Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and the femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient

Hemodynamic Monitoring In The Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Three Arterial Catheters

OBJECTIVE

Systemic systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure monitoring is the cornerstone in hemodynamic management of the cardiac surgical patient, and the radial artery is the most common site of catheter placement. The present study compared 3 different arterial line procedures. It is hypothesized that a 20-G 12.7- cm catheter inserted into the radial artery will be equal to a 20-G 12.7- cm angiocath placed in the brachial artery, and superior to a 20-G 5.00 cm angiocath placed in the radial artery.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized control study was performed.

SETTING

Single academic university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients ≥18 years old undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

INTERVENTIONS

After approval by the Rhode Island Hospital institutional review board, a randomized prospective control study to evaluate 3 different peripheral intraarterial catheter systems was performed: (1) Radial Short (RS): 20-G 5- cm catheter; (2) Radial Long (RL): 20-G 12- cm catheter; and (3) Brachial Long (BL): 20-G 12- cm catheter.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Gradients between central aortic and peripheral catheters (CA-P) were compared and analyzed before CPB and 2 and 10 minutes after separation from CPB. The placement of femoral arterial lines and administration of vasoactive medications were recorded. After exclusions, 67 BL, 61 RL, and 66 RS patients were compared. Before CPB, CA-P SAP and MAP gradients were not significant among the 3 groups. Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient was significant for the RS group (p = 0.005) and insignificant for BL (p = 0.47) and RL (p = 0.39). Two-group analysis revealed that CA-P SAP gradients are similar between BL and RL (p = 0.84), both of which were superior to RS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). At 10 minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient for RS remained significant (p = 0.004) and similar to the gradient at 2 minutes. The CA-P SAP gradients increased from 2 to 10 minutes for BL (p = 0.13) and RL (p = 0.06). Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients were significant for the BL (p = 0.003), RL (p < 0.0001), and RS (p < 0.0001) groups. Two-group analysis revealed that the CA-P MAP gradients were lower for the BL group compared with the RL (p = 0.054) and RS (p< 0.05) groups. Ten minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients in the RL and RS groups remained significant (p < 0.0001) and both greater than the BL group (p = 0.002). A femoral arterial line was placed more frequently in the RS group (8/66 = 12.1%) than in the RL group (3/61 = 4.9%) and the BL group (2/67 = 3.0%). Vasopressin was administered significantly more frequently in the RS group.

CONCLUSION

Regarding CA-P SAP gradients, the RL group performed equally to the BL group, both being superior to RS. Regarding CA-P MAP gradients, BL was superior to RL and RS. Clinically, femoral line placement and vasopressin administration were fewer for the BL and RL groups when compared with the RS group. This study demonstrated the benefits of a long (12.7 cm) 20- G angiocath placed in the radial artery.

How Would I Treat My Own Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in the Perioperative Period?

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) results from an incomplete resolution of acute pulmonary embolism, leading to occlusive organized thrombi, vascular remodeling, and associated microvasculopathy with pulmonary hypertension (PH). A definitive CTEPH diagnosis requires PH confirmation by right-heart catheterization and evidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease on imaging studies. Surgical removal of the organized fibrotic material by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest represents the treatment of choice. One-third of patients with CTEPH are not deemed suitable for surgical treatment, and medical therapy or interventional balloon pulmonary angioplasty presents alternative treatment options. Pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with technically operable disease significantly improves symptoms, functional capacity, hemodynamics, and quality of life. Perioperative mortality is <2.5% in expert centers where a CTEPH multidisciplinary team optimizes patient selection and ensures the best preoperative optimization according to individualized risk assessment. Despite adequate pulmonary artery clearance, patients might be prone to perioperative complications, such as right ventricular maladaptation, airway bleeding, or pulmonary reperfusion injury. These complications can be treated conventionally, but extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has been included in their management recently. Patients with residual PH post-PEA should be considered for medical or percutaneous interventional therapy.

Arterial site selection for measurement of mean arterial pressure in septic shock patients on high-dose norepinephrine

Background

The guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign suggest using invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement in septic shock patients, without specifying for a preferred arterial site for accuracy in relation to the severity of septic shock. The objective of this study was to determine the mean arterial pressure (MAP) gradient between the femoral and radial artery sites in septic shock patients.

Method

This prospective study was carried out at a 20-bed ICU in a university hospital. Simultaneous MAP measurements at femoral and radial arterial sites were obtained in septic shock patients receiving norepinephrine (≥0.1 μg/kg/min), with a pre-planned subgroup analysis for those receiving a high dose of norepinephrine (≥0.3 μg/kg/min).

Results

The median norepinephrine dose across all 80 patients studied, including 59 patients on a high dose, was 0.4 (0.28-0.7) μg/kg/min. Overall, simultaneous measurement of MAP (mmHg) at the femoral and radial arterial sites produced mean (95% CI) MAP values of 81 (79-83) and 78 (76-80), respectively, with a mean difference of 3.3 (2.67-3.93), p < 0.001. In Bland-Altman analysis of MAP measurements, the detected effect sizes were 1.14 and 1.04 for the overall and high-dose cohorts, respectively, which indicates a significant difference between the measurements taken at each of the two arterial sites. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated a weak but statistically significant correlation between MAP gradient and norepinephrine dose among patients receiving a high dose of norepinephrine (r = 0.289; p = 0.026; 95% CI 0.036-0.508).

Conclusion

In septic shock patients, MAP readings were higher at the femoral site than at the radial site, particularly in those receiving a high dose of norepinephrine.

Clinical trial registration

[ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03475667].

Central Versus Peripheral Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring in Liver Transplant Surgery

Introduction Invasive blood pressure monitoring is essential in liver transplant surgery due to expected major hemodynamic shifts. The use of central versus peripheral arterial access, however, is institution-dependent, which can affect clinical decisions regarding vasopressor therapy. Although there are studies that demonstrate inconsistencies based on arterial cannulation sites, few studies have compared femoral and radial artery blood pressures in patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. To our knowledge, there are no studies investigating the differences between continuous minute-to-minute femoral and radial artery measurements during all three phases of liver transplant surgery. Objective The main objective of this study was to evaluate for any differences between central and peripheral blood pressure measurements in liver transplant surgery and to assess for any correlation between vasopressor infusion dose and femoral-arterial pressure differences. Methods In this retrospective study, we reviewed and studied the data of 61 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 4 who underwent liver transplant surgery at Loma Linda University Medical Center between January and December of 2019. All patients had both femoral and radial arterial lines placed for liver transplant surgery. Femoral and radial arterial blood pressure values were obtained continuously over 60 minutes in the pre-anhepatic phase, 45 minutes during the anhepatic phase, and 60 minutes into the neo-hepatic phase. Vasopressor infusion doses were also recorded for each patient during these time frames. Results This pilot study found statistically significant differences between the mean femoral and radial systolic blood pressure (SBP; p < 0.0001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP; p < 0.0001), and mean arterial pressure (MAP; p < 0.0001) during all phases of liver transplantation. The meanSBP and MAP differences between femoral and radial arteries were highest (femoral blood pressure reading higher than radial blood pressure measurements) in the late anhepatic and early neo-hepatic phases with SBP differences of 20.8 ± 0.8 mmHg and 22.8 ± 0.8 mmHg, respectively, and MAP differences of 10.0 ± 0.4 mmHg and 9.8 ± 0.4 mmHg, respectively. Higher vasopressor infusion doses were strongly associated with greater differences in femoral-radial SBP and MAP measurements (r = 0.69 for vasopressin, 0.68 for norepinephrine, and 0.68 for epinephrine; p < 0.0001) during the anhepatic phase. Conclusions Peripheral invasive blood pressure monitoring may result in underestimation of the central blood pressure, as was seen in all phases of liver transplantation. This may lead to excessive vasopressor use with potentially adverse effects. Although the cause for the difference between femoral and radial artery measurements is unclear, increasing vasopressor infusion dosages appears to contribute. Femoral artery blood pressure monitoring allows clinicians to interpret hemodynamic status and administer appropriate vasopressors more accurately.

Risk factors for femoral-to-radial artery pressure gradient after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass: a historical cohort study

PURPOSE

After weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the radial artery pressure is frequently lower than the central pressure as reflected by femoral pressure. This discrepancy may cause improper blood pressure management. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk factors related to developing a significant postbypass femoral-to-radial pressure gradient, including the incidence of complications related to femoral pressure monitoring.

METHODS

From January 2017 to May 2021, we studied consecutive adult cardiovascular surgical patients undergoing CPB in a historical cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups according to developing a significant femoral-to-radial pressure gradient, which was defined as a difference of ≥ 25 mm Hg for systolic pressure or ≥ 10 mm Hg for mean pressure, lasting ≥ 5 minutes for 30 minutes after CPB weaning. Factors associated with a significant pressure gradient and femoral pressure monitoring-related complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 2,019 patients, 677 (34%) showed a significant postbypass femoral-to-radial pressure gradient. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed the following factors related to the pressure gradient development: age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for an increase in 10 years, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.09; P < 0.001), body surface area (BSA) (aOR for an increase in 1 m2, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.21; P < 0.001), aortic cross-clamping time (aOR for an increase in 30 minutes, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.08; P < 0.001), and intraoperative epinephrine use (aOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.95; P < 0.001). The femoral pressure monitoring-related complications were observed in 11/2,019 (0.5%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that old age, smaller BSA, prolonged aortic cross-clamping time, and intraoperative epinephrine use were associated with developing a significant postbypass femoral-to-radial pressure gradient in cardiovascular surgery. Considering monitoring-related complications occurred very infrequently, it might be helpful to monitor both radial and femoral pressure simultaneously in patients with these risk factors for appropriate blood pressure management. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to confirm our findings because our results are limited by a retrospective design and residual confounding factors.

Ability of dynamic preload indices to predict fluid responsiveness in a high femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient: a retrospective study

Background

Dynamic preload indices may predict fluid responsiveness in end-stage liver disease. However, their usefulness in patients with altered vascular compliance is uncertain. This study is the first to evaluate whether dynamic indices can reliably predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing liver transplantation with a high femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (PG).

Methods

Eighty liver transplant recipients were retrospectively categorized as having a normal (n = 56) or high (n = 24, difference in systolic pressure ≥ 10 mmHg and/or mean pressure ≥ 5 mmHg) femoral-to-radial arterial PG, measured immediately after radial and femoral arterial cannulation. The ability of dynamic preload indices (stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation [PPV], pleth variability index) to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed before the surgery. Fluid replacement of 500 ml of crystalloid solution was performed over 15 min. Fluid responsiveness was defined as ≥ 15% increase in the stroke volume index. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) indicated the prediction of fluid responsiveness.

Results

Fourteen patients in the normal, and eight in the high PG group were fluid responders. The AUCs for PPV in the normal, high PG groups and total patients were 0.702 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.553–0.851, P = 0.008), 0.633 (95% CI 0.384–0.881, P = 0.295) and 0.667 (95% CI 0.537–0.798, P = 0.012), respectively. No other index predicted fluid responsiveness.

Conclusion

PPV can be used as a dynamic index of fluid responsiveness in patients with end-stage liver disease but not in patients with altered vascular compliance.

Radial-to-femoral pressure gradient quantification in cardiac surgery

Background

A radial-to-femoral pressure gradient (RFPG) can occur in roughly one-third of cardiac surgical patients. Such a gradient has been associated with smaller stature and potentially smaller radial artery diameter. We hypothesized that preoperative radial artery diameter could be a predictor of RFPG. We also investigated the clinical impact of using a femoral versus a radial arterial catheter in terms of vasoactive support.

Methods

Using ultrasound, we measured the bilateral radial artery diameters of 160 cardiac surgical patients. All arterial pressure values were continuously recorded. Significant RFPG was defined as ≥25 mm Hg in systolic and/or ≥10 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure. One hundred and forty-nine additional patients were used to validate the impact of our observations.

Results

Using 78,013 pressure datapoints in 129 patients, 34.8% of patients had an RFPG with a mean duration of 54 ± 48 minutes. Patients with a radial artery diameter <1.8 mm were more likely to have an RFPG (n = 14 [48.3%] vs 12 [22.2%]; P = .042). Patients with only a radial catheter received more phenylephrine (P = .016) despite undergoing shorter and less complex procedures. In the validation cohort, similar observations were made, and patients with a radial artery catheter received a longer duration of vasoactive support in the intensive care unit.

Conclusions

A significant RFPG occurs in one-third of cardiac surgical patients and in 48% of those with a radial artery diameter <1.8 mm. The use of a single radial arterial catheter instead of dual radial and femoral catheters was associated with greater vasopressor requirements in the operating room and in the intensive care unit. We do not recommend the use of a single radial artery catheter in cardiac surgery.

Non-invasive detection of a femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient in intensive care patients with vasoactive agents

BACKGROUND

In patient requiring vasopressors, the radial artery pressure may underestimate the true central aortic pressure leading to unnecessary interventions. When using a femoral and a radial arterial line, this femoral-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (FR-APG) can be detected. Our main objective was to assess the accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measures; specifically, measuring the gradient between the NIBP obtained at the brachial artery and the radial artery pressure and calculating the non-invasive brachial-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (NIBR-APG) to detect an FR-APG. The secondary objective was to assess the prevalence of the FR-APG in a targeted sample of critically ill patients.

METHODS

Adult patients in an intensive care unit requiring vasopressors and instrumented with a femoral and a radial artery line were selected. We recorded invasive radial and femoral arterial pressure, and brachial NIBP. Measurements were repeated each hour for 2 h. A significant FR-APG (our reference standard) was defined by either a mean arterial pressure (MAP) difference of more than 10 mmHg or a systolic arterial pressure (SAP) difference of more than 25 mmHg. The diagnostic accuracy of the NIBR-APG (our index test) to detect a significant FR-APG was estimated and the prevalence of an FR-APG was measured and correlated with the NIBR-APG.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients aged 68 [IQR 58-75] years and an SAPS2 score of 35 (SD 7) were included from which 228 measurements were obtained. A significant FR-APG occurred in 15 patients with a prevalence of 18.5% [95%CI 10.8-28.7%]. Diabetes was significantly associated with a significant FR-APG. The use of a 11 mmHg difference in MAP between the NIBP at the brachial artery and the MAP of the radial artery led to a specificity of 92% [67; 100], a sensitivity of 100% [95%CI 83; 100] and an AUC ROC of 0.93 [95%CI 0.81-0.99] to detect a significant FR-APG. SAP and MAP FR-APG correlated with SAP (r2 = 0.36; p < 0.001) and MAP (r2 = 0.34; p < 0.001) NIBR-APG.

CONCLUSION

NIBR-APG assessment can be used to detect a significant FR-APG which occur in one in every five critically ill patients requiring vasoactive agents.

Correlation between radial and femoral arterial blood pressure during reperfusion in living donor liver transplantation

Background and Aims

Accurate blood pressure measurements are the mainstay for the efficient management of abrupt cardiovascular changes during reperfusion in liver transplant. We sought to compare the femoral and radial pressures during reperfusion and at T1:baseline, T2: 1 h in dissection: T3:portosystemic shunt, T4:reperfusion, T5: at bile duct anastomosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed amongst 102 adult patients who underwent R lobe living donor liver transplantation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) at 10 s intervals at reperfusion and at five fixed time points were compared by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement by Bland-Altman statistics.

Results

MAP by both routes had a good correlation at all time points during reperfusion (overall ICC: 0.946 [0.938, 0.949]) in comparison with SAP (overall ICC: 0.650 [0.6128, 0.684]). At the lowest reperfusion pressure (reperfusion point), MAP showed high levels of agreements (ICC: 0.833 [0.761, 0.885]), whereas SAP showed only a poor level of agreement (ICC 0.343 [0.153, 0.508]). The Bland-Altman analysis for MAP showed a bias of 7.18 (5.94) mmHg and limits of agreement of - 4.5 mmHg to + 18.8 mmHg and for SAP a bias of 25.2 (22.04) mmHg and limits of agreement of - 18.0 mmHg to + 68.4 mmHg at the reperfusion point. The incidence of post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) was 52.94% by femoral and 57.84% by radial routes.

Conclusions

Radial MAP correlated well with femoral MAP during reperfusion and at predefined time points and can be used interchangeably for intraoperative monitoring. A high incidence of PRS was noted by our technique of measurement.

Determination of cardiac output from pulse pressure contour during intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients with low ejection fraction

Evaluation of a new Windkessel model based pulse contour method (WKflow) to calculate stroke volume in patients undergoing intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). Preload changes were induced by vena cava occlusions (VCO) in twelve patients undergoing cardiac surgery to vary stroke volume (SV), which was measured by left ventricular conductance volume method (SVlv) and WKflow (SVwf). Twelve VCO series were carried out during IABP assist at a 1:2 ratio and seven VCO series were performed with IABP switched off. Additionally, SVwf was evaluated during nine episodes of severe arrhythmia. VCO's produced marked changes in SV over 10-20 beats. 198 paired data sets of SVlv and SVwf were obtained. Bland-Altman analysis for the difference between SVlv and SVwf during IABP in 1:2 mode showed a bias (accuracy) of 1.04 ± 3.99 ml, precision 10.9% and limits of agreement (LOA) of - 6.94 to 9.02 ml. Without IABP bias was 0.48 ± 4.36 ml, precision 11.6% and LOA of - 8.24 to 9.20 ml. After one thermodilution calibration of SVwf per patient, during IABP the accuracy improved to 0.14 ± 3.07 ml, precision to 8.3% and LOA to - 6.00 to + 6.28 ml. Without IABP the accuracy improved to 0.01 ± 2.71 ml, precision to 7.5% and LOA to - 5.41 to + 5.43 ml. Changes in SVlv and SVwf were directionally concordant in response to VCO's and during severe arrhythmia. (R² = 0.868). The SVwf and SVlv methods are interchangeable with respect to measuring absolute stroke volume as well as tracking changes in stroke volume. The precision of the non-calibrated WKflow method is about 10% which improved to 7.5% after one calibration per patient.

Does norepinephrine infusion dose influence the femoral-to-radial mean arterial blood pressure gradient in patients with sepsis and septic shock?

The aim of our study is to determine whether there is a clinically important difference between the femoral and the radial site of blood pressure measurements, and to identify whether the vasoactive infusion dose influences the femoral-to-radial mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) gradient. We included 71 patients with sepsis and septic shock, with no comorbidities that may influence the hemodynamic parameters. Simultaneous measurements were registered at the femoral and radial arteries. The agreement between the two sites of recording was tested in the no-norepinephrine, low-norepinephrine, and high-norepinephrine groups, as well as for the whole group. Results show that 75.4% of paired recordings have a gradient of at least 5 mmHg between the femoral and radial recordings. For the measurements that have a gradient more than 5 mmHg, norepinephrine infusion dose was not found to be a determining factor. A better level of agreement was found after carrying out a separate Bland-Altman analysis for the femoral-to-radial and radial-to-femoral gradients. Norepinephrine infusion rate was not found to be a determining factor for the femoral-to-radial MAP gradient in septic and septic shock patients. Measurement of MAP at the radial or femoral site is clinically interchangeable for most of these patients.

Pressure difference between radial and femoral artery pressure in minimally invasive cardiac surgery using retrograde perfusion

Objective:

To investigate whether radial artery pressure is a reliable surrogate measure of central arterial pressure as approximated by femoral artery pressure in minimally invasive cardiac surgery with retrograde perfusion via femoral cannulation.

Method:

Fifty-two consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery were prospectively included in this study. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established via a femoral artery cannulation and femoral vein. Radial and femoral arterial pressures were recorded continuously, and the pressure differential between them was calculated for both systolic and mean arterial pressures. The agreement between measurements from the two arteries was compared using Bland–Altman plots. An interval of 95% limits of agreement of less than 20 mm Hg was set as satisfactory agreement.

Results:

Average age was 65 ± 14 years. With respect to systolic arterial pressure, 28 patients (54%) had a peak pressure differential between radial and femoral arteries ⩾20 mm Hg. With respect to mean arterial pressure, only five patients (9%) had a peak pressure differential ⩾20 mm Hg. The pressure differential changed with time. Pressure differential in systolic arterial pressure was 5 ± 8 mm Hg until aortic declamping, then increased to a peak of 23 ± 16 mm Hg when cardiopulmonary bypass was turned off. The femoral systolic arterial pressures were significantly greater than radial systolic arterial pressures from time of aortic declamping to 20 min after cardiopulmonary bypass. The Bland–Altman plots revealed large biases and poor agreement in this period.

Conclusion:

Radial and femoral systolic artery pressure readings can differ significantly in minimally invasive cardiac surgery with retrograde perfusion. Intraoperative arterial pressure management based solely on radial systolic arterial pressure readings should be avoided.

Risk Factors for Radial-to-Femoral Artery Pressure Gradient in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with radial-to-femoral pressure gradient during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single specialized cardiothoracic hospital in Montreal, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients that underwent heart surgery with CPB between 2005 and 2015 (n = 435).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A radial-to-femoral pressure gradient occurred in 146 patients of the 435 patients (34%). Based on the 10,000 bootstrap samples, simple logistic regression models identified the 17 most commonly significant variables across the bootstrap runs. Using these variables, a backward multiple logistic model was performed on the original sample and identified the following independent variables: body surface area (m²) (odds ratio [OR] 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.030-0.232), clamping time (minutes) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.007-1.018), fluid balance (for 1 liter) (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.669-0.976), and preoperative hypertension (OR 1.801, 95% CI 1.131-2.868).

CONCLUSION

A radial-to-femoral pressure gradient occurs in 34% of patients during cardiac surgery. Patients at risk seem to be of smaller stature, hypertensive, and undergo longer and more complex surgeries.

Association Between Optic Nerve Head Blood Flow Measured Using Laser Speckle Flowgraphy and Radial Arterial Pressure During Aortic Arch Surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the association between ocular blood flow measured using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) and radial arterial pressure during aortic arch surgery.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

A single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included 24 patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (SCP).

INTERVENTIONS

Measurement of optic nerve head blood flow using LSFG and radial arterial pressure via a catheter in the radial artery METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS: Antegrade SCP was managed with 24℃ and 40-to-60 mmHg at the right radial artery, which usually corresponds to a flow rate of 10 mL/kg/min. Optic nerve head blood flow using LSFG and radial arterial blood pressure were evaluated simultaneously at the right side and recorded at the following 4 points: after the induction of anesthesia (phase 1), after the beginning of CPB (phase 2), after the beginning of antegrade SCP (phase 3), and after cessation of CPB (phase 4). A moderate positive correlation between %change of mean blur rate in the optic nerve head measured using LSFG and %change of radial mean arterial pressure was identified (r = 0.604, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the bias (mean difference) was -1.2% (95% limits of agreement -47.4% to 45.0%), indicating good agreement between %changes of the values recorded using the 2 measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative monitoring of optic nerve head blood flow using LSFG can be used as an additional cerebral perfusion parameter during aortic arch surgery with CPB using antegrade SCP.

Brachial Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Cardiac Surgery Rarely Causes Complications

Background

Brachial arterial catheters better estimate aortic pressure than radial arterial catheters but are used infrequently because complications in a major artery without collateral flow are potentially serious. However, the extent to which brachial artery cannulation promotes complications remains unknown. The authors thus evaluated a large cohort of cardiac surgical patients to estimate the incidence of related serious complications.

Methods

The institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database and Perioperative Health Documentation System Registry of the Cleveland Clinic were used to identify patients who had brachial artery cannulation between 2007 and 2015. Complications within 6 months after surgery were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic and procedural codes, Current Procedural Terminology procedure codes, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons variables. The authors reviewed electronic medical records to confirm that putative complications were related plausibly to brachial arterial catheterization. Complications were categorized as (1) vascular, (2) peripheral nerve injury, or (3) infection. The authors evaluated associations between brachial arterial complications and patient comorbidities and between complications and in-hospital mortality and duration of hospitalization.

Results

Among 21,597 qualifying patients, 777 had vascular or nerve injuries or local infections, but only 41 (incidence 0.19% [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.26%]) were potentially consequent to brachial arterial cannulation. Vascular complications occurred in 33 patients (0.15% [0.10 to 0.23%]). Definitely or possibly related infection occurred in 8 (0.04% [0.02 to 0.08%]) patients. There were no plausibly related neurologic complications. Peripheral arterial disease was associated with increased risk of complications. Brachial catheter complications were associated with prolonged hospitalization and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions

Brachial artery cannulation for hemodynamic monitoring during cardiac surgery rarely causes complications.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension and Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension results from incomplete resolution of a pulmonary embolus or from recurrent pulmonary emboli. Its incidence is underappreciated, and it is currently an undertreated phenomenon. Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy is currently the safest and most effective treatment for this condition. The surgery involves midline sternotomy, profound hypothermic circulatory arrest, and complete endarterectomy of the pulmonary vascular tree. Success depends on effective coordination of multiple medical teams, including pulmonary medicine, anesthesiology, and surgery. This review, based on the past 30 years of experience at University of California San Diego Medical Center, includes information about the clinical history, diagnostic workup, anesthesia, surgical approach, and postoperative care. Outcome data are discussed, as are avenues for future research.

Risk Factors Involved in Central-to-Radial Arterial Pressure Gradient During Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

A central-to-radial arterial pressure gradient may occur after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which, in some patients, may last for a prolonged time after CPB. Whenever there is a pressure gradient, the radial artery pressure measure may underestimate a more centrally measured systemic pressure, which may result in a misguided therapeutic strategy. It is clinically important to identify the risk factors that may predict the appearance of a central-to-radial pressure gradient, because more central sites of measurements might then be considered to monitor systemic arterial pressure in high-risk patients. The objective of this study was to assess preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for central-to-radial pressure gradient.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients undergoing cardiac surgery using CPB were included in this prospective observational study. A significant central-to-radial arterial pressure gradient was defined as a difference of 25 mm Hg in systolic pressure or 10 mm Hg in mean arterial pressure for a minimum of 5 minutes. Preoperative data included demographics, presence of comorbidities, and medications. Intraoperative data included type of surgery, CPB and aortic clamping time, use of inotropic drugs, and vasodilators or vasopressors agents. The diameter of the radial and femoral artery was measured before the induction of anesthesia using B-mode ultrasonography.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients developed a central-to-radial arterial pressure gradient (45%). Patients with a significant pressure gradient had a smaller weight (71.0 ± 16.9 vs 79.3 ± 17.3 kg, P = 0.041), a smaller height (162.0 ± 9.6 vs 166.3 ± 8.6 cm, P = 0.047), a smaller radial artery diameter (0.24 ± 0.03 vs 0.29 ± 0.05 cm, P < 0.001), and were at a higher risk as determined by the Parsonnet score (30.3 ± 24.9 vs 17.0 ± 10.9, P = 0.007). In addition, a longer aortic clamping time (85.8 ± 51.0 vs 64.2 ± 29.3 minutes, P = 0.036), mitral and complex surgery (P = 0.007 and P = 0.017, respectively), and administration of vasopressin (P = 0.039) were identified as potential independent predictors of a central-to-radial pressure gradient. By using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following independent risk factors were identified: Parsonnet score (odds ratio [OR], 1.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-1.127, P = 0.002), aortic clamping time >90 minutes (OR, 8.521; 95% CI, 1.917-37.870, P = 0.005), and patient height (OR, 0.933, 95% CI, 0.876-0.993, P = 0.029). The relative risk (RR) estimates remained statistically significant for the Parsonnet score and the aortic clamping time ≥90 minutes (RR, 1.010; 95% CI, 1.003-1.018, P = 0.009 and RR, 2.253; 95% CI, 1.475-3.443, P < 0.001 respectively) while showing a trend for patient height (RR, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.948-1.001, P = 0.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Central-to-radial gradients are common in cardiac surgery. The threshold for using a central site for blood pressure monitoring should be low in small, high-risk patients undergoing longer surgical interventions to avoid inappropriate administration of vasopressors and/or inotropic agents.

Agreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution

To study agreement in cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (Systemic VRI) and stroke volume variation (SV variation) between the FloTrac/Vigileo at radial and femoral arterial cannulation sites, and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution, in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. A prospective observational study of 25 adult patients with liver failure. Radial and femoral arteries were cannulated with standardised FloTrac/Vigileo arterial transducer kits and a PAC was inserted. CI, SV variation and Systemic VRI were measured four times (30 min after induction of anesthesia, 30 min after portal vein clamping, 30 min after graft reperfusion, 30 min after commencement of bile duct anastomosis). The bias, precision, limits of agreement (LOA) and percentage errors were calculated using Bland-Altman statistics to compare measurements from radial and femoral arterial cannulation sites and PAC thermodilution. Neither radial nor femoral CI achieved acceptable agreement with PAC CI [radial to PAC bias (SD) 1.17 (1.49) L/min/m², percentage error 64.40 %], [femoral to PAC bias (SD) -0.71 (1.81) L/min/m², percentage error 74.20 %]. Agreement between radial and femoral sites for CI [mean difference (SD) -0.43 (1.51) L/min/m², percentage error 70.40 %] and Systemic VRI [mean difference (SD) 0.03 (4.17) LOA ±8.17 mmHg min m²/L] were also unacceptable. Agreement in SV variation between radial and femoral measurement sites approached a clinically acceptable threshold [mean difference (SD) 0.68 (2.44) %), LOA ±4.78 %]. FloTrac/Vigileo CI cannot substitute for PAC thermodilution CI, regardless of measurement site. SV variation measurements may be interchangeable between radial and femoral sites for determining fluid responsiveness.

Agreement in hemodynamic monitoring during orthotopic liver transplantation: a comparison of FloTrac/Vigileo at two monitoring sites with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution

To study agreement in cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (Systemic VRI) and stroke volume variation (SV variation) between the FloTrac/Vigileo at radial and femoral arterial cannulation sites, and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution, in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. A prospective observational study of 25 adult patients with liver failure. Radial and femoral arteries were cannulated with standardised FloTrac/Vigileo arterial transducer kits and a PAC was inserted. CI, SV variation and Systemic VRI were measured four times (30 min after induction of anesthesia, 30 min after portal vein clamping, 30 min after graft reperfusion, 30 min after commencement of bile duct anastomosis). The bias, precision, limits of agreement (LOA) and percentage errors were calculated using Bland-Altman statistics to compare measurements from radial and femoral arterial cannulation sites and PAC thermodilution. Neither radial nor femoral CI achieved acceptable agreement with PAC CI [radial to PAC bias (SD) 1.17 (1.49) L/min/m², percentage error 64.40 %], [femoral to PAC bias (SD) -0.71 (1.81) L/min/m², percentage error 74.20 %]. Agreement between radial and femoral sites for CI [mean difference (SD) -0.43 (1.51) L/min/m², percentage error 70.40 %] and Systemic VRI [mean difference (SD) 0.03 (4.17) LOA ±8.17 mmHg min m²/L] were also unacceptable. Agreement in SV variation between radial and femoral measurement sites approached a clinically acceptable threshold [mean difference (SD) 0.68 (2.44) %), LOA ±4.78 %]. FloTrac/Vigileo CI cannot substitute for PAC thermodilution CI, regardless of measurement site. SV variation measurements may be interchangeable between radial and femoral sites for determining fluid responsiveness.

Arterial Catheterization and Infection: Toll-like Receptors in Defense against Microorganisms and Therapeutic Implications

Radial artery catheterization has become a preferred route over femoral artery catheterization, in order to monitor the blood pressure of hemodynamically unstable patients or for repeated sampling of arterial blood gases. While the incidence of catheter-related infection is lower in the radial artery than the femoral artery, infection remains a major issue that requires attention. In this review of the literature, we discuss infectious complications of radial artery catheterization, with a focus on various risk factors and establishing the most common causative agents. We also critically review the role of the innate immune system involving Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in host-defense, with the goal of establishing a common pathway used by the innate immune system via TLRs to combat the pathogens that most commonly cause infection in radial artery catheterization. If this pathway can be therapeutically manipulated to preemptively attack pathogenic agents, immunomodulation may be an option in reducing the incidence of infection in this procedure.

Can the Anesthesiologist Use the Radial Artery for Monitoring After Transradial Artery Catheterization?

The use of transradial coronary angiography and intervention is growing because of its advantages over the femoral approach. However, the small size of the radial artery can contribute to complications. We present a case of an in situ access complication of transradial coronary artery catheterization. It is important for the anesthesiologist to know about the short-term and long-term consequences of this intervention, which could lead to narrowing of the artery even beyond the site of puncture. Understanding these changes could help anesthesiologists make better decisions about using the radial artery for monitoring after transradial coronary artery catheterization procedures.

Pulmonary Endarterectomy

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) results from recurrent or incomplete resolution of pulmonary embolism. CTEPH is much more common than generally appreciated. Although pulmonary embolism (PE) affects a large number of Americans, chronic pulmonary thromboembolic hypertension remains underdiagnosed. It is imperative that all patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) be screened for the presence of CTEPH since this form of PH is potentially curable with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) surgery. The success of this procedure depends greatly on the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team approach that includes pulmonary medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, and cardiac anesthesiology. This review, based on the experience of more than 3000 pulmonary endarterectomy surgeries, is divided into 2 parts. Part I focuses on the clinical history and pathophysiology, diagnostic workup, and intraoperative echocardiography. Part II focuses on the surgical approach, anesthetic management, postoperative care, and complications.

Radial mean arterial pressure reliably reflects femoral mean arterial pressure in uncomplicated pediatric cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To see if radial mean arterial pressure reliably reflects femoral mean arterial pressure in uncomplicated pediatric cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

An ethics committee-approved prospective interventional study.

SETTING

Operating room of a tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-five children aged 3 months to 4 years who underwent pediatric cardiac surgery with hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Simultaneous femoral and radial arterial pressures were recorded at 10-minute intervals intraoperatively. A pressure gradient>5mmHg was considered to be clinically significant. The patients' mean age was 14±11 months and and mean weight was 8.0±3.0kg. A total of 1,816 simultaneous measurements of arterial pressure from the radial and femoral arteries were recorded during the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiopulmonary bypass, and post-cardiopulmonary bypass periods, including 520 (29%) systolic arterial pressures, 520 (29%) diastolic arterial pressures, and 776 (43%) mean arterial pressures. The paired mean arterial pressure measurements across the 3 periods were significantly and strongly correlated, and this was true for systolic arterial pressures and diastolic arterial pressures as well (r>0.93 and p<0.001 for all). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated good agreement between femoral and radial mean arterial pressures during the pre-cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiopulmonary bypass, and post-cardiopulmonary bypass periods. A significant radial-to-femoral pressure gradient was observed in 150 (8%) of the total 1,816 measurements. These gradients occurred most frequently between pairs of systolic arterial pressure measurements (n = 113, 22% of all systolic arterial pressures), followed by mean arterial pressure measurements (n = 28, 4% of all mean arterial pressures) and diastolic arterial pressures measurements (n = 9, 2% of all diastolic arterial pressures). These significant gradients were not sustained (ie, were not recorded at 2 or more successive time points).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that radial mean arterial pressure provided an accurate estimate of central mean arterial pressure in uncomplicated pediatric cardiac surgery. There was a significant gradient between radial and femoral mean arterial pressure measurements in only 4% of the mean arterial pressure measurements, and these significant gradients were not sustained.

Central-radial artery pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with cardiac function and may affect therapeutic direction

Objective

To investigate the risk factors involved in radial-femoral artery pressure gradient after cardiac surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we reviewed 412 cardiac surgeries with both femoral artery pressure and radial artery pressure monitoring before cardiopulmonary bypass. 138 patients had radial-femoral artery pressure gradient after cardiopulmonary bypass (group P) but 263 were not (group N). Their hemodynamic data and other demographic data were analyzed.

Results

Phenylephrine usage was 1.7±1.1 mg in group N and 2.9±1.2 mg in group P (P<0.001). Total adrenaline usage was 229.2±116.9 µg in group N and 400.6±145.1 µg in group P (P<0.001). SBP gradient was -4±3, 14±9, 10±4, 0±11 mmHg in group P and -3±3, 0±1, -1±9, -6±4 mmHg in group N after induction, during discontinuation of CPB, at the end of surgery and 1 postoperative day respectively. DBP gradient was 3±3, -1±9, 4±5, 0±8 mmHg in group P and 3±3, 5±2, 7±5, 0±8 mmHg in group N after induction, during discontinuation of CPB, at the end of surgery and 1 postoperative day respectively. MAP gradient was 1±2, 4±6, 6±4, 0±8 mmHg in group P and 1±2, 3±1, 1±4, -2±5 mmHg in group N after induction, during discontinuation of CPB, at the end of surgery and 1 postoperative day respectively. Significant arterial pressure gradient emerged during discontinuation of CPB and at the end of surgery, which was more obvious in group P(P<0.01). CI was 2.0±0.3, 2.3±0.4,2.3±0.4, 2.2±0.4 L/min/m² in group P and 2.1±0.3, 2.8±0.5,2.8±0.5, 2.8±0.5 L/min/m² in group N at baseline, after discontinuation of CPB, at the end of surgery and the first postoperative day (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Detecting the exact central artery pressure is most important when patients have artery pressure gradients after cardiac surgery. Use inotropic agents to improve cardiac output, avoiding excessive vasoconstriction might reduce artery pressure gradient.

Comparison of invasive blood pressure measurements from the caudal ventral artery and the femoral artery in male adult SD and Wistar rats

Background and Purpose

Studies have suggested that the caudal ventral artery is a potential site for continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring in rats. However, the agreement of mean arterial pressure values between the femoral artery and the caudal ventral artery has not been investigated. This study was performed to identify whether the caudal ventral artery could be safely used for continuous blood pressure monitoring as an alternative site to the femoral artery.

Methods

Rats were randomized into four groups: Sprague Dawley rats under normothermia; Wistar rats under normothermia; Sprague Dawley rats under hypothermia; Wistar rats under hypothermia. Each rat underwent simultaneous monitoring of blood pressure using femoral artery and caudal ventral artery catheterization during a stable hemodynamic state and three periods of acute severe hemodynamic changes. The effects of rat strain, rectal temperature, experimental time course and hemodynamic factors on pressure gradients, the concordance of mean arterial pressure values between the femoral artery and the caudal ventral artery, and the rates of distal ischemia after surgery were determined.

Results

There was a significant difference in the rate of distal ischemia between femoral and caudal ventral arteries after catheterization (25% vs 5%, P<0.05). The overall mean gradient and the mean gradient under a steady hemodynamic state were 4.9±3.7 mm Hg and 5.5±2.5 mm Hg, respectively. The limits of agreement (bias±1.96 SD) were (−2.5 mm Hg, 12.3 mm Hg) and (-0.5 mm Hg, 10.5 mm Hg), respectively. Although the concordance decreased during the first 30 sec of each period of severe hemodynamic changes, the degree of agreement was acceptable regardless of the effects of rat strain and rectal temperature.

Conclusions

Based on the degree of agreement and the safety of catheterization, the caudal ventral artery may be a preferred site for continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring without acute severe hemodynamic changes.

Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock

Cardiac output measurement from arterial pressure waveforms presumes a defined relationship between the arterial pulse pressure (PP), vascular compliance (C), and resistance (R). Cardiac output estimates degrade if these assumptions are incorrect. We hypothesized that sepsis would differentially alter central and peripheral vasomotor tone, decoupling the usual pressure wave propagation from central to peripheral sites. We assessed arterial input impedance (Z), C, and R from central and peripheral arterial pressures, and aortic blood flow in an anesthetized porcine model (n = 19) of fluid resuscitated endotoxic shock induced by endotoxin infusion (7 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ increased to 14 and 20 μg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ every 10 min and stopped when mean arterial pressure <40 mmHg or Sv(O₂) < 45%). Aortic, femoral, and radial artery pressures and aortic and radial artery flows were measured. Z was calculated by FFT of flow and pressure data. R and C were derived using a two-element Windkessel model. Arterial PP increased from aortic to femoral and radial sites. During stable endotoxemia with fluid resuscitation, aortic and radial blood flows returned to or exceeded baseline while mean arterial pressure remained similarly decreased at all three sites. However, aortic PP exceeded both femoral and radial arterial PP. Although Z, R, and C derived from aortic and radial pressure and aortic flow were similar during baseline, Z increases and C decreases when derived from aortic pressure whereas Z decreases and C increases when derived from radial pressure, while R decreased similarly with both pressure signals. This central-to-peripheral vascular tone decoupling, as quantified by the difference in calculated Z and C from aortic and radial artery pressure, may explain the decreasing precision of peripheral arterial pressure profile algorithms in assessing cardiac output in septic shock patients and suggests that different algorithms taking this vascular decoupling into account may be necessary to improve their precision in this patient population.

Pitfalls in haemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform

The accuracy of the arterial pressure-based cardiac output FloTrac-Vigileo system remains unacceptably low during haemodynamic instability. Data show that the measurement of cardiac output (CO) is strongly influenced by changes in factors that affect arterial blood pressure (ABP) - for example, vascular tone and compliance and the arterial site - independently of true changes in CO. Although in theory the autocalibration algorithm of FloTrac-Vigileo should adjust for those changes, the model undercompensates (or overcompensates) for prominent increases (or decreases) in vascular tone and compliance, making the system largely dependent on changes in ABP. These limitations make FloTrac-Vigileo accurate in stable haemodynamic conditions only, and until more robust algorithms and further validation studies become available, we should be aware that during haemodynamic instability or in extreme conditions of vasodilation or vasoconstriction, the measured CO may diverge from an independent bolus indicator dilution measurement, particularly if a peripheral artery is used. In these conditions, we advocate the use of transpulmonary indicator dilution via a femoral artery.

Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device

BACKGROUND

The performance of a recently introduced, arterial waveform-based device for measuring cardiac output (CO) without the need of invasive calibration (FloTrac/Vigileo) has been controversial. We designed the present study to assess the validity of an improved version of this monitoring technique compared with intermittent thermodilution CO measurement using a pulmonary artery catheter in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Forty ASA III patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied. Simultaneous CO measurements by bolus thermodilution and the FloTrac/Vigileo device were obtained after induction of anesthesia (T1), before CPB (T2), after CPB (T3), after sternal closure (T4), on arrival in the intensive care unit (T5), 4 h (T6), 8 h (T7), and 24 h after surgery (T8). CO was indexed to the body surface area (cardiac index, CI). A percentage error of 30% or less was established as the criterion for method interchangeability.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-two data pairs were analyzed. Thermodilution CI ranged from 1.2 to 4.1 L x min(-1) x m(-2) (mean 2.5 +/- 0.54 L x min(-1) x m(-2)). Bias and precision (1.96 sd of the bias) were 0.19 L x min(-1) x m(-2) and +/- 0.60 L x min(-1) x m(-2), resulting in an overall percentage error of 24.6%. Subgroup analysis revealed a percentage error of 28.3% for data pairs obtained intraoperatively (T1-4) and 20.7% in intensive care unit (T5-8).

CONCLUSION

CI values obtained by the improved, second generation semiinvasive arterial waveform device showed good intraoperative and postoperative agreement with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution CI measurements in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Anesthesia for pulmonary endarterectomy

Anesthetic care for patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy represents one of the most challenging tasks in cardiac anesthesia. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension with its concomitant right ventricular failure may cause hemodynamic instability during anesthetic induction and the precardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period, and the associated comorbidities (pulmonary, hepatic) may affect the actions and metabolism of anesthetic drugs. During the CPB period, proper perfusion patterns, cerebral oxygenation, and adequate hypothermia for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest must be achieved. During the post-CPB period the anesthesiologist must be prepared to treat residual pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary edema, pulmonary bleeding, right ventricular failure, and various metabolic and cardiovascular sequelae of hypothermic circulatory arrest. This review highlights the main issues the anesthesiologist faces during pulmonary endarterectomy, as well as suggests approaches to their management.

Cardiac Output Determination From the Arterial Pressure Wave: Clinical Testing of a Novel Algorithm That Does Not Require Calibration

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a novel algorithm that evaluates cardiac output by using arterial pressure waveform characteristics.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study comparing the cardiac output values of intermittent thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and continuous arterial pressure wave assessment.

SETTING

The intensive care unit in a tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty postoperative cardiac surgical patients, within the first 12 hours after surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and at least 1 systemic arterial pressure catheter. The data from the arterial catheter were processed by using a new arterial pressure cardiac output (APCO) algorithm. The data from the PAC (continuous and intermittent assessments) were collected for comparison with the APCO.

MEASUREMENTS

Two hundred ninety-five cardiac output measurements using intermittent thermodilution (ICO), continuous thermodilution (CCO), and arterial pressure-based output (APCO) were obtained during various times during the first 12 postoperative hours. The measurements of each method at each time point were compared by using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The mean cardiac output ranged from 2.77 to 9.60 L/min. APCO, compared with ICO, revealed a bias of 0.55 L/min and precision of 0.98 L/min. APCO, compared with CCO, revealed a bias of 0.06 L/min and precision of 1.06 L/min. The APCO agreement between femoral and radial arterial catheters was close; the bias was -0.15 L/min, and the precision was 0.56 L/min.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel arterial pressure cardiac output algorithm provides cardiac output assessments that agree satisfactorily for clinical purposes with intermittent and continuous thermodilution techniques in postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Further study is required for other patient populations and clinical situations.

Peripheral arterial blood pressure monitoring adequately tracks central arterial blood pressure in critically ill patients: an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring is a common practice in intensive care units (ICUs). Accuracy of invasive blood pressure monitoring is crucial in evaluating the cardiocirculatory system and adjusting drug therapy for hemodynamic support. However, the best site for catheter insertion is controversial. Lack of definitive information in critically ill patients makes it difficult to establish guidelines for daily practice in intensive care. We hypothesize that peripheral and central mean arterial blood pressures are interchangeable in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational study carried out in a surgical-medical ICU in a teaching hospital. Fifty-five critically ill patients with clinical indication of invasive arterial pressure monitoring were included in the study. No interventions were made. Simultaneous measurements were registered in central (femoral) and peripheral (radial) arteries. Bias and precision between both measurements were calculated with Bland-Altman analysis for the whole group. Bias and precision were compared between patients receiving high doses of vasoactive drugs (norepinephrine or epinephrine >0.1 microg/kg/minute or dopamine >10 microg/kg/minute) and those receiving low doses (norepinephrine or epinephrine <0.1 microg/kg/minute or dopamine <10 microg/kg/minute).

RESULTS

Central mean arterial pressure was 3 +/- 4 mmHg higher than peripheral mean arterial pressure for the whole population and there were no differences between groups (3 +/- 4 mmHg for both groups).

CONCLUSION

Measurement of mean arterial blood pressure in radial or femoral arteries is clinically interchangeable. It is not mandatory to cannulate the femoral artery, even in critically ill patients receiving high doses of vasoactive drugs.

Pulmonary endarterectomy

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is a condition that is recognised in an increased percentage of patients. Pulmonary endarterectomy is recognised as being the only curative option for a subgroup of those patients, but anaesthesiologists and intensivists face many challenges in how they manage these patients perioperatively. Ultimately, it is the combination of skills in a multidisciplinary team that leads to a successful procedure and dramatically improves patient's quality of life and life expectancy.

Radial to femoral arterial blood pressure differences during liver transplantation

This observational study compared femoral and radial arterial blood pressure in 72 patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Simultaneous femoral and radial arterial blood pressures, cardiac index, core temperature and vasoconstrictor therapy were recorded at seven time points during the operation. No significant differences between radial and femoral pressures were found at the start of surgery. Femoral and radial systolic arterial blood pressures were statistically significantly different during liver reperfusion (mean (SD) arterial pressure = 92 (22) mmHg vs. 76 (22) mmHg, p < 0.01). Mean arterial blood pressures showed no statistically significant differences throughout the study. Vasoconstrictor drug administration was associated with a larger systolic pressure difference between femoral and radial arteries (28 (24) mmHg in patients being given vasoconstrictor drugs vs. 9 (19) mmHg in patients not needing vasoconstrictors during reperfusion, p < 0.001). In conclusion, differences in systolic arterial blood pressure occur between femoral and radial arterial monitoring sites during liver reperfusion, and in particular in patients being given vasoconstrictor therapy. Thus, if femoral arterial monitoring is not available, clinicians should rely on mean rather than systolic arterial pressure measurements from a radial artery catheter during liver transplantation.