Dynamic Variables Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in an Animal Model With Pericardial Effusion

Continuous Estimation of Acute Changes in Preload Using Epicardially Attached Accelerometers

OBJECTIVE

A miniaturized accelerometer can be incorporated in temporary pacemaker leads which are routinely attached to the epicardium during cardiac surgery and provide continuous monitoring of cardiac motion during and following surgery. We tested if such a sensor could be used to assess volume status, which is essential in hemodynamically unstable patients.

METHODS

An accelerometer was attached to the epicardium of 9 pigs and recordings performed during baseline, fluid loading, and phlebotomy in a closed chest condition. Alterations in left ventricular (LV) preload alter myocardial tension which affects the frequency of myocardial acceleration associated with the first heart sound ( f_S1). The accuracy of f_S1 as an estimate of preload was evaluated using sonomicrometry measured end-diastolic volume (EDV[Formula: see text]). Standard clinical estimates of global end-diastolic volume using pulse index continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) measurements (GEDV[Formula: see text]) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) were obtained for comparison. The diagnostic accuracy of identifying fluid responsiveness was analyzed for f_S1, stroke volume variation (SVV[Formula: see text]), pulse pressure variation (PPV[Formula: see text]), GEDV[Formula: see text], and PAOP.

RESULTS

Changes in f_S1 correlated well to changes in EDV[Formula: see text] ( r²=0.81, 95%CI: [0.68, 0.89]), as did GEDV[Formula: see text] ( r²=0.59, 95%CI: [0.36, 0.76]) and PAOP ( r²=0.36, 95%CI: [0.01, 0.73]). The diagnostic accuracy [95%CI] in identifying fluid responsiveness was 0.79 [0.66, 0.94] for f_S1, 0.72 [0.57, 0.86] for SVV[Formula: see text], and 0.63 (0.44, 0.82) for PAOP.

CONCLUSION

An epicardially placed accelerometer can assess changes in preload in real-time.

SIGNIFICANCE

This novel method can facilitate continuous monitoring of the volemic status in open-heart surgery patients and help guiding fluid resuscitation.

Diastolic Function and Peripheral Venous Pressure as Indices for Fluid Responsiveness in Cardiac Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVE

Identifying fluid responsiveness is critical to optimizing perfusion while preventing fluid overload. An experimental study of hypovolemic shock resuscitation showed the importance of ventricular compliance and peripheral venous pressure (PVP) on fluid responsiveness. The authors tested the hypothesis that reduced ventricular compliance measured using transesophageal echocardiography results in decreased fluid responsiveness after a fluid bolus.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Two-center, university hospital study.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 29 patients undergoing elective coronary revascularization.

INTERVENTION

Albumin 5%, 7 mL/kg, was infused over 10 minutes to characterize fluid responders (>15% increase in stroke volume) from nonresponders.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Invasive hemodynamics and the ratio of mitral inflow velocity (E-wave)/annular relaxation (e'), or E/e' ratio, were measured using transesophageal echocardiography to assess left ventricular (LV) compliance at baseline and after albumin infusion. Fifteen patients were classified as responders and 14 as nonresponders. The E/e' ratio in responders was 7.4 ± 1.9 at baseline and 7.1 ± 1.8 after bolus. In contrast, E/e' was significantly higher in nonresponders at baseline (10.7 ± 4.6; p = 0.04) and further increased after bolus (12.6 ± 5.5; p = 0.002). PVP was significantly greater in the nonresponders at baseline (14 ± 4 mmHg v 11 ± 3 mmHg; p = 0.02) and increased in both groups after albumin infusion. Fluid responsiveness was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and was 0.74 for the E/e' ratio (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.93; p = 0.029) and 0.72 for the PVP (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.92; p = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

Fluid responders had normal LV compliance and lower PVP at baseline. In contrast, nonresponders had reduced LV compliance, which worsened after fluid bolus. E/e,' more than PVP, may be a useful clinical index to predict fluid responsiveness.