Effects of losartan or enalapril on hemoglobin, circulating erythropoietin, and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with and without posttransplant erythrocytosis

High-Throughput Screening for Prescribing Cascades Among Real-World Angiotensin-II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) Initiators

Objective

Angiotensin-II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed; however, their adverse events may prompt new drug prescription(s), known as prescribing cascades. We aimed to identify potential ARB-induced prescribing cascades using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis.

Methods

Using claims data from a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries (2011-2020), we identified new ARB users aged ≥66 years with continuous enrollment ≥360 days before and ≥180 days after ARB initiation. We screened for initiation of 446 other (non-antihypertensive) 'marker' drug classes within ±90 days of ARB initiation, generating sequence ratios (SRs) reflecting proportions of ARB users starting the marker class after versus before ARB initiation. Adjusted SRs (aSRs) accounted for prescribing trends over time, and for significant aSRs, we calculated the naturalistic number needed to harm (NNTH); significant signals were reviewed by clinical experts for plausibility.

Results

We identified 320,663 ARB initiators (mean ± SD age 76.0 ± 7.2 years; 62.5% female; 91.5% with hypertension). Of the 446 marker classes evaluated, 17 signals were significant, and three (18%) were classified as potential prescribing cascades after clinical review. The strongest signals ranked by the lowest NNTH included benzodiazepine derivatives (NNTH 2130, 95% CI 1437-4525), adrenergics in combination with anticholinergics, including triple combinations with corticosteroids (NNTH 2656, 95% CI 1585-10074), and other antianemic preparations (NNTH 9416, 95% CI 6606-23784). The strongest signals ranked by highest aSR included other antianemic preparations (aSR 1.7, 95% CI 1.19-2.41), benzodiazepine derivatives (aSR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.3), and adrenergics in combination with anticholinergics, including triple combinations with corticosteroids (aSR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.22).

Conclusion

The identified prescribing cascade signals reflected known and possibly under-recognized ARB adverse events in this Medicare cohort. These hypothesis-generating findings require further investigation to determine the extent and impact of these prescribing cascades on patient outcomes.

High-Throughput Screening for Prescribing Cascades Among Real-World Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Initiators

PURPOSE

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are commonly prescribed, but their adverse effects may prompt new drug prescription(s), known as prescribing cascades (PCs). We aimed to identify potential ACEI-induced PCs using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis.

METHODS

Using claims data from a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries (2011-2020), we identified new ACEI users aged ≥ 66 years with continuous enrollment ≥ 360 days before and ≥ 180 days after ACEI initiation. We screened for initiation of 446 other (non-antihypertensive) "marker" drug classes within ±90 days of ACEI initiation, generating sequence ratios (SRs) reflecting proportions of ACEI users starting the marker class after versus before ACEI initiation. Adjusted SRs (aSRs) accounted for prescribing trends over time. For significant aSRs, we calculated the naturalistic number needed to harm (NNTH), and significant signals underwent clinical review for plausibility.

RESULTS

We identified 308 579 ACEI initiators (mean age 76.1 ± 7.5 years; 59.6% female; 88.6% with hypertension). Of 446 marker classes evaluated, 81 signals were significant, and 42 (52%) classified as potential PCs after clinical review. The strongest signals ranked by lowest NNTH included corticosteroids (NNTH 313; 95% CI, 262-392) and serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) antagonists (NNTH 496; 95% CI, 392-689); the strongest signals ranked by highest aSR included sympathomimetics (aSR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.10-3.53) and other antianemic preparations (aSR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.31-2.67).

CONCLUSION

Identified prescribing cascade signals were indicative of known and possibly underrecognized ACEI adverse events in this Medicare cohort. The findings are hypothesis-generating and require further investigation to determine the extent and impact of the identified PCs on health outcomes.

Is Erythrocytosis More Common After Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney Transplantation? A Single-Center Experience

Post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) is reported in 8% to 22% of kidney transplant recipients. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence of PTE in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT). This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of PTE in a cohort of SPKT and same-donor single kidney transplant patients and find predictive factors for erythrocytosis development. A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed with 65 SPKT recipients and 65 same-donor single kidney transplant patients. Post-transplant erythrocytosis was defined as a hematocrit persistently >51% without a known cause of erythrocytosis. The PTE prevalence was 23.1% and was more frequent in SPKT patients than in single donor patients (38.5% vs 7.7%; P < .001). The mean time for PTE development was 11.2 ± 13.3 months. In the multivariate model, SPKT was the only predictor for PTE development. De novo hypertension was more frequent in the PTE group (P = .002), but there was no difference in stroke and pancreatic or kidney thrombosis occurrence. Post-transplant erythrocytosis is more common after SPKT than after single kidney transplantation. De novo hypertension was more frequent in the erythrocytosis group, but allograft thrombosis rates.

Risk factors and outcomes of post-transplant erythrocytosis among adult kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Post-transplant erythrocytosis (PTE) can occur in up to 10-16% after kidney transplant (KT). However, the post-transplant outcomes of recipients with PTE in the literature were conflicting. We performed systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate risk factors of PTE as well as outcomes of recipients who developed PTE compared with controls. A literature search was conducted evaluating all literature from existence through February 2, 2021, using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model. (PROSPERO: CRD42021230377). Thirty-nine studies from July 1982 to January 2021 were included (7,099 KT recipients). The following factors were associated with PTE development: male gender (pooled RR = 1.62 [1.38, 1.91], I²  = 39%), deceased-donor KT (pooled RR = 1.18 [1.03, 1.35], I²  = 32%), history of smoking (pooled RR = 1.36 [1.11, 1.67], I²  = 13%), underlying polycystic kidney disease (PKD) (pooled RR=1.56 [1.21, 2.01], I² =44%), and pretransplant dialysis (pooled RR=1.6 [1.02, 2.51], I² =46%). However, PTE was not associated with outcomes of interest, including overall mortality, death-censored graft failure, and thromboembolism. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that male gender, deceased-donor KT, history of smoking, underlying PKD, and pretransplant dialysis were significantly associated with developing PTE. However, with proper management, PTE has no impact on prognosis of KT patients.

Anaemia in heart failure patients: the prevalence of haematinic deficiencies and the role of ACE inhibitors and aspirin doses as risk factors

Background:

Patients with heart failure often have comorbidities that alter the progression of heart failure and impact on prognosis. One such comorbidity is anaemia, and clinicians have started to appreciate the full gravity of its impact on heart failure patients. Yet, the extent of the problem is not fully understood, particularly the role of heart failure therapy itself as a risk factor for developing anaemia.

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of anaemia in a cohort of heart failure patients. The impact of using different ACEIs and different doses of aspirin was also explored, together with the prevalence of haematinic deficiencies.

Methods:

Medication lists and pathology results were examined to establish the prevalence of ACEIs use, and the use of aspirin at its most common doses of 100mg and 150mg, together with haematinic deficiencies. Multinomial logistic regression and the Student’s t-test were utilised for the analysis of data. Statistical significance was pre-set at p<0.05.

Results:

Ninety-six patients were eligible for analysis, with 26% having anaemia. The use of ACEIs had a RR of 17.4 for the presence of anaemia. Perindopril was associated with a RR of 20.8, while the use of ramipril was not significantly associated with such a high RR. Haematinic anaemia occurred only at a rate of 3.3%, but borderline deficiencies were found in more than a third of all patients. An aspirin dose of 150mg was associated with a higher risk for anaemia, compared to a dose of 100mg.

Conclusions:

ACEIs are associated with the presence of anaemia, with perindopril posing more risk than ramipril when used in heart failure patients. The dose of aspirin may also be a factor in the development of anaemia, with lower doses being safer. Despite the lack of high prevalence of haematinic anaemia among this cohort of patients, borderline haematinic deficiencies were common.

Anemia and markers of erythropoiesis in pediatric kidney transplant recipients compared to children with chronic renal failure

PTA and anemia of CKD share a similar pathogenesis. However, PTA may be disproportionate to the reduction in the GFR. Data relating to the mechanism of PTA are scarce. We evaluated the erythropoiesis parameters in pediatric kidney recipients compared to children with CKD. A total of 100 patients (54 post-kidney TX, 46 with CKD) were enrolled in the single-center cohort study. GFR was found to be significantly lower in the CKD group (49.7±22.4 vs 72.9±28.5 mL/min/1.73 m², P<.001); anemia was significantly more common in the TX patients (52% vs 41.3%, P<.001). Iron transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels were lower in the CKD patients. In both groups, hemoglobin Z scores significantly correlated with GFR (R=.31, P=.07). This correlation was more prominent in the CKD group (R=.43, P=.008) compared to the TX group (R=.31, P=.04). Anemia was significantly more common in the TX patients than in the CKD patients despite a better GFR. The higher prevalence of anemia in the TX group could not be explained by an iron deficiency or reduced EPO production. We speculate that immunosuppressive therapy together with resistance to EPO may play a role in the pathogenesis of post-transplantation anemia.

Hematologic manifestations of kidney disease

Physiologically, there is an intimate link between the kidney and the blood. Many of the kidney diseases are the result of alteration in the blood such as dysproteinemia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), hemolysis, etc. On the other hand, the kidney is the organ responsible for the regulation of hematopoiesis. Renal dysfunction can lead to both anemia and polycythemia. In addition, recent understanding of the MAHA process reveals that the renal microvasculature plays a key role in the pathogenesis. Finally, the failure of the kidney to clear toxins from the body can result in alteration involving hemostasis, as well as leukocyte function and survival.

Specific management of anemia and hypertension in renal transplant recipients: influence of renin-angiotensin system blockade

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition has proven to be helpful in reducing cardiovascular and kidney disease progression in the general population; whether kidney transplant patients would derive similar benefits is unknown. RAS inhibition also reduces posttransplantation erythrocytosis in kidney transplant recipients, but its effect on hemoglobin (Hb) levels in patients without posttransplantation erythrocytosis is unclear.

METHODS

The Specific Management of Anemia and Hypertension in Renal Transplant (SMAhRT) recipients study was designed to examine the cardiovascular benefits of RAS blockade with telmisartan 80 mg versus placebo, and Hb management with darbepoetin α in a randomized, double-blind, single-center controlled trial in 2,000 patients over 3 years. The primary efficacy variable was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke.

RESULTS

The SMAhRT study was stopped prematurely due to a lower than expected event rate. At that point, 136 patients were enrolled and were followed for a mean duration of 15 months. The use of RAS blockade was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events such as worsening anemia or hyperkalemia. Likewise, the correction of Hb with darbepoetin was not associated with any increase in thrombotic events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides insight into the safety of RAS inhibition and Hb correction with an erythrocyte-stimulating agent in kidney transplant recipients.

Anaemia, diabetes and chronic kidney disease: where are we now?

Anaemia is a common finding in people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease and failure of the kidney to produce erythro-poietin in response to a falling haemoglobin concentration is a key component, correlating with the degree of albuminuria, renal dysfunction and iron deficiency. Anaemia in diabetes is associated with a number of adverse outcomes, including increased risk of all cause and cardiovascular mortality. Whether or not anaemia is a marker or mediator of adverse outcome still remains to be completely resolved. Treatment of anaemia in diabetes has quality of life benefits and reduces transfusion requirements. Correction of anaemia to normal haemoglobin concentrations is associated with significant adverse cardiovascular outcomes and is not recommended, escalating doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents should be avoided. The treatment of anaemia in people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease should begin with optimisation of iron stores. An aspirational haemoglobin concentration range of 10-12 g/dl with anaemia management, balances proven benefits of anaemia treatment with potential cardiovascular risk.

Angiotensin II blockade: a strategy to slow ageing by protecting mitochondria?

Protein and lipid oxidation-mainly by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS)-was proposed as a crucial determinant of health and lifespan. Angiotensin II (Ang II) enhances ROS production by activating NAD(P)H oxidase and uncoupling endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Ang II also stimulates mtROS production, which depresses mitochondrial energy metabolism. In rodents, renin-angiotensin system blockade (RAS blockade) increases survival and prevents age-associated changes. RAS blockade reduces mtROS and enhances mitochondrial content and function. This suggests that Ang II contributes to the ageing process by prompting mitochondrial dysfunction. Since Ang II is a pleiotropic peptide, the age-protecting effects of RAS blockade are expected to involve a variety of other mechanisms. Caloric restriction (CR)-an age-retarding intervention in humans and animals-and RAS blockade display a number of converging effects, i.e. they delay the manifestations of hypertension, diabetes, nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and cancer; increase body temperature; reduce body weight, plasma glucose, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-1; ameliorate insulin sensitivity; lower protein, lipid, and DNA oxidation, and mitochondrial H(2)O(2) production; and increase uncoupling protein-2 and sirtuin expression. A number of these overlapping effects involve changes in mitochondrial function. In CR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) seem to contribute to age-retardation partly by regulating mitochondrial function. RAS inhibition up-regulates PPARs; therefore, it is feasible that PPAR modulation is pivotal for mitochondrial protection by RAS blockade during rodent ageing. Other potential mechanisms that may underlie RAS blockade's mitochondrial benefits are TGF-β down-regulation and up-regulation of Klotho and sirtuins. In conclusion, the available data suggest that RAS blockade deserves further research efforts to establish its role as a potential tool to mitigate the growing problem of age-associated chronic disease.

High cumulative incidence of cancer in patients with cardio-renal-anaemia syndrome

AIMS

The combination of chronic kidney disease (CKD), chronic heart failure (HF), and anaemia, the so-called cardio-renal-anaemia syndrome (CRA) is associated with dysregulation of erythropoietin levels and inflammation. Both have been associated with the development of cancer. This study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of cancer in patients with CRA, as compared with anaemic CKD and control patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients aged <80 years who attended the nephrology or cardiology outpatient clinics between March 2006 and November 2007 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective case-control study if haemoglobin <8.1 mmol/L (13 g/dL) and serum creatinine >80 mmol/L (0.90 mg/dL). Medical records dating back to 1996 were reviewed. The relationship between cancer and CRA, chronic HF, CKD, and anaemia was analysed using logistic regression analysis. Data from 1087 patients were reviewed. We identified 348 patients with both CKD and anaemia, of whom 132(38.3%) had CRA. The control group included 264 patients attending the hypertension outpatient clinic. Patients with CRA had a 19% cumulative incidence of cancer compared with 11% for patients with anaemia, CKD and no chronic HF, and 11% in the control group. The odds ratio (OR) for cancer was 1.8(95% CI 1.0-3.2) for the CRA group compared with the control group. Chronic HF was an independent risk factor for cancer after correction for age and gender (adjusted OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The cumulative incidence of cancer among patients with CRA is high compared with controls and to anaemic CKD patients without chronic HF. Chronic HF was an independent risk factor for cancer. These results stress the importance of clarifying the mechanisms involved in the development of cancer in CRA.

Efficacy and safety of losartan in treatment of hyperuricemia and posttransplantation erythrocytosis: results of a prospective, open, randomized, case-control study

BACKGROUND

Hyperuricemia and posttransplantation erythrocytosis (PTE) are frequent complications after kidney transplantation and are important risk factors for cardiovascular events. Losartan decreases serum uric acid and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations and may be a useful agent for treatment of hyperuricemia and PTE.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of losartan on serum creatinine (SCr), serum uric acid, and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in patients after kidney transplantation and to evaluate the safety profile of losartan in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six Han Chinese patients (43 men and 23 women; mean [SD] age, 40.45 [11.50] years) were enrolled in the study. All patients had undergone a first cadaveric donor kidney transplantation at least 3 months previously and had stable graft function with SCr concentration less than 176.8 micromol/L and Hb concentration greater than 110 g/L. The patients were divided into 2 groups (losartan group, n = 34; and control group, n = 32) according to the odevity of patient identification number. Patients in the losartan group received losartan, 50 mg/d; patients in the control group did not receive losartan. Each patient was followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

Nine patients in the losartan group and 5 patients in the control group dropped out because of acute renal insufficiency, anemia, acute rejection, or poor compliance. The serum uric acid concentration in the losartan group continuously decreased at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 (P = .12, P = .01, P = .04, and P = .005 compared with baseline, and P = .02, P = .003, P = .02, and P = .006 compared with control), especially in the patients with hyperuricemia (P = .02, P < .001, P = .003, and P < .001 compared with baseline, and P = .02, P = .002, P = .02, and P = .002 compared with control). The Hb level in the losartan group decreased significantly at months 1, 2, 3, and 6 (P = .003, P < .001, P = .004, and P = 0.02 compared with baseline, and P = .001, P < .001, P = .001, and P = .005 compared with control), especially in patients with PTE. In patients without PTE, there was no significant decline in Hb concentration in the losartan group compared with baseline. There was no significant decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate in the losartan group.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan may be an effective agent for treatment of hyperuricemia and PTE in Han Chinese patients after kidney transplantation. However, in some patients, losartan may not be safe.

Hematologic abnormalities following renal transplantation

Recipients of renal allografts are surviving longer and, consequently, may experience a variety of complications related not only to the transplanted kidney, but also to the hematopoietic system. Common hematologic complications in the renal transplant patient include abnormalities of one cell line, such as post-transplantation erythrocytosis or anemia, that are often treatable with simple measures. Conversely, pathologies involving the leukocyte and platelet population often exist in the context of pancytopenia, which may be a manifestation of systemic infection (e.g., cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus 8) or malignancy (post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders). Uncommon, but life-threatening, processes complicating renal transplantation include hepatosplenic gammadelta T-cell lymphoma and viral-induced hemophagocytic syndrome, both of which are associated with severe pancytopenia and, often, death. Since this patient population is often managed in a multidisciplinary fashion by nephrologists, infection specialists, transplant surgeons, hematologists, and internal medicine physicians, a succinct review of this topic is warranted.

Erythropoietin levels in heart failure after an acute myocardial infarction: determinants, prognostic value, and the effects of captopril versus losartan

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic heart failure, erythropoietin (Epo) levels are increased and related to a poor prognosis. Furthermore, Epo levels in these patients show a weak correlation with hemoglobin levels.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a subgroup of the OPTIMAAL (Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) trial in which serum Epo levels were measured at baseline, at 1 month, and at 1 and 2 years in 224 patients with an acute myocardial infarction complicated by signs or symptoms of heart failure. We investigated the determinants and the prognostic role of elevated Epo levels in these patients, and we studied the change in Epo levels by either captopril or losartan.

RESULTS

The correlation between Epo and hemoglobin at baseline (r = 0.348, P < .001) and after 1 month (r = 0.272, P < .001) disappeared after 1 year of follow up (r = 0.129, P = .102). At 1 year, C-reactive protein was the only factor associated with Epo levels. Higher Epo levels at baseline were independently related to a higher mortality during 2 years of follow-up (hazard ratio 2.84, P = .014). In the captopril group, logEpo levels decreased from 1.19 (+/-0.26) to 0.95 (+/-0.20) mIU/mL, and in the losartan group from 1.19 (+/-0.27) to 1.01 (+/-0.17) mIU/mL (P = .036 between groups).

CONCLUSION

In this substudy of the OPTIMAAL trial, the correlation between Epo and hemoglobin disappeared in early post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure patients. Furthermore, elevated Epo levels at baseline predicted increased mortality.

Renin-angiotensin system polymorphisms and hemoglobin level in renal allografts: a comparative study between losartan and enalapril

INTRODUCTION

In this study, hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations secondary to enalapril (E) or losartan (L) therapy were evaluated with respect to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) polymorphisms in renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After determination of RAS polymorphisms [angiotensin-converting enzyme (DD, non-DD), angiotensinogen (TT, non-TT), and angiotensin receptor type 1 (CC, non-CC)] by polymerase chain reaction, 70 renal transplant recipients were recruited to four groups randomly: first and second groups were treated with E (10 mg/d, 15 patients) and L (50 mg/d, 20 patients) alone, respectively. The third group received E+L (10 mg/d + 50 mg/d, 13 patients) and the fourth group (22 patients) received no medication. The treatment protocol was followed for 16 weeks. Complete blood counts were checked before treatment and every 2 months. P<.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Treatment for 4 months decreased the Hb level in the E+L (14.15 +/- 0.94 to 12.06 +/- 0.66 g/dL, P=.000), E (14.00 +/- 0.86 to 13.11 +/- 0.82 g/dL, P=.02), and L (14.12 +/- 0.90 to 12.10 +/- 2.35 g/dL, P=.01) groups, but not in the control group (13.55 +/- 0.70 to 13.36 +/- 0.69 g/dL, P>.05). None of these regimens showed greater Hb reduction than the others (P>.05). None of the RAS polymorphisms predicted the intensity of the reduced Hb according to the type of treatment (P>.05). Any other sets of RAS polymorphisms (alone or together) did not impact on Hb levels pre- or post-intervention (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that low dosages of E and/or L decrease Hb levels regardless of the RAS polymorphisms.

Association of anemia with outcomes in men with moderate and severe chronic kidney disease

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the outcomes associated with lower hemoglobin (Hgb) levels in patients with CKD not yet on dialysis are not well characterized. Analyses exploring outcomes associated with a single baseline Hgb value also do not account for the longitudinal variation of this measure. After collecting all Hgb measurements (N=17 194, median (range): 12 (1-168)) over a median follow-up period of 2.1 years in a historical prospective cohort of 853 male US veterans with CKD Stages 3-5 not yet on dialysis, we examined the association of time-averaged Hgb levels with predialysis all-cause mortality, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and a composite end point of both. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox models adjusted for age, race, body mass index, smoking status, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, categories of estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum concentrations of albumin and cholesterol, and proteinuria were examined. Lower time-averaged Hgb was associated with significantly higher hazard of the composite end point (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in the adjusted model for time-averaged Hgb of <110, 111-120 and 121-130, compared to >130 g/l: 2.57 (1.85-3.58), 1.97 (1.45-2.66), 1.19 (0.86-1.63), P(trend)<0.001). Lower time-averaged Hgb was associated with both significantly higher pre-dialysis mortality and higher risk of ESRD, when analyzed separately. Anemia (especially time-averaged Hgb <120 g/l) is associated with both higher mortality and increased risk of ESRD in male patients with CKD not yet on dialysis.

A randomized trial comparing losartan with amlodipine as initial therapy for hypertension in the early post-transplant period

BACKGROUND

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the early post-transplant period remains controversial. Angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARB) have many benefits to the patient with chronic kidney disease and these benefits may also apply to the renal transplant recipient (RTR). Additionally, there are theoretical benefits of ARB use in RTR. This study was designed to investigate the safety of early ARB use after renal transplantation.

METHODS

RTR with serum creatinine levels <3.0 mg/dl were randomized to receive either ARB (n = 29) or calcium-channel blocker (CCB; n = 27) as initial therapy for post-transplant hypertension. Differences in potassium, creatinine and haemoglobin concentrations were compared at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after transplantation.

RESULTS

Withdrawal from the assigned treatment was high: 12 in the ARB group (due to hyperkalaemia in six) and 17 in the CCB group (due to intractable oedema in seven and post-transplant erythrocytosis requiring an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in seven). There were no differences in blood pressure, haemoglobin or creatinine concentration at any time-points. Mean potassium concentrations were only slightly higher in the ARB vs CCB group (range: 4.2-4.3 vs 3.7-3.8 mEq/l, respectively, but clinically significant) and the number of patients with potassium values >6.0 mEq/l was higher in ARB (n = 7) vs CCB (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that hyperkalaemia is the major complication that occurs with the use of ARB in the immediate post-transplant period. ARB use does not affect renal function or complicate the post-transplant management of RTR. Other than reducing the incidence of post-transplant erythrocytosis, ARB use does not cause an excess incidence of anaemia. Strategies to reduce the risk of hyperkalaemia may allow increased use of ARB immediately after kidney transplantation.

Anemia Due to Losartan in Hypertensive Renal Transplant Recipients Without Posttransplant Erythrocytosis

Losartan is a safe, effective long-term treatment for hypertension or posttransplant erythrocytosis (PTE) in renal transplant recipients. There were only a few studies in patients without PTE and their results were different. Starting from week 6 and continuing to the week 12 we observed a decrease in hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) levels in patients without PTE. Anemia developed in 42.8% of the patients, and Hb levels increased after the withdrawal of losartan treatment. There was a significant decrease in Hct levels beginning from week 3 when compared with the control group. Our study suggests that losartan therapy can decrease Hb beyond its antihypertensive efficacy. Based on the capacity of losartan to decrease Hb and Hct, this drug should be carefully used in patients with preexistent anemia or low Hb levels.

Valsartan-Induced Hematocrit Changes in Renal Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor type 1 blockers (ARB) are frequently prescribed for renal transplant patients. The main reasons for their use are that their antihypertensive and antifibrogenic effects may prevent chronic renal allograft dysfunction, potentially improving transplant survival. Furthermore, ACE and ARB have been used to reduce the hematocrit in patients with posttransplant erythrocytosis. We evaluated the effects of the ARB valsartan on the evolution of hematocrit in stable renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (Aza), and prednisone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six stable renal transplant patients treated with valsartan 80 mg/d orally were followed for 6 months. Evaluations were performed prior to as well as at 3 and 6 months following the initiation of valsartan.

RESULTS

The hematocrit levels decreased significantly at 3 months (46.1 +/- 7.3 vs 39.9 +/- 5.8 ; P < .0001) in patients with a normal hematocrit, namely a level over 38%, with no further reduction at 6 months. In recipients with an hematocrit less than 38%, there was no significant reduction, either at 3 or 6 months follow-up. Valsartan was well tolerated without significant side effects.

CONCLUSION

We postulate that inhibition of the proerythropoietic effects of angiotensin II and/or the reduction in hypoxia within the renal tubulointerstitium as well as the vasodilator effects on the efferent arterioles, represent possible mechanisms for the reduction and stabilization of the hematocrit in stable renal transplant patients.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor as a risk factor for the development of anemia, and the impact of incident anemia on mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) on hematocrit values in those with heart failure, and the relationship between incident anemia and mortality.

BACKGROUND

Prevalent anemia is an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in those with heart failure. Studies in patients with polycythemia have demonstrated that ACEIs are effective in lowering hematocrit values.

METHODS

We used the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) database to compare the odds of developing new anemia at one year in patients who were not anemic at entry and who were randomized to enalapril or placebo. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to determine the impact of incident and prevalent anemia on subsequent mortality.

RESULTS

Enalapril increased the odds of incident anemia (hematocrit < or =39% in men or < or =36% in women) at one year by 48% (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20 to 1.82) in unadjusted and 56% (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.93) in adjusted models. With multivariate analysis, prevalent anemia at randomization was associated with a 44% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.66) increase in all-cause mortality, whereas incident anemia after randomization was associated with a 108% increase (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.38). After adjusting for incident and prevalent anemia, use of enalapril was associated with a survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril was associated with increased odds of developing anemia at one year. Those with periods of time with incident anemia had the poorest survival, followed by those with prevalent anemia, then those without anemia. Enalapril was protective of overall mortality after adjusting for incident anemia and in those with prevalent anemia.

The impact of serum uric acid on cardiovascular outcomes in the LIFE study

BACKGROUND

The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study demonstrated the superiority of a losartan-based regimen over atenolol-based regimen for reduction of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. It has been suggested that the LIFE study results may be related to the effects of losartan on serum uric acid (SUA). SUA has been proposed as an independent risk factor for CV morbidity and death.

METHODS

Cox regression analysis was used to assess relationship of SUA and treatment regimens with the LIFE primary composite outcome (CV death, fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal stroke).

RESULTS

Baseline SUA was significantly associated with increased CV events [hazard ratio (HR) 1.024 (95% CI 1.017-1.032) per 10 micromol/L, P < 0.0001] in the entire study population. The association was significant in women [HR = 1.025 (1.013-1.037), P < 0.0001], but not in men [HR = 1.009 (0.998-1.019), P= 0.108]. After adjustment for Framingham risk score (FRS), SUA was no longer significant in the entire study population [HR = 1.006 (0.998-1.014), P= 0.122] or in men [HR = 1.006 (0.995-1.017), P= 0.291], but was significant in women [HR = 1.013 (1-1.025), P= 0.0457]. The baseline-to-end-of-study increase in SUA (standard deviation, SD) was greater (P < 0.0001) in atenolol-treated subjects (44.4 +/- 72.5 micromol/L) than in losartan-treated subjects (17.0 +/- 69.8 micromol/L). SUA as a time-varying covariate was strongly associated with events (P < 0.0001) in the entire population. The contribution of SUA to the treatment effect of losartan on the primary composite end point was 29% (14%-107%), P= 0.004. The association between time-varying SUA and increased CV risk tended to be stronger in women (P < 0.0001) than in men (P= 0.0658), although the gender-outcome interaction was not significant (P= 0.079).

CONCLUSION

The increase in SUA over 4.8 years in the LIFE study was attenuated by losartan compared with atenolol treatment, appearing to explain 29% of the treatment effect on the primary composite end point. The association between SUA and events was stronger in women than in men with or without adjustment of FRS.

Blood pressure management in the kidney transplant recipient

Hypertension is extremely common after kidney transplantation. It has been observed in up to 80% to 90% of patients. The etiologies are multifactorial but, in large part, rest with the native kidneys, concomitant immunosuppressant drugs, and behavioral factors that promote the development of higher levels of blood pressure, including obesity, salt intake, smoking, and alcohol consumption. There is a direct relationship between kidney allograft failure and level of systolic blood pressure during follow-up. Patients with a systolic blood pressure greater than 180 mmHg have 2-fold greater risk of loss of graft function compared with patients with systolics of less than 140 mmHg. A similar pattern exists for diastolic blood pressure. Some investigators have also demonstrated that higher levels of blood pressure also correlate with an increased risk of acute graft rejection, particularly in African Americans. What is not known is whether more effective control of arterial pressure in the transplant patient will reduce the likelihood of graft loss and improve survival. No prospective outcome trials have ever been performed. However, it is likely, given the marked success of better control of blood pressure in nontransplant patients in reducing cardiovascular death and the rate of progression of kidney disease, that similar benefits will be appreciated in the transplant patient. Given the greater cardiovascular burden in the kidney transplant recipient because of the presence, in many cases, of diabetes and hypertension, perhaps even more risk reduction may be realized with incremental reductions in blood pressure. Preferred treatment strategies for lowering blood pressure depends on the mechanism of action and medical comorbidity. Drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system should be preferentially considered because they may have similar advantages in delaying progressive loss of allograft function, much in the same way they have proven benefits in protecting native kidney function. Treating blood pressure in the kidney transplant recipient is a complicated process because patients are already on multiple medications and many will need 3 to 5 antihypertensive drugs to achieve optimal control of blood pressure, which should preferably be below 130/80 mmHg.

Angiotensin II receptor type 1 expression in erythroid progenitors: implications for the pathogenesis of postrenal transplant erythrocytosis

Under normal physiological conditions red blood cell production is controlled primarily by erythropoietin, although multiple additional stimulatory factors are likely to be involved. One of these factors, angiotensin II, can modulate erythropoiesis directly via its type 1 receptor, as well as indirectly through multiple secondary mediators. We propose that angiotensin II exerts its stimulatory effect during the early stages of erythropoiesis, and that this effect serves as an important compensatory mechanism if erythropoietin production is chronically inadequate. We speculate that if this compensatory stimulation continues to be abnormally high after restoration of erythropoietin production following renal transplantation, erythrocytosis ensues.

Angiotensin-Converting enzyme gene polymorphism significantly affects renal posttransplantation erythrocytosis

Posttransplantation erythrocytosis (PE) is a frequent problem in renal transplant patients. The pathogenesis and mechanisms of both the problem and therapy strategy are unknown. Since ACE and angiotensin 2 receptor inhibitors have been used to successfully manage PE, we speculated a relation between gene polymorphisms and this complication. Ninety-six ( 30 women, 66 men, age 34.4 +/- 11.0 years) renal transplant patients evaluated retrospectively, for gene polymorphisms of ACE, angiotensinogen, angiotensin 1 and 2 receptors (ATR1 and ATR2), as well as endothelial nitric oxide synthase (ecNOS). They were divided into two groups; patients with versus without PE, which was defined as >15 g/dL hemoglobin levels during the first year after renal transplantation. PE was found to be significantly more prevalent among D/D than I/I gene polymorphism of ACE genes (P <.04). The distribution of D/D, I/D, and I/I polymorphisms were 39.1%, 45.9%, and 7.6%, respectively. There was no difference between D/D and I/D polymorphisms. Comparing the I/D and I/I polymorphisms showed PE to be statistically more prevalent in the I/D polymorphism (P <.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed that D/D and I/D polymorphisms were significant risk factors for PE (P <.05, RR = 7.714 and P <.03, RR = 10.199, respectively). While previous studies revealed a relation between angiotensin II and PE, our study discovered the contribution of ACE gene polymorphism.

Do alterations of endogenous angiotensin II levels regulate erythropoietin production in humans?

AIMS

Recent evidence suggests a potential role of angiotensin II in the physiological regulation of erythropoietin (Epo) production. While the administration of exogenous angiotensin II (AII) has been used so far to study its effects, the role of endogenous AII has remained unclear.

METHODS

To alter endogenous AII in humans experimentally we used furosemide bolus injection as a short-term (study 1) and dietary salt as a long-term modulator (study 2). In an open crossover design, 12 healthy male volunteers received furosemide (F) 0.5 mg kg(-1) intravenously or placebo (P) in random order (study 1). With the same design, 12 volunteers received high-salt (HS), normal-salt (NS) and low-salt (LS) diet (study 2). Plasma renin activity (PRA) was analysed along with AII. Inulin and paraaminohippurate (PAH) clearances were used to indicate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow (RPF), respectively.

RESULTS

While F stimulated AII and PRA and decreased GFR and RPF significantly, no concomitant alteration of Epo was observed [AUCEpo: placebo 5709 +/- 243 (% of baseline x h), furosemide: 5833 +/- 255 (% of baseline x h); 95% confidence interval (CI) -608.4, 856.0; P = 0.73]. F decreased GFR (from 103.6 +/- 4.0 to 90.6 +/- 4.8 ml min(-1) 1(-1) 73 m-2; 95% CI 1.1, 24.9; P < 0.05), but not RPF (study 1). Correspondingly, LS stimulated and HS decreased AII and PRA significantly. HS increased GFR and RPF. Again, Epo concentrations were not affected (AUCEpo: normal sodium 44 +/- 6.7 mIU x day ml(-1), low sodium 39 +/- 2.4 mIU x day ml(-1), high sodium 48.5 +/- 6.1 mIU x day ml(-1); normal salt/low salt 95% CI -11.9, 21.9, P = 0.54; normal salt/high salt 95% CI -14.4, 23.3, P = 0.63; study 2).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that, at least in the physiological setting in healthy volunteers, increased concentrations of endogenous AII may not be a major factor of Epo regulation.

Maximal suppression of renin-angiotensin system in nonproliferative glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND

Elimination of residual proteinuria is the novel target in renoprotection; nevertheless, whether a greater suppression of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) effectively improves the antiproteinuric response in patients with moderate proteinuria remains ill-defined.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of maximizing RAS suppression on quantitative and qualitative proteinuria in ten patients with stable nonnephrotic proteinuria (2.55 +/- 0.94 g/24 hours) due to primary nonproliferative glomerulonephritis (NPGN), and normal values of creatinine clearance (103 +/- 17 mL/min). The study was divided in three consecutive phases: (1) four subsequent 1-month periods of ramipril at the dose of 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 20 mg/day; (2) 2 months of ramipril 20 mg/day + irbesartan 300 mg/day; and (3) 2 months of irbesartan 300 mg/day alone.

RESULTS

Maximizing RAS suppression was not coupled with any major effect on renal function and blood pressure; conversely, a significant decrement in hemoglobin levels, of 0.8 g/dL on average, was observed during up-titration of ramipril dose. The 2.5 mg dose of ramipril significantly decreased proteinuria by 29%. Similar changes were detected after irbesartan alone (-28%). The antiproteinuric effect was not improved either by the higher ramipril doses (-30% after the 20 mg dose) or after combined treatment (-33%). The reduction of proteinuria led to amelioration of the markers of tubular damage, as testified by the significant decrement of alpha 1 microglobulin (alpha 1m) excretion and of the tubular component of proteinuria at sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

CONCLUSION

In nonnephrotic NPGN patients, standard doses of either ramipril or irbesartan lead to significant reduction of residual proteinuria and amelioration of the qualitative features suggestive of tubular damage. The enhancement of RAS suppression up to the maximal degree does not improve the antiproteinuric response and is coupled with a decrement of hemoglobin levels.