Transoesophageal low-energy cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Results with the oesophageal-right atrial lead configuration

Esophageal electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: when esophagus gives a help to cardiologists

Atrial fibrillation is a common clinical disease especially in the elderly and in patients with organic heart disease. Electrical cardioversion is the first choice therapeutic approach for patients in which sinus rhythm could improve the quality of life and where the maintenance of sinus rhythm is considered likely. There are different techniques to perform an electrical cardioversion, each with specific indications, advantages, and limitations. The method most frequently used to restore sinus rhythm is external direct current cardioversion; however, this technique has some disadvantages, since it requires a high energy and usually general anesthesia. Esophageal cardioversion is an alternative method to obtain restoration of sinus rhythm, warranting acute and long-term results absolutely comparable with those obtained by the conventional transthoracic technique, especially in obese and COPD patients with high thoracic impedance for whom the standard technique may be less effective.

Transthoracic versus transesophageal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation under light sedation: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by a 5-10% failure rate and by the expense arising from a perceived need for general anesthesia. A transesophageal approach using light sedation has been proposed as a means of augmenting the success rate and avoiding the need for general anesthesia. We hypothesized that the high rate of success and the lower energy requirement associated with biphasic cardioversion might eliminate any advantage of the transesophageal approach.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 60 patients attending for ECV of persistent AF to a transesophageal or a transthoracic approach. Sedation of moderate depth was achieved with intravenous midazolam. The dose of midazolam was titrated in the same manner in both groups.

RESULTS

Sinus rhythm was restored in 29/30 patients (97%) in each group using a similar number of shocks for both groups (1.3 +/- 0.6 transesophageal vs 1.4 +/- 0.7 transthoracic, P = NS) with a similar procedure duration (14.1 +/- 8.2 minutes vs 13.8 +/- 7.5 minutes, P = NS). Both groups received similar doses of midazolam (4.2 +/- 2.7 mg vs 4.4 +/- 2.8 mg, P = NS) and both reported a similar discomfort score in (0.9 +/- 1.3 vs 1.1 +/- 1.8, P = NS). No complication occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

AF may be cardioverted safely and effectively by either a transthoracic or a transesophageal approach. The use of sedation of moderate depth renders cardioversion by either approach acceptable. As transesophageal ECV shows no clear advantage, transthoracic cardioversion should remain the approach of first choice.

Outpatient oesophageal-precordial electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an effective and safe technique to restore sinus rhythm

OBJECTIVE

External electrical cardioversion is commonly used in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), but usually involves general anaesthesia. We tested the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a minimally invasive cardioversion technique, not requiring general anaesthesia, performed on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

We performed outpatient oesophageal cardioversion in 87 consecutive patients (mean age: 67.5 +/- 9.6 years; weight: 77.47 +/- 12.34 kg; left atrium diameter: 46.25 +/- 6.85 mm; LVEF: 55.5 +/- 16%) with persistent AF (mean duration: 6.99 +/- 11.55 months). A biphasic shock was delivered via an oesophageal decapolar lead (cathode) and two precordial patches (anode) under a mild sedation (midazolam 2.5-5 mg). In the first 25 patients, a step-up protocol (from 10 to 100 J) was performed whereas, in the other 62, a first shock at 50 J and a second one at 100 J, were delivered.

RESULTS

Patients described the level of discomfort caused by the procedure according a five-grade scale. Cardioversion was achieved in 97.7% of patients using a mean effective energy of 51.2 +/- 15.7 J. In 88.5% of patients, sinus rhythm was restored by using 50 J or less. No complications occurred and no patient required hospital admission. Mean discomfort score was 1.56 +/- 0.74 out of 5. Sinus rhythm persisted in 62.6% of patients at the 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient oesophageal cardioversion is a safe, acceptable and effective way to cardiovert patients with AF. It may be a useful alternative to external cardioversion. A relatively high starting energy (50 J) was demonstrated to be superior to a low-energy step-up technique.

Single-step atrial thrombus exclusion and transesophageal cardioversion in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia, has a major impact on both patient morbidity and healthcare economics. Hospital admissions due to AF have risen by two-thirds in the last 20 years. This is due mainly to an aging population and an increasing prevalence of chronic heart disease. Strategies for the management of AF include prevention of thromboembolism, rate control and correction of the arrhythmia. Electrical cardioversion as one component of the treatment of AF requires the absence of atrial thrombi. Transesophageal echocardiography is used routinely for exclusion of atrial thrombi prior to cardioversion in many hospitals. This review presents preliminary data on the clinical use of devices for simultaneous transesophageal echocardiography and transesophageal cardioversion.

Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: different methods for a safe and effective technique

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia observed in clinical practice. Many different therapeutic approaches are available at present but none may be considered the gold standard treatment. Antiarrhythmic drugs are not very effective agents to cardiovert persistent atrial fibrillation and, therefore, the technique most frequently used to restore sinus rhythm is external direct current cardioversion, which has proved to be safe and very effective. Esophageal cardioversion is an alternative method that could obviate some of the limitations of the external technique, such as the high energy required, need for anesthesia and longer hospital stay. Another technique performed during the last two decades is internal cardioversion, but at present, the advantage of this technique is limited to the small proportion of cases of unsuccessful external cardioversion.

Biphasic transoesophageal vs. transthoracic electrical cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of transoesophageal (TOC) vs. transthoracic (TTC) electrical cardioversion, both with biphasic shocks, for sinus rhythm (SR) restoration in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We randomised 210 patients (151 male, 59 female, mean age 66 +/- 9 years) with persistent AF into two groups: group 1 (n = 104) undergoing TOC with a step-up protocol of 30, 50, 70 and 100 J, and group 2 (n = 106) undergoing TTC with a step-up protocol of 70, 100, 120 and 150 J.

RESULTS

The two groups were homogeneous as for clinical and instrumental characteristics, except for left ventricular ejection fraction (50.5 +/- 10% in group 1 vs. 53 +/- 8% in group 2, P < 0.05) and thoracic impedance (63 +/- 8 Omega in group 1 vs. 66 +/- 6 Omega in group 2, P < 0.005). SR was restored in 98 (94%) group 1 patients vs. 99 (93%) group 2 patients (P = NS). First shock was effective in 48 (46%) group 1 patients vs. 54 (51%) group 2 patients (P = NS). Mean delivered energy was 50.4 +/- 23.6 and 95.1 +/- 29.6 J; mean effective energy was 47.3 +/- 20.7 and 91.2 +/- 26.6 J in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Cross-over to the highest energy level was never effective. TOC tolerability was optimal (mean discomfort score 1.2 on a 1-4 grading scale). Markers of myocardial necrosis did not increase and no procedure-related complications occurred. On logistic regression analysis, the most predictive variables of unsuccessful cardioversion were AF duration (P = 0.0001) and low left atrial appendage emptying velocity (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Both TOC and TTC with biphasic shocks are effective and safe for SR restoration in patients with persistent AF; however, the considerably lower levels of delivered and effective energies for SR restoration allow TOC to be performed during mild sedation with optimal tolerability, thus avoiding general anaesthesia.

Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography using a combined probe when converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

We studied the feasibility and efficacy of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) combined with transesophageal cardioversion (TEC). Secondary aims were to study left atrial flow velocities before and 1 and 5 minutes after TEC, biochemical markers of myocardial damage, and patient tolerability. TEC after a short period of anticoagulation and exclusion of a clot with TEE was safe. TEC was well tolerated and efficacious. The use of a combined probe for TEE and TEC therefore can save time and be more effective. A custom-made probe for combined TEE plus TEC was used. TEC was performed with a step-up protocol (20 J to between 30 and 50 J) and with biphasic shocks. Presence of spontaneous echo contrast was scored. Cumulative energy needed to achieve sinus rhythm was calculated. Discomfort was scored on a scale of 0 to 10. Twenty-six patients underwent combined TEE/TEC. Sinus rhythm was achieved in 24 of 26 patients (92%) with a mean cumulative energy of 42.3 J. Sixteen of 26 patients were cardioverted with a 20-J shock, and 6 of these patients had early recurrence of atrial fibrillation. All biochemical markers were unaffected, and TEE/TEC was well tolerated. Left atrial appendage velocity decreased significantly after TEC. Thus, the use of a TEE/TEC probe offers effective cardioversion with low energy levels, is well tolerated, and hemodynamics during and immediately after cardioversion can be monitored. Early cardioversion after exclusion of a clot with this combined probe is time saving and cost effective.

Phase relationships between two or more interacting processes from one-dimensional time series. I. Basic theory

A general approach is developed for the detection of phase relationships between two or more different oscillatory processes interacting within a single system, using one-dimensional time series only. It is based on the introduction of angles and radii of return times maps, and on studying the dynamics of the angles. An explicit unique relationship is derived between angles and the conventional phase difference introduced earlier for bivariate data. It is valid under conditions of weak forcing. This correspondence is confirmed numerically for a nonstationary process in a forced Van der Pol system. A model describing the angles' behavior for a dynamical system under weak quasiperiodic forcing with an arbitrary number of independent frequencies is derived.