Atenolol prophylaxis in migraine secondary to an arteriovenous malformation

Symptomatic migraine: A systematic review to establish a clinically important diagnostic entity

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a clinical presentation indistinguishable from migraine can occur due to an underlying condition or pathology, that is, "symptomatic migraine."

BACKGROUND

It is currently not clear whether migraine truly can be caused by an underlying condition or pathology. Characterization of the etiology and clinical features of possible symptomatic migraine is of significant clinical importance and further may help elucidate the pathophysiology of migraine.

METHODS

We devised operational diagnostic criteria for "symptomatic migraine" and "possible symptomatic migraine" requiring strong evidence for a causal relation between underlying cause and migraine symptoms adhering strictly to diagnostic criteria. PubMed was searched for case reports of symptomatic migraine from inception to March 2020. Only articles published in English or German were included. No restrictions were placed on study design. Relevant references in the articles were also included. Papers were systematically reviewed by two independent reviewers for detailed clinical features of migraine as well as the proposed underlying conditions and the effects of treatment of these conditions.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 1726 items. After screening, 109 papers comprising 504 cases were reviewed in detail. Eleven patients with migraine with aura (MWA) fulfilled our working criteria for symptomatic migraine, and 39 patients fulfilled our criteria for possible symptomatic migraine. The most common etiologies of symptomatic migraine were arteriovenous malformations, carotid stenosis, dissection or aneurysm, brain infarctions, meningioma, and various intra-axial tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic MWA, indistinguishable from idiopathic MWA, may occur due to cortical lesions or microembolization. We found no clear evidence supporting the existence of symptomatic migraine without aura although we did identify possible cases. Our findings are limited by the available literature, and we suggest that prospective studies are needed.

The visual system in migraine: from the bench side to the office

BACKGROUND

Throughout history, migraine-associated visual symptoms have puzzled patients, doctors, and neuroscientists. The visual aspects of migraine extend far beyond the aura phenomena, and have several clinical implications.

METHODS

A narrative review was conducted, beginning with migraine mechanisms, then followed by pertinent aspects of the anatomy of visual pathways, clinical features, implications of the visual system on therapy, migraine on visually impaired populations, treatment of visual auras and ocular (retinal) migraine, effect of prophylactic migraine treatments on visual aura, visual symptoms induced by anti-migraine or anti-headache drugs, and differential diagnosis.

RESULTS

A comprehensive narrative review from both basic and clinical standpoints on the visual aspects of migraine was attained; however, the results were biased to provide any useful information for the clinician.

CONCLUSION

This paper achieved its goals of addressing and condensing information on the pathophysiology of the visual aspects of migraine and its clinical aspects, especially with regards to therapy, making it useful not only for those unfamiliar to the theme but to experienced physicians as well.

Magnetic resonance angiography of the circle of Willis in migraine patients

We analysed records of 244 consecutive adult outpatients who presented at our neurological polyclinic between 1996 and 2001 with migraine and who underwent a MRA of the circle of Willis. In 80 cases, a definitive migraine diagnosis according to the International Headache Society criteria (1988) could be retrieved from the patient records. Of these, 63 patients had migraine without aura and 17 patients had migraine with aura. Two MRA procedures were abrupted because of claustrophobia and another two MRA studies were unreliable because of movement artefacts. In only one patient of the remaining 240, an aneurysm was suspected with MRA. However, a conventional angiography did not confirm any cerebrovascular abnormality. All other exams were considered normal. This retrospective study argues against a systematic screening of migraine patients with MRA.