Early Protected Weightbearing After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures With Trans-syndesmotic Screws

Utility of Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography in the Postoperative Assessment of Ankle Fractures

Background: Ankle fractures are among the most common injuries requiring surgical intervention. Standard radiographs are typically used for postoperative assessment; however, some patients continue to experience residual symptoms despite satisfactory radiographic outcomes. Weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT), though not yet widely integrated into clinical practice, offers potential advantages in evaluating lower-limb deformities, injuries, and arthritis. This study explores the utility of WBCT for the midterm assessment following ankle fracture fixation and compares its findings with those obtained from standard radiographs. Methods: In this retrospective case study, we analyzed the correlations between the functional outcome scores approximately one year post-surgery and parameters assessed using WBCT. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate these correlations, and a t-test was performed to assess their statistical significance, with a threshold p-value of 0.05. Additionally, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated as a supplementary descriptive measure, without significance testing. These correlations were then compared with those obtained from standard ankle radiographic views (anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise). Results: Several correlations were identified between WBCT parameters and functional scales, with certain parameters demonstrating high statistical significance (p < 0.05). Overall, the correlations observed for WBCT were stronger than those for standard radiographs. Conclusions: Although the study cohort was limited, the findings suggest that WBCT may provide additional insights beyond conventional radiography. Further research with larger patient groups is needed to establish its clinical relevance.

Management of High-Risk Ankle Fractures

Successful outcomes in the surgical treatment of the fractured ankle require methods that respect the soft tissue envelope and establish a stable mortise for functional rehabilitation. Ankle fractures in patients with osteopenia and in diabetic patients with deranged bone remodeling constitute high-risk injuries that may result in catastrophic complications. These patients present unique care challenges and should not be approached in the same manner as their healthy counterparts. We present the principles of treatment in high-risk ankle fractures, operative treatment philosophy illustrating techniques frequently used at our institution, and a review of current literature.

Early Functional Rehabilitation in Foot and Ankle Surgery

The traditional postoperative management of common foot and ankle procedures has involved a prolonged period of immobilization and nonweight bearing. The concern was loss of correction and fixation failure. However, it has been shown that a prolonged period of nonweight bearing can predispose patients possible deep vein thrombosis, disuse osteopenia, cardiovascular complications, and generalized deconditioning. The authors' institution has published studies reviewing the efficacy of early weight bearing after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis, modified Lapidus bunionectomy, and open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. This article highlights the literature and rationale supporting the safety of early weight-bearing protocols.

Acute Syndesmosis Injuries

Ankle syndesmosis injuries include isolated ligamentous rupture, as well as fractures with ligamentous injury. These injuries can significantly affect athletes in all sports, and lead to prolonged recovery and return to sport. Adequate evaluation and diagnosis of these injuries are imperative for treatment and return to play. Many can be treated nonoperatively, but operative treatment is indicated in fractures with syndesmosis disruption and ligamentous injuries with instability. Anatomic reduction and fixation of these injuries will allow functional rehab and return to sport.

Characteristics and Effectiveness of Postoperative Rehabilitation Strategies in Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To explore the characteristics and to report on the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation strategies for people with an ankle fracture.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched to identify studies published from January 2010 to November 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that described or evaluated postoperative rehabilitation strategies for surgically repaired ankle fractures were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on postoperative rehabilitation were extracted in accordance with the Template for Intervention Description and Replication guide. Quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Study Quality Assessment Tools.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analysis was planned to look at the effectiveness of postoperative rehabilitation strategies. Forty studies described postoperative rehabilitation strategies without evaluating effectiveness, whereas 15 studies focused on evaluating effectiveness. Because of the large variety in postoperative strategies and outcomes, narrative synthesis was deemed most suitable to answer our aims. Characteristics of postoperative rehabilitation strategies varied widely and were poorly described in a way that could not be replicated. Most of the studies (48%) used a late weight-bearing approach, although definitions and details around weight-bearing were unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Late weight-bearing has been the most common postoperative approach reported in the past 10 years. The variety of definitions around weight-bearing and the lack of details of rehabilitation regimens limit replication and affect current clinical practice. The authors propose to adopt consistent definitions and terminology around postoperative practices such as weight-bearing to improve evidence for effectiveness and ultimately patient outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Radiographic Assessment of Ankle Fracture Displacement: A Validation Study

BACKGROUND

Ankle fracture displacement is an important outcome in clinical research examining the effectiveness of surgical and rehabilitation interventions. However, the assessment of displacement remains subjective without well-described or validated measurement methods. The aim of this study was to assess inter- and intrarater reliability of ankle fracture displacement radiographic measures and select measurement thresholds that differentiate displaced and acceptably reduced fractures.

METHODS

Eight fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons evaluated a set of 26 postoperative ankle fracture radiographs on 2 occasions. Surgeons followed standardized instructions for making 5 measurements: coronal displacement (3) talar tilt (1), and sagittal displacement (1). Inter- and intraobserver interclass correlations were determined by random effects regression models. Logistic regression was used to determine the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the measurements with the highest correlation.

RESULTS

Three of the 5 measures had excellent interobserver reliability (correlation coefficient &gt; 0.75): (1) coronal plane distance between the lateral border of tibia and lateral border of talus, (2) coronal plane talar tilt, and (3) sagittal plane displacement. The threshold that best discriminated displaced from well-aligned fractures was 2 mm for coronal plane distance (sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 85.4%), 3 degrees for talar tilt (sensitivity 80.4%, specificity 82.2%), and 5 mm for sagittal plane distance (sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 84.9%).

CONCLUSION

This study identified 3 reliable measures of ankle fracture displacement and determined optimal thresholds for discriminating between displaced and acceptably reduced fractures. These measurement criteria can be used for the design and conduct of clinical research studying the impact of surgical treatment and rehabilitation interventions.

Fractures of the lateral malleolus - a retrospective before-and-after study of treatment and resource utilization following the implementation of a structured treatment algorithm

Background

In 2015 a study of isolated lateral malleolar fractures (AO/OTA44-B1) treated at Sahlgrenska University hospital (SU) during two consecutive years revealed large-scale variation in the choice of treatment and planned follow-up. The study resulted in the development of a structured treatment algorithm (TA) for ankle fractures. We investigated the effects of this well-implemented TA on the classification, treatment and follow-up of lateral malleolar fractures.

Methods

The current study is an uncontrolled, non-randomized, retrospective before-and-after study comparing a group of AO/OTA44-B1 fractures treated at SU before the introduction of the TA for ankle fractures (1 April 2012 to 31 March 2014) with a group treated after the introduction of the TA (1 September 2017 to 31 August 2019).

Results

In all the studied parameters regarding treatment for AO/OTA44-B1 fractures, a statistically significant change was seen after the introduction of the TA. Surgical treatment reduced from 32% (95% CI 27.5 – 36.5) pre-TA to 10% (95% CI 6.9 – 13.1) post-TA, while the number of patients permitted full weight-bearing increased from 41% (95% CI 36.3 – 45.7) to 84% (95% CI 80.1 – 87.9).

Conclusions

A thoroughly implemented treatment algorithm can reduce the number of surgical treatments for stable ankle fractures. The current study demonstrates that a structured treatment algorithm can standardize the management of ankle fractures and make decisions less dependent on the surgeon’s discretion.