1
|
Veen T, Kanani A, Zaharia C, Lea D, Søreide K. Treatment-sequencing before and after index hepatectomy with either synchronous or metachronous colorectal liver metastasis: Comparison of recurrence risk, repeat hepatectomy and overall survival in a population-derived cohort. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2025; 51:109540. [PMID: 39662106 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/07/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) includes several options with impact on the patient journey and may depend on presentation and patient characteristics. The aim of the study was to investigate how treatment sequencing in index hepatectomy for synchronous or metachronous CRLM may potentially impact treatment pathways and oncological outcomes. METHODS An observational cohort study (ACROBATICC; NCT0176813) of patients having surgery for CRLM. Patient and tumour characteristics, treatment and recurrence patterns were recorded. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). RESULTS The study included 132 patients, median age 67 yrs, 69 % men and 55 % had synchronous CRLM. Overall, 65 (50 %) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 45 (63 %) in synchronous and 20 (33 %) in metachronous CRLM (odds ratio, OR 0.30 95%CI 0.15-0.62; p < 0.001). Patient- and tumour characteristics did not differ except number of metastases (synchronous CRLM median 2 (range 1-4) vrs metachronous median 1 (1-2), respectively; p < 0.001). Some 99 (75 %) patients relapsed, 38 % had liver-recurrence. Repeat hepatectomy was performed in one-third, with equal rates between synchronous or metachronous CRLM. Median OS of all patients was 68 months, for a difference of 24 months between synchronous and metachronous CRLM (59 and 83 months, respectively; p = 0.334). RFS survival did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION Pre-operative chemotherapy was given twice as often for patients with synchronous CRLM who also had more metastases and more frequently rectal primaries. Liver recurrence rates, repeat hepatecomy and overall survival was comparable between groups. Intrinsic cancer biology needs to be better investigated to provide better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torhild Veen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Arezo Kanani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Claudia Zaharia
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dordi Lea
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Søreide K. Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: the thin red line. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1794-1796. [PMID: 36959377 PMCID: PMC10147914 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02234-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yaqub S, Margonis GA, Søreide K. Staged or Simultaneous Surgery for Colon or Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Implications for Study Design and Clinical Endpoints. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072177. [PMID: 37046837 PMCID: PMC10093596 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients presenting with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases, the disease burden related to the liver metastasis is the driving cause of limited longevity and, eventually, risk of death. Surgical resection is the potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases. In the synchronous setting where both the liver metastases and the primary tumor are resectable with a relative low risk, the oncological surgeon and the patient may consider three potential treatment strategies. Firstly, a "staged" or a "simultaneous" surgical approach. Secondly, for a staged strategy, a 'conventional approach' will suggest removal of the primary tumor first (either colon or rectal cancer) and plan for liver surgery after recovery from the first operation. A "Liver first" strategy is prioritizing the liver resection before resection of the primary tumor. Planning a surgical trial investigating a two-organ oncological resection with highly variable extent and complexity of resection as well as the potential impact of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy makes it difficult to find the optimal primary endpoint. Here, we suggest running investigational trials with carefully chosen composite endpoints as well as embedded risk-stratification strategies to identify subgroups of patients who may benefit from simultaneous surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saeed U, Myklebust TÅ, Robsahm TE, Kielland MF, Møller B, Skålhegg BS, Mala T, Yaqub S. Risk and survival in colorectal cancer with increasing body mass index: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:375-385. [PMID: 36222384 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim was to explore potential associations between the body mass index (BMI) and the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), including subsites of the colon, and cancer-specific death. METHODS A registry-based cohort study was conducted with baseline data gathered from the Norwegian Tuberculosis Screening Programme, collected between 1963 and 1975, and linked to follow-up data from the Cancer Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Cox regression models were used to explore associations between BMI and CRC risk and cancer-specific death. RESULTS Of 1 723 692 included individuals, 76 616 developed CRC during 55 370 707 person-years of follow-up. In men, a 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with an increased risk of colon cancer, including both right and left subsites, and rectal cancer. Allowing for nonlinearities, we found a U-shaped association for the right colon and an inverse U-shape for the left colon and rectum cancer. In women, a 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI in early adulthood was associated with increased risk of colon cancer, including both subsites. In women, an increased risk of CRC death with increasing BMI was found for colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS Men of all ages have an increased risk of CRC with increasing BMI, with the highest risk for right-sided colon cancer. An increased risk for colon cancer was also found in women with high BMI in early adulthood. Furthermore, women of all age groups appeared to have an increased risk of CRC death with higher BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usman Saeed
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor Å Myklebust
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Trude E Robsahm
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marlene F Kielland
- Division for Molecular Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Møller
- Department of Registration, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn S Skålhegg
- Division for Molecular Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom Mala
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Paediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zaharia C, Veen T, Lea D, Kanani A, Alexeeva M, Søreide K. Histopathological Growth Pattern in Colorectal Liver Metastasis and The Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010181. [PMID: 36612177 PMCID: PMC9818232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Almost half of all patients with colorectal cancer present with or eventually develop metastasis, most frequently in the liver. Understanding the histopathological growth patterns and tumor immune microenvironment of colorectal liver metastases may help determine treatment strategies and assess prognosis. A literature search was conducted to gather information on cancer biology, histopathological growth patterns, and the tumor immune microenvironment in colorectal liver metastases, including their mechanisms and their impact on clinical outcomes. A first consensus on histopathological growth patterns emerged in 2017, identifying five growth patterns. Later studies found benefits from a two-tier system, desmoplastic and non-desmoplastic, incorporated into the updated 2022 consensus. Furthermore, the tumor immune microenvironment shows additional characteristic features with relevance to cancer biology. This includes density of T-cells (CD8+), expression of claudin-2, presence of vessel co-option versus angiogenesis, as well as several other factors. The relation between histopathological growth patterns and the tumor immune microenvironment delineates distinct subtypes of cancer biology. The distinct subtypes are found to correlate with risk of metastasis or relapse, and hence to clinical outcome and long-term survival in each patient. In order to optimize personalized and precision therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases, further investigation into the mechanisms of cancer biology and their translational aspects to novel treatment targets is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Zaharia
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Torhild Veen
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dordi Lea
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Arezo Kanani
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marina Alexeeva
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Group, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4068 Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, N-7804 Bergen, Norway
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer has served as a genetic and biological paradigm for the evolution of solid tumors, and these insights have illuminated early detection, risk stratification, prevention, and treatment principles. Employing the hallmarks of cancer framework, we provide a conceptual framework to understand how genetic alterations in colorectal cancer drive cancer cell biology properties and shape the heterotypic interactions across cells in the tumor microenvironment. This review details research advances pertaining to the genetics and biology of colorectal cancer, emerging concepts gleaned from immune and single-cell profiling, and critical advances and remaining knowledge gaps influencing the development of effective therapies for this cancer that remains a major public health burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiexi Li
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Xingdi Ma
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Deepavali Chakravarti
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Shabnam Shalapour
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | - Ronald A DePinho
- Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Drake TM, Søreide K. Cancer epigenetics in solid organ tumours: A primer for surgical oncologists. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:736-746. [PMID: 30745135 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is initiated through both genetic and epigenetic alterations. The end-effect of such changes to the DNA machinery is a set of uncontrolled mechanisms of cell division, invasion and, eventually, metastasis. Epigenetic changes are now increasingly appreciated as an essential driver to the cancer phenotype. The epigenetic regulation of cancer is complex and not yet fully understood, but application of epigenetics to clinical practice and in cancer research has the potential to improve cancer care. Epigenetics changes do not cause changes in the DNA base-pairs (and, hence, does not alter the genetic code per se) but rather occur through methylation of DNA, by histone modifications, and, through changes to chromatin structure to alter genetic expression. Epigenetic regulators are characterized as writers, readers or erasers by their mechanisms of action. The human epigenome is influenced from cradle to grave, with internal and external life-time exposure influencing the epigenetic marks that may act as modifiers or drivers of carcinogenesis. Preventive and public health strategies may follow from better understanding of the life-time influence of the epigenome. Epigenetics may be used to define risk, to investigate mechanisms of carcinogenesis, to identify biomarkers, and to identify novel therapeutic options. Epigenetic alterations are found across many solid cancers and are increasingly making clinical impact to cancer management. Novel epigenetic drugs may be used for a more tailored and specific response to treatment of cancers. We present a primer on epigenetics for surgical oncologists with examples from colorectal cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Drake
- Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Veen T, Søreide K. Can molecular biomarkers replace a clinical risk score for resectable colorectal liver metastasis? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9:98-104. [PMID: 28344745 PMCID: PMC5348630 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i3.98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 11/25/2016] [Accepted: 12/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) the role and use of molecular biomarkers is still controversial. Several biomarkers have been linked to clinical outcomes in CRLM, but none have so far become routine for clinical decision making. For several reasons, the clinical risk score appears to no longer hold the same predictive value. Some of the reasons include the ever expanding indications for liver resection, which now increasingly tend to involve extrahepatic disease, such as lung metastases (both resectable and non-resectable) and the shift in indication from “what is taken out” (e.g., how much liver has to be resected) to “what is left behind” (that is, how much functional liver tissue the patient has after resection). The latter is amenable to modifications by using adjunct techniques of portal vein embolization and the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy techniques to expand indications for liver resection. Added to this complexity is the increasing number of molecular markers, which appear to hold important prognostic and predictive information, for which some will be discussed here. Beyond characteristics of tissue-based genomic profiles will be liquid biopsies derived from circulating tumor cells and cell-free circulating tumor DNA in the blood. These markers are present in the peripheral circulation in the majority of patients with metastatic cancer disease. Circulating biomarkers may represent more readily available methods to monitor, characterize and predict cancer biology with future implications for cancer care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Søreide K, Watson MM, Lea D, Nordgård O, Søreide JA, Hagland HR. Assessment of clinically related outcomes and biomarker analysis for translational integration in colorectal cancer (ACROBATICC): study protocol for a population-based, consecutive cohort of surgically treated colorectal cancers and resected colorectal liver metastasis. J Transl Med 2016; 14:192. [PMID: 27357108 PMCID: PMC4928276 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0951-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background More accurate predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) primaries or colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) are needed. Outside clinical trials, the translational integration of emerging pathways and novel techniques should facilitate exploration of biomarkers for improved staging and prognosis. Methods An observational study exploring predictive and prognostic biomarkers in a population-based, consecutive cohort of surgically treated colorectal cancers and resected colorectal liver metastases. Long-term outcomes will be cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and overall survival at 5 years from diagnosis. Beyond routine clinicopathological and anthropometric characteristics and laboratory and biochemistry results, the project allows for additional blood samples and fresh-frozen tumour and normal tissue for investigation of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and novel biomarkers (e.g. immune cells, microRNAs etc.). Tumour specimens will be investigated by immunohistochemistry in full slides. Extracted DNA/RNA will be analysed for genomic markers using specific PCR techniques and next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Flow cytometry will be used to characterise biomarkers in blood. Collaboration is open and welcomed, with particular interest in mutual opportunities for validation studies. Status and perspectives The project is ongoing and recruiting at an expected rate of 120–150 patients per year, since January 2013. A project on circulating tumour cells (CTCs) has commenced, with analysis being prepared. Investigating molecular classes beyond the TNM staging is under way, including characteristics of microsatellite instability (MSI) and elevated microsatellite alterations in selected tetranucleotides (EMAST). Hot spot panels for known mutations in CRC are being investigated using NGS. Immune-cell characteristics are being performed by IHC and flow cytometry in tumour and peripheral blood samples. The project has ethical approval (REK Helse Vest, #2012/742), is financially supported with a Ph.D.-Grant (EMAST project; Folke Hermansen Cancer Fund) and a CTC-project (Norwegian Research Council; O. Nordgård). The ACROBATICC clinical and molecular biobank repository will serve as a long-term source for novel exploratory analysis and invite collaborators for mutual validation of promising biomarker results. The project aims to generate results that can help better discern prognostic groups in stage II/III cancers; explore prognostic and predictive biomarkers, and help detail the biology of colorectal liver metastasis for better patient selection and tailored treatment. The project is registered at http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01762813.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, POB 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway. .,Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Martin M Watson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, POB 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.,Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dordi Lea
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Oddmund Nordgård
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, POB 8100, 4068, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hanne R Hagland
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Centre of Organelle Research (CORE), University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Watson MM, Lea D, Rewcastle E, Hagland HR, Søreide K. Elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotides in early-stage colorectal cancers with and without high-frequency microsatellite instability: same, same but different? Cancer Med 2016; 5:1580-7. [PMID: 27061136 PMCID: PMC4944885 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Revised: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with better prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotides (EMAST) is a less‐understood form of MSI. Here, we aim to investigate the role of EMAST in CRC±MSI related to clinical and tumor‐specific characteristics. A consecutive, population‐based series of stage I–III colorectal cancers were investigated for MSI and EMAST using PCR primers for 10 microsatellite markers. Of 151 patients included, 33 (21.8%) had MSI and 35 (23.2%) were EMAST+, with an overlap of 77% for positivity, (odds ratio [OR] 61; P < 0.001), and 95% for both markers being negative. EMAST was more prevalent in colon versus rectum (86% vs. 14%, P = 0.004). EMAST+ cancers were significantly more frequent in proximal colon (77 vs. 23%, P = 0.004), had advanced t‐stage (T3–4 vs. T1–2 in 94% vs. 6%, respectively; P = 0.008), were larger (≥5 cm vs. <5 cm in 63% and 37%, respectively; P = 0.022) and had poorly differentiated tumor grade (71 vs. 29%, P < 0.01). Furthermore, EMAST+ tumors had a higher median number of harvested lymph nodes than EMAST− (11 vs. 9 nodes; P = 0.03). No significant association was found between EMAST status and age, gender, presence of distant metastases or metastatic lymph nodes, and overall survival. A nonsignificant difference toward worse survival in node‐negative colon cancers needs confirmation in larger cohorts. EMAST+ cancers overlap and share features with MSI+ in CRC. Overall, survival was not influenced by the presence of EMAST, but may be of importance in subgroups such as node‐negative disease of the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin M Watson
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Molecular Laboratory, Hillevåg, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Dordi Lea
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Molecular Laboratory, Hillevåg, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Emma Rewcastle
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Hanne R Hagland
- Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Molecular Laboratory, Hillevåg, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Centre for Organelle Research (CORE), University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Gastrointestinal Translational Research Unit, Molecular Laboratory, Hillevåg, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|