Outcomes of hemodialysis patients in a long-term care hospital setting: a single-center study

Outcomes following acute kidney injury requiring dialysis: A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Retrospective study to examine the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI-D) patients that received outpatient hemodialysis as part of continued AKI-D care and explore factors associated with recovery of kidney function and discontinuation of dialysis.

METHODS

Records of all admissions to Emory Dialysis centers between January 2010 to December 2021 were reviewed to include patients with confirmed diagnosis of AKI-D. Basic demographics, comorbidities, duration of hospitalization and cause of AKI were extracted from hospital records and cross-referenced with the dialysis center electronic health record. Patients were followed starting from the day of the first outpatient hemodialysis up to 180 days. All hemodialysis sessions and laboratory data were analyzed. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with recovery of kidney function, defined as survival free of dialysis.

RESULTS

132 patients were analyzed, corresponding to 12,662 patient-day of outpatient AKI-D care. Among those, 19 (14 %) patients died during the observation period. 54 % of patients were male and 70 % were Black race. Median Age was 64 years (IQR 49-79). 42 patients (32 %) recovered enough kidney function to discontinue dialysis. Median time to kidney recovery was 31 days (IQR: 19-75), and the cumulative probability of kidney recovery at 6 months was 39 %. Patients who discontinued dialysis were younger (58 vs 66 years), had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at time of admission (69 vs 46 ml/min/1.73m2) to the hospital, and were less likely to have a history of hypertension (61 % vs 82 %). Intra-dialytic hypotension was more common in patients who did not recover kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

39 % of patients with AKI-D recovered kidney function within 180 days of outpatient HD start. The median time to recovery was 31 days. Younger age, higher e-GFR at time of hospital admission, and absence of hypertension were predictors of kidney recovery. Patients who recover kidney function experienced episodes of intradialytic hypotension less frequently.

Management of Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Undergoing Dialysis After Hospital Discharge

Acute kidney injury is a common diagnosis in hospitalized patients and can range in severity from a minor, reversible rise in creatinine to a more severe kidney injury with resultant complications. In a small but significant percentage of patients with acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy is required for supportive care. Patients who require renal replacement therapy and survive to hospital discharge face major challenges in recovering from acute illness while adapting to an outpatient dialysis system that was not designed for patients with acute kidney injury. In addition, treating clinicians must navigate complex transitions of care and remain cognizant of signs of renal recovery. This review describes the current evidence in postdischarge acute kidney injury requiring dialysis management. We discuss risk factors for dialysis dependency, markers of kidney recovery, transitions of care, dialysis customization, and quality of life.

Palliative Care for Patients with Kidney Disease

Interest in palliative care has increased in recent times, particularly in its multidisciplinary approach developed to meet the needs of patients with a life-threatening disease and their families. Although the modern concept of palliative simultaneous care postulates the adoption of these qualitative treatments early on during the life-threatening disease (and potentially just after the diagnosis), palliative care is still reserved for patients at the end of their life in most of the clinical realities, and thus is consequently mistaken for hospice care. Patients with acute or chronic kidney disease (CKD) usually experience poor quality of life and decreased survival expectancy and thus may benefit from palliative care. Palliative care requires close collaboration among multiple health care providers, patients, and their families to share the diagnosis, prognosis, realistic treatment goals, and treatment decisions. Several approaches, such as conservative management, extracorporeal, and peritoneal palliative dialysis, can be attempted to globally meet the needs of patients with kidney disease (e.g., physical, social, psychological, or spiritual needs). Particularly for frail patients, pharmacologic management or peritoneal dialysis may be more appropriate than extracorporeal treatment. Extracorporeal dialysis treatment may be disproportionate in these patients and associated with a high burden of symptoms correlated with this invasive procedure. For those patients undergoing extracorporeal dialysis, individualized goal setting and a broader concept of adequacy should be considered as the foundations of extracorporeal palliative dialysis. Interestingly, little evidence is available on palliative and end of life care for acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. In this review, the main variables influencing medical decision-making about palliative care in patients with kidney disease are described, as well as the different approaches that can fulfill the needs of patients with CKD and AKI.

The efficacy of rehabilitation for elderly hemodialysis patients: a retrospective, single center study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease is associated with an increased risk of vascular events and bone fractures, and its prevalence is increasing. Despite the high frequency of strokes and bone fractures in the hemodialysis (HD) population, the few studies on rehabilitation outcomes in this population are controversial. The current study assessed the efficacy of inpatient rehabilitation for hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational review of medical records of all chronic HD patients who underwent rehabilitation in Meir Medical Center, from 2008 to 2018. The primary endpoint was functional independence measure (FIM) score at discharge. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, efficiency of rehabilitation and discharge destination from rehabilitation.

RESULTS

During the study period, 162 patients were included in the analysis. 76/81 (93.8%) hemodialysis patients had improvement FIM scores. There were no significant differences in FIM scores at discharge between hemodialysis patients and controls. However, the efficiency of rehabilitation expressed by FIM efficiency (progress measured as FIM gain/length of stay in rehabilitation) was higher in hemodialysis vs. controls. 73% of hemodialysis patients were discharged home. There was no significant difference in discharge destinations between groups. Both 30-day and 1-year mortality after admission to rehabilitation was higher in HD vs. controls (OR 4.97, 95% CI 1.4-18.2, p = 0.008 and OR 4.98, 95% CI 1.8-14.1, p value = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis patients may benefit from inpatient rehabilitation. Although mortality was higher, efficacy of rehabilitation for hemodialysis patients is comparable to non-dialysis patients and is no less effective.

Importance of Early Inpatient Geriatric Rehabilitation on Outcomes in Individuals on Dialysis

OBJECTIVE

To report short-term functional outcomes of patients incident to dialysis undergoing inpatient rehabilitation within 3 months of dialysis initiation.

DESIGN

Retrospective observation study using prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Single-center, hospital-based geriatric dialysis rehabilitation unit. All patients incident to hemodialysis admitted to the geriatric dialysis rehabilitation unit between May 2002 and April 2016 were identified using a retrospective observational design. Clinical and demographic data were collected prospectively and linked, using the unique hospital number and dates of admission and discharge, to FIM scores (used to assess functional recovery) at admission and discharge.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=449; mean age ± SD, 74±9y) newly started on hemodialysis (within 3mo).

INTERVENTIONS

Inpatient rehabilitation care, short daily dialysis therapy with nephrologist support, and geriatrician assessment.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Change in FIM score; discharge location.

RESULTS

Patients were admitted within 3 months of hemodialysis initiation. The median length of stay in the rehabilitation program was 43 days (25th and 75th quartile, 33-55 days). Of those with complete data (n=370), 95% had improvement in FIM scores (median changes in total FIM score 25 [quartiles, 16, 33]; in motor FIM 23 [quartiles, 15, 32]; and in cognitive FIM 1 [quartiles, 0, 3], respectively). Most improvement was seen in transfer abilities, grooming, and mobility. A total of 324 patients (72%; 95% CI, 68%-76%) were discharged to a private home. An additional 11 were discharged to a seniors' residence.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that older patients incident to dialysis with functional decline respond well to specialized rehabilitation care and suggest this may be a novel approach to dialysis initiation.

Low blood pressure is associated with acute kidney injury development and mortality in octogenarians admitted to the emergency room

AIM

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in octogenarians admitted to the emergency room, and to compare these parameters with those in a younger group of patients admitted in the same period.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational, single-center study that enrolled adult patients admitted to the emergency room of Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. Patients were stratified by age (≥80 years or <80 years) and followed up prospectively until discharge. The incidence of AKI, in-hospital mortality and duration of hospital stay were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 319 patients, 128 were octogenarians (mean age 86.7 years, range 80-105 years) and 191 were younger (mean age 60.6 years, range 18-79 years). The incidence of AKI and in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in octogenarians (16.4% vs 12.6%, P = 0.039 and 15.6% vs 3.1%, P = 0.001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only low systolic blood pressure at admission in octogenarians (P = 0.002), and a history of chronic kidney disease (P < 0.001) and hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.001) in the younger patients were independent risk factors for AKI.

CONCLUSION

The present results confirm the observation that AKI is common in octogenarians. We identified systolic blood pressure as the only independent variable associated with AKI in octogenarians. However, the role of therapeutic strategies aimed to increase systolic blood pressure and diminish complications in octogenarians remains to be elucidated. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 874-878.

Infrequent Provision of Palliative Care to Patients with Dialysis-Requiring AKI

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of palliative care in AKI is not well described. We sought to better understand palliative care practice patterns for hospitalized patients with AKI requiring dialysis in the United States.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using the 2012 National Inpatient Sample, we identified patients with AKI and palliative care encounters using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We compared palliative care encounters in patients with AKI requiring dialysis, patients with AKI not requiring dialysis, and patients without AKI. We described the provision of palliative care in patients with AKI requiring dialysis and compared the frequency of palliative care encounters for patients with AKI requiring dialysis with that for patients with other illnesses with similarly poor prognoses. We used logistic regression to determine factors associated with the provision of palliative care, adjusting for demographics, hospital-level variables, and patient comorbidities.

RESULTS

We identified 3,031,036 patients with AKI, of whom 91,850 (3%) received dialysis. We observed significant patient- and hospital-level differences in the provision of palliative care for patients with AKI requiring dialysis; adjusted odds were 26% (95% confidence interval, 12% to 38%) lower in blacks and 23% (95% confidence interval, 3% to 39%) lower in Hispanics relative to whites. Lower provision of palliative care was observed for rural and urban nonteaching hospitals relative to urban teaching hospitals, small and medium hospitals relative to large hospitals, and hospitals in the Northeast compared with the South. After adjusting for age and sex, there was low utilization of palliative care services for patients with AKI requiring dialysis (8%)-comparable with rates of utilization by patients with other illnesses with poor prognosis, including cardiogenic shock (9%), intracranial hemorrhage (10%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (10%).

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of palliative care varied widely by patient and facility characteristics. Palliative care was infrequently used in hospitalized patients with AKI requiring dialysis, despite its poor prognosis and the regular application of life-sustaining therapy.

Integrating Supportive Care Principles Into Dialysis Decision Making: A Primer for Palliative Medicine Providers

Despite advances in predialysis care and dialysis technology, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease continue to experience multiple comorbidities, a high symptom burden, a shortened life expectancy, and substantial physical, emotional, and spiritual suffering. Patients with acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease, especially if they are older, often undergo prolonged hospitalizations, greater use of intensive medical treatment, and limited survival. Unfortunately, most nephrologists are not trained to conduct shared decision-making conversations to elicit patients' values, preferences, and goals for treatment and address their patients' multifactorial suffering. These patients would benefit from the integration of supportive care principles into their care. This article addresses how supportive care specialists can collaborate with nephrology clinicians to provide patient-centered supportive care and identifies resources to assist them in this endeavor.

The ethics of offering dialysis for AKI to the older patient: time to re-evaluate?

Older patients are more susceptible to AKI. In the elderly, AKI has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and it is a significant risk factor for CKD and dialysis-dependent ESRD. There are now accumulating data that the start of dialysis for some older patients is associated with poor outcomes, such as high treatment intensity, suffering, and limited life prolongation, which occur at the expense of dignity and quality of life. The biomedicalization of aging is a relatively recent field of ethical inquiry with two directly relevant features to decisions about starting dialysis for older patients with AKI: (1) the routinization of geriatric clinical interventions, such as dialysis, which results in the overshadowing of patient choice, and (2) the transformation of the technological imperative into the moral imperative. A major consequence of the biomedicalization of aging is that societal expectations about standard medical care have resulted in the relatively unquestioned provision of dialysis for AKI to older patients. This paper calls for nephrologists to re-examine the data and their attitudes to offering dialysis to older patients with AKI, especially those patients with underlying CKD and significant comorbidities. Shared decision-making and the reinforcement of the right of the patient to make a choice need to slow down the otherwise ineluctable routinization of starting old and very sick patients on dialysis. In the process of shared decision-making, nephrologists should not automatically recommend dialysis for older patients; in those patients who can be predicted to do poorly, recommending against dialysis upholds the Hippocratic maxim to be of benefit and do no harm. This paper challenges the automatic transformation of the technological imperative into the moral imperative for older patients with AKI and points to the need for a re-evaluation of dialysis ethics in this population.

Dialysis therapies in older patients with end-stage renal disease

Each year a large number of older individuals with advanced renal disease are started on chronic dialysis therapy. Life expectancy is estimated at between 2 and 4 years depending on age, comorbidity, and intensity of medical care required in the weeks around the dialysis start time. Survivors remain at high risk of ongoing morbidity. Regarding quality of life, many older patients express regret over having opted for chronic dialysis therapy and subsequently choose to withdraw from treatment, whereas many others maintain a quality of life similar to that of age-matched peers. Early assessment and ongoing comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended.

Renoprevention: A new concept for reengineering nephrology care--an economic impact and patient outcome analysis of two hypothetical patient management paradigms in the CCU

BACKGROUND

The impact of acute kidney injury (AKI) on chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression remains uncertain; the common belief is that AKI in CKD is short-lived with subsequent full recovery. However 25.2% of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Medicare patients all experienced antecedent AKI. We recently described a new syndrome of ESRD following AKI, the syndrome of rapid-onset end-stage renal disease (SORO-ESRD). Renoprevention, which we described in 2009, is the application of preventative measures to reduce AKI incidence.

METHODS

This is a descriptive study based on real clinical experience. Two hypothetical 69-year-old Caucasian male patients, A and B, with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) presented for elective cardiac catheterization and subsequent coronary artery bypass graft procedures; renoprevention was applied in patient A but not in B.

RESULTS

Aggressive fluid repletion, withholding Lisinopril 40 mg once daily (QD) 1 week before hospitalization (hydralazine substituted) in A-earlier discharge after 6 days, transient minimal change in serum creatinine. Patient B continued on Lisinopril 40 mg QD, experienced prolonged hypotension needing pressors-severe oliguric AKI, volume overload, daily RRT for 6 days, recovered kidney function, was discharged after 20 days. Hospital charges were $68,580 (A) versus $154,650 (B). If patient B had developed ESRD (SORO-ESRD), the savings would be humongous.

CONCLUSION

A more forceful and pragmatic application of renoprevention strategies in the coronary care unit (CCU)-preemptive withholding of nephrotoxics including renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, aggressive prevention of perioperative hypotension, avoiding nephrotoxic exposure as contrast, and antibiotics-leads to less AKI, potentially less SORO-ESRD, better patient outcomes, and massive dollar savings. Such paradigm shifts would constitute major rethinking in current nephrology practice, a form of nephrology practice reengineering.

Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the leading cause of nephrology consultation and is associated with high mortality rates. The primary causes of AKI include ischemia, hypoxia, or nephrotoxicity. An underlying feature is a rapid decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) usually associated with decreases in renal blood flow. Inflammation represents an important additional component of AKI leading to the extension phase of injury, which may be associated with insensitivity to vasodilator therapy. It is suggested that targeting the extension phase represents an area potential of treatment with the greatest possible impact. The underlying basis of renal injury appears to be impaired energetics of the highly metabolically active nephron segments (i.e., proximal tubules and thick ascending limb) in the renal outer medulla, which can trigger conversion from transient hypoxia to intrinsic renal failure. Injury to kidney cells can be lethal or sublethal. Sublethal injury represents an important component in AKI, as it may profoundly influence GFR and renal blood flow. The nature of the recovery response is mediated by the degree to which sublethal cells can restore normal function and promote regeneration. The successful recovery from AKI depends on the degree to which these repair processes ensue and these may be compromised in elderly or chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Recent data suggest that AKI represents a potential link to CKD in surviving patients. Finally, earlier diagnosis of AKI represents an important area in treating patients with AKI that has spawned increased awareness of the potential that biomarkers of AKI may play in the future.

AKI in the ICU: definition, epidemiology, risk stratification, and outcomes

Acute kidney injury (AKI) has emerged as a major public health problem that affects millions of patients worldwide and leads to decreased survival and increased progression of underlying chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recent consensus criteria for definition and classification of AKI have provided more consistent estimates of AKI epidemiology. Patients, in particular those in the ICU, are dying of AKI and not just simply with AKI. Even small changes in serum creatinine concentrations are associated with a substantial increase in the risk of death. AKI is not a single disease but rather a syndrome comprising multiple clinical conditions. Outcomes from AKI depend on the underlying disease, the severity and duration of renal impairment, and the patient's renal baseline condition. The development of AKI is the consequence of complex interactions between the actual insult and subsequent activation of inflammation and coagulation. Contrary to the conventional view, recent experimental and clinical data argue against renal ischemia-reperfusion as a sine qua non condition for the development of AKI. Loss of renal function can occur without histological signs of tubular damage or even necrosis. The detrimental effects of AKI are not limited to classical well-known symptoms such as fluid overload and electrolyte abnormalities. AKI can also lead to problems that are not readily appreciated at the bedside and can extend well beyond the ICU stay, including progression of CKD and impaired innate immunity. Experimental and small observational studies provide evidence that AKI impairs (innate) immunity and is associated with higher infection rates.

Acute kidney injury episodes and chronic kidney disease risk in diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Prior studies have examined long-term outcomes of a single acute kidney injury (AKI) event in hospitalized patients. We examined the effects of AKI episodes during multiple hospitalizations on the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a cohort with diabetes mellitus (DM).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A total of 4082 diabetics were followed from January 1999 until December 2008. The primary outcome was reaching stage 4 CKD (GFR of <30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)). AKI during hospitalization was defined as >0.3 mg/dl or a 1.5-fold increase in creatinine relative to admission. Cox survival models examined the effect of first AKI episode and up to three episodes as time-dependent covariates, on the risk of stage 4 CKD. Covariates included demographic variables, baseline creatinine, and diagnoses of comorbidities including proteinuria.

RESULTS

Of the 3679 patients who met eligibility criteria (mean age = 61.7 years [SD, 11.2]; mean baseline creatinine = 1.10 mg/dl [SD, 0.3]), 1822 required at least one hospitalization during the time under observation (mean = 61.2 months [SD, 25]). Five hundred thirty of 1822 patients experienced one AKI episode; 157 of 530 experienced ≥2 AKI episodes. In multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, any AKI versus no AKI was a risk factor for stage 4 CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.76, 4.61); each AKI episode doubled that risk (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.78, 2.30).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI episodes are associated with a cumulative risk for developing advanced CKD in diabetes mellitus, independent of other major risk factors of progression.

Withholding and withdrawing renal support in acute kidney injury

Management of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) is mainly limited to supportive therapy, with dialysis as one of the main components. Whether or not to offer dialysis and when to withdraw dialysis is a one of the many choices physicians face in daily clinical practice. Withholding or withdrawing renal replacement therapy is a complex decision and depends on many interacting factors, which are unique for each patient and their families and for the care team. An evidence-based guideline with nine specific recommendations for managing patients has been available however is infrequently employed to help clinical decision making. In this review, we discuss the important issues affecting decisions to withhold or withdraw dialysis in AKI patients and provide an approach for making these decisions for patient management.

Chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the elderly population: current prevalence, future projections, and clinical significance

The world's population is aging, with the number of older adults projected to increase dramatically over the next 2 decades. This trend poses major challenges to health care systems, reflecting the greater health care use and more comorbid conditions among elderly adults. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a substantial concern in the elderly population, with both an increasing incidence of treated kidney failure with dialysis as well as a high prevalence of earlier stages of CKD. Given the high burden of risk factors for CKD, the high prevalence of CKD in the elderly population is not surprising, with the rise in obesity, diabetes, and hypertension in middle-aged adults likely foreshadowing further increases in CKD prevalence among the elderly population. It is now commonly agreed that the presence of CKD identifies a higher risk state in the elderly population, with increased risk for multiple adverse outcomes, including kidney failure, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and death. Accordingly, CKD in older adults is worthy of attention by both health care providers and patients, with the presence of a reduced glomerular filtration rate or albuminuria in the elderly potentially informing therapeutic and diagnostic decisions for these individuals.

Acute kidney injury: a springboard for progression in chronic kidney disease

Recently published epidemiological and outcome analysis studies have brought to our attention the important role played by acute kidney injury (AKI) in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). AKI accelerates progression in patients with CKD; conversely, CKD predisposes patients to AKI. This research gives credence to older, well-thought-out wisdom that recovery from AKI is often not complete and is marked by residual structural damage. It also mirrors older experimental observations showing that unilateral nephrectomy, a surrogate for loss of nephrons by disease, compromises structural recovery and worsens tubulointerstitial fibrosis after ischemic AKI. Moreover, review of a substantial body of work on the relationships among reduced renal mass, hypertension, and pathology associated with these conditions suggests that impaired myogenic autoregulation of blood flow in the setting of hypertension, the arteriolosclerosis that results, and associated recurrent ischemic AKI in microscopic foci play important roles in the development of progressively increasing tubulointerstitial fibrosis. How nutrition, an additional factor that profoundly affects renal disease progression, influences these events needs reevaluation in light of information on the effects of calories vs. protein and animal vs. vegetable protein on injury and progression. Considerations based on published and emerging data suggest that a pathology that develops in regenerating tubules after AKI characterized by failure of differentiation and persistently high signaling activity is the proximate cause that drives downstream events in the interstitium: inflammation, capillary rarefaction, and fibroblast proliferation. In light of this information, we advance a comprehensive hypothesis regarding the pathophysiology of AKI as it relates to the progression of kidney disease. We discuss the implications of this pathophysiology for developing efficient therapeutic strategies to delay progression and avert ESRD.