Improving Carboplatin Dosing Based on Estimated GFR

Pharmacokinetic Study of Carboplatin Using Various Overweight-Correcting Dosing Algorithms and Biomarkers in Patients With Varying BMI Categories

BACKGROUND

The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula is more likely to overestimate renal function and carboplatin dosing in patients who are overweight. In this prospective pharmacokinetic study, the use of an adjusted Cockcroft-Gault formula (aCG) was evaluated to correct for overweight status.

METHODS

aCG was adjusted in patients with body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 using adjusted ideal body weight, capping low serum creatinine values at 60 μmol/L, and high creatinine clearance values at 125 mL/min. Patients were categorized as follows: BMI <25.0 (normal weight), 25.0-29.9 (overweight), and ≥30.0 kg/m2 (obese). To assess the pharmacokinetics, blood samples were collected and carboplatin ultrafiltrate concentrations were analyzed. Exposure was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model and compared with the target area under the curve (AUC) regarding bias mean prediction error (MPE%) and imprecision mean absolute prediction error (MAPE%). In addition, substitutes for renal function, including weight descriptors, cystatin C, 24-hour creatinine clearance, and glomerular filtration rate estimators, were compared.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study. aCG slightly underestimated individual carboplatin clearance across all weight groups, with the highest deviation in patients who had obesity (MPE%: -10.5%) versus +8.8% using CG. aCG underestimated -5.7% in patients with a normal weight and overestimated by +1.1% in those who were overweight, compared with -4.2% and +2.8%, respectively, using CG. The most accurate predictor of the target AUC for all weight categories was cystatin C (MPE%: +0.2%, -2.0%, and -0.1% for patients with a normal weight, those who were overweight, and those who had obesity, respectively) with low imprecision (MAPE%: 9.8%, 9.5%, and 13.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find evidence to support using aCG to predict carboplatin clearance better than CG. However, cystatin C was found to be the most precise and accurate biomarker for carboplatin clearance.

Integrating International Consensus Guidelines for Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) into everyday practice

Part 2 of the International Consensus Guideline on Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) offers drug-specific consensus recommendations based on both evidence and practical experience. These recommendations build upon the kidney function assessment and classification guidelines established in Part 1 of ADDIKD. Here we illustrate how dosing recommendations differ between ADDIKD and existing guidance for four commonly used drugs: methotrexate, cisplatin, carboplatin and nivolumab. We then describe how the recommendations can be distilled into practice points for methotrexate and cisplatin. While ADDIKD is a significant improvement from previous guidelines, adoption of this new guideline requires further endorsement from key external stakeholders, 'change championing' by clinicians locally and encouraging its integration into existing reference sources, clinical trial protocols and electronic prescribing systems.

Funding

Development of the ADDIKD guideline is funded by the NSW Government as part of the Cancer Institute NSW and received no funding from external commercial sources.

From Prospective Evaluation to Practice: Model-Informed Dose Optimization in Oncology

One dose does not fit all, especially in oncolytic drugs, where side effects and therapy failures highlight the need for personalized dosing approaches. In recent years, the quest to apply model-informed precision dosing to oncology drugs has gained significant momentum, reflecting its potential to revolutionize patient care by tailoring treatments to individual pharmacokinetic profiles. Despite this progress, model-informed precision dosing has not (yet) become widely integrated into routine clinical care. We aimed to explain model-informed precision dosing from a clinical viewpoint while addressing all prospective model-informed precision dosing implementation and validation studies in the field of oncology. We identified 16 different drugs for which prospective model-informed precision dosing validation/implementation has been performed. Although these studies are mostly focused on attaining adequate drug exposures and reducing inter-individual variability, improved clinical outcomes after performing model-informed precision dosing were shown for busulfan, and high-dose methotrexate. Toxicities were significantly reduced for busulfan and cyclophosphamide treatment. In contrast, for carboplatin, for which model-informed precision dosing has been used in the Calvert formula, no prospective validation on outcomes was deemed necessary as the therapeutic window had been extensively validated. Model-informed precision dosing has shown to be of added value in oncology and is expected to significantly change dosing regimens in the future.

Aligning kidney function assessment in patients with cancer to global practices in internal medicine

The kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline recommends assessing kidney function using glomerular filtration rate (GFR) either through direct measurement or through estimation (eGFR) and describes a standardised classification of reduced kidney function. KDIGO guidelines have been adopted by most internal medicine specialities for the assessment and classification of kidney function, but not by cancer medicine. The development of the International Consensus Guideline on Anticancer Drug Dosing in Kidney Dysfunction (ADDIKD) aims to overcome the perceived challenges with KDIGO recommendations by describing their utility in patients with cancer. Two virtual, consensus building workshops were held consecutively, involving international, multidisciplinary participants (Part 1 of ADDIKD development). During these workshops, three consensus recommendations were agreed upon based on KDIGO's principles; to standardise kidney function assessment, classify kidney function, and determine a uniform approach to dose anticancer drugs in patients with reduced kidney function. Cancer clinicians attending the workshops identified issues regarding the adoption of KDIGO's recommendations. These issues were addressed by nephrologists, clinical pharmacologists, and other clinicians with extensive experience in the contemporary assessment of kidney function. The key concern for cancer specialists was a hesitancy to move away from the familiar and long-standing practice of using the Cockcroft-Gault equation to estimate creatinine clearance. The consensus building within the two multidisciplinary workshops allowed a thorough assessment of the evidence and clarified how directly measured GFR and eGFR, rather than creatinine clearance, could be optimally utilised in cancer care. The development of Part 1 of the ADDIKD guideline represents a standardised, contemporary approach to the assessment, classification, and utility of kidney function in the setting of cancer care and it harmonises with the approach used in other areas of medicine internationally.

Funding

Development of the ADDIKD guideline is funded by the Cancer Institute NSW as part of the NSW Government and received no funding from external commercial sources.

Glomerular Filtration Rate Measurement and Chemotherapy Dosing

Many chemotherapeutic drugs used to treat malignancies undergo renal clearance. Thus, accurate knowledge of kidney function is critical to ensure proper dosing, maximize efficacy, and minimize toxicity of drugs that often have a narrow therapeutic index. Making this issue more salient is the fact that impaired kidney function, as assessed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is encountered commonly in patients with cancer. Recent data and expert guidelines recommend the use of the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration equation to guide the assessment of kidney function, except when directly measured GFR is clinically necessary. Controversies regarding the measurement of kidney function include the use of race in this equation, indexing to body surface area, and dosing of medications based on stages of chronic kidney disease versus more discrete values of estimated GFR. The development of accurate, real-time GFR measures may hold great promise in allowing for more accurate dosing of these important drugs.

Carboplatin dose calculations for patients with lung cancer: significant dose differences found depending on dosing equation choice

Background

Carboplatin is the backbone cytotoxic agent for many chemotherapy regimens for lung cancer. Dosing of carboplatin is complicated due to its relationship to renal function and narrow therapeutic index. Overestimation of renal function may lead to supratherapeutic dosing and toxicity, while underestimation may lead to underdosing and therapeutic failure. Although the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations have higher accuracy in estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the Cockcroft Gault (CG) formula has been historically used for carboplatin dosing internationally.

Methods

We compared these formulae to identify patient profiles that were associated with significant carboplatin dose variation by retrospectively analysing the carboplatin dosing of 96 patients with lung cancer. Carboplatin doses were calculated using eGFR generated by MDRD, CKD-EPI ²⁰⁰⁹ and CKD-EPI ²⁰²¹ equations. These three hypothetical doses were compared to actual CG-based doses prescribed.

Results

MDRD and CKD-EPI equations resulted in comparable carboplatin doses; however, CG doses diverged markedly with up to 17% of the patients receiving a carboplatin dose that was at least 20% higher than a non-CG formula would have predicted, and 20% received a dose that was at least 20% lower than a non-CG formula would have predicted. Our data suggest CG use overestimates kidney function in patients with a higher bodyweight and body surface area (BSA) while underestimating it in patients with a lower bodyweight and BSA. Importantly, we demonstrate potential real-world benefit as CKD-EPI predicted lower doses for patients whose (CG-derived) carboplatin dose was later reduced following clinical assessment prior to infusion.

Conclusions

We have therefore confirmed significant differences in carboplatin dosing depending on the equation used in our modern patient population and suggest that use of CKD-EPI provides the most clinically appropriate carboplatin dosing and should be implemented as the new standard of care internationally.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09885-7.

Improving the tolerability of osimertinib by identifying its toxic limit

Background:

Osimertinib is the cornerstone in the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, ±25% of patients experience severe treatment-related toxicities. Currently, it is impossible to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity beforehand. Therefore, we aimed to study the relationship between osimertinib exposure and severe toxicity and to identify a safe toxic limit for a preventive dose reduction.

Methods:

In this real-life prospective cohort study, patients with NSCLC treated with osimertinib were followed for severe toxicity (grade ⩾3 toxicity, dose reduction or discontinuation, hospital admission, or treatment termination). Blood for pharmacokinetic analyses was withdrawn during every out-patient visit. Primary endpoint was the correlation between osimertinib clearance (exposure) and severe toxicity. Secondary endpoint was the exposure–efficacy relationship, defined as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results:

In total, 819 samples from 159 patients were included in the analysis. Multivariate competing risk analysis showed osimertinib clearance (c.q. exposure) to be significantly correlated with severe toxicity (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88–0.99). An relative operating characteristic curve showed the optimal toxic limit to be 259 ng/mL osimertinib. A 50% dose reduction in the high-exposure group, that is 25.8% of the total cohort, would reduce the risk of severe toxicity by 53%. Osimertinib exposure was not associated with PFS nor OS.

Conclusion:

Osimertinib exposure is highly correlated with the occurrence of severe toxicity. To optimize tolerability, patients above the toxic limit concentration of 259 ng/mL could benefit from a preventive dose reduction, without fear for diminished effectiveness.

Carboplatin Dosing in Children Using Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate: Equation Matters

Renal function-based carboplatin dosing using measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) results in more consistent drug exposure than anthropometric dosing. We aimed to validate the Newell dosing equation using estimated GFR (eGFR) and study which equation most accurately predicts carboplatin clearance in children with retinoblastoma. In 13 children with retinoblastoma 38 carboplatin clearance values were obtained from individual fits using MWPharm++. Carboplatin exposure (AUC) was calculated from administered dose and observed carboplatin clearance and compared to predicted AUC calculated with a carboplatin dosing equation (Newell) using different GFR estimates. Different dosing regimens were compared in terms of accuracy, bias and precision. All patients had normal eGFR. Carboplatin exposure using cystatin C-based eGFR equations tended to be more accurate compared to creatinine-based eGFR (30% accuracy 76.3-89.5% versus 76.3-78.9%, respectively), which led to significant overexposure, especially in younger (aged ≤ 2 years) children. Of all equations, the Schwartz cystatin C-based equation had the highest accuracy and lowest bias. Although anthropometric dosing performed comparably to many of the eGFR equations overall, we observed a weight-dependent change in bias leading to underdosing in the smallest patients. Using cystatin C-based eGFR equations for carboplatin dosing in children leads to more accurate carboplatin-exposure in patients with normal renal function compared to anthropometric dosing. In children with impaired kidney function, this trend might be more pronounced. Anthropometric dosing is hampered by a weight-dependent bias.

Pediatric onco-nephrology: time to spread the word : Part I: early kidney involvement in children with malignancy

Onco-nephrology has been a growing field within the adult nephrology scope of practice. Even though pediatric nephrologists have been increasingly involved in the care of children with different forms of malignancy, there has not been an emphasis on developing special expertise in this area. The fast pace of discovery in this field, including the development of new therapy protocols with their own kidney side effects and the introduction of the CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, has introduced new challenges for general pediatric nephrologists because of the unique effects of these treatments on the kidney. Moreover, with the improved outcomes in children receiving cancer therapy come an increased number of survivors at risk for chronic kidney disease related to both their cancer diagnosis and therapy. Therefore, it is time for pediatric onco-nephrology to take its spot on the expanding subspecialties map in pediatric nephrology.

CamGFR v2: A New Model for Estimating the Glomerular Filtration Rate from Standardized or Non-standardized Creatinine in Patients with Cancer

PURPOSE

Management of patients with cancer, specifically carboplatin dosing, requires accurate knowledge of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Direct measurement of GFR is resource limited. Available models for estimated GFR (eGFR) are optimized for patients without cancer and either isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS)- or non-IDMS-standardized creatinine measurements. We present an eGFR model for patients with cancer compatible with both creatinine measurement methods.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

GFR measurements, biometrics, and IDMS- or non-IDMS-standardized creatinine values were collected for adult patients from three cancer centers. Using statistical modeling, an IDMS and non-IDMS creatinine-compatible eGFR model (CamGFR v2) was developed. Its performance was compared with that of the existing models Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), Lund-Malmö revised, and CamGFR v1, using statistics for bias, precision, accuracy, and clinical robustness.

RESULTS

A total of 3,083 IDMS- and 4,612 non-IDMS-standardized creatinine measurements were obtained from 7,240 patients. IDMS-standardized creatinine values were lower than non-IDMS-standardized values in within-center comparisons (13.8% lower in Cambridge; P < 0.0001 and 19.3% lower in Manchester; P < 0.0001), and more consistent between centers. CamGFR v2 was the most accurate [root-mean-squared error for IDMS, 14.97 mL/minute (95% confidence interval, 13.84-16.13) and non-IDMS, 15.74 mL/minute (14.86-16.63)], most clinically robust [proportion with >20% error of calculated carboplatin dose for IDMS, 0.12 (0.09-0.14) and non-IDMS, 0.17 (0.15-0.2)], and least biased [median residual for IDMS, 0.73 mL/minute (-0.68 to 2.2) and non-IDMS, -0.43 mL/minute (-1.48 to 0.91)] eGFR model, particularly when eGFR was larger than 60 ml/minute.

CONCLUSIONS

CamGFR v2 can utilize IDMS- and non-IDMS-standardized creatinine measurements and outperforms previous models. CamGFR v2 should be examined prospectively as a practice-changing standard of care for eGFR-based carboplatin dosing.

Comparison of Equations To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate and Their Impact on Frequency of Cisplatin-associated Acute Kidney Injury

Background

Accurate estimation of kidney function is essential for patient selection and drug dosing in patients with cancer. eGFR equations are necessary for decision making and monitoring. Our aim was to identify which of these equations-estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) by Cockcroft-Gault (CG), eGFR by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFRMDRD), CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (eGFRCKD-EPI) or the recently proposed Janowitz-Williams equation (eGFRJ-W)-would be most suitable for GFR estimation among patients with cancer receiving cisplatin.

Methods

We assembled a cohort of 5274 patients with cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two large cancer centers. We ascertained the frequency of cisplatin-associated AKI (C-AKI) defined as a ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in serum creatinine over baseline. We compared baseline eGFR and eCrCl using Bland-Altman (B-A) plots, coefficients of variation (CV), and concordance correlation coefficients. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (PPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Patients were predominantly middle aged (median 58 years, IQR 49-66 years), overweight (median BMI 26.2, IQR 23.1-29.8 kg/m2), and White (88%), with a median baseline creatinine of 0.8 mg/dl and median cisplatin dose of 99 mg. C-AKI developed in 12% of the cohort. eGFRCKD-EPI had the highest PPV and AUC. eGFRCKD-EPI and eGFRMDRD, along with their BSA-modified counterparts, had the closest agreement with the lowest CV (7.2, 95% CI, 7.0 to 7.3) and the highest concordance. C-AKI was lowest when using eGFRCKD-EPI to define eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2.

Conclusions

On the basis of its superior diagnostic performance, eGFRCKD-EPI should be used to estimate GFR in patients being considered for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Performance of Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations Before and After Bariatric Surgery

Rationale & Objective

Evaluation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is challenging in adults undergoing bariatric surgery because creatinine and cystatin C levels are influenced by changes in muscle and fat mass. Additionally, indexing of GFR by body surface area (BSA) may by affected by decreases in BSA.

Study Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting & Participants

27 adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m² who underwent measurement of GFR before and after bariatric surgery.

Outcomes

Indexed and nonindexed GFRs measured (mGFRs) using plasma iohexol clearance, indexed and nonindexed estimated GFR (eGFR) based on levels of creatinine, cystatin C, or both from Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations.

Analytic Approach

Bias and percent of estimates within 20% and 30% of mGFR (P₂₀ and P₃₀) for estimating equations were examined.

Results

Mean presurgery BMI was 49.5 (SD, 9.4) kg/m², BSA was 2.42 (SD, 0.27) m², nonindexed mGFR was 117.3 (SD, 34.1) mL/min, and indexed mGFR was 84.1 (SD, 22.0) mL/min/1.73 m². After 6 months, mean BMI changed by –13.8 (95% CI, −15.9 to −11.8) kg/m², BSA by −0.30 (95% CI, −0.33 to −0.27) m², and nonindexed mGFR by −9.2 (95% CI, −17.2 to −1.1) mL/min, while indexed mGFR was unchanged at 5.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 10.4) mL/min/1.73 m². Nonindexed eGFR_cr was unbiased (median bias, 5.0 [95% CI, −4.3 to 11.6] mL/min) before surgery, but overestimated mGFR (8.8 [95% CI, 1.8 to 16.9] mL/min) after surgery. Nonindexed eGFR_cys underestimated mGFR before (median bias, −12.1 [95% CI, −21.4 to −1.2] mL/min) and after surgery (−11.2 [95% CI, −21.8 to −7.3] mL/min). Nonindexed eGFR_cr-cys was unbiased before (median bias, −6.0 [95% CI, −11.0 to 1.0] mL/min) and after surgery (−2.0 [95% CI, −8.8 to 4.9] mL/min). Findings were similar for indexed eGFR compared with indexed mGFR.

Limitations

Small, mostly white sample.

Conclusions

Changes in indexed and nonindexed GFRs may be discordant after bariatric surgery in adults because of decreases in BSA. Indexed and nonindexed eGFR_cr-cys may be less biased than indexed or nonindexed eGFR_cr or eGFR_cys because of opposite biases in estimating mGFR.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction potential of iohexol, a renal filtration marker

PURPOSE

Carboplatin dose is calculated based on kidney function, commonly estimated with imperfect creatinine-based formulae. Iohexol is used to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and allows calculation of a more appropriate carboplatin dose. To address potential concerns that iohexol administered during a course of chemotherapy impacts that therapy, we performed in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction evaluations of iohexol.

METHODS

Carboplatin was administered IV to female mice at 60 mg/kg with or without iohexol at 300 mg/kg. Plasma ultrafiltrate, kidney and bone marrow platinum was quantitated by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Paclitaxel microsomal and gemcitabine cytosolic metabolism as well as metabolism of CYP and UGT probes was assessed with and without iohexol at 300 µg/mL by LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

In vivo carboplatin exposure was not significantly affected by iohexol co-administration (platinum AUC combination vs alone: plasma ultrafiltrate 1,791 vs 1920 µg/mL min; kidney 8367 vs 9757 µg/g min; bone marrow 12.7 vs 12.7 µg/mg-protein min). Paclitaxel microsomal metabolism was not impacted (combination vs alone: 6-α-OH-paclitaxel 38.3 versus 39.4 ng/mL/60 min; 3-p-OH-paclitaxel 26.2 versus 27.7 ng/mL/60 min). Gemcitabine human cytosolic elimination was not impacted (AUC combination vs gemcitabine alone: dFdU 24.1 versus 23.7 µg/mL/30 min). Iohexol displayed no relevant inhibition of the CYP and UGT enzymes in human liver microsomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Iohexol is unlikely to affect the clinical pharmacokinetics of carboplatin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or other agents used in combination with carboplatin treatment. Measuring GFR with iohexol to better dose carboplatin is unlikely to alter the safety or efficacy of chemotherapy through pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.

Quantitation of iohexol, a glomerular filtration marker, in human plasma by LC-MS/MS

We developed a high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method for quantitating iohexol in 50 μL human plasma. After acetonitrile protein precipitation, chromatographic separation was achieved with a Shodex Asahipak NH2P-50 2D (5 μm, 2 × 150 mm) column and a gradient of 0.1 % formic acid in acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid in water over a 10 min run time. Mass spectrometric detection was performed on a Micromass Quatromicro triple-stage bench-top mass spectrometer with electrospray, positive-mode ionization. The assay was linear from 1 to 500 μg/mL for iohexol, proved to be accurate (101.3-102.1 %) and precise (<3.4 %CV), and fulfilled Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for bioanalytical method validation. Recovery from plasma was 53.1-64.2 % and matrix effect was trivial (-3.4 to -1.3 %). Plasma freeze thaw stability (97.4-99.4 %), stability for 5 months at -80 °C (95.5-103.3 %), and stability for 4 h at room temperature (100.6-103.3 %) were all acceptable. This validated assay using a deuterated internal standard will be an important tool in measuring iohexol clearance and determining glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in patients.

How to determine kidney function in cancer patients?

A precise and efficient method for estimating kidney function in cancer patients is important to determine their eligibility for clinical trials and surgery and to allow for appropriate dose adjustment of anti-cancer drugs, especially toxic drugs with a narrow therapeutic index. Since direct measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is cumbersome, several formulae have been developed to estimate kidney function. Most of these are based on serum creatinine concentration. Though the CKD-EPI formula is recognised as being the most accurate, there is an ongoing debate on which is the optimal formula for cancer patients. In this review, we provide an overview of different GFR estimating equations for kidney function and the advantages and disadvantages of each method and compare their performance in cancer patients. We discuss the importance of body surface area-indexing and propose a framework for evaluating kidney function in cancer patients.

Phase 1 study of veliparib (ABT-888), a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, with carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

Veliparib is an oral inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1 and -2. PARP-1 expression may be increased in cancer, and this increase confers resistance to cytotoxic agents. We aimed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of veliparib combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included patients with advanced solid tumors treated with ≤ 3 prior regimens. Paclitaxel and carboplatin were administered on day 3 of a 21-day cycle. Veliparib was given PO BID days 1-7, except for cycle 1 in the first 46 patients to serve as control for toxicity and PK. A standard "3 + 3" design started veliparib at 10 mg BID, paclitaxel at 150 mg/m², and carboplatin AUC 6. The pharmacokinetic (PK) disposition of veliparib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin was determined by LC-MS/MS and AAS during cycles 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were enrolled. Toxicities were as expected with carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy. DLTs were seen in two of seven evaluable patients at the maximum administered dose (MAD): veliparib 120 mg BID, paclitaxel 200 mg/m², and carboplatin AUC 6 (febrile neutropenia, hyponatremia). The MTD and RP2D were determined to be veliparib 100 mg BID, paclitaxel 200 mg/m², and carboplatin AUC 6. Median number of cycles of the three-agent combination was 4 (1-16). We observed 22 partial and 5 complete responses. Veliparib did not affect paclitaxel or carboplatin PK disposition.

CONCLUSION

Veliparib, paclitaxel, and carboplatin were well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumor activity.

Evaluation of chronic kidney disease in cancer patients: is there a preferred estimation formula?

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cancer patients seems to rely mostly on the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula or the creatinine levels to adjust treatment dosages which is a practice refuted by internists.

AIMS

We evaluate the overall agreement of the CG, modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and CKD-epidemiology collaboration equations (CKD-EPI) equation with the newly devised Janowitz and Williams' (JW) equation.

METHODS

The renal function was estimated in 235 cancer patients according to the CG, MDRD, body surface area (BSA)-adjusted MDRD, CKD-EPI, BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI and JW formulae.

RESULTS

JW equation was more in agreement with CG and CKD-EPI estimations than the other equations. Taking JW equation as reference, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CG eGFR had the higher area under the curve when compared with other equations. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed more proximity between CG and JW equations than the other equations.

CONCLUSION

The newly proposed JW eGFR estimation was more in agreement with CG equation than the other equations.