Introduction. Advancing the treatment of fecal and urinary incontinence through research

Coexistent faecal incontinence and constipation: A cross-sectional study of 4027 adults undergoing specialist assessment

BACKGROUND

In contrast to paediatric and geriatric populations, faecal incontinence and constipation in adults are generally considered separate entities. This may be incorrect.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of consecutive patients (18-80 years) referred to a tertiary unit (2004-2016) for investigation of refractory faecal incontinence and/or constipation and meeting Rome IV core criteria (applied post-hoc) for self-reported symptoms. We sought to determine how frequently both diagnoses coexisted, how frequently coexistent diagnoses were recognised by the referring clinician and to evaluate differences in clinical characteristics between patients with single or both diagnoses.

FINDINGS

Study sample consisted of 4,027 patients (3,370 females [83·7%]). According to Rome IV criteria, 807 (20·0%) patients self-reported faecal incontinence in isolation, 1,569 (39·0%) patients had functional constipation in isolation, and 1,651 (41·0%) met criteria for both diagnoses (coexistent symptoms). In contrast, only 331 (8·2%) patients were referred for coexistent symptoms. Of the 1,651 patients with self-reported coexistent symptoms, only 225 (13·6%) were recognised by the referrer i.e. 86·4% were missed. Coexistent symptoms were most often missed in patients referred for faecal incontinence in isolation. In this group of 1,640 patients, 765 (46·7%) had concomitant symptoms of functional constipation. Opioid usage, comorbidities, childhood bowel problems, mixed incontinence symptoms, prolapse symptoms and structural abnormalities on defaecography were associated with reclassification.

INTERPRETATION

Over 40% of adults referred for anorectal physiological investigation had coexistent diagnoses of faecal incontinence and functional constipation, based on validated criteria. This overlap is overlooked by referrers, poorly documented in current literature, and may impact management.

SECCA procedure for anal incontinence and antibiotic treatment: a case report of anal abscess

BACKGROUND

Fecal Incontinence (FI) can seriously affect quality of life. The treatment of fecal incontinence starts conservatively but in case of failure, different surgical approaches may be proposed to the patient. Recently several not invasive approaches have been developed. One of these is the radiofrequency (RF) energy application to the internal anal sphincter.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a rare case of an anal abscess related to a SECCA procedure in a 66-year-old woman affected by gas and FI for twenty years.

CONCLUSIONS

The complications post-SECCA procedure reported in literature are generally not serious and often self-limited, such as bleeding or anal pain. This is a case of an anal abscess. We suggest that this finding could consolidate the importance of administering antibiotic therapy to patients and to run a full course of at least 6 days rather than a short-term (24 h) therapy, with the aim to minimize the incidence of this complication.

Purse-string morphology of external anal sphincter revealed by novel imaging techniques

The external anal sphincter (EAS) may be injured in 25-35% of women during the first and subsequent vaginal childbirths and is likely the most common cause of anal incontinence. Since its first description almost 300 years ago, the EAS was believed to be a circular or a "donut-shaped" structure. Using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging, MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, and muscle fiber tracking, we delineated various components of the EAS and their muscle fiber directions. These novel imaging techniques suggest "purse-string" morphology, with "EAS muscles" crossing contralaterally in the perineal body to the contralateral transverse perineal (TP) and bulbospongiosus (BS) muscles, thus attaching the EAS to the pubic rami. Spin-tag MRI demonstrated purse-string action of the EAS muscle. Electromyography of TP/BS and EAS muscles revealed their simultaneous contraction and relaxation. Lidocaine injection into the TP/BS muscle significantly reduced anal canal pressure. These studies support purse-string morphology of the EAS to constrict/close the anal canal opening. Our findings have implications for the effect of episiotomy on anal closure function and the currently used surgical technique (overlapping sphincteroplasty) for EAS reconstructive surgery to treat anal incontinence.

A cross-sectional survey of the relationship between fecal incontinence and constipation

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We compared the prevalence of fecal incontinence between constipated and nonconstipated women and correlated its prevalence with the number of Rome III constipation symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the prevalence of fecal incontinence and constipation among women who presented to two gynecologic clinics for routine care over a 24-month period. Fecal incontinence was defined as loss of well-formed and/or loose stool beyond the patient's control that occurred at least once in the last 4 weeks, was bothersome, had been present for the past 3 or more months, and had affected the person's activities, relationships, or feelings. Constipation was diagnosed using the Rome III criteria. Our study was exempt from institutional review board approval because it was a survey and did not ask for information that could be used to identify the participant.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 2,319 participants was 50.1 ± 15 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.7 ± 7. Seven hundred and twenty-five (31 %) women had constipation, and 233 (10 %) had fecal incontinence. One hundred and one (43 %) incontinent women had coexisting constipation. Logistic regression analysis identified white race (p = .013), menopause (p = .010), and constipation (p = .004) as risk factors for fecal incontinence. After controlling for these risk factors, constipated women were more likely to have fecal incontinence than nonconstipated women [relative risk (RR) 1.60, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.05]. In addition, the prevalence of fecal incontinence was strongly associated with the number of Rome III constipation symptoms (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Constipation is an important risk factor for fecal incontinence.

Evaluation and treatment of anal incontinence, constipation, and defecatory dysfunction

Posterior compartment disorders include anal incontinence, constipation, and defecatory dysfunction. These disorders cause considerable morbidity, and are typically underreported by patients and undertreated by providers. The purpose of this article is outline the approach to diagnosis and treatment of anal incontinence, constipation, and defecatory dysfunction with a brief description of the nature of the problem and approaches to evaluation and diagnosis, as well as medical and surgical management.

Radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal: is it a promising new approach to the treatment of fecal incontinence?

BACKGROUND

The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of the delivery of radiofrequency energy to the anal canal (the SECCA procedure).

METHODS

Eight patients with fecal incontinence underwent the SECCA procedure. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score and the Fecal Incontinence-related Quality of Life (FIQL) scale were completed at baseline and after the procedure. Anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound also were conducted.

RESULTS

Seven of the 8 patients were women, and the median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 28-73 y). The mean FISI score and all of the parameters in the FIQL scale with the exception of the embarrassment scale measured at 6 months after the procedure was not improved significantly. We observed no changes in the anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound parameters. Complications associated with the procedure developed in 7 of the 8 patients, including anal bleeding, anal pain, and anal mucosal discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The FISI score and FIQL scale were not improved significantly after the SECCA procedure, and considerable complications were associated with the procedure.

Fibre supplementation in addition to loperamide for faecal incontinence in adults: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many patients with faecal incontinence (FI) are prescribed a constipating agent concurrently with either fibre supplementation or a low-residue diet. Clinician opinion varies as to which initial approach is best. This study compared these treatments in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

Double-blind randomized cross-over trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients referred for FI.

INTERVENTION

Six weeks of low-residue diet, placebo fibre supplement and loperamide followed by 6 weeks of fibre supplement, neutral diet and loperamide or the reverse order.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were randomized. At baseline the mean Faecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) was 31. After low-residue diet, placebo fibre supplement and loperamide the FISI was 18.4 (standard deviation, SD 13.2). After fibre supplementation and loperamide the FISI was 18.8 (SD 14.1). The mean difference between the treatment arms was not significant (-0.8; 95% CI: -4.9 to 3.3). There was also no difference between the treatments for the SF-36 and the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale. There was marked variability in individual responses, some favouring more fibre and some less.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that treatment with more or less fibre in addition to loperamide has similar clinical effectiveness overall, however individual tailoring of treatment seems important to achieve the best outcome.

Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults and impact on quality-of-life

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of anal incontinence in the general population and in patients consulting gastroenterologist and gynecologist practices in the Rhône Alpes area.

METHODS

For the first study a questionnaire was sent to a sample of 2800 people selected randomly from the electoral roll. Another study of patients selected randomly among patients attending gynecology and gastroenterology consultations was performed. A Jorge & Wexner score above or equal to 5 was used to define anal incontinence.

RESULTS

For the first study, a total of 706 questionnaires was analyzed: the prevalence of anal incontinence was 5.1% [95% CI: 3.6-7.0] and the scores of each dimension of the SF-12 Health Survey were significantly lower among incontinent people than among continent people. The prevalence was significantly higher for women (7.5% [5.0-10.7]) than for men (2.4% [1.1-4.7]). Eighty-four physicians returned 835 valid questionnaires. The prevalence was 13.1% [10.1-16.6] among patients attending gastroenterology consultations and 5.0% [3.1-7.6] among those attending gynecology consultations. For 84.8% of the incontinent patients, the physician was unaware of the patient's disorder.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence figures we obtained coincide with data in the literature. This disorder is common and affects the patient's quality-of-life, but remains underestimated and under-diagnosed.

Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The epidemiology of fecal incontinence (FI) is incompletely understood. We report the prevalence, clinical spectrum, health care-seeking behavior, and quality of life (QOL) in community women with FI.

METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed to an age-stratified random sample of 5300 Olmsted County, Minnesota, women identified by the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Symptom severity was assessed by a validated scale, and impact on QOL was evaluated for subjects who had any FI during the past year. The prevalence of FI was calculated with direct age adjustment to the 2000 US white female population.

RESULTS

Altogether, 2800 of 5300 women (53%) responded to the survey. The overall age-adjusted prevalence of FI in the past year was 12.1 per 100 (95% confidence interval, 11.0-13.1). The prevalence increased with age from 7 (third decade) to 22 (sixth decade) per 100 and was steady thereafter. Symptoms were mild (45%), moderate (50%), or severe (5%), and symptom severity was related to the impact of FI on QOL and physician-consulting behavior. Moderate to severe impact on >/=1 domain of QOL was reported by 6% with mild, 35% with moderate, and 82% with severe symptoms, whereas 5% with mild, 10% with moderate, and 48% with severe FI had consulted a physician for FI in the past year.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 1 of 10 adult women in the population have FI; almost 1 of 15 have moderate to severe FI. FI significantly impacts QOL and prompts health care utilization predominantly in women with moderate to severe symptoms.