1
|
Trends in In-Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, Nonroutine Discharge, and Cost Among End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis Hospitalized With Heart Failure (2001–2014). J Card Fail 2019; 25:524-533. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
2
|
Inampudi C, Alvarez P, Asleh R, Briasoulis A. Therapeutic Approach to Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and End-stage Renal Disease. Curr Cardiol Rev 2018; 14:60-66. [PMID: 29366423 PMCID: PMC5872264 DOI: 10.2174/1573403x14666180123164916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several risk factors including Ischemic heart disease, uncontrolled hypertension, high output Heart Failure (HF) from shunting through vascular hemodialysis access, and anemia, contribute to development of HF in patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Guidelinedirected medical and device therapy for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) has not been extensively studied and may have limited safety and efficacy in patients with ESRD. RESULTS Maintenance of interdialytic and intradialytic euvolemia is a key component of HF management in these patients but often difficult to achieve. Beta-blockers, especially carvedilol which is poorly dialyzed is associated with cardiovascular benefit in this population. Despite paucity of data, Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) when appropriately adjusted by dose and with close monitoring of serum potassium can also be administered to these patients who tolerate beta-blockers. Mineralocorticoid receptors in patients with HFrEF and ESRD have been shown to reduce mortality in a large randomized controlled trial without any significantly increased risk of hyperkalemia. Implantable Cardiac-defibrillators (ICDs) should be considered for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with HFrEF and ESRD who meet the implant indications. Furthermore in anemic iron-deficient patients, intravenous iron infusion may improve functional status. Finally, mechanical circulatory support with leftventricular assist devices may be related to increased mortality risk and the presence of ESRD poses a relative contraindication to further evaluation of these devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chakradhari Inampudi
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Section of Heart Failure and Transplant, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Paulino Alvarez
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Section of Heart Failure and Transplant, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Rabea Asleh
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, United States
| | - Alexandros Briasoulis
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Section of Heart Failure and Transplant, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Collins SP, Levy PD, Martindale JL, Dunlap ME, Storrow AB, Pang PS, Albert NM, Felker GM, Fermann GJ, Fonarow GC, Givertz MM, Hollander JE, Lanfear DJ, Lenihan DJ, Lindenfeld JM, Peacock WF, Sawyer DB, Teerlink JR, Butler J. Clinical and Research Considerations for Patients With Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure: A Consensus Statement from the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine and the Heart Failure Society of America Acute Heart Failure Working Group. J Card Fail 2016; 22:618-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Revised: 04/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
4
|
Collins SP, Levy PD, Martindale JL, Dunlap ME, Storrow AB, Pang PS, Albert NM, Felker GM, Fermann GJ, Fonarow GC, Givertz MM, Hollander JE, Lanfear DE, Lenihan DJ, Lindenfeld JM, Peacock WF, Sawyer DB, Teerlink JR, Butler J. Clinical and Research Considerations for Patients With Hypertensive Acute Heart Failure: A Consensus Statement from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine and the Heart Failure Society of America Acute Heart Failure Working Group. Acad Emerg Med 2016; 23:922-31. [PMID: 27286136 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Revised: 04/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Management approaches for patients in the emergency department (ED) who present with acute heart failure (AHF) have largely focused on intravenous diuretics. Yet, the primary pathophysiologic derangement underlying AHF in many patients is not solely volume overload. Patients with hypertensive AHF (H-AHF) represent a clinical phenotype with distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms that result in elevated ventricular filling pressures. To optimize treatment response and minimize adverse events in this subgroup, we propose that clinical management be tailored to a conceptual model of disease that is based on these mechanisms. This consensus statement reviews the relevant pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, approach to therapy, and considerations for clinical trials in ED patients with H-AHF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P. Collins
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Vanderbilt University; Nashville TN
| | - Phillip D. Levy
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Wayne State University; Detroit MI
| | | | - Mark E. Dunlap
- Department of Medicine; Case Western University; Cleveland OH
| | - Alan B. Storrow
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Vanderbilt University; Nashville TN
| | - Peter S. Pang
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Indiana University; Indianapolis IN
| | | | | | - Gregory J. Fermann
- Department of Emergency Medicine; University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati OH
| | - Gregg C. Fonarow
- Department of Medicine; University of California at Los Angeles; Los Angeles CA
| | | | - Judd E. Hollander
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia PA
| | | | | | | | - W. Frank Peacock
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Baylor College of Medicine; Houston TX
| | | | - John R. Teerlink
- Department of Medicine; San Francisco VA Medical Center; San Francisco CA
| | - Javed Butler
- Department of Medicine; Stony Brook University; Stony Brook NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pandey A, Golwala H, DeVore AD, Lu D, Madden G, Bhatt DL, Schulte PJ, Heidenreich PA, Yancy CW, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC. Trends in the Use of Guideline-Directed Therapies Among Dialysis Patients Hospitalized With Systolic Heart Failure: Findings From the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Program. JACC-HEART FAILURE 2016; 4:649-61. [PMID: 27179827 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the temporal trends in the adherence to heart failure (HF)-related process of care measures and clinical outcomes among patients with acute decompensated HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated significant underuse of evidence-based HF therapies among patients with coexisting ESRD and HFrEF. However, it is unclear if the proportional use of evidence-based medical therapies and associated clinical outcomes among these patients has changed over time. METHODS Get With The Guidelines-HF study participants who were admitted for acute HFrEF between January 2005 and June 2014 were stratified into 3 groups on the basis of their admission renal function: normal renal function, renal insufficiency without dialysis, and dialysis. Temporal change in proportional adherence to the HF-related process of care measures and incidence of clinical outcomes (1-year mortality, HF hospitalization, and all-cause hospitalization) during the study period was evaluated across the 3 renal function groups. RESULTS The study included 111,846 patients with HFrEF from 390 participating centers, of whom 19% had renal insufficiency but who did not require dialysis, and 3% were on dialysis. There was a significant temporal increase in adherence to evidence-based medical therapies (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker: p trend <0.0001, β-blockers: p trend = 0.0089; post-discharge follow-up referral: p trend <0.0001) and defect-free composite care (p trend <0.0001) among dialysis patients. An improvement in adherence to these measures was also observed among patients with normal renal function and patients with renal insufficiency without a need for dialysis. There was no significant change in cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes over time among the HF patients on dialysis. CONCLUSIONS In a large contemporary cohort of HFrEF patients with ESRD, adherence to the HF process of care measures has improved significantly over the past 10 years. Unlike patients with normal renal function, there was no significant change in 1-year clinical outcomes over time among HF patients on dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambarish Pandey
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Harsh Golwala
- Division of Cardiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Adam D DeVore
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Di Lu
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | - George Madden
- Integris Southwest Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Clyde W Yancy
- Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garg N, Thomas G, Jackson G, Rickard J, Nally JV, Tang WW, Navaneethan SD. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in CKD: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8:1293-303. [PMID: 23660183 PMCID: PMC3731896 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.00750113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Accepted: 03/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) confers morbidity and mortality benefits to selected patients with heart failure. This systematic review examined effects of CRT in CKD patients (estimated GFR [eGFR] <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS MEDLINE and Scopus (from 1990 to December 2012) and conference proceedings abstracts were searched for relevant observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies comparing the following outcomes were included: (1) CKD patients with and without CRT and (2) CKD patients with CRT to non-CKD patients with CRT. Mortality, eGFR, and left ventricular ejection fraction data were extracted and pooled when appropriate using a random-effects model. RESULTS Eighteen studies (14 observational studies and 4 RCTs) were included. There was a modest improvement in eGFR with CRT among CKD patients (mean difference 2.30 ml/min per 1.73m(2); 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 4.27). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection with CRT in CKD patients (mean difference 6.24%; 95% confidence interval, 3.46 to 9.07). Subgroup analysis of three RCTs reported lower rates of death or hospitalization for heart failure with CRT (versus other therapy) in the CKD population. Survival outcomes of CKD patients (compared with the non-CKD population) with CRT differed among observational studies and RCTs. CONCLUSIONS CRT improves left ventricular and renal function in the CKD population with heart failure. Given the increasing use of cardiac devices, further studies examining the effects of CRT on mortality in CKD patients, particularly those with advanced kidney disease, are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Garg
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - George Thomas
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gregory Jackson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John Rickard
- Department of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph V. Nally
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - W.H. Wilson Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sankar D. Navaneethan
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah RV, Givertz MM. Managing acute renal failure in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the cardiorenal syndrome. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2009; 6:176-81. [PMID: 19723459 DOI: 10.1007/s11897-009-0025-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
In patients with acute decompensated heart failure, worsening renal function during conventional decongestive therapy (cardiorenal syndrome) affects prognosis and the initiation of therapies with known benefit in chronic heart failure. Potential strategies for decongestion in patients who develop cardiorenal syndrome include invasive hemodynamic monitoring to guide therapy, use of continuous diuretic infusions, ultrafiltration, or novel therapy with adenosine or vasopressin receptor antagonists. Clinical trials by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Heart Failure Network are currently underway to validate such therapies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with worsening renal function and to establish novel biomarkers for the early identification of patients who develop cardiorenal syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi V Shah
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease have a higher burden of cardiovascular disease, which increases in a dose-dependent fashion with worsening kidney function. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including advanced age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidemia, have an important role in the progression of cardiovascular disease in patients who have a reduced glomerular filtration rate, especially in those with mild-to-moderate kidney disease. In patients with severe kidney disease, nontraditional or 'novel' risk factors, including inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular calcification, a prothrombotic milieu, and anemia, seem to confer additional risk. In this Review, we highlight factors that increase cardiovascular risk in patients with a reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate. In addition, we discuss therapeutic strategies for reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with kidney disease, whose unique atherosclerotic phenotype might require an approach that differs from traditional models developed in populations with normal kidney function. Therapeutic paradigms for patients with chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular risk factors must be evaluated in randomized trials, from which such patients have often been excluded.
Collapse
|