Carotid endarterectomy; local or general anaesthesia?

Locoregional Versus General Anesthesia in Prolonged Carotid Endarterectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database from 2011 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective treatment for carotid stenosis. Previous studies yielded conflicting findings regarding postoperative outcomes after CEA when comparing those under general and locoregional anesthesia. However, these findings may be influenced by an inherent selection bias, as general anesthesia is frequently selected for more complex CEA. To counteract this selection bias, this study compared the 30-day outcomes of locoregional and general anesthesia in patients who underwent prolonged CEA.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing CEA were identified in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)-targeted database from 2011 to 2022. Only cases with prolonged operative times (over third quartile) were selected. Patients who had symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis were examined separately. A 1:3 propensity score matching was used to address preoperative differences between patients under locoregional and general anesthesia to assess 30-day postoperative outcomes. Moreover, factors associated with prolonged CEA were identified by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among symptomatic patients who underwent prolonged CEA, 246 and 4,286 were under locoregional and general anesthesia, respectively. In asymptomatic patients, 388 had locoregional anesthesia and 5,137 had general anesthesia. After propensity score matching, patients under locoregional and general anesthesia had comparable 30-day mortality (symptomatic: 1.63% vs. 0.81%, P = 0.28; asymptomatic: 0.77% vs. 0.52%, P = 0.70) and stroke (symptomatic: 4.88% vs. 4.34%, P = 0.72; asymptomatic: 1.29% vs. 1.46%, P = 1.00). All other 30-day outcomes were comparable between groups, except for symptomatic patients under locoregional had shorter operation time (P < 0.01) and asymptomatic patients under locoregional had lower cranial nerve injury (2.06% vs. 4.90%, P = 0.02). High-risk anatomical factors, male sex, younger age, and certain comorbidities were associated with prolonged operative times.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients under both types of anesthesia had mostly comparable 30-day postoperative outcomes, including mortality and stroke, for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Therefore, locoregional and general anesthesia appear to be equally effective in CEA cases characterized by anticipated complexity and, consequently, prolonged operative times.

Seizures Following Carotid Endarterectomy: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of 69,479 Patients and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Perioperative Care

Background: Seizures are a rare but potentially serious complication following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Understanding their prevalence and associated factors is crucial for optimizing perioperative care and improving patient outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of seizures following CEA and explore clinical and procedural factors contributing to their occurrence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting on seizures following CEA. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases was performed, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled prevalence of postoperative seizures. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. A total of 20 studies, encompassing 69,479 patients, were included. Results: The overall pooled prevalence of seizures following CEA was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%; p < 0.001), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 93.52%). Prospective studies reported a higher pooled prevalence (2%, 95% CI 0-4%; I2 = 76.34%) compared to retrospective studies (0%, 95% CI 0-1%; I2 = 91.51%). Male predominance was noted among patients who experienced seizures, and hypertension was the most common comorbidity. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome was identified as a key contributing factor to postoperative seizures. Data on long-term outcomes, including the development of epilepsy, were insufficient for further analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies varied, with most studies demonstrating a moderate risk of bias. Conclusions: Seizures occur in approximately 1% of patients following CEA, with higher rates observed in prospective studies. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome is an important contributor to this rare complication. We provide evidence-based specific recommendations for seizure management and introduce the SMART-CEA Checklist, a practical framework to guide perioperative care and reduce complications. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, including epilepsy, and incorporate standardized methodologies to improve data reliability and guide clinical practice.

The effect of the collateral cerebrovascular circulation on tolerance to carotid artery cross-clamping and on early outcome after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The Circle of Willis (CoW) serves as the primary source of contralateral blood supply in patients who undergo carotid artery cross-clamping (CC) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). It has been suggested that the CoW's anatomy influences CEA outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate associations between the cerebral collateral circulation, a positive awake test for intraoperative neurologic deficit after carotid CC, and postoperative adverse neurologic events.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted searching MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies that assessed the cerebral circulation, including CoW variations, using neuroimaging techniques in patients who underwent carotid CC. For the metanalytical incidence, the statistical technique used was weight averaging. Otherwise, descriptive analysis was used due to the excessive heterogeneity of the studies.

RESULTS

Eight publications, seven cohort and one case-controlled study, involving 1313 patients who underwent carotid artery CC under loco-regional anesthesia, were included in the systematic review. The incidence of positive awake test in the cohort studies ranged from 4.4% to 19.7%. Carotid artery CC resulted in positive awake test in 5% to 91% of patients with alterations in the anterior portion and in 27% to 74% with alterations in the posterior portion of the CoW. A positive awake test in patients with contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion ranged from 5.8% to 45.7%. Contralateral carotid stenosis >70% or occlusion were associated with a positive awake test (P < .001). Patients with incomplete CoW did not have statistically significant correlation with intraoperative neurological deficits after CC. Data were insufficient to evaluate the effect of the collateral circulation on early outcome after CEA.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, contralateral carotid artery stenosis or occlusion, but not CoW abnormalities, were associated with a positive awake test after carotid artery CC. Further research is needed to evaluate which specific CoW anomaly predicts neurologic deficit after CC and to confirm association between a positive awake test and clinical outcome after CEA.

Effect of regional versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following carotid endarterectomy: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

The effect of regional versus general anesthesia on carotid endarterectomy outcomes is debated. This study assesses the effect of anesthetic technique on major morbidity and mortality and additional secondary endpoints following carotid endarterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective propensity-matched-cohort analysis investigating elective carotid endarterectomy patients in the 2015-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program ( n =37 204). The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and major morbidity, defined as stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. Secondary endpoints included minor morbidity, bleeding events, healthcare resource utilization, and length of hospital stay. Univariate, multivariable, and survival analyses were applied.

RESULTS

The 1 : 1 propensity-matched-cohort included 8304 patients (4152 in each group). Regional anesthesia was associated with similar incidences of major morbidity and mortality [odds ratio (OR), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.61-1.09); P = 0.162] and unplanned resource utilization [OR, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.78-1.11); P = 0.443], but lower incidences of minor morbidity [OR, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.81); P < 0.001] and bleeding events [OR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30-0.78); P = 0.002], and a shorter length of hospital stay [1.4 vs. 1.6 days; mean difference, -0.16 days (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.07); P < 0.001]. On multivariable analysis, regional anesthesia remained independently predictive of minor morbidity [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.79); P = 0.001] and bleeding events [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.30-0.77); P = 0.003]. Significance was maintained on survival analysis for these two endpoints. A mortality benefit was observed on univariate [OR, 0.50 (95% CI, 0.25-1.00); P = 0.045], multivariable [AOR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.24-0.96); P = 0.043], and survival analysis ( P = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid endarterectomy patients receiving regional anesthesia experience favorable outcomes compared to propensity-matched general anesthesia controls.

Impact of intraoperative neurologic deficits in carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may experiment neurologic deficits during the carotid cross-clamping due to secondary cerebral hypoperfusion. An associated risk of postoperative stroke incidence is also well established. This work aimed to assess the postoperative adverse events related to neurologic deficits in the awake test after clamping and to determine its predictive factors. Methods. From January 2012 to January 2018, 79 patients from a referral hospital that underwent CEA with regional anesthesia for carotid stenosis and manifested neurologic deficits were gathered. Consecutively selected controls (n = 85) were submitted to the same procedure without developing neurological changes. Postoperative complications such as stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and Clavien-Dindo classification were assessed 30 days after the procedure. Univariate and binary logistic regressions were performed for data assessment. Results. Patients with clamping associated neurologic deficits were significantly more obese than the control group (aOR = 9.30; 95% CI: 2.57-33.69; p = .01). Lower degree of ipsilateral stenosis and higher degree of contralateral stenosis were independently related to clamping intolerance (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-0.99; p = .047 and aOR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.06-1.50; p = .009, respectively). Neurologic deficits were a main 30-day stroke predictor (aOR = 4.30; 95% CI: 1.10-16.71; p = .035). Conclusions. Neurologic deficits during carotid clamping are a predictor of perioperative stroke. Body mass index > 30 kg/m², a lower degree of ipsilateral stenosis, and a higher degree of contralateral stenosis are independent predictors of neurologic deficits and, therefore, might play a role in the prevention of procedure-related stroke.

Efficacy of near-infrared spectroscopy cerebral oximetry on detection of critical cerebral perfusion during carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia

Summary: Background: Patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may suffer from cerebral hypoperfusion during the carotid cross-clamping. Near-infrared spectroscopy cerebral oximetry (NIRS) is a non-invasive method of regional cerebral oxygen saturation measurement reflecting changes in cerebral blood flow during CEA. The main goal of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the NIRS in detecting cerebral hypoperfusion during CEA under regional anesthesia (RA) and compare it with awake neurological testing. Patients and methods: A prospective observational study of 28 patients that underwent CEA in RA and manifested neurologic deficits, and 28 consecutive controls from a tertiary and referral center, was performed. All patients were monitored with NIRS cerebral oximetry and awake testing as the control technique. Subsequently, operating characteristic curve and Cohen’s kappa coefficient were determined to evaluate the reliability of the monitoring test. Results: NIRS presented a sensitivity of 27.3% and a specificity of 89.3% in comparison to awake testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis demonstrated that a decrease of at least 20% in cerebral oxygen saturation is the best threshold to infer cerebral hypoperfusion. However, the respective area under the curve (AUROC) was 0.606 (95% CI: 0.456–0.756, P = 0.178) with a calculated Cohen’s kappa of 0.179, P = 0.093. Regarding 30-days outcomes, only awake testing has shown significant associations with stroke and postoperative complications ( P = 0.043 and P = 0.05), which were higher in patients with post-clamping neurologic deficits. Conclusions: NIRS demonstrated a reduced discriminative capacity for critical cerebral hypoperfusion, and does not seem to add substantial clinical benefits to the awake test.

Regional anaesthesia techniques for carotid surgery: the state of art

PURPOSE

This review will analyse some aspects of regional anaesthesia (RA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgical procedure which requires a strict monitoring of patient's status. RA remains an important tool for the anaesthesiologist. Some debates remain about type and definition of regional anaesthesia, efficacy and safety of the different cervical block techniques, the right dose, concentration and volume of local anaesthetic, the use of adjuvants, the new perspectives: ultrasonography, the future directions.

METHODS

A literature search was performed for journal articles in English language in the PubMed Embase and in The Cochrane Library database, from January 2000 to December 2013. The electronic search strategy contained the following medical subject headings and free text terms: local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for endarterectomy, superficial and deep cervical block, complications of cervical nerve block, ultrasound guidance of superficial and deep cervical plexus block.

CONCLUSIONS

The gold standard for RA will be achieved after overcoming a number of limitations by a more extensive use of ultrasonography, by combining general and regional anaesthesia, including conscious anaesthesia, by defining the appropriate volume, concentration and dosage of local agents and by addition of adjuvants.

Selective shunt during carotid endarterectomy using routine awake test with respect to a lower shunt rate

PURPOSE

To evaluate shunt rate and discuss the resultsrelated to selective shunt placement during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using routine awake test.

METHODS

Patients with CEA from 2007 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed from prospectively collected data. The need for shunt placement was determined by the awake test, based on the alteration in the neurologic examination. We collected data by using the clinical records and imaging studies, and investigated factors related to selective shunt such as collateral circulation and contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.

RESULTS

There were 45 CEAs under regional anesthesia with the awake test in 44 patients. The mean age was 61.8 ± 7.1 years old. There were 82.2% (37/45) of males, and 68.9% (31/45) of symptomatic patients. Selective shunt placement had been performed in only two (4.4%) patients. Among them fewer cases (4%) had severe (stenosis >70%) contralateral ICA lesions, and more cases (91%) of complete morphology of the anterior or posterior circulation in the circle of Willis. There was no perioperative stroke, myocardial infarctionor death, and asymptomatic new brain lesions were detected in 4 patients (9%), including 2 cases of selective shunt placement.

CONCLUSION

CEA under routine awake test could besafe and feasible method with low shunt placement rate in selected patients.

Carotid endarterectomy—safe and effective in a neurosurgeon's hands: a 25-year single-surgeon experience

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a procedure performed by both vascular surgeons and neurosurgeons in the UK. We present a single neurosurgeon's experience of 728 CEAs over 25 years, performed under both general and local anesthesia, and discuss the results in this context. Our objective was to report on the efficacy of CEA in the hands of a neurosurgeon.

METHODS

Prospective outcome data were collected for all patients who underwent CEA performed by the senior author (A.D.M.) from 1987 to 2011. Data evaluated included patient age, sex, surgical indication, preoperative characteristics, diagnostic modalities used, shunt usage, operative time, any neurological deterioration during or after surgery, and early postoperative problems. Outcome measures used were 30-day death and 30-day disabling stroke. The results were tabulated and analyzed using JMP 8.0.2 (SAS Inc., Cary, NC).

RESULTS

The 30-day death rate was 0.8% and the 30-day disabling stroke rate was 1.7% in our series. The mean operative time was 135 minutes (±38.1), and the mean clamp time was 28.4 minutes (±8.5). In the subset of patients who had the operation performed under local anesthesia (n = 616), the disabling stroke rate was 1.6% and the death rate was 0.6%. In the subset of asymptomatic patients (n = 194), the 30-day death and 30-day disabling stroke rates were each 1%. Postoperative complications were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, CEA under local anesthesia is safe procedure in the hands of a neurosurgeon and would be recommended according to the clinical presentation and local guidelines.

Giant cervical lipoma excision under cervical epidural anesthesia: A viable alternative to general anesthesia

The technique of Cervical Epidural Anesthesia (CEA) was first described by Dogliotti in 1933 for upper thoracic procedures. Administration of local anesthetic into cervical epidural space results in anesthesia of the neck, upper extremity, and upper thoracic region. CEA provides high-quality analgesia and anesthesia of above dermatomes and, at the same time, it has favorable effect on hemodynamic variable by blocking sympathetic innervation of the heart. CEA is not practiced routinely because of its potential complications. We selected this technique of CEA for excision of giant cervical lipoma on the back of the neck in an adult patient, as the patient was unwilling for general anesthesia. CEA was induced with 10 ml of 1% lignocaine-adrenaline mixture administered into C7-T1 space through 18G Tuohy needle. Our patient maintained vital parameters throught the procedure. The added advantage of epidural anesthesia was that the patient was awake and comfortable throughout the procedure.

Neuroprotective effect of volatile anesthetic agents: molecular mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Intra-operative cerebral ischemia can be catastrophic, and volatile anesthetic agents have been recognized for their potential neuroprotective properties since the 1960s. In this review, we examine the neuroprotective effects of five volatile anesthetic agents in current or recent clinical use: isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane, halothane and enflurane.

METHODS

A review of publications in the National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health database from 1970 to 2007 was conducted.

RESULTS

Volatile anesthetic agents have been shown to be neuroprotective in multiple animal works of ischemic brain injury. Short-term neuroprotection (<1 week post-ischemia) in experimental cerebral ischemia has been reported in multiple works, although long-term neuroprotection (> or = 1 week post-ischemia) remains controversial. Comparison works have not demonstrated superiority of one specific volatile agent over another in experimental models of brain injury. Relatively few human works have examined the protective effects of volatile anesthetic agents and conclusive evidence of a neuroprotective effect has yet to emerge from human works.

CONCLUSION

Proposed mechanisms related to the neuroprotective effect of volatile anesthetic agents include activation of ATP-dependent potassium channels, up-regulation of nitric oxide synthase, reduction of excitotoxic stressors and cerebral metabolic rate, augmentation of peri-ischemic cerebral blood flow and up-regulation of antiapoptotic factors including MAP kinases.

Subtle Cerebral Damage after Shunting vs Non Shunting during Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the extent of subtle cerebral damage (SCD) in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with or without shunt placement.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed a consecutive series of 96 patients undergoing endarterectomy for severe unilateral left carotid stenosis who had been randomly assigned to receive a shunt (48) or not (48). Eligibility criteria included age up to 80 years and Mini-Mental State Examination score >24 points. Patients underwent neuropsychological testing before surgery. Serum concentrations of S100 protein, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured intraoperatively before and after carotid clamping. Finally, each patient underwent neuropsychological testing 3 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients with and without shunt had similar serum concentrations of S100 protein, NSE and IL-6 as well as similar neuropsychological test scores, all p>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in subtle cerebral damage between patients randomized to receive a shunt or not.

Regional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: an audit over 10 years

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the failure rates and the frequency of anaesthesia-related complications of two different methods of regional anaesthesia used for carotid endarterectomy--cervical epidural (CE) anaesthesia and cervical plexus block (CPB).

METHODS

The study included 1828 carotid endarterectomies performed in 1455 patients between 1996 and 2006. A combination of deep and superficial CPB was used for 1166 procedures, whereas in 662 cases surgery was performed under CE anaesthesia.

RESULTS

The failure rate of CPB was 3% compared with 6.9% for CE anaesthesia (P < 0.0001). The reasons for failure of the anaesthetic techniques were (1) technical failure, (2) insufficient analgesia, (3) non-compliant patients, and (4) anaesthetic complications. The incidence of complications resulting from CE anaesthesia was significantly higher than with CPB; life-threatening complications--2% compared with 0.3% (P < 0.0001); other anaesthesia-related complications 5.7 vs 4.7%. Serious complications included inadvertant injection into the subarachnoid space or vertebral artery. The frequency of shunt insertion, perioperative stroke, and death from any cause was similar in both groups of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods of regional anaesthesia are acceptable for carotid artery surgery. CPB is associated with a significantly lower frequency of anaesthesia-related complications and should therefore be considered the anaesthetic of choice. CE anaesthesia should not be performed except in extenuating circumstances such as variant anatomy or the requirement for more extensive surgery.

Frequency of transient ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Especially because of improvements in clinical neurologic monitoring, carotid endarterectomy done under local anesthesia has become the technique of choice in several centers. Temporary ipsilateral vocal nerve palsies due to local anesthetics have been described, however. Such complications are most important in situations where there is a pre-existing contralateral paralysis. We therefore examined the effect of local anesthesia on vocal cord function to better understand its possible consequences.

METHODS

This prospective study included 28 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia. Vocal cord function was evaluated before, during, and after surgery (postoperative day 1) using flexible laryngoscopy. Anesthesia was performed by injecting 20 to 40 mL of a mixture of long-acting (ropivacaine) and short-acting (prilocaine) anesthetic.

RESULTS

All patients had normal vocal cord function preoperatively. Twelve patients (43%) were found to have intraoperative ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis. It resolved in all cases < or =24 hours. There were no significant differences in operating time or volume or frequency of anesthetic administration in patients with temporary vocal cord paralysis compared with those without.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthesia led to temporary ipsilateral vocal cord paralysis in almost half of these patients. Because pre-existing paralysis is of a relevant frequency (up to 3%), a preoperative evaluation of vocal cord function before carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia is recommended to avoid intraoperative bilateral paralysis. In patients with preoperative contralateral vocal cord paralysis, surgery under general anesthesia should be considered.

The effect of local cooling on pain perception during infiltration of local anaesthetic agents, a prospective randomised controlled trial

The effect of pre-infiltration local cooling of the site of inguinal herniorrhaphy on pain perception during infiltration of local anaesthetic was studied in a prospective randomised controlled trial. One hundred patients were randomly allocated to receive topical application of either a cooled saline bag (study group) or a saline bag at room temperature (control group) prior to injection of local anaesthetic. Pain scores were recorded using a visual analogue scale following application of the saline bags and again on completion of infiltration with local anaesthetic. There was no significant difference in pain scores following topical saline bag application. However, a highly significant difference (p = 0.0001, Mann-Whitney U) was observed between post-infiltration pain scores of the study group (median = 2) and the control group (median = 6).

Regional versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: impact of change in practice

BACKGROUND

Local anaesthesia (LA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may offer advantages over general anaesthesia (GA).

AIM

Our aim was to compare outcome from CEA before and after changing our anaesthetic technique from GA to LA.

METHODS

Sequential patients who underwent CEA between January 1997 and December 2001 were identified from a prospectively collected database. GA was used during the first two years of this period and LA was used exclusively over the last three years. Differences in the incidence of intraoperative shunting, perioperative stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA), cranial nerve injury, neck haematoma, perioperative death and duration of hospital stay were assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred and seventy one CEAs were carried out in 363 patients, 179 under GA and 192 under LA. Indications were TIAs (140), stroke with recovery (134), amaurosis fugax (85) and asymptomatic high-grade stenosis (12). Intraoperative shunting was used in 66 (37%) GA operations and 36 (18.8%) LA operations (p<0.01). There were nine strokes and four transient neurological events; 10 (5.5%) patients developed such problems with GA and three (1.6%) with LA (p<0.05). There were four deaths, three (1.7%) after GA and one (0.5%) after LA (p=NS). Duration of hospital stay was less in the LA group at a median (range) of three days (2-10) compared with 4.5 (3-14) days in the GA group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Employing LA rather than GA for CEA has been associated with a reduction in intraoperative shunting and perioperative stroke, and the duration of hospital stay. LA appears to offer clinical and possible cost advantages over GA.

Staged anesthesia for combined carotid and coronary artery revascularization: a different approach

OBJECTIVE

Combined coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are performed in an attempt to reduce the risk of postoperative stroke after CABG surgery in patients with significant or symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The choice between regional and general anesthesia for CEA is still under debate. Regional anesthesia offers an excellent monitoring technique of the neurologic status of the awake patient during carotid clamping. In an attempt to improve monitoring of the neurologic status and avoid the use of temporary shunting in patients undergoing the combined procedure, a different approach is described combining regional anesthesia for CEA followed immediately by general anesthesia for CABG surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized case series.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients scheduled for combined CEA and CABG surgery underwent a "staged" anesthetic approach from January to December 2004.

INTERVENTIONS

Pulmonary, femoral artery, and urinary catheters were inserted under local anesthesia. A deep cervical plexus block was then performed and supplemented by a superficial cervical plexus block. The patient was draped for standard combined CEA and CABG surgery. CEA was then performed using standard techniques. Without altering the surgical field, general anesthesia was given and endotracheal intubation performed following the successful CEA. Coronary revascularization was then completed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

CEA and CABG surgery were completed successfully in all patients. There was no need for conversion from local to general anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation was easily performed in all patients. There was no hospital mortality in this series. No neurologic events were observed during the CEA. A reversible ischemic stroke, ipsilateral to the CEA, occurred postoperatively on awakening from CABG surgery in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This staged anesthetic approach for combined CABG and CEA surgery is an alternative in this complex subset of patients.

Regional anaesthesia and propofol sedation for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons now perform carotid endarterectomy under regional anaesthesia. The aim of the present study was to review a sedation technique using a computer-controlled infusion of propofol.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 84 carotid endarterectomies done by a single surgeon and commenced under regional anaesthesia with sedation was studied. There were 54 men and 27 women (three bilateral procedures), with a median age of 71 years (range 48-87 years). All patients had carotid stenosis > 70% 80 procedures were done for symptomatic disease and three asymptomatic patients were treated before cardiac surgery (one bilateral).

RESULTS

Seventy-seven procedures were completed under regional anaesthesia and sedation alone; seven required conversion to general anaesthetic, usually for intolerance of the operation. An intraoperative shunt was required on only four occasions (5%). Postoperatively eight patients required critical care monitoring, usually for blood pressure control. The remainder were nursed on the vascular ward, and 68% were discharged home on the day after surgery. No patient died, but there were two neurological complications. One patient had a cerebellar stroke 10 days after surgery, but recovered fully after 4 months. A second developed cerebral oedema due to severe intraoperative hypertension and required intensive care for 15 days. He too recovered fully. Five patients had a further episode of transient cerebral ischaemia within 1 month of operation, but in all cases duplex imaging showed a widely patent carotid and there were no sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Target controlled propofol infusion is an effective method of sedation in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

The Retrojugular Approach to Carotid Endarterectomy—A Safer Technique?

The conventional technique of carotid endarterectomy involves approaching the carotid sheath, anterior and medial to the internal jugular vein with division of the facial vein. Mobilisation of the ansa cervicalis and identification of the hypoglossal nerve is usually required. We describe our results of retrojugular approach in a consecutive nonrandomised cohort of 50 carotid endarterectomy patients.

Intraoperative management: carotid endarterectomies

The management of anesthesia for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy is challenging and dynamic. Effective management and good outcome requires the anesthesiologist's understanding of cerebral physiology, knowledge of neck anatomy, and understanding of the rapid pathophysiologic changes that occur during carotid artery manipulations. The anesthesiologist must be flexible in the management of patients, who frequently have underlying multiorgan pathology and cardiovascular compromise. Good communication between the anesthetic and surgical teams is needed to avoid irreversible debilitating consequences for the patient.

Prediction of Cerebral Ischemic Tolerance During Carotid Cross-clamping by Angiographic Criteria

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic value of angiographic criteria and internal carotid artery (ICA) stump pressure for shunt placement in carotid surgery under local anaesthesia.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial at a university hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 120 patients a cerebral angiography was initiated before undergoing carotid surgery. Seventy-five percent of the patients were neurologically asymptomatic, 13% had transient ischaemic attacks and 12% suffered from previous strokes. The operation was exclusively performed under local anaesthesia and prior to cross-clamping the ICA stump-pressure was measured. A shunt was inserted only if hemispheric symptoms or unconsciousness occurred independent of the angiographic findings or stump pressure.

RESULTS

In 23% (27/120) a shunt became necessary and significantly (p<0.001) more often when there was a cross-flow towards the contralateral hemisphere (12/20=60%) or if the contralateral ICA was occluded (9/13=69%). The sensitivity for not needing a shunt in case of cross-flow towards the side of operation was 91% (52/57) whereas the specificity was 35% (22/63). ICA stump-pressure was significantly reduced in patients requiring a shunt (31 mmHg) compared to those not needing a shunt (53 mmHg) (p<0.001), but no definitive threshold value was found determining the need for shunting. Intraoperatively, no persistent neurological complication developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiographic cross-flow was a good, but not perfect predictor for the need of an intraoperative shunt.

Patient Satisfaction for Carotid Endarterectomy Performed under Local Anaesthesia

OBJECTIVES

To develop, validate and use a procedure specific questionnaire to evaluate patient experience and satisfaction following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under either general (GA) or local anaesthesia (LA).

METHODS

Twenty post-CEA patients were interviewed. Data were content analysed and recurrent themes used to generate the specific carotid endarterectomy experience questionnaire (CEA-EQ). The CEA-EQ consists of 15 pre-op and 13 postoperative questions. Validity was established by correlation with the FRS Patient Satisfaction with Surgical Services (SSSQ) and State form of the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) in 69 patients (35 LA, 34 GA). Subsequently 88 patients randomised to GA CEA and 88 to LA CEA received the CEA-EQ. A local anaesthetic intraoperative experience questionnaire (LA-EQ) was also developed and given to LA patients only.

RESULTS

Validity was confirmed through significant correlations with the STAI-S (r=0.67, p<0.001) and the SSSQ (r=0.44, p<0.001). In the randomised prospective study response rates were greater than 90%. Overall experience and satisfaction with CEA was high. There was no statistically significant difference in anxiety, satisfaction or overall experience between anaesthetic techniques. LA CEA was associated with a significantly better perception of recovery. The majority of LA patients found the procedure acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

The CEA-EQ is a valid tool to assess qualitative aspects of CEA patient care. Overall satisfaction and experience with CEA is good and not related to anaesthetic technique. LA CEA is not associated with any increased anxiety, is tolerated by the majority of patients and is associated with a better perception of recovery.

Comparison of Catecholamine Hormone Release in Patients Undergoing Carotid Artery Stenting or Carotid Endarterectomy

PURPOSE

To investigate the pattern of catecholamine response in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

Adrenaline, noradrenaline, and renin levels were measured at 5 time points in 12 patients undergoing 13 CEAs (1 bilateral) and 13 patients undergoing unilateral CAS. Arterial blood samples were taken at the following time points: (1) after induction in CEA patients or 5 minutes following first contrast injection in CAS patients, (2) 5 minutes following ICA clamp release in surgical patients or deflation of the balloon in the CAS cohort, (3) 60 minutes following ICA clamp release in surgical patients or deflation of the balloon in the CAS cohort, and (4) 24 hours following the procedure. Intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate were recorded using radial arterial monitoring. Changes in adrenaline, noradrenaline, and renin levels are expressed as ratios versus baseline.

RESULTS

Patterns of adrenaline and noradrenaline release were significantly different in patients undergoing CAS and CEA, with much higher and more variable surges of adrenaline and noradrenaline occurring in CEA patients. Adrenaline and noradrenaline levels increased significantly over baseline following carotid artery clamping in patients undergoing CEA (noradrenaline ratio before clamping: 1.54+/-1.25, 24 hours after unclamping: 8.38+/-16.35 [p<0.001]; adrenaline ratio before clamping: 1.12+/-0.49, 60 minutes after unclamping: 17.59+/-19.14 [p<0.001]). Conversely, in patients undergoing CAS, catecholamine levels remained unchanged (noradrenaline ratio before dilation: 0.96+/-0.23, 24 hours after the procedure: 0.92+/-0.32 [p=NS]; adrenaline ratio before dilation: 0.83+/-0.33, 60 minutes after balloon deflation: 0.56+/-0.32 [p=NS]).

CONCLUSIONS

CAS is associated with a significantly less marked catecholamine response than CEA, which may reflect down-regulation of the sympathetic nervous system in response to carotid sinus stimulation during carotid angioplasty.

Comparation of influence general and regional anesthesia on basic haemodynamic parameters during carotid endarterectomy

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a preventive operation to reduce the incidence of embolic and thrombotic cerebral stroke. CEA carries a significant perioeperartive mortality rate from stroke and myocardial infarction, which may even approach 5%. Thus, anesthetic and surgical techniques are constantly under scrutiny to try to reduce this relatively high incidence of morbidity and mortality. Anesthetic technique for CEA is divided to general (GA) and regional (RA) anesthesia, performed by cervical plexus block. The aim this study was to examine changes of basic haemodynamic parameters, which routinely fallows during CEA in condition of GA and RA. After obtaining institutional approval and informed consent, we randomized 50 patients scheduled for CEA (Tab.1) in two groups (GA and RA). We fallow blood pressure: systolic (BPs), mean (BPm), diastolic (BPd), heart rate (HR), and RPP index at the examined patients. The examination performed in six control times: before induction of anesthesia (T1), 10 minutes after beginning of operation (T2), 5 minutes after cross clamping of arteria carotis (T3), 5 minutes after declamping arteria carotis (T4), 10 minutes (T5) and 2 hours after operation (T6). The results of study shows significant changes of blood pressure (BPs and BPm) and RPP index in T2 time in patinets undergoing GA. The changes occurred under influence of induction agent thio- pental. These changes were in homeostatic range. In RA patinets, no haemodynamic changes registrated in control times. Therefore, from haemodynamic aspect RA was superior to GA.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Stroke Group trials register (April 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). We handsearched 13 relevant journals up to 2002, and searched the reference lists of articles identified. We also advertised the review in Vascular News (a newspaper for European vascular specialists) in August 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials and non-randomised studies comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer selected studies for inclusion and another independently checked the decisions. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and independently extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised trials involving 554 operations, and 41 non-randomised studies involving 25622 operations were included. The methodological quality of the non-randomised trials was questionable. Eleven of the non-randomised studies were prospective and 29 reported on a consecutive series of patients. In nine non-randomised studies the number of arteries, as opposed to the number of patients, was unclear. Meta-analysis of the non-randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with significant reductions in the odds of death (35 studies), stroke (31 studies), stroke or death (26 studies), myocardial infarction (22 studies), and pulmonary complications (7 studies), within 30 days of the operation. Meta-analysis of the randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a significant reduction in local haemorrhage (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.79) within 30 days of the operation, but there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke. However, the trials were too small to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn, and in some studies intention-to-treat analyses were not possible because of exclusions.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy performed under local and general anaesthetic. Non-randomised studies suggest potential benefits with the use of local anaesthetic, but these studies may be biased. More randomised studies are needed.

Local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: report of 329 cases

Since stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, carotid endarterectomies are used frequently to reduce the risk of stroke and death. Unfortunately, an inherent risk of the carotid endarterectomy procedure is that surgery itself may result in stroke. At this point the question is which method of anesthesia, local or general, is better to protect and monitorize the brain function during cross-clamp period in carotid endarterectomies? In the authors' center, 365 carotid endarterectomies were applied to 329 patients between 1990 and 2001; 165 operations were done under general anesthesia and the other 200 operations were done under local anesthesia. These 2 groups, general (group I) and local anesthesia (group II), were studied retrospectively according to preoperative and postoperative data. In group I, the rate of major stroke was 7.3%, but this rate was 1% in group II (p < 0.05). Intraoperative shunts were used in 50 (30.3%) operations of group I, but the usage of shunt was 8% (16 operations) in group II (p < 0.0001). The hospitalization period was also much shorter in group II than in group I. The time of hospitalization was 4.1 +/-1.9 days in group I and 2.4 +/-1.1 days in group II (p < 0.0001). In terms of cost analysis, the mean costs were 1007.14 dollars +/-135.71 dollars in group I and 885.71 dollars +/-78.57 dollars in group II (p < 0.0001). In short, the local procedure was more cost-effective. As a result, in carotid endarterectomy procedures, the authors prefer local anesthesia to achieve better brain function monitoring and to reduce hospitalization time and cost.

Physiological advantages of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthesia. A randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

to examine the effects of type of anaesthesia on cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

DESIGN

prospective randomised study.

METHODS

thirty-four CEA procedures under local anaesthesia (LA) are compared to 33 procedures under general anaesthesia (GA). Mean middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAV(mean)) was monitored using Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) assessed by continuous intra-arterial blood pressure transducer.

RESULTS

pre-op MCAV(mean) and MAP were similar in both groups. Pre-clamp MCAV(mean) was similar in both groups and did not differ from pre-op values. With carotid clamping the MCAV(mean) significantly dropped in both groups. The post-clamp MCAV(mean) was significantly less in the GA group (p < 0.05), and the percentage reduction in MCAV(mean) significantly more for GA procedures (p < 0.05). Pre-clamp MAP was significantly elevated in LA procedures and significantly lowered in GA procedures. Pre-clamp MAP was significant less for GA procedures (p < 0.001). Post clamp MAP did not differ from pre-clamp levels in either group. There was no correlation between MCAV(mean) and MAP. Complication rate, combined death/stroke rates were similar in each group.

CONCLUSION

LA CEA is associated with better preservation of the ipsilateral cerebral circulation and increased tolerance of the effects of carotid clamping. Changes in MCAV(mean) cannot be explained by variations in blood pressure between the two techniques.

Variation in surgical and anaesthetic technique and associations with operative risk in the European carotid surgery trial: implications for trials of ancillary techniques

OBJECTIVES

several ancillary surgical techniques, such as shunting and patching, are used in association with carotid endarterectomy. However, the balance of risks and benefits of these techniques is uncertain because of the lack of large randomised controlled trials (RCTs). To assess the potential for further trials, we studied the variation in use of these techniques by surgeon and by country in the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST).

METHODS

use of each ancillary technique was assessed by surgeon and by country. For each technique, the relationships between the use of the technique and baseline patient characteristics, use of other techniques, and the 30-day operative risk of stroke and death were determined.

RESULTS

there was considerable variation between surgeons in the use of ancillary operative techniques both within (p<0.001 for shunting and patching), and between countries (p<0.001 for shunting and patching). Some surgeons used techniques selectively, and so the characteristics of patients differed depending on which techniques were used. Use of each technique was also significantly associated with the use of other techniques. Multiple regression analysis, taking into account all these factors, found no statistically significant associations between operative risk and the use of shunting, patching, intra-operative EEG monitoring, or type of anaesthetic. The only surgical technique significantly associated with an increased operative risk was not using intra-operative anticoagulation (hazard ratio=2.33, 95% CI=1.4-4.2). Other factors associated with an increased risk were an operation time of less than 1 h, or greater than 1.5 h, and the surgeons' subjective assessment that the operation was difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

in the ECST, operative risk was more closely related to patient characteristics, length of surgery, and the surgeons' perception of the difficulty of the operation, than to the use of particular ancillary operative techniques. The considerable variation between surgeons, and between countries, in the use of ancillary techniques is in keeping with the lack of convincing data from RCTs, and suggests that there should be sufficient uncertainty to make large pragmatic trials possible.