Accuracy of acetabular component alignment with surgical guidance systems during hip arthroplasty

Accuracy of intraoperative approximation of pelvic tilt using preoperative standing radiographs

Background

Anterior approach surgeons who utilize intraoperative fluoroscopy often try to match a preoperative radiograph as a reference for intraoperative cup position. Every degree of inaccuracy in tilt leads to a roughly 0.7° change in anteversion. This study aimed to determine how closely pelvic tilt (PT) is approximated intraoperatively when compared to preoperative anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 193 primary THA's done by 2 surgeons at an academic tertiary referral center between September 2021-January 2023. There were 24 patients excluded for distorted anatomy, post-traumatic arthritis, insufficient x-rays, or a sacroiliac joint that could not be visualized on film. Data collected included age and BMI. PT was calculated using the formula, Tilt = -(ln((B/A) x (1/0.483)))/0.051. Value A is the distance from the base of the SI joint to the superior margin of the obturator foramen; value B is the height of the obturator foramen.

Results

Mean preoperative PT was 0.2° versus intraoperative PT was 3.4° (p < 0.001). Mean absolute difference was 6.5°. 48% of patients (n = 81) had an absolute difference less than 5°, 31% (n = 52) between 5° and 10°, 14% (n = 24) between 10° and 15°, and 7% (n = 12) greater than 15°. There was no correlation between BMI or age and PT discrepancy.

Conclusion

Of the patients, 21% had a discrepancy of 10° or greater between their preoperative radiographs and intraoperative fluoroscopic images. Surgeons should be aware of potential errors in cup positioning and be particularly diligent in high-risk cases.

Evaluating pelvic tilt using the pelvic antero-posterior radiographs: A novel method

Pelvic tilt (PT) is an important parameter for orthopedic surgeries involving hip and spine, typically determined from sagittal pelvic radiographs. However, various challenges can compromise the feasibility of measurement from sagittal imaging, including obscured landmarks, anatomical variations, hardware interference, and limited medical resources. Addressing these challenges and with the aim of reducing radiation exposure to patients, our study developed a novel method to estimate PT from antero-posterior (AP) radiographs, using vertical distances from the pelvic outlet and obturator foramen. We correlated these measurements with PT, defined both anatomically (anterior pelvic plane, PTa) and mechanically (centers of femoral heads and sacral plate, PTm). The study explored creating linear, exponential, and multivariate regression models based on twelve 3D CT-derived pelvic models (six men, six women), simulating AP radiograph projections with controlled PTs. We then validated these models against 105 pairs of patient stereoradiographs. Statistical analysis revealed that combined exponential-linear models yielded the most accurate results, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.75 for PTa and 0.77 for PTm, and mean absolute errors of 3.7° ± 2.6° for PTa and 4.5° ± 3.4° for PTm, showing excellent measurement reliability (all ICCs > 0.9) without significant gender discrepancies. In conclusion, this study presents a validated, simple, and accessible method for estimating PT using AP radiograph parameters, supported by the Supporting Information S1: Excel Tool, showing great potential for clinical application in hip and spine procedures.

Combining inertial navigation with transacetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach results in excellent accuracy compared to standard manual technique - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Correct acetabular component placement plays a critical role in reducing early revisions after dislocations in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) guides anteversion, inclination can only be accurately guided by navigation. In order to overcome the initial disadvantages with navigation, an imageless, easy-to-use inertial navigation system has been recently introduced. This study aims to analyze the accuracy of inclination with this navigation system compared to the standard manual technique.

METHODS

Two cohorts, manual technique (MT) and navigation (NAV) cohorts, consisted of 83 and 95 patients, respectively, after exclusion criteria were applied. Inclination target was 38° and anteversion was guided by TAL. Demographic data were collected, and anteroposterior (AP) pelvic and cross-table lateral radiographs were obtained 6 weeks post-operatively. Inclination and anteversion were determined on the AP pelvic and cross-table lateral radiograph, respectively.

RESULTS

A mean inclination of 41.8° (±6.8°) and 38.9° (±4.4°) was found in the MT and NAV cohorts, respectively. There was no statistical difference in gender, age, and BMI. If the inclination was set within 10° of the target (i.e., 38°), 88% of the MT cohort and 97% of the NAV cohort were within the target zone. Accuracy decreased to 53% and 83%, respectively, if the target zone range was narrowed down to ± 5°.

CONCLUSION

Combining inertial imageless navigation for inclination and TAL as a landmark for anteversion is significantly more accurate compared to the manual technique, without having the limitations and disadvantages of current standard navigational techniques.

Measurement accuracy of the acetabular cup position using an inertial portable hip navigation system with patients in the lateral decubitus position

Accurate cup placement is critical to ensure satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative guidance tools that achieve accurate cup placement in the supine position; however, accuracy in the lateral decubitus position is under debate. A new inertial portable navigation system has recently become available. The present study investigated the accuracy of measurements of the cup position in 54 patients in the lateral decubitus position using this system and compared it with that by a goniometer. After cup placement, cup abduction and anteversion were measured using the system and by the goniometer, and were then compared with postoperatively measured angles. Absolute measurement errors with the system were 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction and 3.9° ± 2.9° for anteversion. The system achieved 98 and 96% measurement accuracies within 10° for cup abduction and anteversion, respectively. The system was more accurate than the goniometer for cup anteversion (p < 0.001), but not for abduction (p = 0.537). The system uses a new registration method of the pelvic reference plane and corrects intraoperative pelvic motion errors, which may affect measurement accuracy. In the present study, reliable and reproducible intraoperative measurements of the cup position were obtained using the inertial portable navigation system.