Comparison of Anorectal Manometry, Rectal Balloon Expulsion Test, and Defecography for Diagnosing Defecatory Disorders

From simplicity to precision: the balloon expulsion test in the diagnosis of anorectal disorders

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal disorders, such as chronic constipation and fecal incontinence, significantly impact patients' quality of life. Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective treatment, and the balloon expulsion test (BET) has emerged as a simple yet valuable tool in evaluating anorectal function. Despite its simplicity, variations in technique and interpretation have led to ongoing debates regarding its diagnostic precision. To support this review, a PubMed search was conducted using the terms balloon, expulsion, test, evacuation, and disorders, focusing on the most relevant articles published over the past 25 years.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the evolution of the BET, highlighting its role in diagnosing defecatory disorders. It examines various methodologies, standardization efforts, and the test's sensitivity and specificity compared to other diagnostic modalities like anorectal manometry and defecography.

EXPERT OPINION

The balloon expulsion test remains a cornerstone in the functional assessment of anorectal disorders due to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility. However, standardized protocols are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility. Future research should focus on refining BET techniques and integrating them with advanced diagnostic tools to enhance patient outcomes and guide personalized treatment strategies.

Dynamic functional luminal imaging probe analysis of the anal sphincter opening function during straining in healthy volunteers

The objective of the present study was to introduce a novel method of assessing anal canal opening in healthy volunteers (HV) using the EndoFLIP system. By analyzing dynamic loops during push maneuvers, the study aimed to identify the most reliable markers of anal canal opening function during this maneuver. Forty HV women were recruited and underwent anal canal assessments with the EndoFLIP system, both at rest and during push maneuvers. Cross-sectional area (CSA)-pressure loops were constructed for each HV at distension volumes of 40 mL and 50 mL. Key parameters (pressure and CSA) derived from these loops were identified as potential markers of anal function to reduce dimensionality. Anal opening function during push maneuver was quantified in both percentage (relative variation) and absolute (absolute variation) values for pressure and CSA. The direction of the CSA-pressure loops during the push maneuver at 40 mL and 50 mL of distension was upward and to the right, indicating an increase in both pressure and CSA during straining. None of the demographic data were significant predictors of any characteristics of the CSA-pressure loops at 40 mL and 50 mL of distension. The mean relative variation in pressure and CSA at 50 mL of distension and, to a lesser extent, the maximal relative variation pressure and CSA, were identified as markers with the lowest variability. This pilot study points to potential markers for assessing anal opening function during push maneuvers. Further confirmatory studies are necessary to establish the clinical utility of these markers.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In the present study, we generated a bioinformatics pipeline for analyzing anal EndoFLIP data in healthy volunteers using automated data reprocessing to identify potential markers of anal opening function during the push maneuver. Mean relative variations in pressure and CSA at 50 mL of distension were identified as the most indicative parameters. Given that this was a pilot study, our findings warrant further confirmatory research to establish the clinical relevance of these markers.

Validation of the London Classification for Rectal Hyposensitivity in an Anorectal Manometry Database of 2540 Patients With Functional Defecatory Disorder

Background/Aims

Rectal hyposensitivity (RH), as defined by the London Classification, has been linked to sensory dysfunction caused by diabetes mellitus and Parkinson's disease (PD); however, its clinical interpretation has not been sufficiently validated. In this study, we aim to explore the correlations between rectal sensory thresholds and the clinical characteristics of patients with functional defecatory disorders.

Methods

We reviewed data from patients who underwent high-resolution anorectal manometry and acquired their clinical characteristics using a standardized questionnaire. The associations between RH based on either 1 (borderline RH) or 2 (RH) abnormal rectal sensory thresholds and patients' clinical and demographic characteristics were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models in the overall sex-stratified populations.

Results

We enrolled 2540 patients, of whom 1046 (41.2%) were men. Overall, 150 (5.9%) patients were diagnosed with RH, whereas 422 (16.6%) had borderline RH. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS) increased linearly with the increase in the number of abnormal rectal sensory thresholds (effect per threshold: 0.900 [standard deviation: 0.188]). Upon stratification by sex, borderline RH was positively associated with diabetes mellitus, PD, and CCCS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [1.08, 4.15]; aOR = 1.49 [1.03, 2.14]; aOR = 1.03 [1.01, 1.05], respectively) in women. However, RH was positively associated with only the CCCS.

Conclusions

Defining RH based on 1 or more abnormal sensory thresholds showed better clinical correlation with patient characteristics. However, further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings before proposing revisions to the current London classification criteria.

Inadequate Propulsion and Pelvic Floor Relaxation in Dyssynergic Defecation: Insights from Synchronous Proctomanometry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) and fluoroscopic defecography, which are used to diagnose dyssynergic defecation (DD), are performed asynchronously and in different positions. This limits our understanding of the relationship between anorectal pressures and rectal evacuation and the diagnostic utility of HR-ARM. We aimed to assess anorectal pressures in isolation and synchronously with defecography.

METHODS

We evaluated anorectal pressures during evacuation with left lateral HR-ARM, seated HR-ARM, and seated, concurrent fluoroscopic barium proctography/manometry (proctomanometry). Rectal evacuation was assessed with proctomanometry and rectal balloon expulsion time (BET).

RESULTS

Forty-two (86%) of 49 healthy (22 women) vs 25 of 55 (45%) constipated participants (28 women) evacuated ≥25% barium ("evacuators") (P < .001). During the preparatory phase of defecation, rectal and anal pressures increased concurrently; anorectal descent followed. During evacuation, the anal canal opened and evacuation occurred. During preparatory and evacuation phases, rectal pressure, anorectal descent, and widening of anorectal angle independently predicted evacuation (P < .05). During evacuation, the rectoanal gradient was (1) lower in participants with a prolonged BET and/or reduced rectal evacuation (P ≤ .001) and (2) greatest with proctomanometry, lower during seated HR-ARM, and lowest during left lateral HR-ARM (P < .001). Four clusters based on pressure and motion were associated with evacuator status and BET (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early events-increased rectal pressure (propulsive force), anorectal angle (puborectalis relaxation), and anorectal descent (perineal relaxation)-determine evacuation. Body position and rectal filling affect the rectoanal gradient. Most DD patients have both impaired propulsion and relaxation. Constipated patients with a prolonged BET and/or reduced evacuation have DD.

Overall and Regional Colonic Transit Abnormalities in Elderly Patients with Constipation

OBJECTIVE

Chronic constipation (CC) more frequently affects the elderly; pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) may confuse the appraisal of the pathophysiology of CC. The aim was to characterize colonic transit (CT) in elderly with CC with/without PFD.

DESIGN

We conducted retrospective medical records review of 191 patients ≥ 65 years who underwent scintigraphic CT for assessing CC. Overall CT and distribution of isotopes in 4 colonic regions and stool were compared with 179 healthy controls < 65 years and 183 CC < 66 years. Presence of PFD, comorbidities, and concomitant medications were documented. Data shown are median (IQR).

RESULTS

Elderly CC patients were predominantly female (69.3%), aged 70 (67,74) years, with PFD in 56.9%. Elderly CC had overall slower CT (geometric center) at 48 h [2.5 (2.0,3.48)] compared to controls [3.79 (2.69,4.69)], but overall and proximal CT were not different compared to CC < 66 years. Combined ascending and transverse colon (AC + TC) at 48 h was lower in elderly CC [51.1 (14.4,76.5)] % compared to healthy controls [86.5 (53.6, 100)% p < 0.001]. There was no difference in overall CT among elderly CC with and without PFD. Among groups with PFD, the elderly CC (compared to CC < 66y) had higher AC + TC emptying at 24 h (8.6% [IQR 0.0-30.2] vs 0.3% [0.0-20.6] p = 0.042), but not at 48 h.

CONCLUSION

Overall and proximal CT of elderly with CC was slower to healthy controls, but similar to adults < 66 years with CC. In the 56.9% elderly CC with PFD, overall CT and AC + TC emptying were similar to those without PFD.

Prevalence and Clinical Impact of the London Classification: A Prospective, International, Multicenter Study From the Lower Gastrointestinal International Consortium (LoGIC)

INTRODUCTION

The London classification provides standardization for characterization of disorders of anorectal function, although prevalences and clinical impact of these disorders are unclear.

METHODS

An international research consortium was established, including 5 specialist centers. Prospective data were collected in consecutive adults referred for refractory chronic constipation (CC), fecal incontinence (FI), or coexistent CC/FI over 18 months. Patients completed a standardized clinical questionnaire and underwent anorectal physiology tests, which were performed and interpreted using uniform methodology. The prevalence of the London classification was compared between symptom groups (CC, FI, and coexistent CC/FI), equipment types, and sites. Clinical impact was assessed using Cleveland Clinic Constipation and St. Marks Incontinence Scores.

RESULTS

Of 1,012 included patients (85.6% women), 30.5% had self-reported CC, 33.2% had FI, and 36.3% had coexistent CC/FI. Rectoanal areflexia was uncommon (3.1%). Disorders of anal tone/contractility (CC: 45.0%; FI: 68.5%; coexistent CC/FI: 63.8%; P < 0.0001) and disorders of rectal sensation (major findings: rectal hyposensitivity, CC: 10.0%; FI: 5.0%; coexistent CC/FI: 11.1%; P = 0.018; rectal hypersensitivity, CC: 3.8%; FI: 9.0%; coexistent CC/FI: 4.9%; P = 0.025) varied between the symptom groups and were associated with symptom severity. Most disorders of rectoanal coordination were found in similar proportions across the symptom groups and were not associated with the severity of CC (median Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score 10-14 in all groups). Prevalences of some disorders differed between equipment types (specifically balloon expulsion test).

DISCUSSION

This prospective multicenter study provides information on the prevalence and clinical impact of the London classification and will guide refinement of the current London classification.

Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?

Background and Aims

Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high-definition anorectal manometry (3D-HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost-effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This study aimed to assess DRE's capability to classify DD patients into the four subtypes outlined in Rao's classification.

Methods

This retrospective monocentric study involved patients diagnosed with DD through 3D-HRAM. After initial 3D-HRAM performed by one physician, patients underwent a clinical examination, including DRE by a second senior clinician blinded to DD subtypes. Statistical tests measured the correlation between DRE and HRAM in classifying the four DD subtypes.

Results

The study included 200 patients, revealing commendable overall agreement between DRE and 3D-HRAM (Kappa = 0.658). For subtype diagnosis, correlation was substantial for Subtypes I, II, and IV (0.679, 0.741, 0.649, respectively) and moderate for Subtype III (Kappa = 0.325).

Conclusion

DRE demonstrates satisfactory performance in diagnosing the four subtypes of DD. Enhanced training in DRE, emphasizing functional information, has the potential to reduce reliance on additional tests, thereby mitigating economic and organizational impacts.

Rome IV Functional Defecation Disorder: Time for a Change in Symptom Criteria for Improved Clinical Relevance?

INTRODUCTION

Defecatory disorders are common affecting up to 8% of the population. Rome IV diagnostic criteria are used to define this condition and, therefore, select patients for the gold standard therapy, anorectal biofeedback. The aim of this study was to test the current Rome IV Functional Defecation Disorder (FDD) criteria in a real-world population by using the response to biofeedback as a validation tool.

METHODS

A total of 485 patients (female 437, mean age 50 ± 17.6 years) with defecatory symptoms presenting to a neurogastroenterology clinic underwent anorectal biofeedback therapy regardless of whether they met formal Rome IV FDD criteria or not. Patients were assessed extensively with the Rome questionnaire, constipation questionnaire, and visual analog scales for satisfaction, control, quality of life, and anorectal manometry.

RESULTS

Rome IV FDD was no better at predicting response to biofeedback compared with non-Rome IV FDD ( P = NS). Digitation ( P = 0.043) and increasing cumulative number of defecatory symptoms ( P = 0.038) were correlated with improvement in biofeedback (≥2-point increase in bowel satisfaction). Those with abnormal physiology only responded well to biofeedback (83% response rate), but this was not statistically different from no Rome IV physiology patients (73%). There was a trend for increasing cumulative number of abnormal physiology factors to correlate with biofeedback ( P = 0.086).

DISCUSSION

Rome IV symptom criteria need revision to include more defecatory symptoms, include all subtypes of irritable bowel syndrome, and be inclusive of those with either loose stools or more frequent stools such as those previously labeled with "pseudodiarrhea" or "hyperdefecation." Continuing to include physiology criteria in the Rome diagnosis of FDD seems valid.

High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry and Balloon Expulsion Test Outcomes in Functional Constipation: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND Functional constipation can occur in children and adults and consists of difficult or infrequent bowel movements, painful defecation, or the sensation of incomplete bowel movement, and it can be idiopathic. This study aimed to compare the findings from high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) and the balloon expulsion test (BET) in 360 patients with functional constipation and 73 healthy volunteers. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 360 patients with functional constipation and 73 healthy volunteers underwent HRAM and BET in our hospital from January 2017 to December 2023. We collected the general data of all participants and surveyed the defecation symptoms of patients with functional constipation. RESULTS Our study showed no significant correlation between HRAM results and age in healthy volunteers, while men had a higher residual anal pressure (P=0.022), higher anal squeeze pressure (P=0.020), and lower rectoanal pressure gradient than women (P=0.017). Using logistic regression analysis, it was concluded that sex (OR=2.880, 95% CI [1.654,5.015], P=0.000) and sensation of incomplete evacuation (OR=1.892, 95% CI [1.023,3.500], P=0.042) affected the occurrence of dyssynergic defecation. The specificity of BET in diagnosing dyssynergic defecation was 81.89%, while that of HRAM was 52.78%. CONCLUSIONS This observation provides normal values for anorectal pressures by HRAM. HRAM and BET are effective methods for assessing functional constipation. Being male and having sensation of incomplete evacuation are risk factors for dyssynergic defecation. The specificity of BET for diagnosing dyssynergic defecation was higher than that of HRAM.

Colon Volume by Computed Tomography and Scintigraphic Colonic Transit in Constipated Patients With or Without Redundant Colon

Redundant colon, also referred to as "dolichocolon," is an anatomical variant associated with elongation and redundancy thought to be associated with constipation, abdominal pain, and distention.1,2 Diagnosis requires radiological visualization of the non-dilated colon in situ via barium enema or abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT). Colonic redundancy is based on 3 criteria: sigmoid loop displaced cranially relative to the iliac crests (type 1); transverse colon caudal to the iliac crests (type 2); and redundant loops at the hepatic or splenic flexure (type 3).2 Rarely, dolichocolon may meet all 3 criteria.2.

Consensus practice recommendations for management of gastrointestinal dysfunction in Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction is a common non-motor feature of Parkinson disease (PD). GI symptoms may start years before the onset of motor symptoms and impair quality of life. Robust clinical trial data is lacking to guide screening, diagnosis and treatment of GI dysfunction in PD.

OBJECTIVE

To develop consensus statements on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of GI dysfunction in PD.

METHODS

The application of a modified Delphi panel allowed for the synthesis of expert opinions into clinical statements. Consensus was predefined as a level of agreement of 100 % for each item. Five virtual Delphi rounds were held. Two movement disorders neurologists reviewed the literature on GI dysfunction in PD and developed draft statements based on the literature review. Draft statements were distributed among the panel that included five movement disorder neurologists and two gastroenterologists, both experts in GI dysmotility and its impact on PD symptoms. All members reviewed the statements and references in advance of the virtual meetings. In the virtual meetings, each statement was discussed, edited, and a vote was conducted. If there was not 100 % consensus, further discussions and modifications ensued until there was consensus.

RESULTS

Statements were developed for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of common GI symptoms in PD and were organized by anatomic segments: oral cavity and esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and colon and anorectum.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus recommendations offer a practical framework for the diagnosis and treatment of GI dysfunction in PD.

Defecatory disorders are a common cause of chronic constipation in Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Up to 50% of patients with Parkinson disease have constipation (PD-C), but the prevalence of defecatory disorders caused by rectoanal dyscoordination in PD-C is unknown. We aimed to compare anorectal function of patients with PD-C versus idiopathic chronic constipation (CC).

METHODS

Anorectal pressures, rectal sensation, and rectal balloon expulsion time (BET) were measured with high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR-ARM) in patients with PD-C and control patients with CC, matched for age and sex.

RESULTS

We identified 97 patients with PD-C and 173 control patients. Eighty-six patients with PD-C (89%) had early PD, and 39 (40%) had a defecatory disorder, manifest by a prolonged rectal balloon expulsion time (37 patients) or a lower rectoanal pressure difference during evacuation (2 patients). PD-C patients with a prolonged BET had a greater anal resting pressure (p = 0.02), a lower rectal pressure increment (p = 0.005), greater anal pressure (p = 0.047), and a lower rectoanal pressure difference during evacuation (p < 0.001). Rectal sensory thresholds were greater in patients with abnormal BET. In the multivariate model comparing CC and PD-C (AUROC = 0.76), PD-C was associated with a lower anal squeeze increment (odds ratio [OR] for PD-C, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.91-0.95]), longer squeeze duration (OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.08]), lower rectal pressure increment (OR per 10 mm Hg, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66-0.79]), and negative rectoanal gradient during evacuation (OR per 10 mm Hg, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.26]).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CC, PD-C was characterized by impaired squeeze pressure, longer squeeze duration, lower increase in rectal pressure, and a more negative rectoanal gradient during evacuation.

Increased Grades of Rectal Intussusception: Role of Decline in Pelvic Floor Integrity and Association With Dyssynergic Defecation

INTRODUCTION

The natural history of rectal intussusception (RI) is poorly understood. We hypothesized that decline in pelvic floor integrity and function leads to increasing RI grades.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a registry of patients with defecatory disorders with high-resolution anorectal manometry and magnetic resonance defecography was performed. Association of risk factors on increasing RI grades was assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Analysis included a total of 238 women: 90 had no RI, 43 Oxford 1-2, 49 Oxford 3, and 56 Oxford 4-5. Age ( P = 0.017), vaginal delivery ( P = 0.008), and prior pelvic surgery ( P = 0.032) were associated with increased Oxford grades. Obstructive defecation symptoms and dyssynergic defecation were observed at relatively high rates across groups. Increased RI grades were associated with less anal relaxation at simulated defecation yet, higher rates of normal balloon expulsion ( P < 0.05), linked to diminished anal sphincter. Indeed, increased RI grades were associated with worsening fecal incontinence severity, attributed to higher rates of anal hypotension. Levator ani laxity, defined by increased levator hiatus length and its excessive descent at straining, was associated with increasing RI grades, independent of age, history of vaginal delivery, and pelvic surgeries and could independently predict increased RI grades. Concurrent anterior and posterior compartments, and visceral prolapse were associated with higher Oxford grades.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggest that decline in pelvic floor integrity with abnormal levator ani laxity is associated with increased RI grades, a process that is independent of age, history of vaginal deliveries, and/or pelvic surgeries, and perhaps related to dyssynergic defecation.

Diagnostic value of balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry in patients with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aims to compare the diagnostic value of balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry in patients with constipation through meta-analysis. Databases, encompassing PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, etc. were searched for all English publications on the diagnosis of constipation using balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry. The publication date was restricted from the inception of the databases until December 2022. Data analysis was carried out utilizing Stata 15.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Thirteen studies involving 2171 patients with constipation were included. According to the meta-analysis, the balloon expulsion test showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.77), a pooled specificity (Spe) of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.62-0.72), a pooled positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 3.24 (95% CI: 1.53-6.88), a pooled negative likelihood ratio (-LR) 0.35 (95% CI: 0.23-0.52) and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 9.47 (95% CI: 3.27-27.44). For anorectal manometry, the pooled Sen, Spe, +LR, -LR and DOR were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72-0.76), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.76), 2.69 (95% CI: 2.18-3.32), 0.35 (95% CI: 0.28-0.43), and 8.3 (95% CI: 5.4-12.75), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve areas for balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry were 0.8123 and 0.8088, respectively, with no statistically significant disparity (Z = -0.113, P > 0.05). Both the balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry demonstrate comparable diagnostic performance, each offering unique advantages. These diagnostic procedures hold significance in the diagnosis of constipation.

Optimizing the Management Algorithm for Adults With Functional Constipation Failing a Fiber/Laxative Trial in General Gastroenterology: Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Minimization Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal function testing is traditionally relegated to subspecialty centers. Yet, it is an office-based procedure that appears capable of triaging care for the many patients with Rome IV functional constipation that fail empiric over-the-counter therapy in general gastroenterology, as an alternative to empirical prescription drugs. We aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of routine anorectal function testing in this specific population.

METHODS

We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective and a cost-minimization analysis from the insurer perspective to compare 3 strategies: (i) empiric prescription drugs followed by pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) for drug failure, (ii) empiric PFPT followed by prescription drugs for PFPT failure, or (iii) care directed by up-front anorectal function testing. Model inputs were derived from systematic reviews of prospective clinical trials, national cost data sets, and observational cohort studies of the impact of chronic constipation on health outcomes, healthcare costs, and work productivity.

RESULTS

The most cost-effective strategy was upfront anorectal function testing to triage patients to appropriate therapy, in which the subset of patients without anal hypocontractility on anorectal manometry and with a balloon expulsion time of at least 6.5 seconds would be referred to PFPT. In sensitivity analysis, empiric PFPT was more cost effective than empiric prescription drugs except for situations in which the primary goal of treatment was to increase bowel movement frequency. If adopted, gastroenterologists would refer ∼17 patients per year to PFPT, supporting feasibility.

DISCUSSION

Anorectal function testing seems to be an emergent technology to optimize cost-effective outcomes, overcoming testing costs by phenotyping care.

The rectum, anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle show different contraction wave forms during prolonged measurement with a simulated feces

Contractile patterns in rectum, puborectalis muscle and anal sphincter must be studied to understand defecation. Six subjects had contractile waveforms studied with Fecobionics. Symptom questionnaires, balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry were done for reference. The Fecobionics bag was filled in rectum to urge-to-defecate volume and measurements were done for 4 h before the subjects attempted to evacuate the device. Pressures and bend angle (BA) variations were analyzed with Fast Fourier Transformation. Four normal subjects exhibited low frequency waves (< 0.06 Hz) for pressures and BA. The waves were uncoordinated between recordings, except for rear and bag pressures. Peak wave amplitudes occurred at 0.02-0.04 Hz. Pressures and the BA differed for peak 1 (p < 0.001) and peak 2 amplitudes (p < 0.005). The front pressure amplitude was bigger than the others (rear and BA, p < 0.05; bag, p < 0.005) for peak 1, and bigger than bag pressure (p < 0.005) and BA (p < 0.05) for peak 2. One subject was considered constipated with lower front pressure amplitudes compared to normal subjects and increased amplitudes for other parameters. The sixth subject was hyperreactive and differed from the other subjects. In conclusion, the rectum, anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle showed different contraction waves during prolonged measurements. The data call for larger studies to better understand normal defecation, feces-withholding patterns, and the implications on anorectal disorders.

Abnormal gastrointestinal motility is a major factor in explaining symptoms and a potential therapeutic target in patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction

The objective of this article is to review the evidence of abnormal gastrointestinal (GI) tract motor functions in the context of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). These include abnormalities of oesophageal motility, gastric emptying, gastric accommodation, colonic transit, colonic motility, colonic volume and rectal evacuation. For each section regarding GI motor dysfunction, the article describes the preferred methods and the documented motor dysfunctions in DGBI based on those methods. The predominantly non-invasive measurements of gut motility as well as therapeutic interventions directed to abnormalities of motility suggest that such measurements are to be considered in patients with DGBI not responding to first-line approaches to behavioural or empirical dietary or pharmacological treatment.

Colorectal motility patterns and psychiatric traits in functional constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: A study from China

BACKGROUND

Functional constipation (FC) and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) represent a spectrum of constipation disorders. However, the majority of previous clinical investigations have focused on Western populations, with limited data originating from China.

AIM

To determine and compare the colorectal motility and psychiatric features of FC and IBS-C in an Eastern Chinese population.

METHODS

Consecutive chronic constipation patients referred to our motility clinic from December 2019 to February 2023 were enrolled. FC and IBS-C diagnoses were established using ROME IV criteria, and patients underwent high-resolution anorectal manometry (ARM) and a colonic transmit test using the Sitz marker study. Constipation-related symptoms were obtained through questionnaires. Anxiety and depression were assessed by the Hamilton anxiety rating scale and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21. The clinical characteristics and colorectal motility patterns of FC and IBS-C patients were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences in sex, age or abdominal discomfort symptoms were observed between IBS-C and FC patients (all P > 0.05). The proportion of IBS-C patients with delayed colonic transit was higher than that of patients with FC (36.63% vs 15.91%, P < 0.05), while rectosigmoid accumulation of radiopaque markers was more common in the FC group than in the IBS-C group (50% vs 26.73%, P < 0.05). Diverse proportions of these dyssynergic patterns were noted within both the FC and IBS-C groups by ARM. IBS-C patients were found to have a higher prevalence of depression than FC patients (66.30% vs 42.42%, P < 0.05). The scores for feelings of guilt, suicide, psychomotor agitation, diurnal variation, obsessive/compulsive disorder, hopelessness, self-abasedment and gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly higher in IBS-C patients than that in FC patients (P < 0.05). For IBS-C (χ2 = 5.438, P < 0.05) but not FC, patients with normal colon transit time were significantly more likely to have anxiety than those with slow colon transit time. For IBS-C patients but not FC patients, the threshold of first constant sensation, desire to defecate and sustained urgency were all weakly correlated with the degree of anxiety (r = 0.414, r = 0.404, and r = 0.418, respectively, P < 0.05). The proportion of patients with a low threshold of desire to defecate among IBS-C patients with depression was lower than that in those without depression (69.6% vs 41.9%, χ2 = 4.054, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight both overlapping and distinctive patterns of colon transit, dyssynergic patterns, anorectal sensation, psychological distress, and associations of psychiatric and colorectal motility characteristics in FC and IBS-C patients in an Eastern Chinese population, providing valuable insights into the pathophysiological underpinnings of these disorders.

The influence of defaecating proctograms on clinical decision-making in pelvic floor disorders

AIM

Defaecating proctogram (DP) studies have become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with pelvic floor disorders. However, their impact on treatment decision-making remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of decision-making by colorectal surgeons and the role of the DP in this process.

METHOD

Four colorectal surgeons were presented with online surveys containing the complete history, examination and investigations of 106 de-identified pelvic floor patients who had received one of three treatment options: physiotherapy only, anterior Delorme's procedure or anterior mesh rectopexy. The survey assessed the management decisions made by each of the surgeons for the three treatments both before and after the addition of the DP to the diagnostic work-up.

RESULTS

After the addition of the DP results; treatment choice changed in 219 (52%) of 424 surgical decisions and interrater agreement improved significantly from κ = 0.26 to κ = 0.39. Three of the four surgeons reported a significant increase in confidence. Agreement with the actual treatments patients received increased from κ = 0.21 to κ = 0.28. Intra-anal rectal prolapse on DP was a significant predictor of a decision to perform anterior mesh rectopexy.

CONCLUSION

The DP improves interclinician agreement in the management of pelvic floor disorders and enhances the confidence in treatment decisions. Intra-anal rectal prolapse was the most influential DP parameter in treatment decision-making.

Constipation in Parkinson's Disease

Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal features of Parkinson's disease (PD), occurring in over 50% of all PD patients during the course of their disease. Furthermore, constipation is now recognized as an important, prodromal symptom and may predate the onset of the classical motor symptoms by decades. Thereafter, the prevalence and severity of constipation in PD tend to parallel the course of both motor and nonmotor phenomena such as cognitive decline and depression. Difficult defecation (obstructed defecation, dyssynergia) is the primary pathophysiology underlying constipation and likely reflects involvement by the PD process of one or more of the many skeletal muscle groups that are involved in effecting defecation. Management of constipation in PD may be complicated by several patient factors including dysphagia, cognitive impairment, depression, and weak sphincter tone. While the armamentarium available to those who treat constipation, in general, has expanded considerably in recent years, the evidence supporting any therapy in the management of this symptom in PD has remained slim.

Defecatory disorders in patients with type 1 diabetes and chronic constipation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic constipation (CC) may be caused by defecatory disorders (DDs) and associated with reduced rectal sensation. Among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and CC (T1DCC patients), the prevalence of DDs and reduced rectal sensation is unknown. We sought to compare complications of T1D, anorectal dysfunction, and CC symptoms, among T1DCC patients with versus without a DD.

METHODS

Anorectal pressures at rest and during squeeze and evacuation, as well as rectal sensation and rectal balloon expulsion time (BET) were measured with high-resolution anorectal manometry in 114 consecutive T1DCC patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (32%) had prolonged BET, suggestive of a DD. Complications of T1D included peripheral neuropathy (n = 67, 59%), retinopathy (n = 42, 37%), and nephropathy (n = 26, 23%). Among these complications, only retinopathy was associated with, that is, more prevalent in patients with normal (45%) than prolonged BET (19%). Compared with patients with normal BET, patients with prolonged BET had a lower rectal pressure (mean [SD], 32 [23] mm Hg vs. 23 [19] mm Hg, p = 0.03), greater anal pressure (91 [23] mm Hg vs. 68 [36] mm Hg, p < 0.001), and lower rectoanal gradient (-67 [30] mm Hg vs. -36 [32] mm Hg, p < 0.0001) during evacuation. Anal resting pressure and anal squeeze increment were below normal in 14 (13%) and 32 (29%) of patients and one or more rectal sensory thresholds were above normal in 34 (30%) patients; these abnormalities affected similar proportions in the normal and prolonged BET cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Among T1DCC patients, 37 (32%) had prolonged BET, which was associated with anorectal pressures indicative of a DD but was not associated with reduced rectal sensation, suggesting that DDs are more likely explained by abdomino-anal dyscoordination than visceral disturbance.

Reproducibility of high-resolution manometry among healthy and constipated persons

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although high-resolution manometry (HR_ARM) is commonly used to diagnose defecatory disorders, its intraindividual day-to-day reproducibility is unknown. Since these measurements entail voluntary effort, this study aimed to evaluate the intraindividual day-to-day reproducibility of HR_ARM.

METHODS

In 22 healthy women (35 years [14] mean [SD]) and 53 constipated patients (42 years [13], 46 women), the rectal balloon expulsion time (BET), and anorectal pressures were measured with HR_ARM on 2 days separated by a median (interquartile range) of 15 days (11-53) in healthy and 40 days (8-75) in constipated patients. Anorectal pressures were evaluated at rest (20 s), during squeeze, and during evacuation. Rectal sensation was also evaluated in constipated patients. The agreement between both measurements was evaluated with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and other tests.

RESULTS

Among constipated patients, the anal resting (mean CCC [95%CI] 0.62 [0.43-0.76]) and squeeze pressures (CCC 0.65 [0.47-0.79]), rectoanal gradient during evacuation (CCC 0.42 [0.17-0.62]), and rectal sensory thresholds (CCC for urgency 0.72 [0.52-0.84]) were concordant. Between days 1 and 2, one or more outcomes, characterized as normal or abnormal, differed in 79% of constipated patients, i.e., anal resting and squeeze pressures, the gradient, and the rectal BET differed in, respectively, 25%, 19%, 36%, and 10% of constipated patients. The rectal BET was prolonged in three healthy persons (both days) and either on 1 day (six patients) or 2 days (33 patients) in constipated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

While HR_ARM variables and the BET are reproducible within healthy and constipated persons, the outcome on repeat testing differed in 79% of constipated patients.