Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products

ISHAGE protocol: are we doing it correctly?

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometric CD34(+) stem cell enumeration is routinely performed to optimize timing of peripheral blood stem cell collections and assess engraftment capability of the apheresis product. While a number of different flow methodologies have been described, the highly standardized ISHAGE protocol is currently the most widely employed, with 204/255 (81%) international participants in the UK NEQAS CD34(+) stem cell enumeration program indicating their use of this method. Recently, two laboratories were identified as persistent poor performers, a fact attributed to incorrect ISHAGE protocol usage/setup. This prompted UK NEQAS to question whether other laboratories were making similar errors and, if so, how this might affect individual EQA performance.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In send out 0801, where two stabilized samples were issued, the EQA center surveyed 255 participants with flow analysis data and subsequent results collected. One hundred and ninety-six laboratories returned results with 103 returning dot plots. Eighty-three out of one hundred and three stated that they used the ISHAGE protocol gating strategy but 43% (36/83) were incorrectly set-up. Analysis of the data showed those incorrectly using single platform ISHAGE gating strategy were twice as likely to fail an EQA exercise compared to those using the protocol correctly. This failure rate increased two fold when incorrect ISHAGE protocol was used in a dual platform setting.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests a widespread fundamental lack of understanding of the ISHAGE protocol and the need to deploy it correctly, potentially having significant clinical implications and highlights the need to monitor participants rigorously in their deployment of the ISHAGE protocol. It is hoped that once these findings have been disseminated, performance can be improved.

Flow cytometric CD34+ stem cell enumeration: lessons from nine years' external quality assessment within the Benelux countries

BACKGROUND

A biannual external quality assurance (EQA) scheme for flow cytometric CD34+ haematopoietic stem cell enumeration has been operational in the Benelux countries since 1996. In an evaluation of the results of 16 send-outs, we studied the effects of the methods used on assay outcome and whether or not this exercise was effective in reducing between-laboratory variation.

METHODS

Data were analyzed using robust multivariate regression. This approach is relatively insensitive to outliers and is used to assess the effect of methodological aspects of CD34+ cell counting on the bias and variability.

RESULTS

Five variables were associated with significant bias of absolute CD34+ cell counts: (i) unique laboratory number (ULN), (ii) gating strategy; (iii) CD34 mAb fluorochrome; (iv) type of flow cytometer, and (v) method of sample preparation. In addition, ULN and platform methodology (i.e., single vs. dual) contributed significantly to the variability of this assay. Overall, the variability in results of CD34+ cell enumeration has declined with time; in particular, after a practical workshop in which participants were trained to use the "single platform ISHAGE protocol."

CONCLUSIONS

Between-laboratory variation in CD34+ cell enumeration can be reduced by standardization of methodologies between centres. Our approach, i.e., EQA with targeted training and feedback in response to reported results, has been successful in reducing the variability of CD34+ cell enumeration between participants.

PBSC mobilization

Intentional recruitment of hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is a clinical process termed peripheral blood stem cell (PSBC) mobilization. Mobilized PSBC has replaced bone marrow as the preferred source of stem cells for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy because of rapid and durable engraftment and reconstitution of functional bone marrow. Although the mechanism involved in the process of PBSC mobilization by cytokines is largely unknown, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or chemotherapy combined with GCSF is used as a mobilizing agent in current clinical practice. To date, G-CSF is the best cytokine for PBSC mobilization. However, there are some controversies in its efficacy (poor mobilizer) and safety (in allogeneic donors). Recent research progress has revealed some part of the mechanistic scenarios of PBSC mobilization and found promising candidates for the agents for PBSC mobilization. Until the research at molecular and cellular levels elucidates the precise mechanisms, collecting and comparing clinical observations is the best way to find more optimal condition for PBSC mobilization.

Cord blood processing with an automated and functionally closed system

BACKGROUND

Umbilical cord blood processing with standard centrifugation techniques is performed in open systems and results in varying cell and volume recoveries.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty umbilical cord blood donations were randomly assigned to processing either with a microprocessor-controlled cell separator equipped with closed disposables or with a manual separation procedure in blood bags. The collection efficiency of nucleated cells, MNCs, RBCs, and CD34+ cells and the processing time were analyzed.

RESULTS

Using the cell processor, mean collection efficiencies were 78.6 +/- 24.9 percent for nucleated cells, 77.4 +/- 27.8 percent for MNCs, 55.5 +/- 14.6 percent for RBCs, and 83.6 +/- 32.5 percent for CD34+ cells, while they were 73.1 +/- 13.2 percent for nucleated cells, 78.1 +/- 14.9 percent for MNCs, 26.0 +/- 12.2 percent for RBCs, and 77.0 +/- 17.6 percent for CD34+ cells when using the standard centrifugation technique. The processing time was about 20 minutes for automated processing and 60 to 80 minutes for the standard centrifugation technique.

CONCLUSION

Using the new cell processor, the collection efficiencies for nucleated cells, MNCs, and CD34+ cells are similar to those obtained by established centrifugation techniques while the RBC reduction is less effective. The main advantages of the new systems are the closed system, the more standardized processing procedure, and a significantly shorter processing time.

High-grade loss of leukocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells caused by erythrocyte-lysing procedures for flow cytometric analyses

All current-flow cytometric techniques use erythrocyte-lysing procedures before leukocyte analysis. We investigated the impact of four lysing procedures with different flow cytometric techniques on the loss of leukocytes and hematopoietic progenitor cells in blood samples. A total of 280 determinations out of 10 samples were measured by two flow cytometers (FCMs), using a FACS-Calibur (Becton Dickinson) and a particle-analyzing system (PAS) with a "true volumetric unit" (Partec). All samples were prepared with four different commercially available erythrocyte-lysing reagents (n = 10, respectively). CD34(+) cells were determined in relation to counted leukocytes with both FCMs (dual platform determinations, 2-PF). In addition, further immunologic and nuclear staining determinations of cells with and without erythrocyte-lysing procedures were performed in the "true volumetric unit" (single platform mode 1-PF) using the PAS system (n = 10, respectively). In the 2-PF mode, both systems showed identical results for CD34(+) cells (r = 0.997). The comparison of 1-PF and 2-PF modes with immunologic stainings revealed a mean decrease of 34.5% for absolute amounts of CD45(+) cells [in detail: Becton-Dickinson (BD) lysis 40%; Ortho Diagnostics (OD) lysis 31%; Uti lyse (UL) 38%; Cylyse (CL) 29%] and of 41.3% for absolute concentration of CD34(+) cells [in detail: BD lysis 45%; OD lysis 40%; UL lysis 45%; CL lysis 34%] by the lysing procedures. In contrast, the nuclear stainings revealed a mean leukocyte loss of only 5% for the nonlysed samples and of 12% for lysed samples. All investigated lysing procedures induced a large loss of leukocytes and progenitor cells, obviously due to cell membrane destruction as demonstrated for identical samples in the 1-PF and 2-PF modes by immunologic and nuclear staining methods.

Enumeration of CD34+ cells in cord blood: a variation on a single-platform flow cytometric method based on the ISHAGE gating strategy

Single-platform flow cytometric absolute cell counting protocols provide increased robustness for CD34+ cell enumeration by limiting potential sources of imprecision. However, samples with any cellular fragmentation or debris, such as cord blood samples, provide challenges for these assays. We describe a simple, robust absolute CD34+ cell counting protocol, suitable for cord blood, using TRUCOUNT absolute count tubes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and a modified ISHAGE (International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering) gating strategy. An advantage of TRUCOUNT tubes is that each tube is supplied with a known number of lyophilized fluorescent beads. The method includes no-wash fixative-free ammonium chloride red blood cell lysis and the viability dye, 7-amino actinomycin D, to exclude dead cells. The threshold was set on CD45 expression in the FL1 channel and an exclusion gate in the forward scatter channel reduced debris. No manual adjustment of the gating regions was required, even for samples in less than optimal condition. Comparison of the TRUCOUNT-ISHAGE protocol with the original dual-platform ISHAGE assay (n = 30) and the single-platform ISHAGE protocol using Flow-Count Fluorospheres (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA; n = 22) showed high correlation (R(2) = 0.949 and 0.989, respectively) and no significant difference or bias for samples ranging from 22 to 600 CD34+ cells per microliter. Results are presented that demonstrate the detrimental effect of a fixative-containing lysis reagent when used in a lyse-and-wash procedure. The TRUCOUNT-ISHAGE protocol combines the attributes of TRUCOUNT tubes and the ISHAGE gating strategy to provide a single-platform protocol capable of achieving readily standardization of CD34+ cell enumeration.

Flow cytometric enumeration and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells

Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HPC) is widely used to evaluate the adequacy of peripheral blood stem cell grafts and is also useful for planning the apheresis sessions needed to obtain these grafts. A state-of-the-art method to enumerate CD34(+) cells has been developed that makes use of a multiparameter definition of HPC, based on their light scatter characteristics and dim expression of CD45, utilizing fluorescent counting beads. This approach allows the absolute CD34(+) cell count to be determined directly from a flow cytometer. The method can be extended with a viability stain and additional markers for further immunologic characterization of CD34(+) cells, and has been successfully implemented in multicenter trials. Using such a standardized assay, it should be possible to define more accurately the lower threshold for a safe HPC graft in terms of short- and long-term hematopoietic reconstitution. Semin Hematol 38:139-147.