A Comparison of Urinary Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin in Patients Undergoing On- Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin after off pump versus on pump coronary artery surgery

CONTEXT

Cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To compare plasma and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (P-/U-NGAL) in on-pump (n = 43) versus off-pump (n = 40) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained perioperative P-/U-NGAL and outcome data.

RESULTS

P-/U-NGAL increased after surgery. P-NGAL was higher post-surgery in on pump patients (139 versus 67 µg L(-1); p < 0.001), but not at 24 h. There were no differences in U-NGAL. Correlation between P-/U-NGAL and plasma creatinine was weak.

DISCUSSION

P-NGAL acts like a neutrophil activation biomarker and U-NGAL like a tubular injury marker.

CONCLUSION

On-pump patients had greater neutrophil activation. On- versus off-pump surgery had similar impact on tubular cells.

Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin in acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a member of the lipocalin family of proteins. Usually, NGAL is produced and secreted by kidney tubule cells at low levels, but the amount produced and secreted into the urine and serum increases dramatically after ischemic, septic, or nephrotoxic injury of the kidneys. The purpose of our review article is to summarize the role of NGAL in acute kidney injury (AKI), emergent, and intensive care.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed (only English-language articles concerning human subjects were considered) using each of the following search term combinations: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin OR NGAL and acute kidney injury OR AKI; cardiac surgery; heart failure OR cardiology; intensive care; emergency department OR emergency medicine; nephropathy OR nephrotoxicity and transplantation.

RESULTS

The results of our search yielded 339 articles. Of the 339 articles, 160 were eligible for review based on the predefined criteria for inclusion.

CONCLUSION

Based on the evidence reviewed, it is clear that patient NGAL level is an appropriate, sensitive, and specific early biomarker of AKI caused by a variety of different etiologies. It is advised that a multidisciplinary group of experts come together to make recommendations and propose a consensus of clinical procedures to advance the most efficacious NGAL monitoring protocol for early detection and treatment of patients with AKI.

Time of injury affects urinary biomarker predictive values for acute kidney injury in critically ill, non-septic patients

Background

The predictive value of acute kidney injury (AKI) urinary biomarkers may depend on the time interval following tubular injury, thereby explaining in part the heterogeneous performance of these markers that has been reported in the literature. We studied the influence of timing on the predictive values of tubular proteins, measured before the rise of serum creatinine (SCr) in critically ill, non-septic patients.

Methods

Seven hundred adult critically ill patients were prospectively included for urine measurements at four time-points prior to the rise in serum creatinine (T = 0, -16, -20 and -24 h). Patients with sepsis and or AKI at ICU entry were excluded. The urinary excretion of the proteins, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), which are up-regulated in the distal and proximal tubules, respectively, were measured as well as the constitutive cytoplasmatic enzymes, π- and α-glutathione-S-transferase (GST), which are released by the distal and proximal tubules, respectively.

Results

Five hundred and forty-three subjects were eligible for further analyses; however, 49 developed AKI in the first 48 h. Both NGAL (P = 0.001 at T = -24 vs. non-AKI patients) and KIM-1 (P < 0.0001 at T = 0 vs. non-AKI patients) concentrations gradually increased until AKI diagnosis, whereas π- and α-GST peaked at T = -24 before AKI (P = 0.006 and P = 0.002, respectively vs. non-AKI patients) and showed a rapid decline afterwards. The predictive values at T = -24 prior to AKI were modest for π- and α-GST, whereas NGAL sufficiently predicted AKI at T = -24 and its predictive power improved as the time interval to AKI presentation decreased (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC = 0.79, P < 0.0001). KIM-1 was a good discriminator at T = 0 only (AUC = 0.73, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

NGAL, KIM-1, pi- and alpha-GST displayed unique and mutually incomparable time dependent characteristics during the development of non-sepsis related AKI. Therefore, the time-relationship between the biomarker measurements and the injurious event influences the individual test results.

What is the significance of perioperative release of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in cardiac surgery?

Cardiac surgery is associated with release of the pleiotropic cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). The trigger for MIF release has not yet been elucidated. Owing to its intrinsic antioxidative activity, MIF might reduce oxidative stress and protect from myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury. In the present study, patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery (n=46) were randomized to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting either conventionally with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest-induced I/R (cCABG) or in an off-pump procedure (OPCAB) with minimized I/R. We report that only patients who underwent cCABG exhibited a postoperative increase of MIF (p=0.024), while both groups showed an increase in interleukin-6. MIF release appears to be primarily mediated by I/R and to a lesser extent by inflammation. Endogenous peroxidase activity (p=0.021) and serum levels of thioredoxin (p=0.003) were significantly higher in patients who underwent cCABG after surgery. Interestingly, perioperative MIF release was associated with an enhanced antioxidant capacity and a significantly reduced postoperative incidence of atrial fibrillation (p=0.018) and acute kidney injury (p=0.048). The present study highlights the role of MIF increase during cardiac surgery in response to oxidative stress. Based on current observations, we hypothesize that intraoperative MIF secretion is due to I/R and enhances the antioxidant capacity in patients during cardiac surgery.

The effects of pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on acute kidney injury

PURPOSE

Protective effect of pulsatile flow cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on the occurrence of acute renal injury is still a matter of debate. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of pulsatile and non-pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass on kidneys using Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) as the markers of renal injury.

METHODS

85 consecutive patients with normal preoperative renal function were prospectively enrolled in the study. Pulsatile perfusion (Group P) and non-pulsatile perfusion (Group NP) was used in 42 and 43 of the patients, respectively, during aortic cross-clamping period. NGAL and IL-18 were analyzed using ELISA in urine samples obtained preoperatively, and at 2, 12, and 24 h after CPB.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of perioperative renal function tests. IL-18 levels measured at 12 h after CPB were significantly lower in Group P, compared to Group NP (p<0.05). Urinary NGAL levels measured at 2 and 12 h were higher in Group NP; however, the difference was insignificant. In the subgroup of patients with a cross clamp time ≥45 minutes (pulsatile CPB, group P1, n = 33; non-pulsatile CPB, group NP1, n = 33), IL-18 levels measured at 12 hours after CPB were significantly lower in Group P1. Urinary NGAL concentrations measured at 2 and 12 hours in Group P1 were also significantly lower than that in Group NP1 (p = 0.048 and 0.043, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Low IL-18 and NGAL levels found in the pulsatile perfusion group might suggest the use of pulsatile flow resulted in better kidney protection.

Preventing acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious complication that significantly increases morbidity, mortality and cost of care after cardiac surgery. In this review we identify the current literature that addresses strategies for renal protection and the prevention of AKI after cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Even with aggressive medical care and renal replacement therapy (RRT) the morbidity, mortality and cost of postoperative AKI after cardiac surgery is substantial. An emphasis on preventive strategies would therefore appear to be the most cost-effective approach. Recent literature offers hope that as our understanding of the pathogenesis of AKI after cardiac surgery continues to improve, new directions for the prevention and amelioration of AKI will emerge. Approaches to the prevention of postoperative AKI include careful risk stratification of patients, allowing adequate recovery following a prior AKI, consideration of less extensive surgical procedures, avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass, minimizing injury from radiocontrast dyes or other nephrotoxic agents, and optimizing cardiovascular function and oxygen delivery. Early identification of AKI and prompt, judicious application of RRT may also improve outcomes. Interest in pharmacologic renoprotection is currently directed toward statins and sodium bicarbonate.

SUMMARY

Postoperative AKI is a serious complication after cardiac surgery. Therapeutic interventions and RRT have limited influence on the outcome of AKI, and a preventive strategy remains the mainstay to attenuate its impact.

Anesthetic concerns in patients presenting with renal failure

Anesthesiologists often care for patients with renal insufficiency or renal failure. These patients may present to the operating room for a minor procedure such as an inguinal hernia repair or an arteriovenous fistula/graft. Alternatively, they may present for major abdominal operations or coronary artery bypass grafting. Critically ill patients presenting to the operating room may have acute kidney injury. It is imperative that the anesthesiologist understands the ramifications of renal failure and adjusts the anesthetic plan accordingly. Hemodynamic monitoring and fluid management can be challenging in this patient population. Various metabolic abnormalities can ensue that the anesthesiologist must be able to manage in the acute setting of the operating room.