Combination Lower Extremity Nerve Blocks and Their Effect on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption: A Systematic Review

Fibular (peroneal) neuropathy

Fibular neuropathy has variable presenting features depending on the site of the lesion. Anatomical features make it susceptible to injury from extrinsic factors, particularly the superficial location of the nerve at the head of the fibula. There are many mechanisms of compression or other traumatic injury of the fibular nerve, as well as entrapment and intrinsic nerve lesions. Intraneural ganglion cysts are increasingly recognized when the mechanism of neuropathy is not clear from the medical history. Electrodiagnostic testing can contribute to the localization as well as the characterization of the pathologic process affecting the nerve. When the mechanism of injury is unclear from the analysis of the presentation, imaging with MRI and ultrasound may identify nerve lesions that warrant surgical intervention. The differential diagnosis of foot drop includes fibular neuropathy and other neurologic conditions, which can be distinguished through clinical and electrodiagnostic assessment. Rehabilitation measures, including ankle splinting, are important to improve function and safety when foot drop is present. Fibular neuropathy is less frequently painful than many other nerve lesions, but when it is painful, neuropathic medication may be required. Failure to spontaneously recover or the detection of a mass lesion may require surgical management.

Regional Anesthesia Is Safe and Effective for Low-Energy Tibial Plateau Fractures

The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of peripheral nerve blocks in the operative management of tibial plateau fractures is associated with improved outcomes when compared with the use of spinal and general anesthesia. Over a period of 16 years, 132 patients who underwent operative repair for a low-energy tibial plateau fracture and had at least 12 months of follow-up met the inclusion criteria and formed the basis of this study. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on the anesthetic method used during surgery: peripheral nerve block in combination with conscious sedation or general anesthesia (BA), general anesthesia alone (GA), or spinal anesthesia alone (SA). Outcomes were assessed at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Length of stay was greatest in the GA cohort (P<.05), and more patients in the BA cohort were discharged to home (P<.05). Patients in the GA cohort had the highest pain scores at 3 months and 6 months (P<.05). Patients in both the SA and BA cohorts had better Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores at 6 and 12 months when compared with the GA cohort (P<.05). Although knee range of motion did not differ among the three cohorts at 3 months, it did differ at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, with those who had a preoperative nerve blockade (SA and BA) having the greatest knee range of motion (P<.05). Regional anesthesia was safe and was associated with lower pain scores in the early postoperative period and greater knee range of motion and functional outcome scores in the late postoperative period. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):358-364.].

Strategies for Reducing Perioperative Opioid Use in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Education, Risk Identification, and Multimodal Analgesia

There remains a high prevalence and substantial risks of opioid utilization amongst orthopedic patients. The goal of this review is to discuss strategies for responsible opioid use in the perioperative setting following foot and ankle orthopedic surgeries. We will highlight 1) education interventions, 2) risk identification, and 3) non-opioid alternatives for postoperative pain management.

Enhanced recovery protocols for ambulatory surgery

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, ambulatory surgeries account for up to 87% of all surgical procedures. (1) It was estimated that 19.2 million ambulatory surgeries were performed in 2018 (https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb287-Ambulatory-Surgery-Overview-2019.pdf). Cataract procedures and musculoskeletal surgeries are the most common surgical interventions performed in ambulatory centers. However, more complex surgical interventions, such as sleeve gastrectomies, oncological, and spine surgeries, and even arthroplasties are routinely performed as day cases or in a model of an ambulatory extended recovery. (2-5) The ambulatory surgery centers industry has grown since 2017 by 1.1% per year and reached a market size of $31.2 billion. According to the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association, there is a potential to save $57.6 billion in Medicare costs over the next decade (https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-statistics/market-size/ambulatory-surgery-centers-united-states/). These data suggest an expected rise in the volume of ambulatory (same day) or extended ambulatory (23 h) surgeries in coming years. Similar increases are also observed in other countries. For example, 75% of elective surgeries are performed as same-day surgery in the United Kingdom. (6) To reduce costs and improve the quality of care after those more complex procedures, ambulatory surgery centers have started implementing patient-centered, high-quality, value-based practices. To achieve those goals, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented to reduce the length of stay, decrease costs, increase patients' satisfaction, and transform clinical practices. The ERAS fundamentals for ambulatory surgery are based on five pillars, including (1) preoperative patient counseling, education, and optimization; (2) multimodal and opioid-sparing analgesia; (3) nausea and vomiting, wound infection, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; (4) maintenance of euvolemia; and (5) encouragement of early mobility. Those pillars rely on interdisciplinary teamwork led by anesthesiologists, surgery-specific workgroups, and safety culture. (2) Research shows that a team of ambulatory anesthesiologists is crucial in improving postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain control. (7) This review will summarize the current evidence on the elements and clinical importance of implementing ERAS protocol for ambulatory surgery.

Comparison of a Peripheral Nerve Block versus Spinal Anesthesia in Foot or Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Trial Sequential Analysis

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and spinal anesthesia (SA) in elective foot and ankle surgery. Methods: The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021229597). Researchers independently searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results: Analysis of nine RCTs (n = 802; 399 PNBs, 403 SA) revealed significantly shorter block performance times (WMD: 7.470; 95% CI 6.072 to 8.868), the onset of sensory (WMD: 7.483; 95% CI 2.837 to 12.130) and motor blocks (WMD: 9.071; 95% CI 4.049 to 14.094), durations of sensory (WMD: 458.53; 95% CI 328.296 to 588.765) and motor blocks (WMD: 247.416; 95% CI 95.625 to 399.208), and significantly higher postoperative analgesic requirements (SMD: -1.091; 95% CI -1.634 to -0.549) in the SA group. Additionally, systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 30 min (WMD: 13.950; 95% CI 4.603 to 23.298) was lower in the SA group. Conclusions: The SA demonstrated shorter block performance time, faster onset and shorter duration of sensory and motor blocks, higher postoperative analgesic requirements, and lower SBP at 30 min compared to PNBs in elective foot and ankle surgery.

Regional anesthesia provides limited decreases in opioid use following distal tibia and ankle fracture surgery

PURPOSE

Regional anesthesia (RA) is used for pain control, but its impacts on the orthopedic trauma population are not well known. This study evaluated the impact of peripheral nerve blocks after distal tibia and ankle fracture repair on opioid use and pain scores and quantified the magnitude and duration of any changes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients treated operatively for distal tibia and ankle fractures over a 5-year period, both with and without peripheral nerve blocks. Total inpatient 5 mg oxycodone equivalents (OEs) used in the post-operative period, from 0-24, 24-48, to 48-72 h and maximum visual analog scale (VAS) pain ratings from 0-24, 24-48, to 48-72 h were recorded.

RESULTS

540 non-polytrauma patients and 183 polytrauma patients were included. Patients in the non-polytrauma group who received nerve blocks required fewer opioids on post-operative day (POD) 1 compared to the non-nerve block group (4.8 [95% CI 4.2-5.4] vs. 10.5 [95% CI: 9.2-11.8]; p < 0.001) and had lower VAS scores on POD1 (5.0 [95% CI 4.6-5.4] vs. 7.7 [95% CI: 7.3-8.1]; p < 0.001). However, there were no differences between these groups on POD2 or POD3 and no differences at any timepoints in the polytrauma group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with isolated distal tibia and ankle fractures who receive peripheral nerve blocks demonstrate modest reductions in inpatient opioids and pain scores on POD1. However, there are no clear benefits beyond this point. Furthermore, polytrauma patients do not experience any reductions in opioid consumption or pain scores.

The influence of involving patients in postoperative pain treatment decisions on pain-related patient-reported outcomes: A STROBE-compliant registering observational study

The evidence regarding the influence of allowing patients to participate in postoperative pain treatment decisions on acute pain management is contradictory. This study aimed to identify the role of patient participation in influencing pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This is a cross-sectional study. The data were provided by PAIN OUT (www.pain-out.eu). A dataset specific to adult Chinese patients undergoing orthopedic surgery was selected. The PROs were assessed on postoperative day 1. The patient participant was assessed using an 11-point scale. Participants who reported >5 were allocated to the "participation" group, and those who reported ≤5 were allocated to the "nonparticipation" group. A 1:1 propensity score matching was conducted. The primary outcome was the desire for more pain treatment. All other items of PROs were the secondary outcomes comprising pain intensity, interference of pain with function, emotional impairment, adverse effects, and other patient perception. From February 2014 to November 2020, 2244 patients from 20 centers were approached, of whom 1804 patients were eligible and 726 pairs were matched. There was no significant difference between the groups in the desire for more pain treatment either before (25.4% vs 28.2%, risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.90 [0.77, 1.05], P = .18) or after matching (26.7% vs 28.8%, risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.93 [0.79, 1.10], P = .43). After matching, patients in the participation group reported significantly better PROs, including pain intensity (less time spent in severe pain [P < .01]), emotional impairment (less anxiety [P < .01]), interference with function (less interference with sleep [P < .01]), adverse effects (less drowsiness [P = .01]), and patient perception (more pain relief [P < .01] and more satisfaction [P < .01]), than the nonparticipation group. Patient participation in pain treatment decisions was associated with improved pain experience but failed to mitigate the desire for more treatment.

Opioid Prescribing Patterns of Foot and Ankle Surgeons: Single State Review

The United States is currently in an opioid crisis. In order improve the amount of misuse and overdoses from opioids, some institutions have begun to create protocols based off of state and federal opioid prescription regulations. Our purpose is to analyze the current opioid prescribing patterns in foot and ankle surgery and create an institutional protocol. A survey on current opioid prescribing patterns based on the podiatric surgery was sent out from November 20, 2020 to January 11, 2021 to all members of the North Carolina Foot and Ankle Society. One-hundred surgeons participated in the survey. The most commonly prescribed postoperative pain medication was Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5 mg/325 mg and the most common quantity was between 21 and 30 tablets. The most common medication for local blocks reported was bupivacaine and lidocaine mixed performed as a block closest to the surgical site. We recommend creating an institutional based opioid protocol for foot and ankle surgeries based off of the procedure performed by the surgeon. We recommend limiting prescriptions to under 30 tablets and utilizing a local or regional pain block for podiatric surgeries.

Spinal Anesthesia With Peripheral Nerve Block Versus General Anesthesia With Peripheral Nerve Block for Elective Foot and Ankle Surgeries: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Peripheral nerve blocks are the regional techniques in orthopedic surgeries to control postoperative pain and have early discharge from hospital. However, anesthesia protocols for foot and ankle surgeries of institutes do not include multimodal analgesics including peripheral nerve blocks. The objective of the study was to compare spinal anesthesia with peripheral nerve block against general anesthesia with peripheral nerve block for elective foot and ankle surgeries. Patients have treated for elective foot and ankle surgery under general anesthesia (using propofol, 0.05 mg/kg dezocine, and 1% sevoflurane; GA cohort, n = 112) or spinal anesthesia (using 0.5% bupivacaine, propofol, and 0.05 mg/kg dezocine; SA cohort, n = 132) or patients have treated for elective for foot and ankle surgery under general anesthesia (GL cohort, n = 115) or spinal anesthesia (SL cohort, n = 160) with the use of peripheral nerve block (the sciatic nerve blocks and adductor canal nerve blocks using 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone). Propofol was administered in fewer amounts if anesthesia was used with the peripheral nerve block. Patients of the GL cohort were transferred to ward 36 minutes (mean) earlier than those of the SL cohort. None of the patients of the GL and the SL cohorts have received intraoperative opioid(s) for the management of pain. Patients of the GL and the SL cohorts have reported postoperative falls within 1 day after surgeries during movement. Patients of the SL cohort experienced more frequently difficulty with sleeping. Patients of the GL and the GA cohorts have reported nausea and vomiting. Only patients of the GL cohort were required usage of vasoactive drugs. The study provides information to anesthesiologists and surgeons regarding anesthesia techniques for elective foot and ankle surgeries for better surgical outcomes (Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).