Short- and Medium-Term Effects of Combined Mitral Valve Surgery and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Alone for Patients with Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of mitral valve repair in combination with coronary revascularization for moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of mitral valve repair (MVR) in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) remains unclear. To evaluate whether MVR + CABG is superior to CABG alone, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for eligible RCTs from the date of their inception to October 2023. The primary outcomes were operative (in-hospital or within 30 days) and long-term (≥ 1 year) mortality. The secondary outcomes were postoperative stroke, worsening renal function (WRF), and reoperation for bleeding or tamponade. The authors performed random-effects meta-analyses and reported the results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion. Compared with CABG alone, MVR + CABG did not increase the risk of operative mortality (RR, 1.244; 95% CI, 0.514-3.014); however, it was also not associated with a lower risk of long-term mortality (RR, 0.676; 95% CI, 0.417-1.097). Meanwhile, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative stroke (RR, 2.425; 95% CI, 0.743-7.915), WRF (RR, 1.257; 95% CI, 0.533-2.964), and reoperation for bleeding or tamponade (RR, 1.667; 95% CI, 0.527-5.270).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that MVR + CABG fails to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with moderate IMR compared to CABG alone.

Concomitant Valve Replacement and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Lessons from the Past, Guidance for the Future? A Mortality Analysis in 294 Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to analyze parameters influencing early and late mortality after concomitant valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, using early and long-term information from an institutionally available data registry, and to discuss the results in relation to the current treatment strategies and perspectives.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 294 patients after combined valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis and CABG surgery.

RESULTS

There were 201 men (68.4%) and 93 women (31.6%). Concurrent to the coronary artery bypass grafting, 238 patients (80.9%) underwent aortic-, 46 patients (15.6%) mitral- and 10 patients (3.4%) doublevalve replacement. Cumulative duration of follow up was 1007 patient-years (py) with a maximum of 94 months and was completed in 92.2% (271 cases). Overall hospital mortality (30 days) rate was 6.5% (n = 19). It was significantly higher in patients of female gender, older than 70 y, in those suffering preoperative myocardial infarction, presenting with an additive EuroScore > 8 and being hemodynamically unstable after the operation. Cumulative survival rate at 7.6 y was 78.6%. Determinants of prolonged survival were male gender, age at operation < 70 y, preoperative sinus rhythm, normal renal function, additive EuroScore < 8 and the use of internal thoracic artery for grafting. Subsequent multivariate analysis revealed preoperative atrial fibrillation (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 0.82-5.44, p: 0.01) and risk group of ES > 8 (HR: 3.63, 95% CI: 1.45-9.07, p < 0.01) as independent predictors for lower long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital mortality (30 d) was nearly 2.5-fold higher in female and/or older than 70 y patients. Preoperative atrial fibrillation and/ or a calculated ES > 8 were independent predisposing factors of late mortality for combined VR and CABG surgery. Tailoring the approach, with the employment of the newest techniques and hybrid procedures, to the individual patient clinical profile enables favorable outcomes for concomitant valvular disease and CAD, especially in high-risk patients.

Single or Combined Valve Surgery and Concomitant Right Coronary Artery Bypass through Right Anterior Minithoracotomy Approach

BACKGROUND

Patients with combined valve and coronary artery disease are commonly performed by standard median sternotomy approach for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve surgery. The purpose of this study is to describe our experience and show feasibility and safety of minimally invasive approach to single or combined valve pathology with single-vessel right coronary artery (RCA) disease, even if it is suitable to percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 28 consecutive patients who underwent single or combined valve surgery concomitant right CABG through right anterior minithoracotomy between February 2018 and December 2020. Preoperative evaluation, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 12 men and 16 women. The mean age was 71.46 ± 6.82 years. Ten patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping times were 117.6 ± 21.3 and 98.1 ± 22.6 minutes, respectively. The mean time to extubation was 9.7 ± 5.6 hours, the mean intensive care unit stay was 37.4 ± 14.6 hours, and the mean hospital stay was 6.9 ± 3.2 days. There was one patient who underwent reoperation for bleeding. There were no instances of postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, renal failure, or wound infection. The mean follow-up was 19 ± 2.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Presence of RCA lesion is not a contraindication for minimally invasive approach in cases who underwent single or combined valve surgery. Combined valve surgery and right CABG via right anterior minithoracotomy are a safe and feasible option to standard median sternotomy surgery, even if RCA lesions seem suitable for stenting.

Effect of concurrent mitral valve surgery for secondary mitral regurgitation upon mortality after aortic valve replacement or coronary artery bypass surgery

Objectives

It is uncertain whether concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement for moderate or greater secondary mitral regurgitation at the time of coronary artery bypass graft or aortic valve replacement surgery improves long-term survival.

Methods

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or aortic valve replacement surgery with moderate or greater secondary mitral regurgitation were reviewed. The effect of concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement upon long-term mortality was assessed while accounting for patient and operative characteristics and mitral regurgitation severity.

Results

Of 1,515 patients, 938 underwent coronary artery bypass graft or aortic valve replacement surgery alone and 577 underwent concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement. Concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement did not alter the risk of postoperative mortality for patients with moderate mitral regurgitation (hazard ratio = 0.93; 0.75-1.17) or more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation (hazard ratio = 1.09; 0.74-1.60) in multivariable regression. Patients with more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass graft-only surgery had a survival advantage from concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement in the first two postoperative years (P = 0.028) that did not persist beyond that time. Patients who underwent concurrent mitral valve repair or replacement had a higher rate of later mitral valve operation or reoperation over the five subsequent years (1.9% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.0014) than those who did not.

Conclusions

These observations suggest that mitral valve repair or replacement for more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting may be reasonable in a suitably selected coronary artery bypass graft population but not for aortic valve replacement, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting. Our findings are supportive of 2021 European guidelines that severe secondary mitral regurgitation "should" or be "reasonabl[y]" intervened upon at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting but do not support 2020 American guidelines for performing mitral valve repair or replacement concurrent with aortic valve replacement, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting.

Clinical analysis of coronary artery bypass grafting and concurrent cardiac valve surgery in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the clinical effects and perioperative treatment experience of elderly patients with valvular heart disease combined with coronary heart disease undergoing cardiac valve surgery (CVS) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) concurrently.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients with heart valve disease and coronary heart disease, aged over 65 and who underwent CVS and CABG concurrently between January 2016 and December 2020, were enrolled in this study. The clinical indexes related to cardiac function before and after surgery, early postoperative complications, and prognosis were analyzed retrospectively to explore the clinical effects and perioperative treatment experience of elderly patients undergoing these two procedures concurrently.

RESULTS

All patients were reexamined by echocardiography one month after surgery. The results showed that the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, cardiothoracic ratio, and troponin-I levels were significantly lower than before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The echocardiography revealed that the left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular fractional shortening were larger than before surgery, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

It is feasible and effective for elderly patients to undergo CVS and CABG concurrently. Perioperative management can reduce mortality, achieving good clinical effects.

Combined Degenerative Mitral Valve and Coronary Surgery: Early Outcomes and 10-Year Survival

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the impact of combined degenerative mitral valve (DMV) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG+DMV) surgery vs DMV surgery only on in-hospital health outcome and 10-year survival.

METHODS

We identified 745 patients with DMV disease. Of these, 186 (24.9%) were affected also by coronary disease and underwent combined DMV+CABG. They were compared with the remaining 559 patients receiving DMV-only surgery in in-hospital and 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival. We evaluated a short-term composite outcome of hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, cerebrovascular events, and low cardiac output requiring postoperative use of intraaortic balloon pump. In addition, we assessed mitral valve repair rates over time and their correlation with long-term survival. To minimize bias, we conducted a propensity score-matching analysis.

RESULTS

DMV+CABG surgery was associated with a similar incidence of the composite end point compared with DMV-only surgery in the unmatched analysis (6.5% vs 5.4%, P = .71) and matched analysis (7.5% vs 8.2%, P = .82). The 10-year survival was 70.5% vs 68.6% (P = .07) for the unmatched analysis and 64.6% vs 62.5% (P = .9) for the matched analysis, DMV+CABG vs DMV-only, respectively. Mitral valve repair had a beneficial effect on short-term outcomes and long-term mortality rates, regardless the presence of concomitant coronary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined DMV+CABG surgery is a very effective surgical treatment with high mitral valve repair rate. Early in-hospital outcome and long-term survival are comparable with DMV-only surgery. In these combined procedures, mitral valve repair is associated with better long-term survival.