Incidence of Nonunion Following First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis for Hallux Valgus Deformity: A Retrospective Analysis of Four Different Constructs

Crossed screws versus plating supplemented with an interfragmentary screw in first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) fusion is an effective surgical intervention for conditions such as hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the safety and efficacy of crossed screws versus plating supplemented with an interfragmentary screw. A literature search of the Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify all studies directly comparing the two techniques. Meta-analysis was carried out using RevMan Web. Nine studies with 976 patients (1,035 toes in total, 512 toes in the crossed screws group, and 523 toes in the plate supplemented with screws group) were included. There was no significant difference in union rates (OR=0.75, CI 0.45 - 1.27, p = 0.29), overall complication rates (OR = 1.13, CI = 0.71 - 1.77, p = 0.61), superficial complications, (OR = 0.41, CI = 0.10 - 1.68, p = 0.22), revision surgery (OR = 1.92, CI 0.81 - 4.57, p = 0.14), hardware removal (OR = 1.07, CI = 0.55 - 2.08, p = 0.85), and malunion (OR = 1.63, CI 0.27 - 10.00, p = 0.60). Plate and screws had a significantly shorter time to fusion than crossed screws (MD = 0.51, CI = 0.10 - 0.92, p = 0.02). No significant difference was noted in patient-reported outcome measures or in postoperative hallux valgus, intermetatarsal, and lateral metatarsophalangeal angles. Other potential factors that should influence the decision to use one technique over the other include the indication for MTPJ fusion, the patient's bone quality, and the differing costs of surgery.

Bilateral first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: An investigation of functional, surgical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a commonly utilised procedure. In this study, the authors aim to explore functional outcomes of patients undergoing nonsynchronous bilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis under the care of a single surgeon using a compression screw/locking plate construct.

METHODS

This is a prospectively collected, retrospectively analysed case series of fifty five patients who underwent bilateral nonsynchronous first MTPJ arthrodesis. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at a minimum of two years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the Sports Questionnaire version 1 (SQ). Postoperative radiographs were used to assess evidence of union and compare both hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles. Removal of hardware, revision surgery and correction of deformities were also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty five patients were included in the study. There was statistically significant improvements in all five facets of the FAOS (p value < 0.05). The mean postoperative SEFAS was 45.1. In total, patients participated in thirteen different sporting activities. This represented 92 patient specific activities preoperatively and 104 postoperatively. The most common activities were walking, cycling and swimming. Overall, 94.5% (N = 52) of the cohort were satisfied with their return to sport while 98.2% (N = 54) would recommend bilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis. Mean reductions in hallux valgus angles and intermetatarsal angles were noted at 18.87 and 4.69 degrees respectively. There was one non-union in the cohort which required revision surgery. One patient required removal of hardware.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral first MTPJ arthrodesis is a safe and effective surgical option for patients with bilateral first MTPJ pathology. It has a high union rate, low complication rate and significantly improves clinical outcomes and allows patients reliably return to physical activities.