Durable response to combination therapy including staphylococcal protein A immunoadsorption in life-threatening refractory autoimmune hemolysis

Immunoadsorption in a dog with severe immune mediated hemolytic anemia

Immune mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) is a life-threatening disease with severe, acute hemolysis as a result of an autoimmune response directed against erythrocyte surface antigens. In veterinary medicine, IMHA is usually treated with immunosuppressants and often multiple blood transfusions. In human medicine, immunoadsorption (IA) is an established therapy for antibody removal in immune-mediated diseases. A female, spayed, five-year-old, 28 kg Entlebucher Mountain dog was presented with regenerative anemia and positive autoagglutination diagnosed as immune-mediated hemolytic anemia to the veterinary emergency service. Conventional treatment consisting immunosuppression with prednisolone and mycophenolate failed to improve hemolysis. As hematocrit dropped daily, multiple blood transfusions of blood group DEA 1 negative were required. IA was initiated at day 3 with COM.TEC and ADAsorb platforms and a LIGASORBstaphylococcus antitoxin A column. IA with citrate anticoagulation was performed over the treatment time of 77 minutes with a blood flow of 50 mL/min. Total plasma volume of 1.6 L was processed. Complications consisted of vomitus and lid swelling, shivering, excessive clotting in the tubing after a calcium bolus and hypotension. After IA, hemolysis stopped immediately, plasma concentrations of immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin M and bilirubin decreased, and hematocrit remained stable. The dog was discharged without further hemolysis 4 days after immunoadsorption with immunosuppressive therapy. IA is a promising adjunctive therapy in severe cases of canine IMHA, but it cannot be concluded to which degree IA or concurrent immunosuppression contributed to cessation of hemolysis in the present case.

Quo vadis haemapheresis. Current developments in haemapheresis

The techniques of haemapheresis originated in the development of centrifugal devices separating cells from plasma and later on plasma from cells. Subsequently membrane filtration was developed allowing for plasma-cell separation. The unspecificity of therapeutic plasma exchange led to the development of secondary plasma separation technologies being specific, semi-selective or selective such as adsorption, filtration or precipitation. In contrast on-line differential separation of cells is still under development. Whereas erythrocytapheresis, granulocytapheresis, lymphocytapheresis and stem cell apheresis are technically advanced, monocytapheresis may need further improvement. Also, indications such as erythrocytapheresis for the treatment of polycythaemia vera or photopheresis though being clinically effective and of considerable importance for an appropriate disease control are to some extent under debate as being either too costly or without sufficient understanding of the mechanism. Other forms of cell therapy are under development. Rheohaemapheresis as the most advanced technology of extracorporeal haemorheotherapy is a rapidly developing approach contributing to the treatment of microcirculatory diseases and tissue repair. Whereas the control of a considerable number of (auto-) antibody mediated diseases is beyond discussion, the indication of apheresis therapy for immune complex mediated diseases is quite often still under debate. Detoxification for artificial liver support advanced considerably during the last years, whereas conclusions on the efficacy of septicaemia treatment are debatable indeed. LDL-apheresis initiated in 1981 as immune apheresis is well established since 24 years, other semi-selective or unspecific procedures, allowing for the elimination of LDL-cholesterol among other plasma components are also being used. Correspondingly Lp(a) apheresis is available as a specific, highly efficient elimination procedure superior to techniques which also eliminate Lp(a). Quality control systems, more economical technologies as for instance by increasing automation, influencing the over-interpretation of evidence based medicine especially in patients with rare diseases without treatment alternative, more insight into the need of controlled clinical trials or alternatively improved diagnostic procedures are among others tools ways to expand the application of haemapheresis so far applied in cardiology, dermatology, haematology, immunology, nephrology, neurology, ophthalmology, otology, paediatrics, rheumatology, surgery and transfusion medicine.

Correcting immune imbalance: the use of Prosorba column treatment for immune disorders

The treatment of selected refractory autoimmune diseases has been complemented by the use of Protein A (Prosorba column) immunoadsorption. US Food and Drug Administration-approved clinical applications include idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Other common off label uses include thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Less common experimental uses in diseases in which efficacy has been reported include autoimmune CNS syndromes, peripheral neuropathies, autoimmune pancytopenia, hemolytic anemia and solid organ transplant rejection. Prosorba column treatment is generally well tolerated but a small proportion of treated patients experience chills, fever, tremor, hypotension and rash. The mechanism of action suggested for the efficacy of the column is the restoration of normal immune balance and normal tolerance. Observations in ITP has suggested that column treatment stimulates a rise in anti-idiotype antibody directed against antiplatelet antibodies, effecting a decrease in pathogenic antiplatelet antibodies and immune complexes.