An Alternative Technique for Fixation of Tongue-Type Calcaneal Fractures: The "Hurricane Strap"

Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel 3-Screw Fixation vs Conventional 2-Screw Fixation of Calcaneal Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures

BACKGROUND

Calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures are challenging to treat because of the poor bone stock and high risk of fixation failure secondary to the strong Achilles tendon pull. The purpose of this study is to compare the tensile force to failure of 2 different types of screw fixation construct in a cadaveric model of calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fracture.

METHODS

An oblique osteotomy was created in the calcanei of 7 matched pairs of cadaveric specimens to simulate a tuberosity avulsion fracture and one specimen from each pair randomized into one of the 2 groups for comparison. Two cancellous screws were inserted perpendicular to the fracture line at the posteromedial and posterolateral corners of the avulsed fragment for the 2-screw construct. For the second group, an additional stab incision was made at the midline of the Achilles insertional region for a screw placed between the initial 2 screws with a trajectory toward the calcaneocuboid joint in the 3-screw construct. These specimens were then mounted and loaded to failure.

RESULTS

The mean force to a predefined failure at 3.0-mm gap for the 3-screw construct was 468.7 ± 267.9 N vs 278.9 ± 164.0 N for the 2-screw construct (P < .001). The addition of a central nonparallel screw in the 3-screw construct significantly increased the force required for fracture gap displacement at all cut-off points (1.0-8.0 mm) when compared to the 2-screw construct (P < .001). Notably, the mean peak tensile force for the 3-screw construct was 499.4 ± 255.4 N occurred at the gap displacement of 4.1 mm for the 3-screw construct whereas the mean peak tensile force for the 2-screw construct was 315.9 ± 162.4 N displacing the gap at 4.3 mm.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that an additional central nonparallel screw in the 3-screw construct provided significant mechanical superiority compared to a 2-screw construct.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The present study supported the use of augmented fixation with an additional central off-axis screw to reduce risk of fixation failure in calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures.

Outcomes of operatively treated calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures

BACKGROUND

Calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures are uncommon but when present should be treated emergently due to the high risk of skin compromise. Multiple fixation techniques have been reported in the literature but there are little data regarding the ideal fixation construct and outcomes. We aimed to characterize the clinical presentation, focussing on soft tissue compromise and outcomes of operatively treated calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures with its associated complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all surgically treated calcaneus fracture in our institution from Jun 2008 to Jun 2017 was done. We reviewed patients' demographics, types of avulsion fracture, presence of preoperative skin compromise, age of fracture, time to operation, types of fixation construct, postoperative weight bearing regime, union rates, complications and revision surgeries if present.

RESULTS

We found 9 patients from our database who met the inclusion criteria. They had an average age of 55.6 (range: 43 - 90) years with 5 (55.6%) of them aged 60 years and older. Seven (77.8%) patients were female. Four out of 9 patients (44.4%) presented with soft tissue compromise (3 cases of skin tenting and 1 case of blistering). None of them required soft tissue reconstructive surgery for skin defects postoperatively. However, 2 patients (22.2%) had wound complications after surgery requiring prolonged wound care for up to 4 months. There were 2 patients with fixation failure whereby both were allowed weight bearing prematurely. All of them were able to ambulate independently at their last review.

CONCLUSION

Calcaneal tuberosity avulsion fractures have a high prevalence of soft tissue compromise and warrant early attention. This condition should be treated as both a bony and soft tissue injury rather than just a bony fracture alone. Management of this injury should take into account fracture reduction and stable fixation with neutralization of the Achilles tendon forces.