1
|
Nainani VK, Arcia B, Pilcher D, Ihle J, Diehl A, Radford S, D'Costa R, Nanjayya VB. Organ donation from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and ventricular assist devices in Victoria, Australia: Characteristics and trends. CRIT CARE RESUSC 2025; 27:100102. [PMID: 40143832 PMCID: PMC11938037 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2025.100102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2025] [Revised: 02/05/2025] [Accepted: 02/05/2025] [Indexed: 03/28/2025]
Abstract
Objective To describe the characteristics and the trend of organ donation from donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Design Retrospective, observational, cohort study from June 2014 to June 2021. Setting A multicentre study in Victoria, Australia, using DonateLife Victoria databases. Participants All patients on ECMO/LVAD were referred to DonateLife for organ donation. Main outcome measures Number, proportion, time trend and type of organ donations from the patients on ECMO/LVAD. Results There were 78 donor referrals [mean (SD) age 42 (18.8) yrs, 56 (72 %) males] from patients on Veno-arterial ECMO (73 %), Veno-venous ECMO (16 %) or LVAD (6.4 %), of which 37 (47 %) donated. The annual median (IQR) referral and donation rates were 8 (5-10)/year and 4 (3-7)/year, respectively. Medical contraindications were the main reason for declining organ donation [21(51 %)]. Donation after neurological determination of death (DNDD) occurred in 20 (54 %), and donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) in 17 (46 %). The median (IQR) time from admission to referral for donation was longer in DCDD compared to DNDD patients. Eighty-three organs were retrieved from 37 donors (2.24 organs per donor), out of which 68 organs (82 %) were transplanted in 68 recipients. Kidneys were the most common organs retrieved (73 %) and transplanted (79 %). Conclusion Organ donation on ECMO/LVAD occurs only in half of the referred patients. Further studies are needed to ascertain the barriers to donations and to assess the long-term outcomes of these donations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viveka K. Nainani
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Byron Arcia
- DonateLife, The Australian Organ and Tissue Authority, ACT, Australia
| | - David Pilcher
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- DonateLife Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joshua Ihle
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- DonateLife Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arne Diehl
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Samuel Radford
- DonateLife Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rohit D'Costa
- DonateLife Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vinodh B. Nanjayya
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Carlis R, Buscemi V, Checchini G, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Pagnanelli M, Lauterio A, De Carlis L. Liver transplantation from brain-dead donors on mechanical circulatory support: a systematic review of the literature. Transpl Int 2021; 34:5-15. [PMID: 33037727 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) refers to a range of rescue devices to assist circulation for the treatment of heart failure, including venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VADs). This review aims at evaluating the transplant outcome of the livers procured from brain-dead donors on MCS, who are currently considered as having extended criteria. We identified 22 records (17 on VA-ECMO and 5 on VADs), most of which (68.2%) were case reports. We performed a meta-analysis only when the outcome was reported homogeneously among studies; otherwise, we illustrated the results with narrative synthesis. A total of 156 liver transplants (LTs) have been reported, where VA-ECMO was initiated in the donor with resuscitative intent or as a bridge to donation. Early graft survival approached 100% in most studies. The pooled rate of primary nonfunction was 1% (95% CI: 0-3%). Only three successful LTs from VAD donors have been reported. Particular attention should be paid to cardiological history, biochemical tests, and imaging, as well as MCS parameters, to determine graft eligibility for transplantation. Although further analysis is needed in this field, the results of this review advocate a more systematic consideration of brain-dead patients on MCS as potential liver donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Buscemi
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuliana Checchini
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Pagnanelli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|