2
|
Abstract
We present here a new method for bioethics: systemic modelling. In this method, the complex phenomenon being studied (e.g. personalized medicine, genetic testing, gene therapy, genetically modified organisms) is modelled as a whole, to shed light on its organization and functioning, and major (bio)ethical issues and solutions for their resolution are then identified. This systemic modelling method is ideal for use in the identification of solutions, rather than their validation, with other methods then used to test the solutions found. We provide a description and reproducible instructions for the application of systemic modelling in bioethics, together with a brief example of the application of this method to the study of the impact of personalized medicine on French society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri-Corto Stoeklé
- Department of Ethics and Scientific Integrity, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Philippe Charlier
- Laboratoire Anthropologie, Archéologie, Biologie (LAAB), Université Paris-Saclay (UVSQ), 2, avenue de la Source-de-la-Bièvre, 78180 Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France; Musée du Quai Branly - Jacques-Chirac, 222, rue de l'Université, 75007 Paris, France
| | - Marie-France Mamzer-Bruneel
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université de Paris, Laboratoire ETRES, F-75006, Paris, France; Cancer Research for Personalized Medicine (CARPEM), Paris Descartes, APHP (HEGP, Cochin, Necker) INSERM, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Christian Hervé
- Department of Ethics and Scientific Integrity, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France; Medical School, University of Paris, Paris, France; International Academy of Medical Ethics and Public Health, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Vogt
- Laboratoire Neglected Human Genetics, Inserm, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matuchansky C. [Clinical intelligence and artificial intelligence: a question of nuance]. Med Sci (Paris) 2019; 35:797-803. [PMID: 31625903 DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2019158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Current artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has high performance, particularly in diagnostic and prognostic image analysis, but, in everyday clinical practice, evidence-based results of AI remain limited. In this forum, are analyzed the characteristics of clinical intelligence in medical practice, then the successes and promises of AI, as well as the limitations, reservations and criticisms brought to the introduction of AI in the front-line clinic. The importance of certain ethical and regulatory aspects is highlighted, including a "human guarantee" for AI, as suggested by the "Comité consultatif national d'éthique pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé" (National advisory committee on ethics for life and health sciences). Clinical intelligence could be this "human guarantee" of AI in medicine, and their complementarity could lead to a quality of decisions and, ultimately, of care, far higher than that provided, separately, by each of them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claude Matuchansky
- Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Diderot, 10 avenue de Verdun, 75010 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stoeklé HC, Turrini M, Charlier P, Deleuze JF, Hervé C, Vogt G. Genetic Data, Two-Sided Markets and Dynamic Consent: United States Versus France. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2019; 25:1597-1602. [PMID: 30864046 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00085-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Networks for the exchange and/or sharing of genetic data are developing in many countries. We focus here on the situations in the US and France. We highlight some recent and remarkable differences between these two countries concerning the mode of access to, and the storage and use of genetic data, particularly as concerns two-sided markets and dynamic consent or dynamic electronic informed consent (e-IC). This brief overview suggests that, even though the organization and function of these two-sided markets remain open to criticism, dynamic e-IC should be more widely used, especially in France, if only to determine its real effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri-Corto Stoeklé
- Laboratory of Neglected Human Genetics (NHG), CNRGH-CEA, Evry, France
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH), Direction de la recherche fondamentale, CEA, Institut de biologie François Jacob, Université Paris Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Mauro Turrini
- Université de Nantes - Maison des Sciences de l'Homme (MSH), Nantes, France
| | - Philipe Charlier
- Département de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement, Musée du Quai Branly - Jacques Chirac, 222 rue de l'Université, 75007, Paris, France
- UVSQ (Laboratoire DANTE - EA 4498), 2 avenue de la source de la Bièvre, 78180, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Jean-François Deleuze
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH), Direction de la recherche fondamentale, CEA, Institut de biologie François Jacob, Université Paris Saclay, Evry, France
- LaBex GenMed, Fondation Jean Dausset, Paris, France
- Centre d'études du polymorphisme humain (CEPH), Fondation Jean Dausset, Paris, France
| | - Christian Hervé
- International Academy of Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Vogt
- Laboratory of Neglected Human Genetics (NHG), CNRGH-CEA, Evry, France.
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH), Direction de la recherche fondamentale, CEA, Institut de biologie François Jacob, Université Paris Saclay, Evry, France.
- Laboratoire Neglected Human Genetics, INSERM, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stoeklé HC, Bollet M, Cobat A, Charlier P, Bloch OC, Flatot J, Draghi C, Tolyan V, Hervé C, Desvaux P, Uzan L, Grynberg M, Alcaïs A, Tolédano A, Vogt G. French-style genetics v. 2.0: The "e-CohortE" project. Clin Genet 2019; 96:330-340. [PMID: 31254389 PMCID: PMC6851966 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
In the digital age, a genetics cohort has become much more than a simple means of determining the cause of a disease. Two‐sided markets, of which 23andMe, Ancestry DNA and MyHeritage are the best known, have showed this perfectly over the last few years: a cohort has become a means of producing massive amounts of data for medical, scientific and commercial exploitation, and for genetic use in particular. French law does not currently allow these foreign private companies to develop on French national territory and also forbids the creation of similar entities in France. However, at least in theory, this same law does not preclude the creation of new types of cohorts in France inspired by the success of two‐sided markets but retaining features specific to the French healthcare management system. We propose an optimal solution for France, for genomic studies associated with multi‐subject questionnaires, still purely theoretical for the moment: the development, with no need for any change in the law, of France's own version of “Genetics v.2.0”: “e‐CohortE.”
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henri-Corto Stoeklé
- Neglected Human Genetics Laboratory, CEA, Evry, France.,Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH), Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, Université Paris Saclay, Evry, France.,Institut Sapiens, Paris, France
| | - Marc Bollet
- Institut Rafaël, Maison de l'après cancer, Levallois-Perret, France.,Institut de Radiothérapie et de Radiochirurgie, H Hartmann, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Aurélie Cobat
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Imagine Institute, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, INSERM UMR 1163, Necker Branch, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Charlier
- Département de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement, Musée du Quai Branly - Jacques Chirac, Paris, France.,UVSQ (Laboratoire DANTE - EA 4498), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Oudy Ch Bloch
- Institut Rafaël, Maison de l'après cancer, Levallois-Perret, France.,Attorney, Paris, France
| | | | - Clément Draghi
- Institut Rafaël, Maison de l'après cancer, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Valérie Tolyan
- Institut Rafaël, Maison de l'après cancer, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Christian Hervé
- International Academy of Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Desvaux
- Department of Urology, Cochin hospital, Paris, France.,Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Michaël Grynberg
- Service de Médecine de la Reproduction & Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - Alexandre Alcaïs
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Imagine Institute, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.,Laboratory of Human Genetics of Infectious Diseases, INSERM UMR 1163, Necker Branch, Paris, France.,French National Reference Center for Primary Immune Deficiencies (CEREDIH), Necker-Enfants Malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alain Tolédano
- Institut Rafaël, Maison de l'après cancer, Levallois-Perret, France.,Institut de Radiothérapie et de Radiochirurgie, H Hartmann, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Guillaume Vogt
- Neglected Human Genetics Laboratory, CEA, Evry, France.,Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine (CNRGH), Direction de la Recherche Fondamentale, CEA, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, Université Paris Saclay, Evry, France.,Institut Sapiens, Paris, France.,Neglected Human Genetics Laboratory, INSERM, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berrouiguet S, Le Moal V, Guillodo É, Le Floch A, Lenca P, Billot R, Walter M. Prévention du suicide et santé connectée. Med Sci (Paris) 2018; 34:730-734. [DOI: 10.1051/medsci/20183408021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
L’évaluation ponctuelle du risque suicidaire habituellement conduite aux urgences, après un geste suicidaire, ne rend pas compte de son évolution après la sortie des soins, alors même que le risque de récidive reste important plusieurs mois après. Dans ces conditions, les possibilités d’identification, et donc de prise en charge, des patients à risque suicidaire sont limitées. Le développement de la santé connectée (eHealth) donne désormais accès en temps réel à des informations sur l’état de santé d’un patient entre deux séjours en centre de soins. Cette extension de l’évaluation clinique à l’environnement du patient permet de développer des outils d’aide à la décision face à la gestion du risque suicidaire.
Collapse
|