A technique for determining the signs of sensitivities of steady states in chemical reaction networks

Ceramide-transfer protein-mediated ceramide transfer is a structurally tunable flow-inducing mechanism with structural feed-forward loops

This paper considers two models of ceramide-transfer protein (CERT)-mediated ceramide transfer at the trans-Golgi network proposed in the literature, short distance shuttle and neck swinging, and seeks structural (parameter-free) features of the two models, which rely exclusively on the peculiar interaction network and not on specific parameter values. In particular, it is shown that both models can be seen as flow-inducing systems, where the flows between pairs of species are tuned by the concentrations of other species, and suitable external inputs can structurally regulate ceramide transfer. In the short distance shuttle model, the amount of transferred ceramide is structurally tuned by active protein kinase D (PKD), both directly and indirectly, in a coherent feed-forward loop motif. In the neck-swinging model, the amount of transferred ceramide is structurally tuned by active PI4KIIIβ, while active PKD has an ambivalent effect, due to the presence of an incoherent feed-forward loop motif that directly inhibits ceramide transfer and indirectly promotes it; the structural role of active PKD is to favour CERT mobility in the cytosol. It is also shown that the influences among key variables often have structurally determined steady-state signs, which can help falsify the models against experimental traces.

An Invitation to Pharmacostatics

Pharmacology, the study of interactions between biological processes and therapeutic agents, is traditionally presented as consisting of two subdisciplines: pharmacokinetics, which is about the distribution and metabolism of drugs in organisms, and pharmacodynamics, which is about the organisms' response to drugs. In discovery-stage pharmacology however, one primary concern is what we call pharmacostatics, the characterization of equilibrium parameters and states of core interactions of physiologic and therapeutic interest. This usually takes the form of studying dose-response curves, without consideration for the relevant qualitative properties of the underlying reaction networks, e.g., the existence, multiplicity and asymptotic stability of steady states. Furthermore, steady-state calculations customarily employ manually derived closed-form expressions based on approximating assumptions. While these formulas may seem adequate most of the time, the assumptions need not apply, and there are genuine though seemingly uncommon cases where this approach is not feasible and/or fails to explain non-monotone dose-response curves. It is this paper's aim to stimulate interest in mathematical problems arising in pharmacostatics. We specifically pose two problems about a particular relevant class of networks of reversible binding reactions. The first problem is to exploit a certain fixed-point formulation of the equilibrium equation to devise an algorithmic method that would be compellingly preferable to current practice in the pharmacostatics context. The second problem is to explicitly anticipate the possibility of non-monotone dose-response curves from network topology. Addressing these problems would positively impact biopharmaceutical research, and they have inherent mathematical interest.

Computing the structural influence matrix for biological systems

We consider the problem of identifying structural influences of external inputs on steady-state outputs in a biological network model. We speak of a structural influence if, upon a perturbation due to a constant input, the ensuing variation of the steady-state output value has the same sign as the input (positive influence), the opposite sign (negative influence), or is zero (perfect adaptation), for any feasible choice of the model parameters. All these signs and zeros can constitute a structural influence matrix, whose (i, j) entry indicates the sign of steady-state influence of the jth system variable on the ith variable (the output caused by an external persistent input applied to the jth variable). Each entry is structurally determinate if the sign does not depend on the choice of the parameters, but is indeterminate otherwise. In principle, determining the influence matrix requires exhaustive testing of the system steady-state behaviour in the widest range of parameter values. Here we show that, in a broad class of biological networks, the influence matrix can be evaluated with an algorithm that tests the system steady-state behaviour only at a finite number of points. This algorithm also allows us to assess the structural effect of any perturbation, such as variations of relevant parameters. Our method is applied to nontrivial models of biochemical reaction networks and population dynamics drawn from the literature, providing a parameter-free insight into the system dynamics.

Quantification of Interactions between Dynamic Cellular Network Functionalities by Cascaded Layering

Large, naturally evolved biomolecular networks typically fulfil multiple functions. When modelling or redesigning such systems, functional subsystems are often analysed independently first, before subsequent integration into larger-scale computational models. In the design and analysis process, it is therefore important to quantitatively analyse and predict the dynamics of the interactions between integrated subsystems; in particular, how the incremental effect of integrating a subsystem into a network depends on the existing dynamics of that network. In this paper we present a framework for simulating the contribution of any given functional subsystem when integrated together with one or more other subsystems. This is achieved through a cascaded layering of a network into functional subsystems, where each layer is defined by an appropriate subset of the reactions. We exploit symmetries in our formulation to exhaustively quantify each subsystem's incremental effects with minimal computational effort. When combining subsystems, their isolated behaviour may be amplified, attenuated, or be subject to more complicated effects. We propose the concept of mutual dynamics to quantify such nonlinear phenomena, thereby defining the incompatibility and cooperativity between all pairs of subsystems when integrated into any larger network. We exemplify our theoretical framework by analysing diverse behaviours in three dynamic models of signalling and metabolic pathways: the effect of crosstalk mechanisms on the dynamics of parallel signal transduction pathways; reciprocal side-effects between several integral feedback mechanisms and the subsystems they stabilise; and consequences of nonlinear interactions between elementary flux modes in glycolysis for metabolic engineering strategies. Our analysis shows that it is not sufficient to just specify subsystems and analyse their pairwise interactions; the environment in which the interaction takes place must also be explicitly defined. Our framework provides a natural representation of nonlinear interaction phenomena, and will therefore be an important tool for modelling large-scale evolved or synthetic biomolecular networks.