Chronic Kidney Disease in Cancer Survivors

Platinum-based chemotherapies-induced nephrotoxicity: mechanisms, potential treatments, and management

Platinum-based chemotherapies are essential in the treatment of several malignancies. However, such medications can damage the kidneys, frequently leading to both acute and chronic kidney disease. Treatment becomes more difficult for such problems. Physicians may alter chemotherapy regimens and utilize kidney-protecting medications to lessen renal damage. New imaging techniques and biomarkers also aid in the early detection of renal issues. To effectively handle the mentioned situation, oncologists, nephrologists, and pharmacists must collaborate. However, additional study is still required to develop customized therapies, discover strategies to minimize kidney injury and produce new platinum medicines. Hereupon, the present review's authors are being sought to address the causes, prospective treatments, and management of nephrotoxicity caused by platinum-based chemotherapy.

[Nephroprotection: General principles and application to the patients with cancers - when nephroprotection is essential for oncological care plan]

Nephroprotection is a set of recommendations that aim to prevent the risks of acute and/or chronic renal failure and to limit the progression of renal failure towards an end stage. Nephroprotection is not limited to nephrology and applies to all patients at risk of renal failure. Cancer patients are particularly at risk of developing intrinsic and extrinsic renal failure, as well as the toxicity of specific treatments. However, they are poorly included in nephroprotection studies. Thus, current guidelines have not been adapted to these pathologies and oncology-specific comorbidities, such as malnutrition or prognosis, are often not taken into account. In this article, we review the established recommendations by transposing them to the cancer patient as a whole. In addition to the reminder of hygiene and dietary rules to control blood pressure and diabetes, we discuss the importance of therapeutic education, iatrogeny and treatment options to control renal failure in this context. The lack of clearly established data in cancer confirms the needs to strengthen links between oncologists, hematologists and nephrologists and reinforces the emergence of onco-nephrology as a new discipline.

Recommending ultra-processed oral nutrition supplements for unintentional weight loss: Are there risks?

Oral nutrition supplements (ONS) are widely recommended for the management of unintentional weight loss in patient populations, long-term care residents, and community-dwelling older adults. Most marketed ONS are ultra-processed, with precision nutrition and aseptic composition, as well as convenience and availability, driving their selection. However, therapeutic effectiveness is mixed and the potential health risks of consuming ultra-processed ONS long-term in lieu of less-processed foods have received little attention. A diverse and balanced microbiota supporting immunity and wellness is maintained by a diet rich in plant-sourced foods. The implications of ultra-processed ONS displacing plant-sourced foods, and specifically the potential for undesirable impacts on the gut microbiota, require consideration. Most ONS are either devoid of fiber or are supplemented with isolated or purified fibers that may contribute to adverse gastrointestinal symptoms and appetite suppression. In contrast, the diversity of microbial-available, nondigestible carbohydrates, together with the array of phytochemicals found in plant-sourced foods, support microbial diversity and its resiliency. This review outlines the clinical dilemma of recommending commercial ultra-processed ONS vs nutritionally adequate (eg, high-energy/high-protein) foods and beverages that contribute to diet quality, maintenance of a diverse and stable gut microbiota composition, and support nutrition status and health. Ultra-processed ONS may fall short of expected health benefits, and overreliance may potentially contribute to the risk for patient and older adult populations because of the displacement of a variety of healthful foods.

Association of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate with Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Study

In this study, through a cohort study of 10 million people, we investigated the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence. This is an observational cohort study using data from the national health claims database established by the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). We selected 9,598,085 participants older than 20 years who had undergone health checkups in 2009. A health checkup involves the history of any diseases, current health status, and results of several physical and blood exams including eGFR. We investigated the presence of HNC diagnosis in their national health insurance data from 2010 to 2018. Of the 9,598,085 participants, 10,732 had been newly diagnosed with HNC in the 9-year follow-up. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, participants with elevated eGFR were associated with a risk of HNC incidence (HR = 1.129; 95% CI = 1.075−1.186 for eGFR = 90−104 mL/min/1.73 m2 and HR = 1.129; 95% CI = 1.076−1.194 for eGFR ≥ 105 mL/min/1.73 m2) compared with those with eGFR 60−89 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among HNC, the incidences of oral cavity, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers were significantly increased in the elevated eGFR group. According to the subgroup analysis, participants with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were correlated with risk of HNC incidence in middle age, non/mild drinker, low BMI, no diabetes, and no hypertension patients compared with those with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Elevated eGFR was associated with the risk of some type of HNC, even in individuals with adjusted hypertension and diabetes without chronic diseases. The results of this study have implications for etiological investigations and preventive strategies.