Has plantarflexion any positive impact on the clinical risk of vascular injury during ankle arthroscopy?

Anterior Ankle Arthroscopy: Advantage of a Preoperative Ultrasound Mapping to Prevent Neurovascular Complications

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to verify the usefulness of ultrasound-assisted mapping of the vascular and neurological structures in the anterior compartment of the ankle just before an anterior arthroscopic procedure to reduce these kinds of complications.

METHODS

Various complications can be present in anterior arthroscopy of the ankle. The structures most prone to iatrogenic damage are vessels and nerves. They are macroscopically visible and palpable in a little more than 50% of cases, but arterial ramifications are not visible because they are located deeper.

RESULTS

The authors have investigated how to reduce potential iatrogenic damage to the complex and variable neuro-vascular network of the anterior aspect of the ankle. They have completed the classic routine marking of the bony and tendinous structures with an ultrasound mapping of the neurovascular structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors concluded that ultrasound-assisted mapping is a non-invasive, fast, and safe procedure that can help to reduce potential iatrogenic damage when performing anterior arthroscopic surgery.

Accessibility to Talar Dome in Neutral Position, Dorsiflexion, or Noninvasive Distraction in Posterior Ankle Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral lesions of the talus are frequent pathologies of the ankle joint. Especially through arthroscopy, the treatment is kept as minimally invasive as possible. However, there are some drawbacks as to the reachability because of the high congruency of the ankle joint. Here, either noninvasive distraction or maximal dorsiflexion may be an option for better access to the lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate maximal dorsiflexion compared to neutral position or noninvasive distraction of the ankle joint in the arthroscopic reachability of the talar dome. The hypothesis of this study was that maximal dorsiflexion would allow for greater accessibility of the talar dome compared to neutral position or noninvasive distraction of the joint.

METHODS

Twenty matched pairs (n=40) of anatomical ankle specimens were used. The effects of neutral position, maximal dorsiflexion, and noninvasive distraction of the ankle joint on arthroscopic accessibility of the ankle joint were tested. After disarticulation of the talus, reach was measured and compared between the 3 positions.

RESULTS

In neutral position, 13.7±1.2 mm of the talar dome was reached laterally and 14.0±1.0 mm medially. In maximal dorsiflexion, the distance was 19.0±1.1mm laterally and 19.8±1.4 mm medially, and in noninvasive distraction it was 16.1±1.5 mm laterally and 15.7±1.0 mm medially. The statistical comparison showed a significantly better reach in dorsiflexion laterally (P = .003) and medially (P = .026).

CONCLUSION

Accessibility of the talar dome in maximal dorsiflexion was superior to that in neutral position or noninvasive distraction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results of this study may allow for better planning in arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Pseudoaneurysm following ankle arthroscopy: a systematic review of case series

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Pseudoaneurysms (PA) are rare complications following ankle arthroscopy (AA). Delay in diagnosis is reported to be frequent and could lead to serious complications. Evidence synthesis on the clinical context of such complication lacks in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review is conducted to locate all relevant papers. In total, 23 case reports were included in the review. Data of 23 patients with a mean of 40.9 ± 10.3 years were extracted and analyzed. Outcomes included comorbidities, portals and procedure types performed during AA, PA location and size, time to diagnosis and treatment, and therapeutic modalities.

RESULTS

The results showed that d-ATA and the dorsal pedis artery (DPA) were involved in 18 and 4 cases, respectively. A single case of PA of the fibular artery was described. The mean PA size was found to be 4.2 × 3.9 × 2.1 cm. Five of the 14 patients (35.7%) with a reported detailed medical history were treated for a cardiovascular or hemostasis condition. Delay in PA diagnosis was found to be at a mean time of 50.45 ± 74.6 days. The most commonly reported surgical indications were anterior synovectomy and removal of anterior osteophytes. Ligation was the most common procedure in treating PA.

CONCLUSION

While portal placement might be a minor factor, the variability of the d-ATA and/or DPA anatomical position and its affection with foot position and distraction during AA could play a role in the arterial injury. Synovectomy and removal of anterior, particularly big-sized, osteophytes could be considered as risk factors as well. A state of hypocoagulability might affect injury healing and consequently PA formation. PA diagnosis should be raised whenever a non-resolving or pulsatile swelling over a portal incision is observed.

Anatomic Feasibility Study of Posterior Arthroscopic Tibiotalar Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Operative indications for an anterior arthroscopic tibiotalar arthrodesis are well defined. A posterior approach with the patient in a prone position may be indicated when the anterior approach is precluded by the soft tissue condition or for a 1-step procedure associated with posterior approach subtalar fusion.

METHODS

An anatomic study assessed the feasibility of posterior arthroscopic tibiotalar fusion and sought to determine arthroscopy entry points, mortise cartilage freshening quality, and the risk of osseous, tendinous, vascular, and neural complications. Twenty-two zones of the fibular tibiotalar mortise were mapped from 10 specimens. Medial and lateral para-Achilles arthroscopic portals were used with a 4 mm 30-degree arthroscope. Chondral resection was performed with a motorized burr, curette, and osteotome.

RESULTS

The entire plafond of the tibia could be debrided in all cases, whereas the talar dome was debrided in its entirety in 20% of cases; in 80%, only the posterior two-thirds could be treated with the anterior portion approaching the neck of the talus being poorly accessible. More than 50% of the area of the malleolar grooves was debrided. There was 1 medial malleolar fracture and 1 peroneal artery lesion.

CONCLUSION

The technique was shown to be feasible if there was no frontal hindfoot deformity or tibiotalar equinus preventing satisfactory resection of the posterior and anterior talar cartilage.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrated that a posterior approach arthroscopic ankle fusion would lead to adequate joint preparation. This procedure reduces the risk of nerve damage.

Comparative performance of ankle arthroscopy with and without traction

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthroscopy has evolved as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool. Traditionally, it is performed with traction because of the tight ankle joint space. Original traction techniques were invasive but have progressed to the commonly used noninvasive modalities. Recent reports have suggested traction may be unnecessary. The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively ankle arthroscopy with and without traction in terms of ease of visualization of anatomic structures according to the Ferkel's ankle arthroscopy criteria.

METHODS

Under Institutional Review Board approval, 103 patients received ankle arthroscopies, first with noninvasive traction and subsequently without traction. An independent observer scored each arthroscopy based on the 21-point Ferkel's criteria. For each structure adequately visualized, one point was given. Inadequate visualization was defined as excessive force or as visible cartilage scuffing. The maximum possible score was 21 points and the lowest was zero. Fifty-five females and 48 males, average age 35 (range, 16 to 71) years, participated in the study.

RESULTS

Noninvasive traction facilitated visualization of all structures of the anterior ankle in more than 90% of cases except for the anterior compartment and lateral gutters, which were better visualized without traction with the ankle in dorsiflexion. No difference was seen when visualizing the talus. Traction arthroscopy performed better when evaluating the central and posterior ankle. The mean score difference was statistically significant, 11.2 versus 18.5 points, favoring noninvasive traction arthroscopy. The complication rate was 4%.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive traction facilitated complete ankle arthroscopy. Dorsiflexion improved visualization of the anterior compartment and lateral ankle gutter. The authors recommend noninvasive traction when performing ankle arthroscopy.