What is first, left bundle branch block or left ventricular dysfunction?

Left Bundle Branch Block Disturbs Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Flow: Study Using Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate the influence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) on left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) flow.

METHODS

We divided 89 subjects (34 males and 55 females, mean age 64 +/- 14 years) into an LBBB group (n = 40), a right ventricular (RV) pacing group (n = 26), and a control group (n = 23). All of the patients were examined with surface electrocardiography (ECG) and underwent transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) to measure QRS duration on the ECG, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Coronary flow velocity was measured in the distal LAD with TTE, and the percentage of diastolic flow duration (%DD) was expressed as the percentage of diastolic duration of coronary artery flow divided by the R-R interval.

RESULTS

The %DD of the LAD was significantly shorter in the LBBB group (40.4% +/- 12.4%) with LVEF < 50% than in the RV pacing group (60.3% +/- 7.3%) and the control group (59.3% +/- 7.6%) (P < .01 vs the control and RV pacing groups), and it was also significantly shorter in the LBBB group (49.3% +/- 10.5%) with LVEF > or = 50% than in the control and RV pacing groups (P < .01 vs the control and RV pacing groups). In the LBBB group, the %DD of the LAD had a positive correlation with LVEF (P < .05; r = .50), a negative correlation with LVEDV (P < .05; r = -.57), and a negative correlation with QRS duration (P < .05; r = -.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike RV pacing, LBBB itself can disturb the coronary perfusion of the LAD through shortening of the diastolic flow duration. Furthermore, systolic dysfunction potentiates the shortening effect of diastolic flow duration by LBBB. Whether left ventricular systolic dysfunction is the result of the coronary flow disturbance by LBBB or vice versa merits further investigation.

Effects of Resynchronization Therapy on Cardiac Function in Pacemaker Patients “Upgraded” to Biventricular Devices

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves echocardiographic measures of cardiac function and has a variable effect on QRS duration in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). How CRT affects these indices in patients with right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced LBBB who are "upgraded" with left ventricular (LV) leads for CRT is unknown. We studied the echocardiographic effects of RV pacing and CRT in patients with prior continuous RV pacing after LV lead placement.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifteen consecutive patients (age 73 +/- 11 years, LV ejection fraction 24 +/- 6%, QRS duration 190 +/- 27 msec) with New York Heart Association class IIIB-IV symptoms and continuous RV pacing underwent LV lead placement for CRT. Echocardiography and ECG were performed sequentially during RV pacing and CRT. CRT was associated with significantly reduced QRS duration (190 +/- 27 msec vs 165 +/- 18 msec, P = 0.005) and reduced LV electromechanical delay (180 +/- 33 msec vs 161+/- 43 msec). Baseline QRS duration correlated with CRT response. After CRT, patients had significant improvements in indices of systolic function, including LV ejection fraction, myocardial performance index (MPI), and LV ejection time. Abnormal baseline MPI was associated with greater improvement after CRT. LV end-diastolic and systolic volumes were similarly decreased with CRT. Mitral valve deceleration time, an index of diastolic function, was not affected by CRT.

CONCLUSION

"Upgrading" RV paced patients with advanced heart failure to CRT improves measures of electrical and LV mechanical synchrony and improves systolic function.

Isolated bundle branch block and left ventricular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Population studies have identified the presence of bundle branch block (BBB) as a risk factor for increased mortality in patients with known cardiac disease. It is unknown how chronic ventricular dyssynchrony resulting solely from conduction delay affects ventricular function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Subjects were retrospectively identified from the University of California, San Francisco, electrocardiogram database with QRS prolongation. Subjects who had no evidence of heart disease and had baseline and serial studies evaluating ongoing risk of coronary artery disease status and left ventricular function were followed over time. Documentation of a minimum of 2 serial evaluations of cardiac status were present in a total of 51/176 (20%) subjects with isolated BBB who constitute the study population. After a mean follow-up of 52 +/- 45 months-adjusting for differences due to age, sex, the presence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus-left ventricular ejection fraction diminished by -7.3 +/- 12% per year in the isolated left BBB cohort versus -1.9 +/- 4% in isolated right BBB cohort and -1.1 +/- 3% reduction in the isolated nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay cohort (P =.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Left bundle branch block itself may be a cause of ventricular dysfunction.