Pro: Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Should be an Integral Component of Anesthesiology Residency Training

Competencies for proficiency in basic point-of-care ultrasound in anesthesiology: national expert recommendations using Delphi methodology

PURPOSE

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) allows for rapid bedside assessment and guidance of patient care. Recently, POCUS was included as a mandatory component of Canadian anesthesiology training; however, there is no national consensus regarding the competencies to guide curriculum development. We therefore aimed to define national residency competencies for basic perioperative POCUS proficiency.

METHODS

We adopted a Delphi process to delineate relevant POCUS competencies whereby we circulated an online survey to academic anesthesiologists identified as POCUS leads/experts (n = 25) at all 17 Canadian anesthesiology residency programs. After reviewing a list of competencies derived from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada's National Curriculum, we asked participants to accept, refine, delete, or add competencies. Three rounds were completed between 2022 and 2023. We discarded items with < 50% agreement, revised those with 50-79% agreement based upon feedback provided, and maintained unrevised those items with ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

We initially identified and circulated (Round 1) 74 competencies across 19 clinical domains (e.g., basics of ultrasound [equipment, nomenclature, clinical governance, physics]; cardiac [left ventricle, right ventricle, valve assessment, pericardial effusion, intravascular volume status] and lung ultrasound anatomy, image acquisition, and image interpretation; and clinical applications [monitoring and serial assessments, persistent hypotension, respiratory distress, cardiac arrest]). After three Delphi rounds (and 100% response rate maintained), panellists ultimately agreed upon 75 competencies.

CONCLUSION

Through national expert consensus, this study identified POCUS competencies suitable for curriculum development and assessment in perioperative anesthesiology. Next steps include designing and piloting a POCUS curriculum and assessment tool(s) based upon these nationally defined competencies.

Graduate Medical Education Can Be an Impetus for Behavior Changes in Physicians in Practice: Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Faculty Development Intervention in Anesthesiology

INTRODUCTION

While there is growing evidence to suggest that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may aid in clinical decision-making in the perioperative setting and there are new requirements that anesthesiology residents must be trained in POCUS, few practicing anesthesiologists use POCUS in their practice. The goal of this investigation is to determine whether a multifaceted faculty development program helps a group of faculty members incorporate POCUS into their practice.

METHODS

This intervention had five parts: (1) online prework, (2) 2-day workshop, (3) follow-up hands-on sessions, (4) regular communication, and (5) equipment acquisition. This is a pretest/posttest, single group, observational study where the main outcome measure is the number of POCUS examinations documented and the number of providers who performed at least one examination. In addition, presurveys and postsurveys were administered to determine whether there was a change in confidence and self-reported use of POCUS.

RESULTS

The number of examinations completed and the number of providers completing examinations by month both seemed to increase over time between May 2017 and October 2018. Between August 2017 and October 2018, the number of examinations completed per month increased by a rate of approximately one examination per month (starting with one examination in May 2017) and the number of providers completing examinations increased by a rate of approximately 0.61 providers per month (staring with one provider in May 2017).

DISCUSSION

This study shows that an intervention that targets interested faculty can increase the use of POCUS in practice and residents' perceptions of teaching.

An Approach to Standard Perioperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Practice for Anesthesiologists-Perioperative Transthoracic Echocardiography Protocols

The use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become the standard of care for most cardiac surgical procedures. There are guidelines established for training, practice, and quality improvement in perioperative TEE by the joint efforts of the American Society of Echocardiography and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) increasingly is being incorporated into anesthesiologists' training and practice. While a special "certification in Critical Care Echocardiography" was created by the National Board of Echocardiography in 2019, there currently exist no guidelines for training, certification, and practice of perioperative TTE by anesthesiologists. In this review, the authors describe the categories, indications and applications of perioperative TTE and provide a recommended sequence for performing an examination tailored to the evaluation of perioperative patients. Although the authors describe a protocol utilized at their institution, there are no standards described in the literature for PTTE. Cardiac anesthesiologists and cardiac anesthesia societies (Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiologists) must come forward to establish standards working in collaboration with echocardiography societies (American Society of Echocardiography, European Society of Cardiology).

Tracheal, Lung, and Diaphragmatic Applications of M-Mode Ultrasonography in Anesthesiology and Critical Care

Today, proficiency in cardiopulmonary ultrasound is considered essential for anesthesiologists and critical care physicians. Conventional 2-dimensional images, however, do not permit optimal characterization of specific conditions (eg, diaphragmatic paralysis, major atelectasis, and pneumothorax) that may have relevant clinical implications in critical care and perioperative settings. By contrast, M-mode (motion-based) ultrasonographic imaging modality offers the highest temporal resolution in ultrasonography; this modality, therefore, can provide important information in ultrasound-driven approaches performed by anesthesiologists and intensivists for diagnosis, monitoring, and procedural guidance. Despite its practicability, M-mode has been progressively abandoned in echocardiography and is often underused in lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound. This review describes contemporary applications of M-mode ultrasonography in the practice of critical care and perioperative medicine. Information presented for each clinical application includes image acquisition and interpretation, evidence-based clinical implications in critically ill and surgical patients, and main limitations. The article focuses on tracheal, lung, and diaphragmatic ultrasound. It reviews tracheal ultrasound for procedural guidance during endotracheal intubation, confirmation of correct tube placement, and detection of esophageal intubation; lung ultrasound for the confirmation of endotracheal and endobronchial (selective) intubation and for the diagnosis of pneumothorax, alveolar-interstitial syndrome (cardiogenic v noncardiogenic pulmonary edema), pulmonary consolidation (pneumonia v major atelectasis) and pleural effusion; and diaphragmatic ultrasound for the diagnosis of diaphragmatic dysfunction and prediction of extubation success.

[Knowledge retention after focused cardiac ultrasound training: a prospective cohort pilot study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) has proven instrumental in guiding anesthesiologists' clinical decision-making process. Training residents to perform and interpret FoCUS is both feasible and effective. However, the degree of knowledge retention after FoCUS training remains a subject of debate. We sought to provide a description of our 4-week FoCUS curriculum, and to assess the knowledge retention among anesthesia residents at 6 months after FoCUS rotation.

METHODS

A prospective analysis involving eleven senior anesthesia residents was carried out. At end of FoCUS Rotation (EOR) participants completed a questionnaire (evaluating the number of scans completed and residents' self-rated knowledge and comfort level with FoCUS), and a multiple-choice FoCUS exam comprised of written- and video-based questions. Six months later, participants completed a follow-up questionnaire and a similar exam. Self-rated knowledge and exam scores were compared at EOR and after 6 months. Spearman correlations were conducted to test the relationship between number of scans completed and exam scores, perceived knowledge and exam scores, and number of scans and perceived knowledge.

RESULTS

Mean exam scores (out of 50) were 44.1 at EOR and 43 at the 6-month follow-up. Residents had significantly higher perceived knowledge (out of 10) at EOR (8.0) than at the 6-month follow-up (5.5), p=0.003. At the EOR, all trainees felt comfortable using FoCUS, and at 6 months 10/11 still felt comfortable. All the trainees had used FoCUS in their clinical practice after EOR, and the most cited reason for not using FoCUS more frequently was the lack of perceived clinical need. A strong and statistically significant (rho=0.804, p=0.005) correlation between number of scans completed during the FoCUS rotation and 6-month follow-up perceived knowledge was observed.

CONCLUSION

Four weeks of intensive FoCUS training results in adequate knowledge acquisition and 6-month knowledge retention.

Echocardiographic Applications of M-Mode Ultrasonography in Anesthesiology and Critical Care

Proficiency in echocardiography and lung ultrasound has become essential for anesthesiologists and critical care physicians. Nonetheless, comprehensive echocardiography measurements often are time-consuming and technically challenging, and conventional 2-dimensional images do not permit evaluation of specific conditions (eg, systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve, pneumothorax), which have important clinical implications in the perioperative setting. M-mode (motion-based) ultrasonographic imaging, however, provides the most reliable temporal resolution in ultrasonography. Hence, M-mode can provide clinically relevant information in echocardiography and lung ultrasound-driven approaches for diagnosis, monitoring, and interventional procedures performed by anesthesiologists and intensivists. Although M-mode is feasible, this imaging modality progressively has been abandoned in echocardiography and is often underutilized in lung ultrasound. This article aims to comprehensively illustrate contemporary applications of M-mode ultrasonography in the anesthesia and critical care medicine practice. Information presented for each clinical application will include image acquisition and interpretation, evidence-based clinical implications in the critically ill and surgical patient, and limitations. The present article focuses on echocardiography and reviews left ventricular function (mitral annular plane systolic excursion, E-point septal separation, fractional shortening, and transmitral propagation velocity); right ventricular function (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, subcostal echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid annulus kick, outflow tract fractional shortening, ventricular septal motion, wall thickness, and outflow tract obstruction); volume status and responsiveness (inferior vena cava and superior vena cava diameter and respiratory variability [collapsibility and distensibility indexes]); cardiac tamponade; systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve; and aortic dissection.