Pharmacokinetics of Metformin in Patients Receiving Regular Hemodiafiltration

Research Progress of Population Pharmacokinetic of Metformin

Metformin is commonly used as first-line treatment for T2DM (type2 diabetes mellitus). Owing to the high pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, several population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models have been developed for metformin to explore potential covariates that affect its pharmacokinetic variation. This comprehensive review summarized the published PPK studies of metformin, aimed to summarize PPK models of metformin. Most studies described metformin pharmacokinetics as a 2-compartment (2-CMT) model with 4 study describing its pharmacokinetics as 1-compartment (1-CMT). Studies on metformin PPK have shown that obesity, creatinine clearance (CL_Cr), gene polymorphism, degree of renal function damage, and pathological conditions all have a certain impact on the PK parameters of metformin. It is particularly important to formulate individualized dosing regimens. For future PPK studies of metformin, we believe that more attention should be paid to special populations.

A Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Hemodialysis for Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis

OBJECTIVE

Although hemodialysis is recommended for patients with severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA), the amount of metformin removed by hemodialysis is poorly documented. We analyzed endogenous clearance and hemodialysis clearance in a patient with MALA.

METHODS

A 62-year-old man with a history of type II diabetes mellitus presented after several days of vomiting and diarrhea and was found to have acute kidney injury (AKI) and severe acidemia. Initial serum metformin concentration was 315.34 μmol/L (40.73 μg/mL) (typical therapeutic concentrations 1-2 μg/mL). He underwent 6 h of hemodialysis. We collected hourly whole blood, serum, urine, and dialysate metformin concentrations. Blood, urine, and dialysate samples were analyzed, and clearances were determined using standard pharmacokinetic calculations.

RESULTS

The total amount of metformin removed by 6 h of hemodialysis was 888 mg, approximately equivalent to one therapeutic dose. Approximately 142 mg of metformin was cleared in the urine during this time. His acid-base status and creatinine improved over the following days. No further hemodialysis was required.

CONCLUSION

We report a case of MALA likely secondary to AKI and severe volume depletion. The patient improved with supportive care, sodium bicarbonate, and hemodialysis. Analysis of whole blood, serum, urine, and dialysate concentrations showed limited efficacy of hemodialysis in the removal of metformin from blood, contrary to previously published data. Despite evidence of acute kidney injury, a relatively large amount of metformin was eliminated in the urine while the patient was undergoing hemodialysis. These data suggest that clinical improvement is likely due to factors besides removal of metformin.

The pharmacokinetics of metformin in patients receiving intermittent haemodialysis

The aims of this study were to characterise the population pharmacokinetics of metformin in patients receiving haemodialysis, and to determine the doses that will maintain median metformin plasma concentrations below 5 mg L^-1 for a typical individual. Metformin plasma concentrations from 5 patients receiving thrice weekly intermittent haemodialysis followed by metformin 500 mg postdialysis were fitted to a published pharmacokinetic model. Additional models to describe the dialytic pharmacokinetics of metformin were explored. Doses of 250 and 500 postdialysis were simulated from the model for a typical haemodialysis patient. The published 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model with an additional parameter to describe haemodialysis clearance provided a reasonable fit to the data. Deterministic simulations from the model for a typical individual suggest that metformin doses of 250-500 mg postdialysis and 250 mg given once daily should maintain median metformin plasma concentrations below 5 mg L^-1 .

Is the use of metformin in patients undergoing dialysis hazardous for life? A systematic review of the safety of metformin in patients undergoing dialysis

AIMS

Metformin may have clinical benefits in dialysis patients; however, its safety in this population is unknown. This systematic review evaluated the safety of metformin in dialysis patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomised controlled trials and observational studies evaluating metformin use in dialysis patients. Three authors reviewed the studies and extracted data. The primary outcomes were mortality, occurrence of lactic acidosis and myocardial infarction (MI) in patients taking metformin during dialysis treatment for ≥12 months (long term). Risk of bias was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-1). Overall quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Fifteen observational studies were eligible; 7 were prospective observational studies and 8 were case reports/case series. No randomised controlled trials were identified. The 7 prospective observational studies (n = 194) reported on cautious metformin use in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis. Only 3 provided long-term follow-up data. In 2 long-term studies of metformin therapy (≤1000 mg/d) in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD), 1 reported 6 deaths (6/83; 7%) due to major cardiovascular events (3 MI) and the other reported no deaths (0/35). One long-term study of metformin therapy (250 mg to 500 mg thrice weekly) in patients undergoing haemodialysis reported 4 deaths (4/61; 7%) due to major cardiovascular events (2 MI). These findings provide very low-quality evidence as they come from small observational studies.

CONCLUSION

The evidence regarding the safety of metformin in people undergoing dialysis is inconclusive. Appropriately designed randomised controlled trials are needed to resolve this uncertainty.

'Massive' metformin overdose

Massive metformin overdose can cause metabolic acidosis with hyperlactatemia. A 55-year-old woman presented 5 h after multidrug overdose, including 132 g extended-release metformin. Continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and noradrenaline were commenced due to metabolic acidosis (pH 7.0, lactate 17 mmol l^-1 ) and shock. Despite 3 h of CVVHDF, her acidosis worsened (pH 6.83, lactate 24 mmol l^-1 ). Intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) improved acidosis (pH 7.13, lactate 26 mmol l^-1 ) but again worsened (pH 6.91, lactate 30 mmol l^-1 ) with CVVHDF recommencement. IHD (12 h), CVVHDF (26 h) and vasopressor support for 7 days resulted in survival. Measured metformin concentrations were extremely high with a peak of 292 μg ml^-1 at 8 h postingestion. IHD, but not CVVHDF in this case, was associated with improvement in metabolic acidosis and hyperlactataemia. Pharmacokinetic analysis of metformin concentrations found a reduced apparent oral clearance of 8.2 l h^-1 and a half-life of approximately 30 h. During IHD, the apparent oral clearance increased to 22.2 l h^-1 with an approximate half-life of 10 h. The impact of prolonged oral absorption from a pharmacobezoar and redistribution of metformin from peripheral sites (including erythrocytes) on the pharmacokinetic profile cannot be determined from the data available.