Reducing mortality in acute kidney injury patients: systematic review and international web-based survey

National clinical and financial outcomes associated with acute kidney injury following esophagectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic operation associated with high rates of postoperative complications. While respiratory and septic complications have been well-defined, the implications of acute kidney injury (AKI) remain unclear. Using a nationally representative database, we aimed to characterize the association of AKI with mortality, resource use, and 30-day readmission.

METHODS

All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy with a diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer were identified in the 2010-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Study cohorts were stratified based on presence of AKI. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar survival analysis were used to evaluate the independent association between AKI and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 40,438 patients, 3,210 (7.9%) developed AKI. Over the 10-year study period, the incidence of AKI increased from 6.4% to 9.7%. Prior radiation/chemotherapy and minimally invasive operations were associated with reduced odds of AKI, whereas public insurance coverage and concurrent infectious and respiratory complications had greater risk of AKI. After risk adjustment, AKI remained independently associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR: 4.59, 95% CI: 3.62-5.83) and had significantly increased attributable costs ($112,000 vs $54,000) and length of stay (25.7 vs 13.3 days) compared to patients without AKI. Furthermore, AKI demonstrated significantly increased hazard of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI after esophagectomy is associated with greater risk of mortality, hospitalization costs, and 30-day readmission. Given the significant adverse consequences of AKI, careful perioperative management to mitigate this complication may improve quality of esophageal surgical care at the national level.

Metformin use is associated with reduced acute kidney injury following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with type 2 diabetes: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Patients with diabetes are commonly associated with renal microvascular complications and have a greater risk of AKI after CABG surgery. This study aimed to explore whether preoperative metformin administration could reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI following CABG in patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Patients with diabetes who underwent CABG were retrospectively included in this study. AKI after CABG was defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. The effects of metformin on postoperative AKI following CABG in patients were compared and analyzed.

DATA SOURCE

Patients were enrolled in this study between January 2019 and December 2020 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 812 patients were enrolled. The patients were divided into the metformin group (203 cases) and the control group (609 cases) according to whether metformin was used preoperatively.

INTERVENTION

Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to minimize baseline differences between the two groups. IPT-weighted p values were analyzed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The incidence of AKI in the metformin group and the control group was compared. After IPTW adjustment, the incidence of AKI in the metformin group was lower than the control group (IPTW-adjusted p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, metformin showed significant protective effects in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and eGFR 60-90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 subgroups, which was not observed in the eGFR ≥90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 subgroup. No significant differences in the incidence of renal replacement therapy, reoperation due to bleeding, in-hospital mortality, or red blood cell transfusion volume were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we provided evidence that preoperative metformin was associated with a significant reduction of postoperative AKI following CABG in patients with diabetes. Metformin showed significant protective effects in patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency.

Norepinephrine May Exacerbate Septic Acute Kidney Injury: A Narrative Review

Sepsis, the most serious complication of infection, occurs when a cascade of potentially life-threatening inflammatory responses is triggered. Potentially life-threatening septic shock is a complication of sepsis that occurs when hemodynamic instability occurs. Septic shock may cause organ failure, most commonly involving the kidneys. The pathophysiology and hemodynamic mechanisms of acute kidney injury in the case of sepsis or septic shock remain to be elucidated, but previous studies have suggested multiple possible mechanisms or the interplay of multiple mechanisms. Norepinephrine is used as the first-line vasopressor in the management of septic shock. Studies have reported different hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine on renal circulation, with some suggesting that it could possibly exacerbate acute kidney injury caused by septic shock. This narrative review briefly covers the updates on sepsis and septic shock regarding definitions, statistics, diagnosis, and management, with an explanation of the putative pathophysiological mechanisms and hemodynamic changes, as well as updated evidence. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury remains a major burden on the healthcare system. This review aims to improve the real-world clinical understanding of the possible adverse outcomes of norepinephrine use in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

Protective role of MG53 against ischemia/reperfusion injury on multiple organs: A narrative review

Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a common clinical problem after coronary angioplasty, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and organ transplantation, which can lead to cell damage and death. Mitsugumin 53 (MG53), also known as Trim72, is a conservative member of the TRIM family and is highly expressed in mouse skeletal and cardiac muscle, with minimal amounts in humans. MG53 has been proven to be involved in repairing cell membrane damage. It has a protective effect on I/R injury in multiple oxygen-dependent organs, such as the heart, brain, lung, kidney, and liver. Recombinant human MG53 also plays a unique role in I/R, sepsis, and other aspects, which is expected to provide new ideas for related treatment. This article briefly reviews the pathophysiology of I/R injury and how MG53 mitigates multi-organ I/R injury.

Risk factors for acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery in the elderly aged 75 years and above

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) undergoing major nonvascular abdominal surgery.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective study that evaluated the incidence of AKI in patients within 48 h after major abdominal surgeries. Patients' preoperative characteristics and intraoperative management, including the use of nephrotoxic medications, were evaluated for associations with AKI using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 573 patients were included in our analysis. A total of 33 patients (5.76%) developed AKI, and 30 (90.91%), 2 (6.06%) and 1 (3.03%) reached the AKI stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Older age (adjusted OR, aOR 1.112, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.020-1.212), serum albumin (aOR 0.900, 95% CI 0.829-0.977), baseline eGFR (aOR 3.401, 95% CI 1.479-7.820), the intraoperative occurrence of hypotension (aOR 3.509, 95% CI 1.553-7.929), and the use of hydroxyethyl starch in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aOR 3.596, 95% CI 1.559-8.292) or furosemide (aOR 5.724, 95% CI 1.476-22.199) were independent risk factors for postoperative AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Several risk factors, including intraoperative combined administration of HES and furosemide, are independent factors for AKI during abdominal surgeries. Anesthesiologists and surgeons should take precautions in treating at-risk patients.

Hypoxic preconditioning in renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a review in pre-clinical models

Ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease, which consists of cellular damage and renal dysfunction. AKI is a major complication that is of particular concern after cardiac surgery and to a lesser degree following organ transplantation in the immediate post-transplantation period, leading to delayed graft function. Because effective therapies are still unavailable, several recent studies have explored the potential benefit of hypoxic preconditioning (HPC) on IRI. HPC refers to the acquisition of increased organ tolerance to subsequent ischaemic or severe hypoxic injury, and experimental evidences suggest a potential benefit of HPC. There are three experimental forms of HPC, and, for better clarity, we named them as follows: physical HPC, HPC via treated-cell administration and stabilised hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α HPC, or mimicked HPC. The purpose of this review is to present the latest developments in the literature on HPC in the context of renal IRI in pre-clinical models. The data we compiled suggest that preconditional activation of hypoxia pathways protects against renal IRI, suggesting that HPC could be used in the treatment of renal IRI in transplantation.

CSA-AKI: Incidence, Epidemiology, Clinical Outcomes, and Economic Impact

Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is a common complication following cardiac surgery and reflects a complex biological combination of patient pathology, perioperative stress, and medical management. Current diagnostic criteria, though increasingly standardized, are predicated on loss of renal function (as measured by functional biomarkers of the kidney). The addition of new diagnostic injury biomarkers to clinical practice has shown promise in identifying patients at risk of renal injury earlier in their course. The accurate and timely identification of a high-risk population may allow for bundled interventions to prevent the development of CSA-AKI, but further validation of these interventions is necessary. Once the diagnosis of CSA-AKI is established, evidence-based treatment is limited to supportive care. The cost of CSA-AKI is difficult to accurately estimate, given the diverse ways in which it impacts patient outcomes, from ICU length of stay to post-hospital rehabilitation to progression to CKD and ESRD. However, with the global rise in cardiac surgery volume, these costs are large and growing.

Use of Biomarkers to Identify Acute Kidney Injury to Help Detect Sepsis in Patients With Infection

OBJECTIVES

Although early recognition of sepsis is vital to improving outcomes, the diagnosis may be missed or delayed in many patients. Acute kidney injury is one of the most common organ failures in patients with sepsis but may not be apparent on presentation. Novel biomarkers for acute kidney injury might improve organ failure recognition and facilitate earlier sepsis care.

DESIGN

Retrospective, international, Sapphire study.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Adults admitted to the ICU without evidence of acute kidney injury at time of enrollment.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We stratified patients enrolled in the Sapphire study into three groups-those with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis (n = 216), those with infection without sepsis (n = 120), and those without infection (n = 387) at enrollment. We then examined 30-day mortality stratified by acute kidney injury within each group. Finally, we determined the operating characteristics for kidney stress markers (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2) × (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7) for prediction of acute kidney injury as a sepsis-defining organ failure in patients with infection without a clinical diagnosis of sepsis at enrollment. Combining all groups, 30-day mortality was 23% for patients who developed stage 2-3 acute kidney injury within the first 3 days compared with 14% without stage 2-3 acute kidney injury. However, this difference was greatest in the infection without sepsis group (34% vs 11%; odds ratio, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.53-11.12; p = 0.005). Using a (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2) × (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7) cutoff of 2.0 units, 14 patients (11.7%), in the infection/no sepsis group, tested positive of which 10 (71.4%) developed stage 2-3 acute kidney injury. The positive test result occurred a median of 19 hours (interquartile range, 0.8-34.0 hr) before acute kidney injury manifested by serum creatinine or urine output. Similar results were obtained using a cutoff of 1.0 for any stage of acute kidney injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the urinary (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2) × (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7) test could identify acute kidney injury in patients with infection, possibly helping to detect sepsis, nearly a day before acute kidney injury is apparent by clinical criteria.

Clinical Knowledge Supported Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Risk Assessment Model for Elderly Patients

From the clinical viewpoint, the statistical approach is still the cornerstone for exploring many diseases. This study was conducted to explore the risk factors related to acute kidney injury (AKI) for elderly patients using the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach. Ten nephrologists from a teaching hospital in Taipei took part in forming the AKI risk assessment model. The key findings are: (1) Comorbidity and Laboratory Values would influence Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; (2) Frailty is the highest influential AKI risk factor for elderly patients; and (3) Elderly patients could enhance their daily activities and nutrition to improve frailty and lower AKI risk. Furthermore, we illustrate how to apply MCDM methods to retrieve clinical experience from seasoned doctors, which may serve as a knowledge-based system to support clinical prognoses. In conclusion, this study has shed light on integrating multiple research approaches to assist medical decision-making in clinical practice.

Epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury in cardiac intensive care unit patients

PURPOSE

To describe the epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) among contemporary non-surgical cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed adult non-surgical CICU patients admitted from 2007 to 2015. The highest AKI stage during hospitalization was defined using modified Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, based on changes in serum creatinine. Hospital and 5-year mortality were examined using logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models, respectively.

RESULTS

We included 9311 patients with a mean age of 67.5 years, including 37% females. AKI was present in 51%: stage 1 AKI in 34%, stage 2 AKI in 9%, and stage 3 AKI in 8%. Hospital mortality was associated with AKI stage (adjusted OR for each AKI stage 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.31, p = 0.007). Five-year mortality was incrementally associated with AKI stage (adjusted HR per AKI stage 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.18; p < 0.001), particularly post-discharge mortality among hospital survivors (adjusted HR per AKI stage 1.20, 95% CI 1.15-1.25, p < 0.001). Patients with stage 3 AKI (especially requiring dialysis) had the highest adjusted hospital and five-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

AKI severity is incrementally associated with higher short-term and long-term mortality in CICU patients, especially severe AKI requiring dialysis.

Does Fenoldopam Protect Kidney in Cardiac Surgery? A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the benefits and harms of fenoldopam for nephroprotective effects in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fenoldopam with placebo in cardiac surgery. Trials were systematically searched from PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases, up to July 30, 2018. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to determine whether the present evidence was valid and conclusive for the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of seven randomized controlled trials involving 1,107 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis suggested that the use of fenoldopam was associated with a reduction in the incidence of AKI (18 of 216 [8.3%] in the fenoldopam group versus 45 of 222 [20.3%] in the placebo group, RR = 0.42 [0.26, 0.69], P = 0.0006) and with a higher rate of hypotension (92/357 [25.8%] versus 51/348 [14.7%], RR = 1.76 [1.29, 2.39], P = 0.0003). There was no significant effect on renal replacement therapy requirement (77 of 540 [14.3%] versus 75 of 536 [14.0%], P = 0.96) or hospital mortality (87/392 [22.2%] versus 83/383 [21.7%], P = 0.86). TSA supported the results of the conventional analysis on AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose dopamine offers transient improvements in renal physiology, but no good evidence shows that it offers important clinical benefits to patients with or at risk for acute renal failure.Among patients treated with fenoldopam, there was a decrease in AKI and an increased incidence of hypotension, had no significant effect on RRT or mortality. Given that most studies were small and the definition of AKI was variable between studies, there is not enough evidence to support the systematic use of fenoldopam in cardiac surgery.

A Multinational Observational Study Exploring Adherence With the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Recommendations for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend a bundle of different measures for patients at increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that management in accordance with the KDIGO recommendations was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative AKI in high-risk patients. However, compliance with the KDIGO bundle in routine clinical practice is unknown.

METHODS

This observational prevalence study was performed in conjunction with a prospective RCT investigating the role of the KDIGO bundle in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A 2-day observational prevalence study was performed in all participating centers before the RCT to explore routine clinical practice. The participating hospitals provided the following data: demographics and surgical characteristics, AKI rates, and compliance rates with the individual components of the bundle.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were enrolled in 12 participating hospitals. The incidence of AKI within 72 hours after cardiac surgery was 24.2%. In 5.3% of all patients, clinical management was fully compliant with all 6 components of the bundle. Nephrotoxic drugs were discontinued in 52.6% of patients, volume optimization was performed in 70.5%, 52.6% of the patients underwent functional hemodynamic monitoring, close monitoring of serum creatinine and urine output was undertaken in 24.2% of patients, hyperglycemia was avoided in 41.1% of patients, and no patient received radiocontrast agents. The patients received on average 3.4 (standard deviation [SD] ±1.1) of 6 supportive measures as recommended by the KDIGO guidelines. There was no significant difference in the number of applied measures between AKI and non-AKI patients (3.2 [SD ±1.1] vs 3.5 [SD ±1.1]; P = .347).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients after cardiac surgery, compliance with the KDIGO recommendations was low in routine clinical practice.

Impact of furosemide on mortality and the requirement for renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Objective

To examine the impact of furosemide on mortality and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in adult patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) based on current evidence.

Data sources

PubMed (Medline) and Embase were searched from 1998 to October 2018.

Study selection

We retrieved data from randomised controlled trials comparing prevention/treatment with furosemide at any stage of AKI with alternative treatment/standard of care/placebo. The outcome was short-term mortality and the requirement for RRT, when applicable.

Data extraction

Two reviewers independently extracted appropriate data. PRISMA guidelines were followed for data preparation and reporting.

Data synthesis

We identified 20 relevant studies (2608 patients: 1330 in the treatment arm and 1278 in the control arm). Heterogeneity between studies was deemed acceptable, and the publication bias was low. Furosemide had neither an impact on mortality (OR = 1.015; 95% CI 0.825–1.339) nor the need for RRT (OR = 0.947; 95% CI 0.521–1.721). Furosemide had also no effect on the outcomes in strata defined by intervention strategy (prevention/treatment), AKI origin (cardio-renal syndrome, post-cardiopulmonary bypass, critical illness), control arm comparator (RRT, saline/placebo/standard of care) and its dose (< 160/≥ 160 mg) (p > 0.05 for all). Subjects who received furosemide with matched hydration in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) had a less frequent need for RRT (OR = 0.218; 95% CI 0.05–1.04; p = 0.055).

Conclusions

Furosemide administration has neither an impact on mortality nor the requirement for RRT. Patients at risk of CIN may benefit from furosemide administration. Further well-designed RCTs are needed to verify these findings.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0557-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hemodynamic goal-directed therapy and postoperative kidney injury: an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Background

Perioperative goal-directed therapy (GDT) reduces the risk of renal injury. However, several questions remain unanswered, such as target, kind of patients and surgery, and role of fluids and inotropes. We therefore update a previous analysis, including all studies published in the meanwhile, to clarify the clinical impact of this strategy on acute kidney injury.

Main body

Randomized controlled trials enrolling adult patients undergoing major surgery were considered. GDT was defined as perioperative monitoring and manipulation of hemodynamic parameters to reach normal or supranormal values by fluids alone or with inotropes. Trials comparing the effects of GDT and standard hemodynamic therapy were considered. Primary outcome was acute kidney injury, whichever definition was used. Meta-analytic techniques (analysis software RevMan, version 5.3) were used to combine studies, using random-effect odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Trial sequential analyses were performed including all trials and considering only low risk of bias trials. Sixty-five trials with an overall sample of 9308 patients were included. OR for the development of renal injury was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.62–0.87; p = 0.0003), with no statistical heterogeneity. Trial sequential analyses and sensitivity analysis including studies with low risk of bias confirmed the main results. A significant decrease in renal injury rate was observed in studies that adopted cardiac output and oxygen delivery as hemodynamic target and that used both fluids and inotropes. The postoperative kidney injury rate was significantly lower in trials enrolling “high-risk” patients and major abdominal and orthopedic surgery.

Short conclusion

The present meta-analysis suggests that targeting GDT to perioperative systemic oxygen delivery, by means of fluids and inotropes, can be the best way to improve renal perfusion and oxygenation in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal and orthopedic surgery.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2516-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A Systematic Review and International Web-Based Survey of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative and Critical Care Setting: Interventions Increasing Mortality

OBJECTIVE

Reducing mortality is a key target in critical care and perioperative medicine. The authors aimed to identify all nonsurgical interventions (drugs, techniques, strategies) shown by randomized trials to increase mortality in these clinical settings.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature followed by a consensus-based voting process.

SETTING

A web-based international consensus conference.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred fifty-one physicians from 46 countries.

INTERVENTIONS

The authors performed a systematic literature search and identified all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing a significant increase in unadjusted landmark mortality among surgical or critically ill patients. The authors reviewed such studies during a meeting by a core group of experts. Studies selected after such review advanced to web-based voting by clinicians in relation to agreement, clinical practice, and willingness to include each intervention in international guidelines.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors selected 12 RCTs dealing with 12 interventions increasing mortality: diaspirin-crosslinked hemoglobin (92% of agreement among web voters), overfeeding, nitric oxide synthase inhibitor in septic shock, human growth hormone, thyroxin in acute kidney injury, intravenous salbutamol in acute respiratory distress syndrome, plasma-derived protein C concentrate, aprotinin in high-risk cardiac surgery, cysteine prodrug, hypothermia in meningitis, methylprednisolone in traumatic brain injury, and albumin in traumatic brain injury (72% of agreement). Overall, a high consistency (ranging from 80% to 90%) between agreement and clinical practice was observed.

CONCLUSION

The authors identified 12 clinical interventions showing increased mortality supported by randomized controlled trials with nonconflicting evidence, and wide agreement upon clinicians on a global scale.

Intermittent furosemide administration in patients with or at risk for acute kidney injury: Meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background

Furosemide is the most common loop diuretic used worldwide. The off-label administration of furosemide bolus(es) for the prevention or to reverse acute kidney injury (AKI) is widespread but not supported by available evidence. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials (RCTs) to investigate whether bolus furosemide to prevent or treat AKI is detrimental on patients’ survival.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched through October 2017 for RCTs comparing bolus furosemide administration versus any comparator in patients with or at risk for AKI. The primary endpoint was all-cause longest follow-up mortality. Secondary endpoints included new or worsening AKI, receipt of renal replacement therapy, length of hospital stay, and peak serum creatinine after randomization.

Results

A total of 28 studies randomizing 3,228 patients were included in the analysis. We found no difference in mortality between the two groups (143/892 [16%] in the furosemide group versus 141/881 [16%] in the control group; odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 1.13; p = 0.25). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were found. A significant improvement in survival was found in the subgroup of patients receiving furosemide bolus(es) as a preventive measure (43/613 [7.0%] versus 67/619 [10.8%], OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.94; p = 0.03)

Conclusions

Intermittent furosemide administration is not associated with an increased mortality in patients with or at risk for AKI, although it may reduce mortality when used as a preventive measure. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to define the role of loop diuretics in AKI prevention and management.

Trial registration

The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO database for systematic reviews (Registration no. CRD42017078607 – http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017078607).

Preoperative Short-Term Calorie Restriction for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with adverse outcomes. Although short-term calorie restriction (CR) has proven protective in rodent models of acute kidney injury, similar effects have not yet been demonstrated in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CR_KCH (Effect of a Preoperative Calorie Restriction on Renal Function After Cardiac Surgery) is a randomized controlled trial in patients scheduled for cardiac surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a formula diet containing 60% of the daily energy requirement (CR group) or ad libitum food (control group) for 7 days before surgery. In total, 82 patients were enrolled between April 16, 2012, and February 5, 2015. There was no between-group difference in the primary end point of median serum creatinine increment after 24 hours (control group: 0.0 mg/dL [-0.1 - (+0.2) mg/dL]; CR group: 0.0 mg/dL [-0.2 - (+0.2) mg/dL]; P=0.39). CR prevented a rise in median creatinine at 48 hours (control group: +0.1 mg/dL [0.0 - 0.3 mg/dL]; CR group: -0.1 mg/dL [-0.2 - (+0.1) mg/dL]; P=0.03), with most pronounced effects observed in male patients and patients with a body mass index >25. This benefit persisted until discharge: Median creatinine decreased by 0.1 mg/dL (-0.2 - 0.0 mg/dL) in the CR group, whereas it increased by 0.1 mg/dL (0.0 - 0.3 mg/dL; P=0.0006) in the control group. Incidence of acute kidney injury was reduced by 5.8% (41.7% in the CR group compared with 47.5% in the control group). Safety-related events did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite disappointing results with respect to creatinine rise within the first 24 hours, the benefits observed at later time points and the subgroup analyses suggest the protective potential of short-term CR in patients at risk for acute kidney injury, warranting further investigation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01534364.

Age and Surgical Complexity impact on Renoprotection by Remote Ischemic Preconditioning during Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Meta analysis

We aimed to conduct an up-to-date meta-analysis to comprehensively assess the renoprotective effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery. 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 6302 patients were selected and identified. Compared with controls, RIPC significantly reduced the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.79; P = 0.02; I² = 38%], and in particular, AKI stage I (OR = 0.65; P = 0.01; I² = 55%). RIPC significantly shortened mechanical ventilation (MV) duration [weighted mean difference (WMD) = −0.79 hours; P = 0.002; I² = 53%), and reduced intensive care unit (ICU) stay (WMD = −0.23 days; P = 0.07; I² = 96%). Univariate meta-regression analyses showed that the major sources of heterogeneity for AKI stage I were age (coefficient = 0.06; P = 0.01; adjusted R2 = 0.86) and proportion of complex surgery (coefficient = 0.02; P = 0.03; adjusted R2 = 0.81). Subsequent multivariate regression and subgroup analyses also confirmed these results. The present meta-analysis suggests that RIPC reduces the incidence of AKI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery and this benefit was more pronounced in younger patients undergoing non-complex cardiac surgery. RIPC may also shorten MV duration and ICU stay. Future RCTs tailored for those most likely to benefit from RIPC warrants further investigation.

Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI randomized controlled trial

Purpose

Care bundles are recommended in patients at high risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), although they have not been proven to improve outcomes. We sought to establish the efficacy of an implementation of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines to prevent cardiac surgery-associated AKI in high risk patients defined by renal biomarkers.

Methods

In this single-center trial, we examined the effect of a “KDIGO bundle” consisting of optimization of volume status and hemodynamics, avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs, and preventing hyperglycemia in high risk patients defined as urinary [TIMP-2]·[IGFBP7] > 0.3 undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of AKI defined by KDIGO criteria within the first 72 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints included AKI severity, need for dialysis, length of stay, and major adverse kidney events (MAKE) at days 30, 60, and 90.

Results

AKI was significantly reduced with the intervention compared to controls [55.1 vs. 71.7%; ARR 16.6% (95 CI 5.5–27.9%); p = 0.004]. The implementation of the bundle resulted in significantly improved hemodynamic parameters at different time points (p < 0.05), less hyperglycemia (p < 0.001) and use of ACEi/ARBs (p < 0.001) compared to controls. Rates of moderate to severe AKI were also significantly reduced by the intervention compared to controls. There were no significant effects on other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

An implementation of the KDIGO guidelines compared with standard care reduced the frequency and severity of AKI after cardiac surgery in high risk patients. Adequately powered multicenter trials are warranted to examine mortality and long-term renal outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4670-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may attenuate acute kidney injury (AKI). However, results of studies evaluating the effect of RIPC on AKI after cardiac surgery have been controversial and contradictory.The aim of this meta-analysis is to examine the association between RIPC and AKI after on-pump cardiac surgery.The authors searched relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library through December 2015.We considered for inclusion all randomized controlled trials that the role of RIPC in reducing AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) among patients underwent on-pump cardiac surgical procedures.We collected the data on AKI, initiation of RRT, serum creatinine (sCr) levels, and in-hospital mortality. Random- and fixed-effect models were used for pooling data.Nineteen trials including 5100 patients were included. The results of this meta-analysis showed a significant benefit of RIPC for reducing the incidence of AKI after cardiac interventions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.98; P = 0.02). No significant difference was found in the incidence of RRT between RIPC and control (OR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.46-1.24; P = 0.36). In addition, compared with standard medical care, RIPC showed no significant difference in postoperative sCr (IV 0.07; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.16; P = 0.20; postoperative day 1; IV 0.00; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.09; P = 0.92; postoperative day 2; IV 0.04; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.12; P = 0.39; postoperative day 3), and in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.21, 95% CI, 0.64-2.30; P = 0.56).According to the results from present meta-analysis, RIPC was associated with a significant reduction AKI after on-pump cardiac surgery but incidence of RRT, postoperative sCr, and in-hospital mortality. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials and experimental researches comparing RIPC are desirable.

The Current State of the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Kidney Injury by Pediatric Critical Care Physicians

OBJECTIVES

Increasingly prevalent in pediatric intensive care, acute kidney injury imparts significant short- and long-term consequences. Despite advances in acute kidney injury research, clinical outcomes are worsening. We surveyed pediatric critical care physicians to describe the current state of acute kidney injury diagnosis and management in critically ill children.

DESIGN

Anonymous electronic questionnaire.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric critical care physicians from academic centers, the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators network, and/or the pediatric branch of Society of Critical Care Medicine.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 201 surveys initiated, 170 surveys were more than 50% completed and included in our results. The majority of physicians (74%) diagnosed acute kidney injury using serum creatinine and urine output. Acute kidney injury guidelines or criteria were used routinely by 54% of physicians; Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End stage criteria were the most commonly used. Awareness of any acute kidney injury guideline or definition was associated with five-fold higher odds of using any guideline (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% CI, 1.84-14.83) and four-fold higher odds of being dissatisfied with available acute kidney injury biomarkers (odds ratio, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.58-15.05). Less than half of respondents recognized the limitations of serum creatinine. Physicians unaware of the limitations of serum creatinine had two-fold higher odds of being unaware of newer biomarker availability (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.14-4.79). Novel biomarkers were available to 37.6% of physicians for routine use. Physicians with access to novel biomarkers more often practiced in larger (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.18-8.12) and Midwestern (odds ratio, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.47-7.78) institutions. More physicians with access to a novel biomarker reported satisfaction with current acute kidney injury diagnostics (66%) than physicians without access (48%); this finding approached significance (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of PICU attending physicians surveyed are not using recent acute kidney injury guidelines or diagnostic criteria in their practice. There is a positive association between awareness and clinical use of acute kidney injury guidelines. Serum creatinine and urine output are still the primary diagnostics; novel biomarkers are frequently unavailable.

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Protection of the Kidney--A Novel Therapeutic Option

OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury is a common complication in critically ill patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Sepsis, major surgery, and nephrotoxic drugs are the most common causes of acute kidney injury. There is currently no effective strategy available to prevent or treat acute kidney injury. Therefore, novel treatment regimens are required to decrease acute kidney injury prevalence and to improve clinical outcomes. Remote ischemic preconditioning, triggered by brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion applied in distant tissues or organs before the injury of the target organ, attempts to invoke adaptive responses that protect against acute kidney injury. We sought to evaluate the clinical evidence for remote ischemic preconditioning as a potential strategy to protect the kidney and to review the underlying mechanisms in light of recent studies.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed for studies reporting the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney function in surgical patients (search terms: "remote ischemic preconditioning," "kidney function," and "surgery"). We also reviewed bibliographies of relevant articles to identify additional citations.

STUDY SELECTION

Published studies, consisting of randomized controlled trials, are reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

The authors used consensus to summarize the evidence behind the use of remote ischemic preconditioning.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In addition, the authors suggest patient populations and clinical scenarios in which remote ischemic preconditioning might be best applied.

CONCLUSIONS

Several experimental and clinical studies have shown tissue-protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in various target organs, including the kidneys. Remote ischemic preconditioning may offer a novel, noninvasive, and inexpensive treatment strategy for decreasing acute kidney injury prevalence in high-risk patients. Although many new studies have further advanced our knowledge in this area, the appropriate intensity of remote ischemic preconditioning, its mechanisms of action, and the role of biomarkers for patient selection and monitoring are still unknown.

Worldwide Opinion on Multicenter Randomized Interventions Showing Mortality Reduction in Critically Ill Patients: A Democracy-Based Medicine Approach

OBJECTIVES

Democracy-based medicine is a combination of evidence-based medicine (systematic review), expert assessment, and worldwide voting by physicians to express their opinions and self-reported practice via the Internet. The authors applied democracy-based medicine to key trials in critical care medicine.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A systematic review of literature followed by web-based voting on findings of a consensus conference.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 555 clinicians from 61 countries.

INTERVENTIONS

The authors performed a systematic literature review (via searching MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) and selected all multicenter randomized clinical trials in critical care that reported a significant effect on survival and were endorsed by expert clinicians. Then they solicited voting and self-reported practice on such evidence via an interactive Internet questionnaire. Relationships among trial sample size, design, and respondents' agreement were investigated. The gap between agreement and use/avoidance and the influence of country origin on physicians' approach to interventions also were investigated.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

According to 24 multicenter randomized controlled trials, 15 interventions affecting mortality were identified. Wide variabilities in both the level of agreement and reported practice among different interventions and countries were found. Moreover, agreement and reported practice often did not coincide. Finally, a positive correlation among agreement, trial sample size, and number of included centers was found. On the contrary, trial design did not influence clinicians' agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians' clinical practice and agreement with the literature vary among different interventions and countries. The role of these interventions in affecting survival should be further investigated to reduce both the gap between evidence and clinical practice and transnational differences.

Renal protection in cardiovascular surgery

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most relevant complications after major surgery and is a predictor of mortality. In Western countries, patients at risk of developing AKI are mainly those undergoing cardiovascular surgical procedures. In this category of patients, AKI depends on a multifactorial etiology, including low ejection fraction, use of contrast media, hemodynamic instability, cardiopulmonary bypass, and bleeding. Despite a growing body of literature, the treatment of renal failure remains mainly supportive (e.g. hemodynamic stability, fluid management, and avoidance of further damage); therefore, the management of patients at risk of AKI should aim at prevention of renal damage. Thus, the present narrative review analyzes the pathophysiology underlying AKI (specifically in high-risk patients), the preoperative risk factors that predispose to renal damage, early biomarkers related to AKI, and the strategies employed for perioperative renal protection. The most recent scientific evidence has been considered, and whenever conflicting data were encountered possible suggestions are provided.

Early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of early versus late renal replacement therapy (RRT) on mortality in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of 9 retrospective cohort studies and 2 randomized clinical trials extracted from the Medline engine from 1950 to 2013.

SETTING

University medical school.

PARTICIPANTS

841 Patients.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 841 patients were studied. Pooled estimates of the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval using a random-effect model were conducted as well as the heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analysis. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcome was the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. The 28-days mortality rate was lower in the early RRT group (OR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16-0.52, p<0.0001, NNT = 5). Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 56%), and publication bias was low. Secondary outcome suggested 3.9 (1.5-6.3) days shorter ICU stay in the early RRT group, p<0.0001, with extremely high heterogeneity (I(2) = 99%), and low publication bias. Specifically, studies before 2000 and studies with mortality less than 50% in the late RRT group reported significantly higher odds ratio and mean difference than overall value favoring early RRT.

CONCLUSION

Early initiation of RRT for patients with AKI after cardiac surgery revealed lower 28-days mortality and shorter ICU length of stay. However, this was based on 11 studies of various qualities with very high heterogeneity of results. Defining treatment guidelines needs further research with a larger and better database.

Aspirin and clonidine in non-cardiac surgery: acute kidney injury substudy protocol of the Perioperative Ischaemic Evaluation (POISE) 2 randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative Ischaemic Evaluation-2 (POISE-2) is an international 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial of low-dose aspirin versus placebo and low-dose clonidine versus placebo in patients who undergo non-cardiac surgery. Perioperative aspirin (and possibly clonidine) may reduce the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

After receipt of grant funding, serial postoperative serum creatinine measurements began to be recorded in consecutive patients enrolled at substudy participating centres. With respect to the study schedule, the last of over 6500 substudy patients from 82 centres in 21 countries were randomised in December 2013. The authors will use logistic regression to estimate the adjusted OR of AKI following surgery (compared with the preoperative serum creatinine value, a postoperative increase ≥26.5 μmol/L in the 2 days following surgery or an increase of ≥50% in the 7 days following surgery) comparing each intervention to placebo, and will report the adjusted relative risk reduction. Alternate definitions of AKI will also be considered, as will the outcome of AKI in subgroups defined by the presence of preoperative chronic kidney disease and preoperative chronic aspirin use. At the time of randomisation, a subpopulation agreed to a single measurement of serum creatinine between 3 and 12 months after surgery, and the authors will examine intervention effects on this outcome.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The authors were competitively awarded a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for this POISE-2 AKI substudy. Ethics approval was obtained for additional kidney data collection in consecutive patients enrolled at participating centres, which first began for patients enrolled after January 2011. In patients who provided consent, the remaining longer term serum creatinine data will be collected throughout 2014. The results of this study will be reported no later than 2015.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01082874.