Storage of single-donor platelet concentrates: metabolic and functional changes

Not all (N)SAID and done: Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol intake on platelets

Platelets are key mediators of hemostasis and thrombosis and can be inhibited by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). As a result, platelet donors are temporarily deferred from donating if they have recently taken NSAIDs such as aspirin or ibuprofen. Despite these measures, a proportion of platelet donations show exposure to these drugs; however, little is known about the effect of NSAIDs and their metabolites on platelet quality in vivo and during storage. In this review, the effect of NSAIDs on platelet function is summarized, with a focus on the widely consumed over-the-counter (OTC) medications aspirin, ibuprofen, and the non-NSAID paracetamol. Aspirin and ibuprofen have well-defined antiplatelet effects. In comparison, studies regarding the effect of paracetamol on platelets report variable findings. The timing and order of NSAID intake is important, as concurrent NSAID use can inhibit or potentiate platelet activation depending on the drug taken. NSAID deferral periods and maximum platelet shelf-life is set by each country and are revised regularly. Reduced donor deferral periods and longer platelet storage times may affect the quality of platelet products, and it is therefore important to identify the possible impact of NSAID intake on platelet quality before and after storage.

Determination of thromboxane formation, soluble CD40L release and thrombopoietin clearance in apheresis platelet concentrates

All deleterious changes in platelet morphology, structure and function that occur in platelet concentrates (PC) during storage are titled as the 'platelet storage lesion'. No single in vitro test currently available is sufficient in assessing these changes of platelet quality. The release of soluble CD40 Ligand (sCD40L), the formation of thromboxane (TXB2) and the thrombopoietin (TPO) clearance reflect different aspects of platelet metabolism and activitiy, and were used to examine platelet quality in apheresis platelet products. At days 1, 3 and 5, in single-donor apheresis platelet products (n = 10) under routine storage conditions, sCD40L (measured by ELISA) and TXB2 (measured by RIA) were determined after platelet stimulation (recalcification and clot formation). TPO (measured by ELISA) was determined after an incubation time of 5 h at 37°C with platelet-rich plasma (adjusted initial TPO concentration of about 500 pg/mL). Results were related to a therapeutic unit (TU = 2 × 10(11) platelets). Immediately after platelet preparation, sCD40L release was 41 ± 7.6 ng/TU, TXB2 formation 1688 ± 374 ng/TU and TPO clearance 1.22 ± 0.32 ng/h/TU. At days 1, 3 and 5, sCD40L was reduced to 89 ± 7%, 71 ± 12% and 57 ± 9%, TXB2 release to 91 ± 6%, 74 ± 12% and 58 ± 9% and TPO clearance to 90 ± 15%, 84 ± 5% and 79 ± 10% of the respective control values. In conclusion, in single-donor apheresis PC, sCD40L release and TXB2 formation as well as TPO clearance by the platelets were dependent on storage duration and reduced to about 60% to 80% of the respective control values after a storage period for 5 days. These findings are in line with literature data, indicating that a loss of platelet functionality of about 30% will occur after 5 days of storage.

Storage of single donor platelet concentrates: paired comparison of storage as single or double concentrates

Modern cell separators allow the collection of two plateletpheresis concentrates (PCs) at one session. This study evaluates the quality of PCs stored as double concentrates in standard storage containers of two manufacturers. We collected 20 PCs that contained 4.5 x 10(11) platelets in 375 ml plasma (10 using the COBE Spectra and 10 using the Fresenius AS.TEC 204 with 500 ml bags) that were split into one unit of 3.0 x 10(11) platelets in 250 ml (3.0-PC) and one of 1.5 x 10(11) platelets in 125 ml (1.5-PC). Storage of one 3.0-PC per bag of a two-bag system corresponded to storage conditions for double PCs and storage of one 1.5-PC per bag to storage conditions of single PCs. Cell counts, blood gas analysis, glucose and lactate levels, platelet aggregation, and activation and plasma levels of beta- thromboglobulin (beta-TG) and complement factor 3a (C3a) were measured before storage and again on days 3 and 5. COBE 3.0-PCs demonstrated less pH rise, lactate production, CD 62P expression and beta-TG plasma levels, and better aggregability after storage than COBE 1.5-PCs. Fresenius 1.5-PCs had similar platelet quality to COBE 3.0-PCs. Fresenius 3.0-PCs showed a fall of pH (day 5: 6.22 +/- 0.56), the highest amount of anaerobic glycolysis compared to all other storage conditions investigated, high CD 62P- expression and beta-TG plasma levels, and impaired aggregability on days 3 and 5. The highest C3a levels were found in COBE 1.5-PCs. 3.0 x 10(11) platelets in 250 ml plasma should be stored either in one bag of the COBE system or in two 500 ml bags of the Fresenius system. The COBE two-bag system allows the storage of two PCs without loss of platelet quality. Two PCs should not be stored in the Fresenius C4L 500 ml storage containers.

Platelet concentrates derived from buffy coat and apheresis: biochemical and functional differences

Today, platelet concentrates are generally produced from whole blood by differential centrifugation (buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates--PCs) or by plateletpheresis (apheresis-derived platelet concentrates--APCs). As PCs are characterized by a lower number of platelets than APCs, four to six PCs are customarily combined in order to obtain an equivalent dose. In the 1970s and 1980s, the use of PCs exceeded that of APCs by far; in contrast, since the beginning of the 1990s, APCs comprise more than half of all transfused platelets. However, the selection of PCs or APCs for transfusion to thrombocytopenic patients is still a matter of debate. The present paper compares biochemical and functional properties of both platelet preparations in vitro. Besides plasma parameters (e.g. platelet factor 4 (PF4), P-selectin, C3a-desarginin, plasma coagulation factors), platelet function was analysed by aggregometry and the PFA 100 system. APCs are characterized by a better preservation of ADP and collagen-induced platelet aggregation, and shorter closure times of the PFA 100 test system during storage. The improved primary in vitro haemostatic capacity of APCs is presumed to be owing to a lower cellular activation rate in these preparations. This hypothesis is supported by the higher plasma concentrations of PF4, beta-thromboglobulin and P-selectin found in PCs compared with APCs. The concentrations of C3a-desarginin in PCs exceed those in APCs by far. Additionally, thrombin generation is higher in PCs than in APCs. These data suggest that APCs are characterized by a superior haemostatic capacity over PCs in vitro. However, in vivo studies should be performed to confirm these findings in the patients' circulation also.

Response to vWF-coated beads and soluble p-selectin to characterize apheresis platelets: a comparison of three cell separators

BACKGROUND

Plateletpheresis technologies differ among various cell separators. Differences in centrifugation force, centrifugation time, and platelet concentration in the platelet concentrate may affect platelet activation and function.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In a three-way crossover design, 12 donors were randomly assigned to three types of cell separators, two continuous flow systems (Amicus DN, Fenwall Division, Baxter and Spectra LRS, Gambro BCT) and one intermittent flow system (MCS+, Haemonetics). The response to vWF-coated beads was determined in the peripheral blood and fresh platelet concentrates to obtain information about the initiating step of platelet aggregation, that is, platelet adhesion. Levels of soluble p-selectin were measured as a marker of platelet activation.

RESULTS

Platelet yield and concentration of platelets were higher in platelet concentrates obtained with the Amicus DN than with the Spectra LRS or the MCS+. Maximal aggregation was significantly higher in platelets from the Amicus DN than in platelets from the Spectra LRS or the MCS+. Higher concentrations of soluble p-selectin were seen in platelet concentrates obtained with the Amicus DN than in concentrates from the Spectra LRS or the MCS+, but they did not differ after correction for the number of platelets per component.

CONCLUSIONS

Different plateletpheresis procedures induced distinct changes of platelet function. Platelets collected using the Amicus DN retained the strongest adhesion capacity irrespective of their activation.

Paired comparison of apheresis platelet function after storage in two containers

Platelet quality after storage strongly depends on the pre-storage quality as well as on the storage conditions determined by the storage container. In this paired study, we evaluated two different containers (MedSep CLX and Delmed DPL-110). The Fresenius AS104 cell separator was used to prepare 17 platelet concentrates that were split and distributed into the containers to be compared. Cell counts, blood gas analysis, morphological scores, glucose and lactate levels, platelet activation, and platelet aggregation were measured before splitting at the day of preparation and after storage at day 3 and day 5. At day 3, there was no significant difference between the two bags apart from increased lactate and decreased pCO(2) concentrations in the CLX bags. At day 5 there were significantly higher lactate concentrations, pO(2) levels, and aggregation after stimulation in the CLX group, while the glucose and pCO(2) concentrations were significantly lower in these platelet concentrates as compared to the DPL-110 group. However, these parameters did not influence the functional parameters tested. While the platelet quality decreased during storage in all bags, the functional changes were nearly identical in both bags tested. We conclude that both bags are equivalent for 5-day storage of platelet concentrates.

Effect of gamma radiation on the in vitro aggregability of WBC-reduced apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND

The effect of gamma radiation on single-donor apheresis platelet concentrates (SDPs) has been elucidated only incompletely. The only existing report on the function of SDPs stored in the irradiated state found a deterioration in the in vitro aggregability at the end of shelf life in SDPs divided before irradiation with 1500 cGy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The in vitro properties of platelets were examined in four series of irradiated and control platelets, each obtained from the same 15 donors. Irradiation with 3000 cGy was performed on Days 0, 3, and 5. Cellular content, aggregability by ADP alone or ADP and epinephrine, spontaneous and induced CD62 expression, beta-thromboglobulin release, glucose consumption, lactate production, and pH were measured immediately after preparation and on Days 3 and 5 after donation.

RESULTS

Comparable in vitro properties were measured in irradiated and control platelets, whether irradiation was performed on Day 3 or Day 5. However, in platelets irradiated on Day 0, we found a significantly better in vitro aggregability by 20 microM: ADP immediately after irradiation and by 10 microM: ADP and 2 microM: epinephrine at the end of shelf life than was found in the other groups (Day 5 results: Day 0 irradiation: 75 +/- 32%; Day 3 irradiation: 45 +/- 45%; Day 5 irradiation: 47 +/- 41%; control: 40 +/- 24%; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gamma radiation had no adverse effect on platelet quality in extremely WBC-reduced SDPs. On the contrary, a slight, but significantly better in vitro aggregability was found in SDPs irradiated before storage than in platelets irradiated later during storage and in unirradiated platelets. This increased in vitro aggregability persisted until the end of shelf life.

The cost-effectiveness of reducing donor exposures with single-donor versus pooled random-donor platelets

BACKGROUND

Single-donor platelets (SDPs) are frequently preferred over pooled random-donor platelets (RDPs) to reduce donor exposures and the risk for virus transmission or HLA alloimmunization. Transfusion-associated virus-transmission risks have significantly decreased, which suggests that white cell reduction by filtration eliminates any difference in the risk of alloimmunization in transfused leukemic patients. Health care reform pressures of make it appropriate to examine the cost-effectiveness of SDPs versus RDPs in reducing donor exposures.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A decision analysis model was developed and sensitivity analyses were used to assess the incremental cost (dollars/quality-adjusted life-year) associated with the use of SDPs versus RDPs for adult patients undergoing hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation or primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

RESULTS

Among transplant patients, the incremental cost of choosing SDPs as opposed to RDPs ranged from $168,700 to $519,822 per quality-adjusted life-year. For patients undergoing primary CABG, the incremental cost was $192,415 (females) and $216,280 (males). Variations in the cost differential between SDPs and RDPs, the number of random-donor platelets in the RDP, and the risk of bacterial sepsis markedly influenced cost-effectiveness. The model was minimally affected by variations in the risks of transmission of HIV and hepatitis B and C, and human T-lymphotropic viruses.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with other accepted medical interventions, the use of SDPs as opposed to RDPs may not be a cost-effective method of reducing donor exposures in the adult patient populations studied. SDPs were more cost-effective in patients undergoing primary CABG than in leukemia patients undergoing hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Regardless of diagnosis, decreasing the acquisition cost differential would have the greatest impact on improving the cost-effectiveness of SDPs, as opposed to RDPs, to decrease donor exposures.

Leukocyte depletion and storage of single-donor platelet concentrates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Because of widespread use of leukocyte reduction in platelet concentrates (PCs) and the need to store such concentrates, we investigated the effects of leukocyte depletion on the quality of stored PCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten double-sized PCs were divided into 2 equal units which were tested simultaneously. One half was stored for 5 days after filtration through a polyester filter, the other one was stored unfiltered.

RESULTS

The volume of the 10 "oversized' PCs was 483 +/- 40 ml (mean +/- standard deviation) and they contained 5.9 +/- 1.5 x 10(11) platelets and 80 +/- 23 x 10(6) leukocytes. Filtration significantly reduced the leukocyte concentration (168 +/- 56/microliter before, 6 +/- 4 /microliter after filtration) and leukocyte count (39.9 +/- 11.3 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 +/- 0.9 x 10(6); p < 0.0005). Filtration caused a platelet loss of 16%, the platelet count decreasing not significantly from 2.91 +/- 0.75 x 10(11) to 2.40 +/- 0.94 x 10(11) (p = 0.26). After 5 days of storage all parameters of platelet function (platelet aggregation to several stimuli, hypotonic shock reaction [HSR] and platelet retraction), mean platelet volume, and pH and pCO2 showed no advantage for PCs filtered prior to storage compared to PCs stored unfiltered. Moreover, platelet aggregation on day 5 using 4 agonists at 10 concentrations showed worse results in 4 assays in prestorage filtered PCs (collagen [4 micrograms/ml: p < 0.05, ADP [0.2 mM]: p < 0.05, ADP [0.3 mM]: p < 0.05, thrombin [0.6 E/ml]: p < 0.05). But there is no convincing trend in all aggregation tests, and HSR, presumably the most useful parameter, was not different or day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no advantage in terms of improved quality for prestorage leuko-depletion of PCs. Taking into account the obvious disadvantages of filtration, such as platelet loss and increasing costs per transfusion, we conclude that pre- or post-storage filtration of single-donor PCs should be done only for patients who have a clear indication for the transfusion of leukocyte-poor blood products.

In-line filtration of platelet concentrates obtained with the Omnix blood cell separator

The quality of platelet concentrates (PC) obtained with the blood cell separator Omnix was investigated before and after in-line filtration. PC were filtered 2h (protocol A) and 4 h (protocol B) after the termination of apheresis. Platelet (PLT) yield after filtration was similar in both protocols (median 3.7 vs. 3.4 x 10(11)). Median white blood cell (WBC) contamination after leucocyte depletion was 0.07 x 10(6) (range 0.02-3.27 x 10(6)) in protocol A and 0.06 x 10(6) (range 0.02-2.1 x 10(6)) in protocol B. Glucose, lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, morphology score and pH value were not statistically different before and after filtration in both protocols. We conclude that in-line filtration results in sufficient leucocyte depletion of the PC. The prefiltration storage time did not influence the studied parameters of product quality.

Evaluation of the single needle procedure in plateletpheresis with the fresenius AS 104 blood cell separator

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the single needle (SN) procedure for plateletpheresis with the AS 104 blood cell separator. One hundred fifty-seven platelet collections with different protocols were carried out and analysed with respect to platelet yield, separation efficiency, leukocyte contamination, anticoagulant infused, and donation time. SN plateletpheresis resulted in a mean platelet yield of 2.6-3.1 x 10(11) with separation efficiencies of 49.2-57.4%. The mean leukocyte contamination ranged from 2.8 to 40.5 x 10(6). Parameters of product quality were investigated in 14 platelet concentrates (PC). Determination of glucose, lactate, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and morphology score showed good quality of the PC.

Complement activation during storage of single-donor platelet concentrates

Single-donor platelets are stored up to 5 days prior to transfusion. Since contact of plasma to plastic surfaces may lead to complement activation, we investigated whether there is any increase in the complement factors C3a, C4a and C5a in routinely stored single-donor platelet concentrates. C3a levels increased about 40-fold during a 7-day storage. C4a levels also increased with storage time but to a lesser extent. By contrast, C5a levels remained stable throughout this period. ADP- and collagen-induced aggregation was impaired after storage of platelets, indicating severe functional injury. In platelet-poor plasma stored under identical conditions a comparable increase in C3a and C4a concentrations was observed. The loss of platelet function during storage might at least in part be due to the excessive anaphylatoxin concentrations observed.