A Prospective, Self-Controlled Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Roxadustat for Erythropoietin Hyporesponsiveness in Patients Requiring Chronic Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Efficacy and safety of daprodustat in patients on peritoneal dialysis in the ASCEND-D trial

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Daprodustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is approved for treatment of anemia in dialysis patients with CKD in some parts of the world. This subgroup analysis examined the efficacy and safety of daprodustat versus darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia of CKD undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

ASCEND-D (NCT02879305) was an open-label, Phase 3 trial; patients with CKD were randomized to daprodustat daily and epoetin alfa (HD patients) or darbepoetin alfa (PD patients). In PD patients, prespecified analyses of the co-primary endpoints of mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to Weeks 28-52 using an ANOVA model and first occurrence of a major cardiovascular event (MACE) using a Cox proportional hazards model were conducted. The secondary endpoints were average monthly intravenous iron dose to Week 52 and treatment-emergent adverse events. Additional post hoc analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, 340 PD patients (daprodustat n = 171, darbepoetin alfa n = 169) were randomized. Mean age was 53.6 years (±14 SD), 55% male, 56% White. For daprodustat and darbepoetin alfa groups respectively, mean change in hemoglobin was 0.38 and 0.23 g/dL [adjusted mean difference 0.15, 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.04, 0.34], and first occurrence of adjudicated MACE occurred in 40 (23.4%) and 46 (27.2%) patients (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.55-1.28). No heterogeneity was observed between PD and HD patients for these endpoints in ASCEND-D. Serum hepcidin was lower with daprodustat; there was no difference in other iron parameters, intravenous iron usage, transfusion requirement, blood pressure, or quality of life. There were no differences in adverse events or incidence of peritonitis between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This subgroup analysis of the ASCEND-D trial demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety of daprodustat versus darbepoetin alfa in PD patients, supporting its use in the treatment of anemia in these patients.

A retrospective study on the efficacy of Roxadustat in peritoneal dialysis patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Roxadustat, an oral medication for treating renal anemia, is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor used for regulating iron metabolism and promoting erythropoiesis. To investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective study, 81 PD patients (with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness) were divided into the roxadustat group (n = 61) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) group (n = 20). Hemoglobin (Hb), total cholesterol, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), related indicators of cardiac function and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were collected. Additionally, adverse events were also recorded. The follow-up period was 16 weeks.

RESULTS

The two groups exhibited similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. At baseline, the roxadustat group had a mean Hb level of 89.8 ± 18.9 g/L, while the ESAs group had a mean Hb level of 95.2 ± 16.0 g/L. By week 16, the Hb levels had increased to 118 ± 19.8 g/L (p < 0.05) in the roxadustat group and 101 ± 19.3 g/L (p > 0.05) in the ESAs group. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving anemia was not influenced by baseline levels of hs-CRP and iPTH. Cholesterol was decreased in the roxadustat group without statin use. An increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and stabilization of BNP were observed in the roxadustat group.

CONCLUSION

For PD patients with erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness, roxadustat can significantly improve renal anemia. The efficacy of roxadustat in improving renal anemia was not affected by baseline levels of hs-CRP0 and iPTH.

Interpretations of the Role of Plasma Albumin in Prognostic Indices: A Literature Review

This review assesses how publications interpret factors that influence the serum or plasma albumin (PA) level in prognostic indices, focusing on inflammation and nutrition. On PubMed, a search for "albumin AND prognosis" yielded 23,919 results. From these records, prognostic indices were retrieved, and their names were used as search strings on PubMed. Indices found in 10 or more original research articles were included. The same search strings, restricted to "Review" or "Systematic review", retrieved yielded on the indices. The data comprised the 10 latest original research articles and up to 10 of the latest reviews. Thirty indices had 294 original research articles (6 covering two indices) and 131 reviews, most of which were from recent years. A total of 106 articles related the PA level to inflammation, and 136 related the PA level to nutrition. For the reviews, the equivalent numbers were 54 and 65. In conclusion, more publications mention the PA level as a marker of nutrition rather than inflammation. This is in contrast to several general reviews on albumin and nutritional guidelines, which state that the PA level is a marker of inflammation but not nutrition. Hypoalbuminemia should prompt clinicians to focus on the inflammatory aspects in their patients.

A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors in dialysis chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Five types of HIF-PHIs have been authorized for anemia treatment in CKD patients in China and Japan. These are enarodustat, roxadustat, daprodustat, vadadustat, and molidustat. How effectively they compare to ESAs about clinical results in CKD-DD patients is uncertain. This study examined the RCT evidence about the benefits and risks of HIF-PHIs and ESAs in dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive investigation and network meta-analysis of RCTs. In these RCTs, patients with CKD-DD received one of five different HIF-PHI or ESAs, a placebo, and no medical intervention. Outcomes included hemoglobin, iron parameters, and adverse events, and there were four weeks of follow-up at least. A frequentist framework for multivariate random effects meta-analyzed the results. The effect sizes of categorical variables were displayed as odds ratios. Mean differences were employed for computing continuous outcomes with common units; otherwise, standardized mean differences were applied. The Cochrane tool evaluated the bias risk in RCTs.

RESULTS

26 RCTs with 14945 patients were qualified for inclusion. Compared to the placebo, HIF-PHIs and ESAs dramatically boosted hemoglobin without affecting serum iron. Roxadustat performed better hemoglobin levels than ESAs (MD 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.53) and daprodustat (0.46, 0.09 to 0.84). Roxadustat (91.8%) was the top hemoglobin treatment among all medical interventions, as determined by the SUCRA ranking. However, roxadustat caused more thrombosis and hypertension than ESAs (1.61, 1.22 to 2.12) and vadadustat (1.36, 1.01 to 1.82). The lowest rates of hypertension and thrombosis were seen in molidustat (80.7%) and ESAs (88.5%). Compared with a placebo, ESAs and HIF-PHIs all affected TSAT levels. Except for molidustat, the other four HIF-PHIs impact different iron parameters. Regarding ferritin reduction, roxadustat (90.9%) and daprodustat (60.9%) came out on top. Enarodustat (80.9%) and roxadustat (74%) placed best and second in lowering hepcidin levels. The former two medicines for TIBC improvement were vadadustat (98.7%) and enarodustat (80.9%).

CONCLUSION

The most effective treatment for hemoglobin correction is roxadustat. The superior efficacy of reducing hepcidin makes roxadustat and enarodustat appropriate for patients with inflammation. However, the increased risk of hypertension and thrombosis associated with roxadustat should be noted. In patients at risk for hypertension and thrombosis, molidustat and ESAs may be preferable options. When administering roxadustat and daprodustat, clinicians should check ferritin to assess iron storage. Lower TSAT in patients receiving HIF-PHIs and ESAs treatment suggests intravenous iron supplements are needed.

The role of roxadustat in chronic kidney disease patients complicated with anemia

The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide and the current prevalence rate is 13.4%. There are > 120 million CKD patients in China and this number is expected to increase. One of the main abnormalities in patients with CKD and kidney impairment is decreased synthesis of erythropoietin (EPO), which causes anemia and affects iron metabolism. The probability of developing is higher in anemia patients with CKD than in the general population, and the incidence increases as kidney function decreases. Deficient EPO production by the kidney is the most important cause of renal anemia. Notably, anemia in patients with CKD has multiple causes, such as bleeding caused by platelet dysfunction, iron deficiency due to digestive and absorption disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, and shorter red blood cell life. Anemia is also a leading cause of hospitalization in patients with CKD. A new oral medication to treat renal anemia, the hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor called roxadustat (FG-4592), regulates iron metabolism and promotes erythropoiesis. This drug has a therapeutic effect on patients with CKD. Roxadustat showed advantages over EPO in clinical experiments. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action, clinical applications, effectiveness, and safety of roxadustat.

Addition of roxadustat to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) effectively corrects ESA-hyporesponsive anaemia in patients on peritoneal dialysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness is an important cause for the undertreatment of anaemia. A decrease in haemoglobin (Hb) levels was observed during the initial stage of the conversion from ESA to roxadustat. The study aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of adding roxadustat to an ESA for the treatment of ESA-hyporesponsive anaemia in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

Patients on PD with ESA-hyporesponsive anaemia were enrolled from January 2020 to April 2020 with a 24-week follow-up period. Patients were treated with roxadustat at a starting dose of 50 or 100 mg thrice weekly without changing the ESA dose. Roxadustat and ESA dose adjustments were made as needed to maintain Hb levels within 11.0 to 13.0 g/dl. Efficacy outcomes and safety were assessed.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Nine patients were recruited in the study. Both the cumulative responsive rate and maintenance rate of Hb > 11 g/dl were 100%. Six patients required ESA dose reduction from ≥15,000 UI/week to ≤7000 IU/week at week 24. No drug-related severe adverse events were observed in this study.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The addition of roxadustat effectively and smoothly corrected anaemia in patients who were hyporesponsive to ESA, and permitted reduction of the ESA dose.