Pro: Steroids should be used for cardiopulmonary bypass

Effects and trend of steroid dosage reduction during cardiac surgery: A three-year retrospective analysis at a tertiary medical center

BACKGROUND

Current adult cardiac surgery guidelines recommend against the routine use of prophylactic intravenous corticosteroids during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) due to concerns about myocardial injury, despite their potential to reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation. Traditionally, a high dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone was used to attenuate the inflammatory response associated with CPB. Our institution aligned with guideline recommendations and gradually reduced methylprednisolone dosages; thus, we reevaluated the impact on postoperative clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Our study reviewed 1341 cases from a total of 1680 adult cardiac surgeries performed between June 2019 and May 2022 after excluding cases with off-pump procedures, ventricular assist device implantations, heart transplants, and aortic surgeries requiring systemic circulatory arrest. The study timely sorted periods including a baseline data from 2018, and other three periods since 2019 to analyze the effects of three different methylprednisolone dosage: 0 mg, 500 mg, and 1000 mg. We assessed the annual trends in methylprednisolone administration and compared morbidity and mortality rates across the groups.

RESULTS

We observed a significant decline in steroid use, with no-steroid surgeries increasing from 23% to 66.5% by period 3. Despite the decreased use of steroids, our study showed no increase in mortality, new-onset atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, cerebrovascular event and prolonged ventilation when compared to baseline data. Notably, less surgical site infection rate was observed in the no-steroid group.

CONCLUSION

The data indicates that a reduction or discontinuation of steroids during CPB can be performed without compromising patient outcomes. This could support a transition towards a more conservative use of steroids in adult cardiac surgery, aligning with current guidelines, and potentially reducing certain postoperative complications.

Efficacy of perioperative prophylactic administration of corticosteroids in pediatric cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review with meta-analysis

An updated systematic review with meta-analysis comparing perioperative prophylactic administration of corticosteroids with placebo in pediatric cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass was conducted. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and MEDLINE (via PubMed) were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials published between January 1, 2000, and February 14, 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome, and adverse events. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Corticosteroid administration did not decrease postoperative in-hospital mortality compared with placebo (relative risk, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.17). Subgroup analyses according to the type of corticosteroids and neonates revealed that corticosteroids did not decrease postoperative in-hospital mortality. In the trial sequential analysis, the last point in the z-curve was within the futility borders. Although the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -5.54 h; 95% confidence interval (CI), -9.75 - -1.34) and incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59 - 0.96) decreased with corticosteroid administration, it did not affect the length of intensive care unit (mean difference, -0.28 days; 95% CI, -0.74 - 0.17) and hospital stay (mean difference, -0.59 days; 95% CI, -1.31 - 0.14). In conclusion, perioperative prophylactic corticosteroid administration in pediatric cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass did not decrease postoperative in-hospital mortality compared with placebo. According to the trial sequential analysis results, additional randomized controlled trials assessing mortality are not required. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD 42023391789.

Effect of low-dose dexamethasone on extra vascular lung water in patients following on-pump elective primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Background

The primary objective was to compare the effect of a low-dose dexamethasone as against a saline placebo on extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) in patients undergoing elective primary coronary artery bypass surgery. The secondary endpoints were to assess the effect of dexamethasone on other volumetric parameters (pulmonary vascular permeability index, global end diastolic volume index, and intrathoracic blood volume index), Vasoactive Inotrope Scores, hemodynamic parameters and serum osmolality in both groups.

Settings and Design

Prospective observational study performed at a single tertiary cardiac care center.

Materials and Methods

Twenty patients were randomized to receive either dexamethasone (steroid group, n = 10) or placebo (nonsteroid group, n = 10) twice before the institution of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). EVLWI and other volumetric parameters were obtained with the help of VolumeView™ Combo Kit connected to EV 1000 clinical platform at predetermined intervals. Hemodynamic parameters, vasoactive-inotropic Scores, hematocrit values were recorded at the predetermined time intervals. Baseline and 1^st postoperative day serum osmolality values were also obtained.

Results

The two groups were evenly matched in terms of demographic and CPB data. Intra- and inter-group comparison of the baseline EVLWI including other volumetric and hemodynamic parameters with those recorded at subsequent intervals revealed no statistical difference and was similar. Generalized estimating equation model was obtained to compare the changes between the groups over the entire study period which showed that on an average the changes between the steroid and nonsteroid group in terms of all volumetric parameters were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

There were no beneficial effects of low-dose dexamethasone on EVLWI or other volumetric parameters in patients subjected to on-pump primary coronary bypass surgery. Hemodynamic parameters were also not affected. Probably, the advanced hemodynamic monitoring aided in optimal fluid management in the nonsteroidal group impacting EVLW accumulation.

Impact of Early Postoperative Hydrocortisone Administration in Cardiac Surgical Patients after Cardiopulmonary Bypass

BACKGROUND:

The usefulness of glucocorticoids after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass has been a matter of debate for many years. Exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass evokes the systemic inflammatory response syndrome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Intravenous glucocorticoids have been used to reduce proinflammatory cytokine release, slow leukocyte migration, and decrease capillary leak associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of early postoperative hydrocortisone administration on duration of vasoactive medication administration and the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgical patients after cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study (between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2008) was conducted at a large, university-affiliated, tertiary-care medical center. One-hundred forty-seven patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, 72 of whom received at least 1 dose of hydrocortisone (treatment), and 75 similar patients who did not receive hydrocortisone (control), were randomly selected.

RESULTS:

Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were similar between treatment and control groups (128 vs 124 minutes, p = 0.56; 103 vs 98 minutes, p = 0.39). Patients who received hydrocortisone had a significantly shorter time to discontinuation of all vasoactive medications (79.6 vs 21.1 hours, p < 0.001), and less postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.56, p < 0.001). Patients in the treatment group experienced significantly more hyperglycemia (89 vs 71%, p = 0.006); however, major and minor bleeding or infection rates did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients treated with hydrocortisone after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass experienced a significantly shorter time to discontinuation of all vasoactive medications and less postoperative atrial fibrillation than patients not treated with hydrocortisone. These benefits came at the expense of significantly more hyperglycemia.

Methylprednisolone in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (SIRS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass initiates a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Steroids suppress inflammatory responses and might improve outcomes in patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. We aimed to assess the effects of steroids in patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

The Steroids In caRdiac Surgery (SIRS) study is a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. We used a central computerised phone or interactive web system to randomly assign (1:1) patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality from 80 hospital or cardiac surgery centres in 18 countries undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass to receive either methylprednisolone (250 mg at anaesthetic induction and 250 mg at initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass) or placebo. Patients were assigned with block randomisation with random block sizes of 2, 4, or 6 and stratified by centre. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible if they had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation of at least 6. Patients were excluded if they were taking or expected to receive systemic steroids in the immediate postoperative period or had a history of bacterial or fungal infection in the preceding 30 days. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing outcomes were masked to allocation. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of death and major morbidity (ie, myocardial injury, stroke, renal failure, or respiratory failure) within 30 days, both analysed by intention to treat. Safety outcomes were also analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00427388.

FINDINGS

Patients were recruited between June 21, 2007, and Dec 19, 2013. Complete 30-day data was available for all 7507 patients randomly assigned to methylprednisolone (n=3755) and to placebo (n=3752). Methylprednisolone, compared with placebo, did not reduce the risk of death at 30 days (154 [4%] vs 177 [5%] patients; relative risk [RR] 0·87, 95% CI 0·70-1·07, p=0·19) or the risk of death or major morbidity (909 [24%] vs 885 [24%]; RR 1·03, 95% CI 0·95-1·11, p=0·52). The most common safety outcomes in the methylprednisolone and placebo group were infection (465 [12%] vs 493 [13%]), surgical site infection (151 [4%] vs 151 [4%]), and delirium (295 [8%] vs 289 [8%]).

INTERPRETATION

Methylprednisolone did not have a significant effect on mortality or major morbidity after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The SIRS trial does not support the routine use of methylprednisolone for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

FUNDING

Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Rationale and design of the steroids in cardiac surgery trial

BACKGROUND

Steroids may improve outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). There is a need\ for a large randomized controlled trial to clarify the effect of steroids in such patients.

METHODS

We plan to randomize 7,500 patients with elevated European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation who are undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of CBP to methylprednisolone or placebo. The first coprimary outcome is 30-day all-cause mortality, and the most second coprimary outcome is a composite of death, MI, stroke, renal failure, or respiratory failure within 30 days. Other outcomes include a composite of MI or mortality at 30 days, new onset atrial fibrillation, bleeding and transfusion requirements, length of intensive care unit stay and hospital stay, infection, stroke, wound complications, gastrointestinal complications, delirium, postoperative insulin use and peak blood glucose, and all-cause mortality at 6 months.

RESULTS

As of October 22, 2013, 7,034 patients have been recruited into SIRS in 82 centers from 18 countries. Patient's mean age is 67.3 years, and 60.4% are male. The average European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation is 7.0 with 22.1% having an isolated coronary artery bypass graft procedure, and 66.1% having a valve procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

SIRS will lead to a better understanding of the safety and efficacy of prophylactic steroids for cardiac surgery requiring CBP.

Prophylactic corticosteroids for cardiopulmonary bypass in adults

BACKGROUND

High-dose prophylactic corticosteroids are often administered during cardiac surgery. Their use, however, remains controversial, as no trials are available that have been sufficiently powered to draw conclusions on their effect on major clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of prophylactic corticosteroids in cardiac surgery on mortality, cardiac and pulmonary complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Major medical databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science) were systematically searched for randomised studies assessing the effect of corticosteroids in adult cardiac surgery. Database were searched for the full period covered, up to December 2009. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing corticosteroid treatment to either placebo treatment or no treatment in adult cardiac surgery were selected. There were no restrictions with respect to length of the follow-up period. All selected studies qualified for pooling of results for one or more end-points.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The processes of searching and selection for inclusion eligibility were performed independently by two authors. Also, quality assessment and data-extraction of selected studies were independently performed by two authors. The primary endpoints were mortality, cardiac and pulmonary complications. The main effect measure was the Peto odds ratio comparing corticosteroids to no treatment/placebo.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-four randomised studies, mostly of limited quality, were included. Altogether, 3615 patients were included in these studies. The pooled odds ratio for mortality was 1.12 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.92), showing no mortality reduction in patients treated with corticosteroids. The odds ratios for myocardial and pulmonary complications were 0.95, (95% CI 0.57 to 1.60) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.49 to 1.40), respectively. The use of a random effects model did not substantially influence study results. Analyses of secondary endpoints showed a reduction of atrial fibrillation and an increase in gastrointestinal bleeding in the corticosteroids group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed no beneficial effect of corticosteroid use on mortality, cardiac and pulmonary complications in cardiac surgery patients.

Recent advances in perioperative medicine: highlights from the literature for the cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesiologist

There have been major advances in perioperative cardiothoracic and vascular medicine. Because of promising data, steroids, statins, and endothelin antagonists are being clinically tested in randomized trials with adult cardiac surgical patients. In vascular surgical patients, recent meta-analysis has revealed that interventions such as beta-blockade or endovascular stenting for peripheral vascular lesions may not improve outcome overall. Furthermore, a landmark trial has shown that anesthetic technique does not affect outcome after carotid endarterectomy. The surgical Apgar score may become part of routine clinical care of the vascular surgical patient because it predicts outcome and can be calculated at the bedside. Recent studies confirm that the serious perioperative risks of hyperglycemia also apply to nondiabetic and pediatric cardiac surgical patients. This has been highlighted in the new guidelines from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Perioperative myocardial protection is possible with ischemic preconditioning and omega-3 fatty acids. Pneumonia after lung resection may be reduced significantly by broadening antibiotic prophylaxis. Transfusion-related acute lung injury has immediate and delayed presentations that highlight the dangers of blood transfusion. Perioperative renal dysfunction after adult cardiac surgery is significantly reduced by the infusion of sodium bicarbonate. Although promising, further trials are required. Taken together, these recent advances will have significant influence on the future practice of cardiovascular and thoracic anesthesia as the ongoing search for perioperative outcome improvement achieves results.

Clinical benefit of steroid use in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

We sought to establish the efficacy and safety of prophylactic steroids in adult patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials reporting the effects of prophylactic steroids on clinical outcomes after CPB. Outcomes examined were mortality, myocardial infarction, neurological events, new onset atrial fibrillation, transfusion requirements, postoperative bleeding, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, wound complications, gastrointestinal complications, and infectious complications. We included 44 trials randomizing 3205 patients. Steroids reduced new onset atrial fibrillation [relative risk (RR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.87], postoperative bleeding [weighted mean difference (WMD) -99.6 mL, 95% CI -149.8 to -49.3], and duration of ICU stay (WMD -0.23 days, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.07). Length of hospital stay was also reduced (WMD -0.59 days, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.02), but this result was less robust. A trend towards reduction in mortality was observed (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.18). Randomized trials suggest that perioperative steroids have significant clinical benefit in CPB patients by decreasing the risk of new onset atrial fibrillation, while results are encouraging for reducing bleeding, length of stay, and mortality. These data do not raise major safety concerns, however, a sufficiently powered trial is warranted to confirm or refute these findings.

The use of TP10, soluble complement receptor 1, in cardiopulmonary bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for cardiac surgery or lung transplantation initiates a systemic inflammatory response characterized by increased vascular permeability, generalized edema, abnormal lung function and oxygenation and impaired ventricular function. This post-CPB syndrome significantly contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Activation of complement during CPB is a key component that initiates and augments this process. TP10, soluble complement receptor 1, is a novel complement inhibitor that is a potent inhibitor of C3 and C5 convertases, blocking activation of the complement cascade at the nexus of all three complement pathways. Recent controlled trials in humans have demonstrated that TP10 effectively inhibits complement activation during CPB. In high-risk adult patients, TP10 decreases the incidence of mortality and myocardial infarction in males but not in females following cardiac surgery. TP10 is also well tolerated and protects vascular function in infants undergoing CPB. In addition, TP10 leads to early extubation in adult lung transplant recipients. TP10 is currently positioned for clinical development in a male-only indication of cardiac surgery on CPB.

Pulse Low Dose Steroids Attenuate Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass SIRS; SIRS I

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) initiates inflammation that contributes to multiorgan dysfunction (SIRS). Steroids have been demonstrated to attenuate this response; however, resistance to use steroids remains because of potential adverse effects of the high doses used. This study examines a lower dose steroid protocol for safety and attenuation of SIRS.

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing CPB were randomized to pulse low doses of methylprednisolone (250 mg given twice IV) or placebo in this RCT. Outcomes pertaining to hemodynamics, ventilator requirement, arrhythmia, and metabolic derangements were recorded. Post-operative glucose control and gastrointestinal prohylaxis was instituted in all patients.

RESULTS

IL-6 concentrations were lower in the steroid group at 4 and 8 h post-operatively (P < 0.0001). The steroid group demonstrated more normothermia (37.2 degrees C versus 37.6 degrees C, P = 0.002), better hemodynamic stability with less requirement for inotropes or vasopressors (0% versus 27.6%, P = 0.005), higher SVRIs (1840 versus 1340 DSm2/cm5, P = 0.002), and higher mean arterial pressures (79 versus 74 mmHg, P = 0.03). The steroid group had a shorter duration of intubation (7.7 versus 10.7 h, P = 0.02), a shorter length of ICU stay (1.0 versus 2.0 days, P = 0.03), and less blood loss (505 versus 690 ml, P = 0.04) with no difference in post-operative blood glucose levels or complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass receiving low pulse dose steroids had better hemodynamics, shorter mechanical ventilation times, less blood loss, and required less time in the ICU compared to those receiving placebo. Therefore, this study demonstrates that prophylactic low dose steroids attenuate the SIRS response to CPB without resulting in any untoward side-effects.