[Epigenetics and development: genomic imprinting]

[DOHaD and pre- or peri-conceptional programming]

The pre- and peri-conceptional periods (before and just after fertilization, until the blastocyst stage) are critical in the context of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD). Maternal in vivo environment, in particular nutrition, can disturb the apposition of epigenetic marks throughout gametogenesis, fertilization and the first steps of embryonic development, which are times during which major epigenetic changes take place. The in vitro environment, in the case of assisted reproduction techniques, also affects epigenetic marks. Whilst the embryo is a target of these changes, female and male gametes are both target and vector of these epigenetic changes, thus leading to multigenerational effects. Long term consequences on the phenotype of offspring vary according to the sex of the vector parent, the sex of the individual and the generation.

[Differential epigenetic marking on imprinted genes and consequences in human diseases]

At the time of fertilisation, the parental genomes have a strikingly different organisation. Sperm DNA is packaged globally with protamines, whereas the oocyte's genome is wrapped around nucleosomes. The maternal and paternal genomes are functionally different as well, and are both required for normal uterine and postnatal development. The functional requirement of both parental genomes is a consequence of differential epigenetic marking by DNA methylation during oogenesis and spermatogenesis, on a group of genes called imprinted genes. After fertilisation, these parental marks persist throughout development and convey the allelic expression of imprinted genes. Pathological perturbation of methylation imprints, before fertilisation in the germ cells, or during development, gives rise to growth-related syndromes, and is frequently observed in cancer as well. Alteration of imprints is thought to occur early in carcinogenesis and shows similarities with the acquisition of aberrant DNA methylation at tumour suppressor genes. This suggests that similar underlying mechanisms could be involved.

[Master and servant: epigenetic deregulations as a cause and a consequence of cancer]

The processes that affect the activity of the genome in a heritable manner without changing its sequence are called epigenetic. Here we review the modes of epigenetic gene regulation, and describe their alterations in cancer. We show how these mechanisms are interdependent, and how they intersect with genetic mutations. We argue that epigenetic abnormalities can occur both as a cause, and as a consequence of cancer. Indeed, oncogenic transformation can deeply alter the epigenetic information contained in the pattern of DNA methylation or histone tail modification. Conversely, epigenetic dysfunctions can drive cellular transformation. We then touch on some practical consequences of the prominence of epigenetic alterations in cancer : increasing knowledge of this field has allowed the development of a new generation of diagnostic tools and therapeutic avenues. Finally we point out that epigenetic phenomena may act as sensors that link environmental conditions to cancer.

[Profiles of DNA methylation in normal and cancer cells]

In eukaryotes, the epigenetic mark DNA methylation is found exclusively at cytosine residues in the CpG islands of genes, transposons and intergenic DNA. Among functional roles, DNA methylation is essential for mammalian embryonic development, and is classically thought to function by stably silencing promoter activity. However, until recently, understanding of the distribution of cytosine methylation in the whole genome - and hence, identification of its targets - was very limited. High-throughput methodologies, including methylated DNA immunoprecipitation, have recently revealed genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation, and provided new and unexpected data. Clearly DNA methylation is selectively associated with some key promoters- and is not a prerequisite for promoter inactivation, since strong CpG island promoters are mostly unmethylated, even when inactive. Most germline-specific genes are methylated and permanently silenced in somatic cells, suggesting a role of this mark in maintaining somatic cellular identity. These large scale studies will also help understanding the deregulation of DNA methylation associated with cancer, among which unmethylation of germinal cells genes, and recent observtion of large hypomethylated regions in tumoral specimens. The next challenge will be to understand if these methylation changes occur randomly, or more likely are specified by oncogenes or linked to environmental pressure.

[Parental genomic imprinting in plants: significance for reproduction]

Parental genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon causing the expression of a gene from one of the two parental alleles. Imprinting has been identified in plants and mammals. Recent evidence shows that DNA methylation and histone modifications are responsible for this parent-of-origin dependent expression of imprinted genes. We review the mechanisms and functions of imprinting in plants. We further describe the significance of imprinting for reproduction and discuss potential models for its evolution.

An imprinted gene network that controls mammalian somatic growth is down-regulated during postnatal growth deceleration in multiple organs

In mammals, somatic growth is rapid in early postnatal life but decelerates with age and eventually halts, thus determining the adult body size of the species. This growth deceleration, which reflects declining proliferation, occurs simultaneously in multiple organs yet appears not to be coordinated by a systemic mechanism. We, therefore, hypothesized that growth deceleration results from a growth-limiting genetic program that is common to multiple tissues. Here, we identified a set of 11 imprinted genes that show down-regulation of mRNA expression with age in multiple organs. For these genes, Igf2, H19, Plagl1, Mest, Peg3, Dlk1, Gtl2, Grb10, Ndn, Cdkn1c, and SLC38a4, the declines show a temporal pattern similar to the decline in growth rate. All 11 genes have been implicated in the control of cell proliferation or somatic growth. Thus, our findings suggest that the declining expression of these genes contributes to coordinate growth deceleration in multiple tissues. We next hypothesized that the coordinate decline in expression of these imprinted genes is caused by altered methylation and consequent silencing of the expressed allele. Contrary to this hypothesis, the methylation status of the promoter regions of Mest, Peg3, and Plagl1 did not change with age. Our findings suggest that a set of growth-regulating imprinted genes is expressed at high levels in multiple tissues in early postnatal life, contributing to rapid somatic growth, but that these genes are subsequently downregulated in multiple tissues simultaneously, contributing to coordinate growth deceleration and cessation, thus imposing a fundamental limit on adult body size.