Arthroscopic Repair of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Using the Pull-Out Technique for Chronic Ankle Instability: Case Report

Prediction of suspicious ankle instability using the calcaneofibular ligament cross-sectional area

Background

An injured calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) is a major cause of ankle instability (AI). Previous research has demonstrated that the thickness of the calcaneofibular ligament (CFLT) is correlated with higher-grade sprains and ankle instability. However, inflammatory hypertrophy is distinct from ligament thickness; accordingly, we considered that the calcaneofibular ligament cross-sectional area (CFLCSA) as a potential morphological parameter to analyze inflammatory CFL. We hypothesized that the CFLCSA was a key morphologic parameter in AI diagnosis.

Methods

We gathered the CFL data of 26 AI patients and 25 control subjects who had undergone ankle magnetic resonance imaging (A-MRI), and it had revealed no evidence of AI. Ankle level T1-weighted coronal A-MRI images were acquired. Using our image analysis program (INFINITT PACS), we analyzed the CFLT and CFLCSA at the CFL on the A-MRI. The CFLCSA was measured as the whole ligament cross-sectional area of the CFL that was most hypertrophied in the transverse A-MR images. The CFLT was measured at the thickest level of CFL.

Results

The mean CFLT was 3.49±0.82 mm in the control group, and 4.82±0.76 mm in the AI group. The mean CFLCSA was 33.31±7.02 mm² in the control group, and 65.33±20.91 mm² in the AI group. The AI patients had significantly greater CFLT (P<0.001) and CFLCSA (P<0.001) than the control group participants. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in the evaluation of the diagnostic tests showed that the optimal cut-off score of the CFLT was 4.06 mm, with 76.9% sensitivity, 76.0% specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99). The optimal cut-off threshold of the CFLCSA was 43.85 mm², with 92.3% sensitivity, 92.0% specificity, and AUC of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.86-1.00).

Conclusions

Even though the CFLT and CFLCSA were both significantly associated with AI, the CFLCSA was a more sensitive diagnostic test.

Long-term functional outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic repair of anterior talofibular ligament avulsion fracture

BACKGROUND

The main purpose of this study was to describe the all-inside arthroscopic technique for repairing anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) avulsion fractures at the attachment points of the fibula and talus, and to evaluate the functional outcomes during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

The data of 78 patients with ATFL avulsion fracture treated in our hospital from August 2013 to November 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had undergone all-inside arthroscopic treatment or open treatment. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (KAFS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and a 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) were used to evaluate functional outcomes.

RESULTS

The postoperative follow-up period was 24-48 months. All patients reported subjective improvements to ankle stability without any nerve, blood vessel or tendon complications. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the AOFAS, SF-36 or sport participation rate between the arthroscopic group and the open group; however, the KAFS and FAOS were significantly higher in the arthroscopic group than in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS

For ATFL avulsion fractures, the all-inside ankle arthroscopic procedure produced better outcomes than did the open procedure. The all-inside ankle arthroscopic procedure provides a minimally invasive technique with acceptable long-term functional outcomes.

Safe angles of ATFL and CFL anchor insertion into anatomical attachment of fibula in a lateral ankle ligament repair

BACKGROUND

Lateral ankle ligament repair for chronic lateral ankle instability is common, and arthroscopic repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) has been widely performed. However, it is desirable to repair of calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) combined with arthroscopic ATFL repair to obtain good long term clinical outcomes. Repairing CFL through small skin incision, there is the possibility to interfere with ATFL and CFL anchors because of close attachment of ATFL and CFL at fibula. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety anchor insertion angles for ATFL and CFL on CT images and to achieve ATFL and CFL repair with minimally invasive technique.

METHODS

Fifty ankles in 50 patients were included in this study. On a sagittal CT image, the anchor drill hole angles for ATFL and CFL were measured to avoid interference with these anchors. Then, arthroscopic ATFL repair combined with CFL repair was performed on 15 patients according to the safety insertion angles obtained by CT. CFL repair was performed through 1.5 cm length of accessory anterolateral portal. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Japanese Society for the Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) ankle hindfoot scale and the Karlsson score before surgery and at final follow-up.

RESULTS

On the CT image, the mean angles between the ATFL drill hole and anterior border of the fibula was 59.4 ± 6.5°, and those between the longitudinal axis of the fibula and ATFL drill hole, and the CFL drill hole were 34.6 ± 5.0°, and 15.1 ± 5.7°, respectively. Postoperative CT after arthroscopic ATFL repair combined with CFL repair showed that no interference with 2 anchors, and JSSF scale and the Karlsson score were significantly improved from preoperative to final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed how safety ATFL and CFL anchor insertion angles comprise a minimally invasive anatomical repair technique.

[A comparative study of all-arthroscopic technique and modified open Broström technique in repair of anterior talofibular ligament with anchors]

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of all-arthroscopic technique and modified open Broström technique in repair of anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) for lateral instability of the ankle (LIA).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on 65 patients who underwent ATFL repair with anchors for LIA between January 2014 and January 2017. The ATFL was repaired by all-arthroscopic technique in 35 patients (arthroscopic group) and modified open Broström technique in 30 patients (open group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, the side of injured ankle, the time from injury to operation, and preoperative anterior displacement of talus, tilt angle of talus, the Karlsson Ankle Functional (KAF) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Japanese Society for Surgery of the foot ankle-hindfoot (JSSF) scale score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, the intraoperative bleeding volume, and the length of time for surgery recovery were recorded. The anterior displacement of talus, the tilt angle of talus, KAF score, AOFAS score, and JSSF scale score were evaluated at 2 weeks, 3 months, and the last follow-up.

Results

All patients were followed up 24-30 months, with an average of 26 months. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and the length of time for surgery recovery of arthroscopic group were superior to open group (P<0.05). There were 2 cases of temporary ankle and dorsum numbness and 1 case of thread reaction in arthroscopic group; and there were 2 cases of temporary ankle and dorsum numbness and 2 cases of thread reaction in open group. The AOFAS score, KAF score, and JSSF scale score in arthroscopic group were significantly higher than those in open group (P<0.05) at 2 weeks after operation; there was no significant difference between the two groups at 3 months and the last follow-up (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the anterior displacement of talus and the tilt angle of talus between the two groups at 2 weeks, 3 months, and last follow-up (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the modified open Broström technique, the all-arthroscopic technique, as a minimally invasive technique, can achieve the same effectiveness, and has the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative bleeding, and less pain in the early stage.