Quality of Life in Relation to Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery

The long-term effects of prolonged intensive care stay postcardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Short-term outcomes for those with a prolonged length of stay (LOS) in intensive care (ITU) following cardiac surgery are poor, with higher rates of in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Consequently, discharge from hospital has been considered the key measure of success. However, there has been a shift towards long-term outcomes, functional recovery and quality of life (QoL) as measures of surgical quality. The aim of this review is to compare and critique the findings of multiple studies to determine the long-term effects of prolonged ITU stay postcardiac surgery.

METHODS

A computerized literature search of CINAHL, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases, based on keywords "long-term effects," "prolonged ITU stay," "cardiac surgery," with rigorous CASP critique was undertaken.

RESULTS

The search yielded 12 papers meeting the inclusion criteria, with eight retrospective and four prospective studies. Eight of these 12 papers identified inferior long-term survival or higher mortality rates for those who had prolonged LOS in ITU in comparison to "normal" LOS or a control. The greatest burden of mortality was 6 months to 1 year postdischarge. Three papers found that quality of life was adversely affected or worse for those who had experienced prolonged LOS in ITU.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is required to provide better quality evidence into QoL, following prolonged stay in ICU postcardiac surgery. The evidence reviewed suggests that the risk of mortality in this demographic of patients is higher, especially within the first year and, therefore, more frequent medical surveillance of these patients is recommended.

Survival, Quality of Life, and Functional Status Following Prolonged ICU Stay in Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Compared with noncardiac critical illness, critically ill postoperative cardiac surgical patients have different underlying pathophysiologies, are exposed to different processes of care, and thus may experience different outcome trajectories. Our objective was to systematically review the outcomes of cardiac surgical patients requiring prolonged intensive care with respect to survival, residential status, functional recovery, and quality of life in both hospital and long-term follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Dissertations and Theses Global up to July 21, 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they assessed hospital or long-term survival and/or patient-centered outcomes in adult patients with prolonged ICU stays following major cardiac surgery. After screening 10,159 citations, 114 articles were reviewed in full; a final 34 articles met criteria for data extraction.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Studies. Extracted data included the used definition of prolonged ICU stay, number and characteristics of prolonged ICU stay patients, and any comparator short stay group, length of follow-up, hospital and long-term survival, residential status, patient-centered outcome measure used, and relevant score.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The definition of prolonged ICU stay varied from 2 days to greater than 14 days. Twenty-eight studies observed greater in-hospital mortality among all levels of prolonged ICU stay. Twenty-five studies observed greater long-term mortality among all levels of prolonged ICU stay. Multiple tools were used to assess patient-centered outcomes. Long-term health-related quality of life and function was equivalent or worse with prolonged ICU stay.

CONCLUSIONS

We found consistent evidence that patients with increases in ICU length of stay beyond 48 hours have significantly increasing risk of hospital and long-term mortality. The significant heterogeneity in exposure and outcome definitions leave us unable to precisely quantify the risk of prolonged ICU stay on mortality and patient-centered outcomes.

Psychiatric disturbances in patients undergoing open-heart surgery

Background

Emotional and behavioral problems have been noted in a considerable number of patients after open-heart surgery. However, great discrepancy exists in the literature regarding the frequency and the course of psychiatric symptoms, cognitive performance, and quality of life among those patients. This prospective study was designed to assess the pre- and postoperative psychiatric profile, as well as the quality of life of patients undergoing open-heart surgery.

Methods

One hundred patients who were prepared for cardiac surgery and met our selection criteria were recruited in this study. Each patient was subjected to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination with selective subtests of Wechsler Adult intelligence scale, and the Short Form 36 questionnaire to assess psychiatric symptoms, cognitive performance, and quality of life respectively. Assessment was done for each of the evaluated items before surgery as well as at 1 week and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

The anxiety and depressive symptoms were significantly lower at 6 months postoperatively than preoperatively. The cognitive performance declined after 1 week, then improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up. The quality of life scale was significantly lower preoperatively than after surgery.

Conclusions

Anxiety and depressive symptoms, which occurred in substantial percentage of patients undergoing open-heart surgery, were gradually improved with time. Cognitive functions showed early deterioration with significant improvement at 6 months. Psychiatric problems had an adverse impact on patients’ quality of life which raised the importance of psychiatric consultation before and after cardiac surgeries to shorten recovery time.