The Effect of Syndesmotic Screw Level on Postoperative Syndesmosis Malreduction

The clinical outcome comparison between trans-syndesmotic fixation and anatomic deltoid ligament repair in unstable ankle fractures with medial clear space widening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to the variability in evidence supporting either trans-syndesmosis fixation or deltoid ligament repair in unstable ankle fractures with medical clear space (MCS) widening makes it unclear which surgical technique leads to the best patient outcomes. The goal of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes of trans-syndesmotic fixation versus anatomic deltoid ligament repair in the management of unstable ankle fractures with MCS widening.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized in this study. A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Outcomes investigated in this review included the rates of syndesmotic malreduction, removal of hardware, postoperative complications including wound issues, and functional/pain scores.

RESULTS

A total of five level-3 studies were selected in this review, with 280 unstable ankle fractures with MCS widening: 165 for the trans-syndesmotic fixation group and 115 for the anatomic deltoid ligament repair group. Three out of five studies evaluated syndesmotic malreduction using CT. Compared to the trans-syndesmosis fixation group, the deltoid repair group showed significant lower rates of syndesmotic malreduction rates and removal of hardware: 6.5 % (4/61) Vs. 27 % (16/59) (RR=0.26, 95 % CI=[0.10, 0.68]), and 2.6 % (3/115) Vs.54.5 % (90/165) (RR=0.06, CI=[0.02, 0.14]), respectively. No significant differences were found between the two groups in postoperative wound complications, reoperations, and functional scores including AOFAS and VAS pain score.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, anatomic deltoid ligament repair was associated with a lower rate of syndesmotic malreduction and the need for hardware removal while there was no significant difference in terms of postoperative wound complications, reoperation, AOFAS score, or VAS pain score. These results should be interpreted with caution due to limitations related to heterogeneity among the studies. Further high-level RCTs with larger sample sizes are necessary to establish a robust consensus.

Does the Level of Syndesmotic Screw Insertion Affect Clinical Outcome after Ankle Fractures with Syndesmotic Instability?

OBJECTIVE

Ankle fractures are often combined with syndesmotic instability, requiring reduction and stabilization. However, the optimal level for syndesmotic screw positioning remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different syndesmotic screw insertion levels on postoperative clinical outcomes and determine whether an optimal level exists.

METHODS

This retrospective study included data from 43 adult patients with acute closed ankle fractures combined with intraoperative evidence of unstable syndesmotic injuries who underwent open reduction internal fixation from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2018 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All 43 patients were divided into three groups based on the syndesmotic screw placement level: trans-syndesmotic group: screw level of 2-3 cm; inferior-syndesmotic group: screw level <2 cm; and supra-syndesmotic group: screw level >3 cm. Clinical outcomes were measured at the final follow-up, including the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), short-form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36), visual analogue scale (VAS) score and restrictions in ankle range of motion (ROM). The relationships between screw placement level and clinical outcomes were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 15 months (range, 10-22 months). No patients developed fracture nonunion or malunion or experienced hardware failure. The outcome scoring systems showed an overall score for the entire group of 94.91 points for the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score, 83.14 for the OMAS, 96.65 for the SF-36, 1.77 for the VAS, 9.14° for the restrictions in dorsiflexion, and 1.30° for the restrictions in plantarflexion. There were no significant differences among three groups in clinical outcomes (P > 0.05). Neither the AOFAS score nor OMAS had significant correlations with screw insertion level (P = 0.825 and P = 0.585, respectively). No postoperative arthritis or widening of the tibiofibular space was observed at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Different syndesmotic screw placement levels appear not to affect the clinical outcomes of ankle fractures with syndesmotic instability. No optimal level was observed in this study. Our findings suggest other clinically acceptable options apart from syndesmotic screw placement 2-3 cm above the ankle.