Intramedullary Metatarsal Fixation for Treatment of Delayed Regenerate Bone in Lengthening of Brachymetatarsia

Treatment of Fourth Metatarsal Brachymetatarsia Using Distraction Osteogenesis with External Fixator: Surgical Techniques, Outcomes and Complications

OBJECTIVE

Surgical technique in distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of brachymetatarsia can influence the final prognosis. However, there are currently no standardized guidelines for surgical procedures and complication management. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of bone lengthening with external fixation by minimally invasive osteotomy based on Ilizarov technique in the treatment of congenital brachymetatarsia.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with congenital brachymetatarsia treated by metatarsal lengthening, from June 2017 to December 2020. There were 11 patients with 17 shorted fourth metatarsals, including 10 females and 1 male, with age of 24.6 ± 4.5 years (16-31 years). Six patients were bilaterally involved. Orthofix external fixator mini track was installed through dorsal approach and the fourth MTP joints were temporarily fixed by Kirschner wire. Bone lengthening was performed after a minimally invasive osteotomy at the proximal metatarsals. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) lesser metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (MTP-IP) scores, metatarsal length, complications were recorded. Statistical comparison was performed using the paired t-student test for pre- and postoperative AOFAS MTP-IP scores.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 55 ± 10.8 months. The mean length of the fourth metatarsal bone was 49.9 ± 2.9 mm preoperatively. The mean metatarsal shortage was 18.8 ± 3.1 mm. The mean lengthening achieved was 19.8 ± 3.3 mm, with a lengthening ratio of 39.7% ± 6.6%. The lengthened callus ossified completely at 3-4 months after operation. All patients were satisfied with the results of lengthening. The AOFAS scores were improved significantly from 83.7 ± 4.2 preoperatively to 93.2 ± 2.7 postoperatively (t = -10.27, p < 0.001). One patient with traumatic metatarsophalangeal joint subluxation was treated by joint reduction and Kirschner wire fixation. One patient had metatarsophalangeal joint release and Kirschner wire fixation due to flexion contracture. Pin tract infections were controlled by wound care and antibiotics in 6 patients. All patients had no nonunion, necrosis of toes, and sensory disturbance of toes.

CONCLUSION

Metatarsal lengthening by minimally invasive osteotomy with external fixator had satisfactory results in the treatment of congenital brachymetatarsia.

What's the evidence on surgical treatment for congenital brachymetatarsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Brachymetatarsia is marked by the shortened length of one or more metatarsal bones. Several operative options have been suggested without demonstrating the superiority of one treatment over another. This study aims to assess the main available treatment, bone lengthening achieved, clinical outcomes, and complications pertaining to congenital brachymetatarsia interventions.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

Result

After the screening process, 13 articles were included in the review. Brachymetatarsia mainly occurs in females at a ratio of 14.8:1, and bilateral involvement in 25.8 % of cases. The fourth metatarsal is most affected, followed by the first metatarsal. The main surgical procedures are one-stage approach which results in limited length gain but fewer complications, and gradual lengthening which achieves greater length but has a higher complication rate, including metatarsophalangeal or interphalangeal subluxation, fractures, and infections. The first metatarsal reported better values concerning lengthening rate and healing index compared to fourth metatarsal, while no differences were observed in distraction rates or clinical outcomes. More complications, such as stiffness, fractures, and cavus foot were associated with first metatarsal lengthening.

Conclusions

It is not possible to identify a gold standard technique for addressing this condition. The two predominant surgical techniques bear advantages and drawbacks. A judicious case-by-case assessment is mandatory to determine the optimal surgical approach. Exploring the combination of techniques could be promise in mitigating the limitations associated with the main two methods and achieving better forefoot balance.

Level of evidence

Level II, systematic review.

Brachymetatarsia: A Classification for Surgical Treatment

Brachymetatarsia is a congenital osseous and soft tissue deformity of a ray(s) of the foot. Because there is no particular consensus of methodology of lengthening for brachymetatarsia, the authors introduce a comprehensive anatomic classification and a surgical guide to treatment of each classification type. This classification combines the number of the metatarsal(s) affected and the letter(s) indicating the type of brachymetatarsia deformity (A = axial deficiency of the metatarsal, B = bowing of the metatarsal, C = congruency of metatarsal phalangeal joint). This study reviewed of 300 brachymetatarsals in 166 patients. Fifty of the 166 (30%) patients had bilateral brachymetatarsia. Of the 300 metatarsals with brachymetatarsia, 64 (21%) were first metatarsals, 22 (7%) were second metatarsals, 28 (9%) were third metatarsals, 12 (4%) were fifth metatarsals, and 174 (58%) were fourth metatarsals. Classification types that were found was a total of 165 (55%) type A, a total of 6 (2%) type B, a total of 72 (24%) type AB, a total of 39 (13%) type AC, and a total of 18 (6%) type ABC. A total of 16 (10%) male and 150 (90%) female patients were evaluated. The mean preoperative amount of shortening of the metatarsal was 15 mm (range, 4-20 mm), as determined by the preoperative metatarsal parabola deficiency, equating to 30% of the preoperative metatarsal length. Brachymetatarsia is a complex congenital deformity which until now has not been critically analyzed. This study outlines a comprehensive brachymetatarsia classification system which provides an accurate diagnosis of the deformity and offers a surgical treatment algorithm.

Callus distraction for brachymetatarsia - A comparison between an internal device and the external fixator

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic patients with severe brachymetatarsia are commonly treated with callus distraction using external mini-fixator (EF) or internal device (ID). This study points out advantages and limitations of both methods comparing clinical and radiographical parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 21 metatarsal bones in twelve patients. Twelve metatarsals were treated with ID (Genos Mini), nine with EF (MiniRail).

RESULTS

Mean lengthening distance was 17.3 mm using EF and 11.7 mm using ID (p = 0.016). Adverse results were observed in 89% of metatarsals treated with EF and in 33% treated with ID (p = 0.011). Postoperative surgical intervention was required in 33% using EF compared to 0% using ID (p = 0.031). Mean total German Foot Function Index (FFI-T) improved from 49 to 33 using EF and from 47 to 22 using ID (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CD is a reliable surgical treatment for BMT. Surgeons should be aware of implant-related advantages and complications when counseling patients about treatment options.

Brachymetatarsia: Surgical Management, Case Report, and Literature Review

Background

Brachymetatarsia is defined by an abnormal shortening of the metatarsal bone. This rare condition is mostly primary and congenital. Consequences of this malformation are both esthetic and functional, due to pain and mechanical problems in the forefoot. Surgical management is an important part of patient care. There are two main options: gradual lengthening by progressive callotosis distraction using an external fixator and one stage lengthening using bone graft and osteotomy of the bone. This review presents two cases using the one stage lengthening surgical management method. We also discuss some reports in the literature with the aim to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods. Literature concerning the surgical management of brachymetatarsia was identified using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Patient Presentation. We describe two female patients aged 20 and 26 years who underwent one stage lengthening surgery of the fourth toe with isolated brachymetatarsia using an iliac bone graft and internal fixator plate. The two patients had a lengthening of around 10 mm after postoperative evaluation. No skin complications were noted, but one of the patients reported flexor stiffness after surgery. Concerning the functional and cosmetic aspects, the two patients are satisfied with the management.

Conclusions

In the literature, one stage lengthening seems to be the most favorable option for the care of brachymetatarsia. Studies show a short healing time and fewer complications like infection, stiffness, malalignment, and malunion. Some reviews note the utility of the gradual lengthening of severe brachymetatarsia when a longer lengthening is necessary. There is no definite consensus concerning the management of brachymetatarsia.