 6000±1153 (HD), p=0.008. Prealbumin, transferrin and cholinesterase levels rose in the AFB group. Kt/V, albumin, transferrin saturation, aluminium, bicarbonate in serum, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in erythrocytes, and malondialdehyde and antioxidant capacity in plasma did not differ between the AFB and HD groups. In terms of anemia control, AFB using an AN69 membrane was found to be more advantageous than low-flux HD, AFB improves some nutritional parameters. The compared methods do not differ in their effect on lipid peroxidation and the antioxidant system. (Int J Artif Organs 2000; 23: 173–80)

Interventions for erythropoietin-resistant anaemia in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

People living with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) often develop anaemia. Erythropoiesis-simulating agents (ESAs) are often given to people living with ESKD to maintain haemoglobin at a level to minimise need for transfusion. However, about 5% to 10% of patients with ESKD exhibit resistance to ESAs, and observational studies have shown that patients requiring high doses of ESA are at increased risk of mortality.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to study the effects of interventions for the treatment of ESA-resistant anaemia in people with ESKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE for randomised controlled trials (RCT) that involved participants with ESKD on dialysis or who were pre-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (stage 5). Date of last search: April 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

ESA resistance was defined as failure to achieve or maintain haemoglobin/haematocrit levels within the desired target range despite appropriate ESA doses (erythropoietin ≥ 450 U/kg/wk intravenously or ≥ 300 U/kg/wk subcutaneously; darbepoetin ≥ 1.5 µg/kg/wk) in people who were not nutritionally deficient, or who had haematological or bleeding disorders. Extended inclusion criteria for ESA hyporesponsive state were: erythropoietin dose ≥ 300 U/kg/wk and ≥ 150 U/kg/wk for intravenous administration; or ≥ 200 U/kg/wk and ≥ 100 U/kg/wk for subcutaneous administration; or darbepoetin dose ≥ 1.0 µg/kg/wk).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using a random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Titles and abstracts of 521 records were screened, of which we reviewed 99 from the full text. Only two studies matched our inclusion criteria. One study compared intravenous vitamin C versus no study medication for six months in 42 ESKD patients on haemodialysis who required intravenous erythropoietin (dose ≥ 450 U/kg/wk). The other included study compared high-flux dialyser versus low-flux dialyser for six months in 48 haemodialysis patients who required subcutaneous erythropoietin (dose ≥ 200 U/kg/wk). Because interventions differed, data could not be combined for quantitative meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was inadequate evidence identified to inform recommendation of any intervention to ameliorate ESA hyporesponsiveness. Adequately powered RCTs are required to establish the safety and efficacy of interventions to improve responsiveness to ESA therapy.

High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines regarding the use of high-flux haemodialysis membranes vary widely.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyse the current evidence reported for the benefits and harms of high-flux and low-flux haemodialysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (July 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1948 to March 2011), and EMBASE (1947 to March 2011) without language restriction.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared high-flux haemodialysis with low-flux haemodialysis in people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who required long-term haemodialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two authors for study characteristics (participants and interventions), risks of bias, and outcomes (all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality, hospitalisation, health-related quality of life, carpal tunnel syndrome, dialysis-related arthropathy, kidney function, and symptoms) among people on haemodialysis. Treatment effects were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 33 studies that involved 3820 participants with ESKD. High-flux membranes reduced cardiovascular mortality (5 studies, 2612 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99) but not all-cause mortality (10 studies, 2915 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.04) or infection-related mortality (3 studies, 2547 participants: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.14). In absolute terms, high-flux membranes may prevent three cardiovascular deaths in 100 people treated with haemodialysis for two years. While high-flux membranes reduced predialysis beta-2 microglobulin levels (MD -12.17 mg/L, 95% CI -15.83 to -8.51 mg/L), insufficient data were available to reliably estimate the effects of membrane flux on hospitalisation, carpal tunnel syndrome, or amyloid-related arthropathy. Evidence for effects of high-flux membranes was limited by selective reporting in a few studies. Insufficient numbers of studies limited our ability to conduct subgroup analyses for membrane type, biocompatibility, or reuse. In general, the risk of bias was either high or unclear in the majority of studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

High-flux haemodialysis may reduce cardiovascular mortality in people requiring haemodialysis by about 15%. A large well-designed RCT is now required to confirm this finding.

Effect of hemodialysis and hemofiltration on plasma C.E.R.A. concentrations

C.E.R.A., a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator, is a long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating agent approved for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Although the large molecular weight and the carbohydrate chain make it unlikely that C.E.R.A. could be removed during hemodialysis or hemofiltration, no such data have been published. In vitro studies were performed to assess the removal of C.E.R.A. during hemodialysis and hemofiltration, using both low-flux and high-flux membranes and parameters very similar to those used in clinical practice. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies of plasma C.E.R.A. concentrations in patients undergoing hemodialysis were also performed following subcutaneous injection of C.E.R.A. In the in vitro studies, plasma C.E.R.A. concentrations were not significantly different from baseline values in the primed blood reservoir over a 4-hour period during hemodialysis (P = 0.12). C.E.R.A. concentrations in the plasma obtained from the venous end of the hemofilter increased proportionally with the plasma total protein concentrations, reflecting the consequence of hemoconcentration and suggesting that C.E.R.A and plasma total proteins were retained by hemofiltration membranes to a similar degree. These in vitro studies showed that C.E.R.A. was not removed by simulated hemodialysis or hemofiltration either via transmembrane transport or adsorption to the membrane. The results were corroborated by the clinical pharmacokinetic data, which showed no detectable changes in plasma C.E.R.A. concentrations during hemodialysis using either low-flux or high-flux dialyzers. These results suggest that C.E.R.A. can be administered to patients at any time during hemodialysis or hemofiltration without appreciable loss in the extracorporeal circuit.

Cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

When the kidney fails the blood-borne metabolites of protein breakdown and water cannot be excreted. The principle of haemodialysis is that such substances can be removed when blood is passed over a semipermeable membrane. Natural membrane materials include cellulose or modified cellulose, more recently various synthetic membranes have been developed. Synthetic membranes are regarded as being more "biocompatible" in that they incite less of an immune response than cellulose-based membranes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PreMEDLINE, HealthStar CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Biosis, SIGLE, CRIB, UK National Research Register and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted biomedical companies, known investigators and handsearched selected journals and conference proceedings. Date of most recent search: June 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with ESRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies. Data was abstracted onto a standard form by one reviewer and checked by another. Relative Risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) MAIN RESULTS: Thirty two studies were identified. Pre-dialysis ss(2) microglobulin concentrations were not significantly lower in patients treated with synthetic membranes (WMD -14.67, 95% CI -33.10 to 4.05). When analysed for change in ss(2) microglobulin, a fall was only noted with high-flux membranes. The incidence of amyloid was less in patients who were dialysed for six years with high-flux synthetic membranes (one study, RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.54). There was a significant difference in favour of the synthetic (high-flux) membrane in comparison to cellulose membranes for triglycerides (WMD -0.66; 95% CI -1.18 to -0.14) but not for modified cellulose membranes. Dialysis adequacy measured by Kt/V was marginally higher when cellulose membranes were used (WMD -0.10; 95% CI -0.16 to 0.04), whereas synthetic membranes achieved significantly higher Kt/V values when compared with modified cellulose membranes (WMD 0.20, 95% 0.11 to 0.29) . There were no data on quality of life measures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence of benefit when synthetic membranes were compared with cellulose/modified cellulose membranes in terms of reduced mortality no reduction in dialysis-related adverse symptoms. Despite the relatively large number of RCTs undertaken in this area none of the included studies reported any measures of quality of life.

Adsorption of oxacalcitriol by polysulphone haemodialyser in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism

AIMS

This study was undertaken to evaluate removal of 22-oxacalcitriol (OCT), an active and intravenously used vitamin D3 analogue with less calcaemic activity, by polysulphone haemodialyser in vivo and in vitro. We further compared the pharmacodynamic efficacy [suppression of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH)] when given intravenously either during or at the end of the haemodialysis.

METHODS

(i) Drug clearance by the polysulphone dialyser was measured during a single continuous infusion (5 microg) for 30 min into the arterial side of the dialyser in end-stage renal failure patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (n = 7). (ii) The drug adsorption by the hollowfibre membrane during incubation for 30 min was measured in vitro. (iii) To evaluate efficacy, the drug was given (i.v. bolus) during or at the end of haemodialysis for 4 weeks in a cross-over fashion with a washout period of 8 weeks (n = 9). Serum Ca(2+), phosphate (P) and iPTH concentrations just before the initiation of the dialysis were monitored every week.

RESULTS

(i) OCT was significantly cleared by the polysulphone haemodialyser, but the clearance declined in a time-dependent manner to approach zero at 30 min. Arterial (at the place between the drug infusion site and the haemodialyser column) drug concentrations did not change during the infusion (mean = 2064 +/- 233 pg ml(-1)). Venous (just after the dialyser) drug concentrations at 10 min after the infusion were significantly lower than those of the arterial side (mean = 784 +/- 84 pg ml(-1)); however, they increased with time and reached those of the arterial side at 30 min. (ii) In vitro, OCT was adsorbed by the membrane. The amount of adsorption was concentration-dependent and was lower in the presence of human serum (55 +/- 4% without and 23 +/- 4% with serum at 600 pg ml(-1) of OCT). (iii) Although serum Ca(2+) and P increased and iPTH decreased by both treatment regimens (i.e. OCT administered either during or at the end of haemodialysis), these changes did not significantly differ. Mean differences (and 95% confidence interval) of Ca(2+), P, and iPTH at the end of the trial were 0.03 (-0.04, 0.09) mm, 0.41 (-0.43, 1.26) mg dl(-1) and 38 (-42, 88) pg ml(-1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

OCT is adsorbed by polysulphone dialyser in vitro and in vivo. However, the pharmacodynamic effectiveness was largely independent of the administration regimen of OCT given either during or at the end of haemodialysis.

Effect of acetate-free biofiltration on the anaemia of haemodialysis patients: a prospective cross-over study

BACKGROUND

The discussion about the pathogenesis of renal anaemia, whether it is primarily due to relative erythropoietin (Epo) deficiency or to uraemic inhibition of erythropoiesis, is still open. Although it has so far not been possible to identify or isolate a substance retained in uraemia with a suppressive action directed specifically against red-cell production, dialysis therapy can improve the effect of both residual endogenous Epo and exogenous rHuEpo. To what extent the mode and/or the dose of dialysis influence Epo efficacy is as yet poorly understood.

METHODS

This study was performed as a single-centre trial. The protocol included a run-in period of 4 months followed by a prospective cross-over study including 6 months each of acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) with a high-flux biocompatible membrane and standard bicarbonate dialysis (BD) with a low-flux cellulosic membrane in a random sequence. AFB is a haemodiafiltration technique based on a continuous post-dilution infusion of a sterile isotonic bicarbonate solution. At the start of the run-in period (and for the entire length of the study), rHuEpo administration was withdrawn; patients whose haemoglobin (Hb) levels dropped at a level <8.0 g/dl at one single monthly check, had to be withdrawn from the study. A blood sample was collected every month for the blood gas analysis and for the determination of blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, sodium, potassium, calcium, phosphorus, Hb, erythrocyte, reticulocyte, leukocyte and thrombocyte cell counts, mean globular volume and haematocrit. An equilibrated single pool Kt/V(urea)>1.2 was mandatory in both treatment modalities. Serum iron, total iron-binding capacity, and ferritin were checked every 3 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 137 haemodialysis patients were considered eligible for the trial on the basis of the entry criteria. Of these, 15 volunteered and only 10 completed the study. No significant differences in the haematological indices, in the biochemical parameters assessing body iron stores, or in i.v. iron dosage was observed when comparing AFB with BD treatments. The equilibrated single pool Kt/V(urea) was always >1.2 and in no case was a significant difference observed when comparing AFB with BD treatments. Treatment time was significantly different between the two treatments (262+/-2 min in BD and 249+/-1 in AFB, P<0.0001). Neither pre- nor post-dialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressures, pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate and pH, pre-dialysis serum sodium, potassium, calcium, or phosphorus were significantly different when comparing the two treatment modalities. All 10 patients completed the 1-year follow-up without any major side-effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study did not show any improvement of anaemia when treating a highly selected patient group, in the absence of any Epo therapy, with AFB compared with standard BD. Even though these conclusions cannot be extended in toto to the entire dialysis population, in which there is a large proportion of Epo-treated patients with Hb levels around 11 g/dl, we may nevertheless conclude that when patients are well selected, adequately dialysed, and not iron- and/or vitamin-depleted, the effect of a haemodiafiltration technique with a high-flux biocompatible membrane is less than might be expected from the results of uncontrolled studies.

Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

When the kidney fails the blood borne metabolites of protein breakdown and water cannot be excreted. The principle of haemodialysis is that such substances can be removed when blood is passed over a semipermeable membrane. Natural membrane materials can be used including cellulose or modified cellulose, more recently various synthetic membranes have been developed. Synthetic membranes are regarded as being more "biocompatible" in that they incite less of an immune response than cellulose-based membranes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline (1966 to December 2000), Embase (1981 to November 2000), PreMedline (29 November 2000), HealthStar (1975 to December 2000), Cinahl (1982 to October 2000), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 1, 1996), Biosis (1989 to June 1995), Sigle (1980 to June 1996), Crib (10th edition, 1995), UK National Research Register (September 1996), and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted biomedical companies, investigators and we hand searched Kidney International (1980 to 1997). Date of the most recent searches: November 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials comparing different haemodialysis membrane material in patients with ESRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of studies. Data was abstracted from included studies onto a standard form by one reviewer and checked by another.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty seven studies met our inclusion criteria and where possible data from these were summated by meta-analyses (Peto's odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)). Twenty two outcome measures were sought in 10 broad areas. For two (number of episodes of significant infection per year and quality of life) no data were available. For the comparison of cellulose with synthetic membranes, data for 12/20 outcome measures were available in only a single trial. For modified cellulose and synthetic membranes, data for three outcome measures were available in one trial only and for 12 of the outcomes no data were found, crossover studies were analysed separately and studies which randomised by patient yet analysed by dialysis sessions adjusted for clustering. Pre-dialysis beta2 microglobulin concentrations were significantly lower at the end of the studies in patients treated with synthetic membranes (WMD - 14.5; 95% CI -17.4 to -11.6). One crossover study showed a lowering of beta2 microglobulin when low flux synthetic membranes were used. When analysed for a change in beta2 microglobulin across a trial a fall was only noted when high flux membranes were used. In one very small study the incidence of amyloid was less in patients who were dialysed for six years with high flux synthetic membranes (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.18). In the single study which measured triglyceride values there was a significant difference in favour of the synthetic (high flux) membrane (WMD -0.66; 95% CI -1.18 to -0.14). Serum albumin was higher in patients treated with synthetic membranes (both low and high flux) although this just bordered statistical significance (WMD -0.09; 95% CI -0.18 to 0.00). Dialysis adequacy measured by Kt/V was marginally higher when cellulose membranes were used (WMD 0.10; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.16). There was no significant difference between these membranes for any of the other clinical outcomes measures but confidence intervals were generally wide. No differences were found between modified cellulose and synthetic membranes although many fewer trials were carried out for this comparison.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

For clinical practice This systematic literature review has generated no evidence of benefit when synthetic membranes were used compared with cellulose/modified cellulose membranes in terms of reduced mortality nor reduction in dialysis related adverse symptoms. Despite the relatively large number of RCTs undertaken in this area none of the included studies reported any measures of quality of life. End-of-study beta2 microglobulin values, and possibly the development of amyloid disease, were less in patients treated with synthetic membranes compared with cellulose membranes. Plasma triglyceride values were also lower with synthetic membranes in the single study that measured this outcome. Differences in these outcomes may have reflected the high flux of the synthetic membrane. Serum albumin was higher when synthetic membranes of both high and low flux were used. Kt/V and urea reduction ratio were higher when cellulose or modified cellulose membranes were used in the few studies that measured these outcomes. We are hesitant to recommend the universal use of synthetic membranes for haemodialysis in patients with ESRD because of; the small number of trials (particularly for modified cellulose membranes, most with low patient numbers), the heterogeneity of many of the trials compared, the variations in membrane flux, the differences in exclusion criteria, particularly relating to comorbidity and the relative lack of patient-centred outcomes studied. Such evidence as we have favours synthetic membranes but even if we assume extra benefit it may be at considerable cost, particularly if high flux synthetic membranes were to be used. For further research A further systematic review of RCTs comparing high and low flux haemodialysis membranes, subgrouped according to membrane composition (cellulose, modified cellulose, synthetic) and reporting clinical outcomes of major importance to patients needs to be undertaken. Further pragmatic RCTs are required to compare the different dialysis membranes available. We recommend that they: - Take into account other properties including flux as well as the material from which the membrane is made and test modified cellulose membranes as well as standard ones. - Record an agreed minimum dataset on primary outcomes of major importance to patients. - Explicitly record whether symptoms are patient- or staff-reported recognising that generally patient reporting will be more appropriate for evaluating effectiveness but staff reported data may be necessary for calculating the cost of treating complications. - Be multi-centre (and possibly multinational) to have sufficient patients to complete the study to allow for a considerable number of withdrawals and dropouts. - Have sufficient length of follow up to draw conclusions for important clinical outcome measures and continue to follow patients who have renal transplants. - Include older patients and those with comorbid illnesses and take into account age and comorbidity when assessing outcomes (possibly by stratification at trial entry). - Carry out, in parallel, an economic evaluation of the different policies being compared in the trial.