Partial expression of RHc on the RHD polypeptide

RHC genotyping in Chinese Han population

BACKGROUND

The Rh blood group system is characterized by its complexity and polymorphism, encompassing 56 different antigens. Accurately predicting the presence of the C antigen using genotyping methods has been challenging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of various genotyping methods for predicting the Rh C and to identify a suitable method for the Chinese Han population.

METHODS

In total, 317 donors, consisting 223 D+ (including 20 with the Del phenotype) and 94 D- were randomly selected. For RHC genotyping, 48C and 109bp insertion were detected on the Real-time PCR platform and -292 substitution was analyzed via restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). Moreover, the promoter region of the RHCE gene was sequenced to search for other nucleotide substitutions between RHC and RHc. Agreement between prediction methods was evaluated using the Kappa statistic, and comparisons between methods were conducted via the χ2 test.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed that the 48C allele, 109bp insertion, a specific pattern observed in RFLP results, and wild-type alleles of seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were in strong agreement with the Rh C, with Kappa coefficients exceeding 0.8. However, there were instances of false positives or false negatives (0.6% false negative rate for 109bp insertion and 5.4-8.2% false positive rates for other methods). The 109bp insertion method exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting the Rh C, at 99.4%, compared to other methods (P values≤0.001). Although no statistical differences were found among other methods for predicting Rh C (P values>0.05), the accuracies in descending order were 48C (94.6%) > rs586178 (92.7%) > rs4649082, rs2375313, rs2281179, rs2072933, rs2072932, and RFLP (92.4%) > rs2072931 (91.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the methods examined can independently and accurately predict the Rh C. However, the 109bp insertion test demonstrated the highest accuracy for predicting the Rh C in the Chinese Han population. Utilizing the 109bp insertion test in combination with other methods may enhance the accuracy of Rh C prediction.

Development of Anti-G, Anti-C and Anti-Jk(b) in a 22-Year-Old Mother during Her Fourth Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Anti-G antibodies are rarely found since anti-D, in combination with anti-C, are difficult to discriminate from anti-G antibodies in routine testing.

CASE REPORT

A 22-year-old, gravida-3, para-1, woman with blood group A Rh D neg ccddee and known antibody anti-Jk(b), gave birth to her second child. While anti-Jk(b) could not be detected at birth, a new anti-C was found. Antibody screening tests (IAT) were performed using gel cards and rare G positive rGr erythrocytes. Genotyping for RHD and RHCE was performed using PCR-SSP.

RESULTS

The child's blood group was A Rh D neg Ccddee. Genotyping revealed Cde/cde haplotypes. The erythrocytes of the new-born showed a positive direct antiglobulin test with IgG; anti-D and anti-C could be eluted. Erythrocytes with the rare phenotype rGr were reactive with the serum of the mother.

CONCLUSION

The presence of anti-D and anti-C in the eluate from then newborn's Ccddee erythrocytes proved anti-G or anti-G in combination with anti-D. When anti-C and anti-D are seen during a pregnancy, possibly anti-G is present. This observation is of relevance since women with anti-G can still develop anti-D and require rhesus prophylaxis.

Molecular basis of the JAHK (RH53) antigen

BACKGROUND

The JAHK antigen was first described in 1995 as a low-frequency red blood cell antigen. Family studies confirmed the association of the antigen with the rare r(G) phenotype of the Rh blood group system, which is associated with weak expression of C and e, but normal G expression. JAHK was allocated the Rh number RH53. The serologic findings indicated the location of the antigen on the RhCE protein, although the molecular basis for JAHK has not been known.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The RHCE gene of eight persons from three unrelated families was analyzed by exon amplification and direct sequencing. Four of the samples were JAHK+ the remaining four were JAHK-. In one JAHK+ sample, the entire RHCE gene was sequenced. The remaining samples were sequenced for exons 1 to 3. A polymerase chain reaction procedure with sequence specific primers was developed for the specific detection of the JAHK allele.

RESULTS

Analysis of the entire RHCE gene of one JAHK+ sample showed the expected CcEe-specific nucleotide sequences and revealed an additional nucleotide change (365C>T) in exon 3. This change represented a missense mutation, which led to an amino acid substitution from serine to leucine at position 122 of the RhCE protein. Three JAHK+ samples from two other unrelated families showed the 365C>T mutation and confirmed the association of the Ser122Leu substitution with the JAHK+ phenotype.

CONCLUSION

The molecular basis of the JAHK antigen (RH53) is defined by a 365C>T mutation in exon 3 of the RHCE gene leading to the amino acid substitution Ser122Leu. Because the position 122 is predicted to be located in the transmembrane region adjacent to the second loop, the substitution of the neutral serine by the hydrophobic leucine seems to be the cause of the JAHK antigen by a conformational change of the RhCE protein. This structural change may also cause the weakened expression of the C and e antigens observed in JAHK+ individuals. Based on our results it is concluded that the JAHK-specific mutation is associated with a dCe haplotype.

RHC and RHc genotyping in different ethnic groups

BACKGROUND

RH genotyping assays are mainly based on research in whites. These assays may not be reliable in a multiracial society because of the genetic variation in RH among ethnic groups.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Five groups from different ethnic backgrounds were serologically typed for C and c and were genotyped on nucleotide C48 and intron 2 for RHC and RHc on nucleotides C178 and C307.

RESULTS

RHc genotyping with both methods proved to be reliable. RHC genotyping on C48 is not reliable because of a 48G>C mutation in the RHce allele (false-positive prediction of C). This mutation was found in every ethnic group and does not affect c or e expression. RHC genotyping on intron 2 is unreliable because of r's (Cdes) alleles (a false-negative prediction of C). This allele was found in whites and blacks from Curaçao and South Africa. Reactions of r's cells with anti-C are weaker, but no negative reactions with various MoAbs were found. A new method (RHC/c/hex3-intron 4/exon 7 multiplex PCRs) was developed based on intron 2 and r's hybrid exon 3 characteristics (RHC) and C307 (RHc).

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable RHC and RHc genotyping is possible in different ethnic groups with the RHC/c/hex3-intron 4/exon 7 multiplex PCR approach.