Avoiding the Internal Mammary Artery During Parasternal Blocks: Ultrasound Identification and Technique Considerations

Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Moderate-to-severe pain is common after cardiac surgery, peaking during the first and second postoperative days. Several nerve blocks for sternotomy have been described; however, the optimal location for continuous catheters has not been established. This study assessed the feasibility of a larger trial evaluating the efficacy of serratus anterior plane (SAP) catheter analgesia for sternotomy pain.

METHODS

This double-blinded trial included patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. Bilateral SAP catheters were placed in all participants, and randomised to ropivacaine or placebo. We assessed feasibility based on predetermined endpoints: (1) average recruitment rate >4 per month; (2) protocol adherence rate >90%; (3) primary outcome measurement rate >90%; and (4) significant catheter-related adverse event rate ≤2%. The quality of recovery index (QoR-15) was compared using an independent t-test.

RESULTS

Of 52 participants randomised, feasibility data were available for 50. A definitive study was deemed 'not feasible' in our standalone centre owing to a low recruitment rate (2.4 per month) and a high adverse event rate (pneumothorax rate 12%). There were no major protocol deviations but minor deviations in 12% of participants. Pain, opioid consumption, complications, and quality of recovery were not different between groups. Long-term pain at 3 months was low in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-centre trial was deemed not feasible for our setting. With limited data, the quality of recovery was not different with ropivacaine dosing of bilateral SAP catheters for sternotomy pain.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04648774.

Advances in Anesthesia Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: An Expert Opinion

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) often leads to severe postoperative pain. At present, multimodal analgesia schemes for MICS have attracted much attention, and the application of various chest wall analgesia techniques is becoming increasingly widespread. However, research on anesthesia techniques for postoperative pain management in MICS remains relatively limited at present. We searched for relevant literature and summarized recent related research in eight MICS techniques, including thoracic epidural anesthesia, spinal anesthesia, thoracic paravertebral plane block, erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, pectoral nerve block, intercostal nerve block, and parasternal block. This article provides an overview of the anatomy and procedures involved in these analgesic techniques, their mechanisms of action, and the latest clinical trial evidence. It also evaluates their progress in MICS, compares their advantages and disadvantages, and discusses practical challenges.

A Retrospective Review of the Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy

Background/Objectives: Regional anesthesia is an important part of Enhanced Recovery after Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) protocols designed to enhance analgesia, reduce opioid use, and improve postoperative outcomes. The deep parasternal intercostal plane (Deep-PIP) block is a fascial plane block in which local anesthetics are injected between the intercostal and transversus thoracis muscles to block neural transmission through the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerve. This study evaluates the impact of the Deep-PIP block in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into cohorts of 232 patients who had a block (BLOCK group) and 351 patients who did not receive a block (NOBlock group) using propensity score matching. Pain scores and opioid consumption over 24 h, extubation times, and ICU and hospital length of stay were compared for the two groups. Several subgroup analyses were also performed to evaluate the effects of block technique and block adjuvants. Results: While there was not a statistically significant difference in opioid consumption between the two groups, the BLOCK group had significantly lower pain scores, extubation times, and hospital length of stay. The subgroup analyses showed that modifications to block technique and use of block adjuvants were associated with reduced opioid consumption, but did not significantly affect pain scores, extubation time, or ICU or hospital length of stay. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the benefits of the deep parasternal intercostal plane block as part of an ERACS protocol. Routine implementation of the Deep-PIP block is reasonable given its potential benefits combined with its positive safety profile.

Perspectives on the Role of Thoracic Fascial Blocks in Cardiac Anaesthesia: Will They Represent a New Era?

Cardiac surgery is continuously evolving, with increasing skills required by the cardiac anaesthesiologist. Following the advent of intraoperative echocardiography, we are witnessing a potential new revolution for the cardiac anaesthesiologist. A new era has indeed started with the implementation of thoracic fascial blocks (TFBs) in the field of cardiac surgery. TFBs provide several advantages in the context of multimodal analgesia, with improved pain control and reduction of the side effects related to large doses of opioids. We envisage that implementation of TFBs is likely to become a pivotal concept in the field of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery. We describe the main TFBs for the anterior and/or antero-lateral chest wall, and their peculiar use in cardiac surgery. In particular, we discuss indications and tips and tricks to enhance clinical results for the following blocks: (1) Pecto-Intercostal Plane (superficial and deep); (2) Rectus Sheath; (3) Interpectoral Plane and Pectoserratus Plane; (4) Serratus Anterior Plane; (5) Erector Spinae Plane. Nonetheless, the scientific evidence for the use of TFBs in the field of cardiac anaesthesia is not robust yet, mostly based on small-sized single-centre studies, making it difficult to achieve a high quality of evidence. Further, it remains unclear which cardiac surgery patients may benefit the most from these techniques.

Serum Levels of Bupivacaine After Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate systemic levels of bupivacaine after bilateral ultrasound-guided deep parasternal intercostal plan (PIP) block in cardiac surgical patients undergoing median sternotomy.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study SETTING: Single institution; academic university hospital PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with median sternotomy received a PIP block with 2.5 mg/kg bupivacaine with or without dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine.

MEASUREMENTS

Arterial blood samples were analyzed for total serum bupivacaine concentration at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after placement of PIP. Local anesthetic volume, local anesthetic adjuncts, time to extubation, postoperative pain scores, and opioid consumption were recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

The mean peak bupivacaine concentration was 0.60 ± 0.62 µg/mL, and the mean time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was 16.92 ± 12.97 minutes. Two patients (7.1%) had a concentration >2.0 µg/mL within 15 minutes of block placement. The mean Tmax of bupivacaine was significantly greater in patients who did not receive additives compared to those patients who did (22.86 ± 14.77 minutes v 10.0 ± 5.22 minutes; p = .004). The times to extubation and postoperative pain were not improved with additives.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral PIP placed at the end of cardiac surgery resulted in low systemic bupivacaine levels. The inclusion of additives shortened Tmax without improving outcome.

Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks: a cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

The optimal techniques of a parasternal intercostal plane (PIP) block to cover the T2-T6 intercostal nerves have not been elucidated. This pilot cadaveric study aims to determine the optimal injection techniques that achieve a consistent dye spread over the second to sixth intercostal spaces after both ultrasound-guided superficial and deep PIP blocks. We also investigated the presence of the transversus thoracis muscle at the first to sixth intercostal spaces and its sonographic identification agreement, as well as the location of the internal thoracic artery in relation to the lateral border of the sternum.

METHODS

Ultrasound-guided superficial or deep PIP blocks with single, double, or triple injections were applied in 24 hemithoraces (three hemithoraces per technique). A total volume of dye for all techniques was 20 mL. On dissection, dye distribution over the first to sixth intercostal spaces, the presence of the transversus thoracis muscle at each intercostal space and the distance of the internal thoracic artery from the lateral sternal border were recorded.

RESULTS

The transversus thoracis muscles were consistently found at the second to sixth intercostal spaces, and the agreement between sonographic identification and the presence of the transversus thoracis muscles was >80% at the second to fifth intercostal spaces. The internal thoracic artery is located medial to the halfway between the sternal border and costochondral junction along the second to sixth intercostal spaces. Dye spread following the superficial PIP block was more localized than the deep PIP block. For both approaches, the more numbers of injections rendered a wider dye distribution. The numbers of stained intercostal spaces after superficial block at the second, fourth, and fifth intercostal spaces, and deep block at the third and fifth intercostal spaces were 5.3±1.2 and 5.7±0.6 levels, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Triple injections at the second, fourth, and fifth intercostal spaces for the superficial approach and double injections at the third and fifth intercostal spaces for the deep approach were optimal techniques of the PIP blocks.

Randomized clinical trial of continuous transversus thoracis muscle plane block for patients undergoing open heart valve replacement surgery

The optimal analgesia regimen after open cardiac surgery is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the beneficial effects of continuous transversus thoracis muscle plane (TTMP) blocks initiated before surgery on open cardiac surgery outcomes. A group of 110 patients were randomly allocated to either receive bilateral continuous TTMP blocks (TTP group) or no nerve block (SAL group). The primary endpoint was post-operative pain at 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h after extubation at rest and exercise. The secondary outcome measures included analgesia requirements (sufentanil and flurbiprofen axetil administration), time to extubation, incidence of reintubation, length of stay in the ICU, incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time until return of bowel function, time to mobilization, urinary catheter removal and length of hospital stay. The length of stay in the ICU and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in the SAL group than in the TTP group. NRS scores at rest and exercise were significantly lower in the TTP group than in the SAL group at all time points. The TTP group required significantly less intraoperative and post-operative sufentanil and post-operative dynastat consumption than the SAL group. Time to extubation, time to first flatus, time until mobilization and time until urinary catheter removal were significantly earlier in the TTP group than in the SAL group. The incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the TTP group. Bilateral continuous TTMP blocks provide effective analgesia and accelerate recovery in patients undergoing open heart valve replacement surgery.

Fascial plane blocks for cardiothoracic surgery: a narrative review

In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the limitations and risks associated with the overreliance on opioids in various surgical procedures, including cardiothoracic surgery.This shift on pain management toward reducing reliance on opioids, together with need to improve patient outcomes, alleviate suffering, gain early mobilization after surgery, reduce hospital stay, and improve patient satisfaction and functional recovery, has led to the development and widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.In this context, fascial plane blocks are emerging as part of a multimodal analgesic in cardiac surgery and as alternatives to conventional neuraxial blocks for thoracic surgery, and there is a growing body of evidence suggesting their effectiveness and safety in providing pain relief for these procedures. In this review, we discuss the most common fascial plane block techniques used in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, offering a comprehensive overview of regional anesthesia techniques and presenting the latest evidence on the use of chest wall plane blocks specifically in this surgical setting.

Preemptive deep parasternal intercostal plane block for perioperative analgesia in coronary artery bypass grafting with sternotomy: a randomized, observer-blind, controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The precise characteristics of deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP), which is useful for providing analgesia during open heart surgery, have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. In this study, we aimed to establish the efficacy, define the cutaneous sensory block area, and determine the duration of preemptive DPIP block at the T3-4 or T4-5 intercostal spaces in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via sternotomy.

DESIGN

A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Patients were randomly divided into three cohorts, each containing thirty patients.

PARTICIPANTS

Ninety patients who underwent elective CABG via sternotomy were included in this study.

INTERVENTIONS

The T3-4 and T4-5 groups received a preoperative single-shot DPIP block at the respective intercostal spaces. The principal objective of the study was to ascertain the optimal dosage of sufentanil administered during surgical procedures involving either a DPIP block or its absence, and to conduct a comparative analysis thereof across distinct injection sites, specifically T3-4 and T4-5. Secondary factors considered were the dosage of postoperative analgesics, the extent of sensory block on the skin, pain levels after extubation, time of recovery from anesthesia (time to extubation), duration of the block, and the occurrence of nausea and vomiting.

MEASUREMENTS & MAIN RESULTS

Preemptive DPIP block significantly reduced intraoperative sufentanil requirement compared to the control group (T3-4:0.38 ± 0.1, T4-5:0.32 ± 0.10, vs. Control:0.88 ± 0.3 μg/kg/h, p < 0.001). It also resulted in decreased analgesic consumption and numeric rating scale scores on the day of surgery (p < 0.01 compared to the control group). The DPIP block provided accurate anesthetic coverage of the dermatomes in the sternal region and reduced the time to extubation and postoperative nausea. However, the injection point (either via the T3-4 intercostal or the T4-5 intercostal) did not affect the efficacy. Preoperative DPIP block failed to provide adequate analgesia beyond 24 h post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive bilateral DPIP block provided effective analgesia in patients undergoing CABG during surgery and in the early postoperative period. The analgesic effects of the DPIP block in the T3-4 and T4-5 intercostal spaces were comparable.

Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery-A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the analgesic efficacy of postoperative deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) blocks for patients having cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

DESIGN

This single-center retrospective study compared patients receiving bilateral DPIP blocks with a matched cohort of patients not receiving DPIP blocks.

SETTING

Large quaternary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients admitted to the authors' institution from January 1, 2016, to August 14, 2020, for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received ultrasound-guided bilateral DPIP blocks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 113 patients received a DPIP block; 3,461 patients did not. The estimated multiplicative change in cumulative opioid consumption through 24 hours was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32-0.56; p < 0.001), indicating that patients receiving DPIP blocks required 60% fewer opioids than patients who did not. Proportional odds ratios for the average pain score on postoperative day (POD) 0 was 0.46 (95% CI 0.32-0.65; p < 0.001), and POD 1 was 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.94; p = 0.021), indicating lower pain scores for patients receiving blocks. The exploratory analysis identified an inverse correlation between DPIP blocks and atrial fibrillation incidence (2% v 15%; inverse probability of treatment weighting odds ratio 0.088, 95% CI 0.02-0.41; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DPIP blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy was associated with less opioid use and improved pain scores in the early postoperative period compared with patients not receiving blocks. Prospective randomized controlled studies should further elucidate the efficacy and risks of DPIP blocks in cardiac surgery.

The effect of different nerve block strategies on the quality of post-operative recovery in breast cancer patients: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of three types of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks on post-operative recovery quality in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blinded trial (chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2200059428), 150 female patients were equally assigned to S group (serratus anterior plane block, SAPB) group, P group (paravertebral block, PVB) or ST group (serratus anterior combined with transverse thoracic muscle plane blocks, SA-TTMPB). The primary outcome was QoR-15 at five time points after surgery. Secondary outcomes were pain scores, time of first rescue analgesic and chronic pain incidence at 3 months.

RESULTS

The QoR-15 total score of S group at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days post-surgery was significantly lower in groups P and ST, while there was no significant difference between groups P and ST (S vs. P vs. ST, 100.29 ± 6.20 vs. 108.51 ± 7.46 vs. 106.46 ± 6.95; 105.59 ± 6.18 vs. 113.06 ± 7.44 vs. 111.22 ± 6.56; 112.51 ± 6.32 vs. 119.88 ± 6.44 vs. 117.62 ± 6.09; 123.00 ± 5.78 vs. 128.86 ± 5.96 vs. 126.92 ± 5.72, p < 0.05). The dynamic and rest NRS scores at 6 and 12 h post-surgery were significantly higher in group S than in groups P and ST.

CONCLUSION

Serratus anterior plane block combined with transverse thoracic muscle plane block and paravertebral block both have better effects than serratus anterior plane block alone in improving patients' early post-operative recovery quality, and also have an advantage in improving early post-operative pain.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200059428).

DATE OF REGISTRATION

29 April 2022.

SIGNIFICANCE

Serratus anterior combined with transverse thoracic muscle plane block may be a safer, easier, and equally effective nerve block strategy than paravertebral block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.

Which ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for post-sternotomy pain? Results from a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Parasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.

METHODS

We designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.

RESULTS

Ninety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00-3.00), 2.00 (0.00-5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60-30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.

Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block, Along with Improved Parasternal Block, is Superior to Serratus Anterior Plane Block Alone in Relieving Pain for Rhinoplasty with Autologous Costal Cartilage

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty with autologous costal cartilage (ACC) is followed by severe pain in the chest. Ultrasound-guided (USG) serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), in combination with parasternal block (PSB), was earlier reported to be highly efficacious in relieving pain associated with thoracic anterior lateral surgery. However, it is unclear whether it is effective for pain relief after ACC harvest.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients, aged 18 to 60, who received rhinoplasty with ACC, were randomly separated into a SAPB+PSB or SAPB group. The analyzed parameters of both groups included the rest and coughing numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores of the chest and the NRS pain scores of the nose at postoperative 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours, oral rescue analgesic usage, side effect incidence and patient satisfaction, etc. RESULTS: Thirty patients per group were recruited for analysis. The rest and coughing NRS scores of the chest and the NRS scores of the nose at postoperative 2, 4, 8, 12 h were lower in the SAPB+PSB group, compared to the SAPB group (all P < 0.05). However, these scores were comparable between the two groups at postoperative 24 and 48 h (all P > 0.05). Additionally, relative to the SAPB group, the oral rescue analgesic usage was drastically lower (P < 0.05), the postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence was diminished (P < 0.05), and the patient satisfaction was markedly higher (P < 0.001) in the SAPB+PSB group.

CONCLUSION

USG-SAPB, in combination with improved PSB, is superior to SAPB alone in relieving pain after ACC harvest in rhinoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Parasternal intercostal plane block catheters for cardiac surgery: a retrospective, propensity weighted, cohort study

Aim: Anesthesia for cardiac surgery has evolved toward fast-track recovery strategies incorporating non opioid analgesics and regional anesthesia. Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort study compared opioid consumption, pain scores and length of stay in patients who underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy and did or did not receive preoperative parasternal intercostal plane block catheters with postoperative ropivacaine infusions. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores did not differ. Blocks were associated with decreased intraoperative opioids and reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Conclusion: Parasternal intercostal plane block catheters were not associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption or pain scores, but were associated with reduced intraoperative opioids and length of stay.

Regional anesthesia as part of enhanced recovery strategies in pediatric cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review article was to highlight the enhanced recovery protocols in pediatric cardiac surgery, including early extubation, rapid mobilization and recovery, reduction of opioid-related side effects, and length of pediatric ICU and hospital stay, resulting in decreased costs and perioperative morbidity, by introducing recent trends in perioperative anesthesia management combined with peripheral nerve blocks.

RECENT FINDINGS

Efficient postoperative pain relief is essential for realizing enhanced recovery strategies, especially in pediatric patients. It has been reported that approaches to perioperative pain management using additional peripheral nerve blocks ensure early extubation and a shorter duration of ICU and hospital stay. This article provides an overview of several feasible musculofascial plane blocks to achieve fast-track anesthesia management for pediatric cardiac surgery.

SUMMARY

Recent remarkable advances in combined ultrasound techniques have made it possible to perform various peripheral nerve blocks. The major strategy underlying fast-track anesthesia management is to achieve good analgesia while reducing perioperative opioid use. Furthermore, it is important to consider early extubation not only as a competition for time to extubation but also as the culmination of a qualitative improvement in the outcome of treatment for each patient.

An Expert Review of Chest Wall Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery

The recent integration of regional anesthesia techniques into the cardiac surgical patient population has become a component of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery pathways. Fascial planes of the chest wall enable single-injection or catheter-based infusions to spread local anesthetic over multiple levels of innervation. Although median sternotomy remains a common approach to cardiac surgery, minimally invasive techniques have integrated additional methods of performing cardiac surgery. Understanding the surgical approach and chest wall innervation is crucial to success in choosing the appropriate chest wall block. Parasternal intercostal plane techniques (previously termed "pectointercostal fascial plane" and "transversus thoracic muscle plane") provide anterior chest and ipsilateral sternal coverage. Anterolateral chest wall coverage is feasible with the interpectoral plane and pectoserratus plane blocks (previously termed "pectoralis") and superficial and deep serratus anterior plane blocks. The erector spinae plane block provides extensive coverage of the ipsilateral chest wall. Any of these techniques has the potential to provide bilateral chest wall analgesia. The relative novelty of these techniques requires ongoing research to be strategic, thoughtful, and focused on clinically meaningful outcomes to enable widespread evidence-based implementation. This review article discusses the key perspectives for performing and assessing chest wall blocks in a cardiac surgical population.

Analgesic Efficacy of an Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Thoracis Plane Block Combined with an Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block on Postoperative Pain Relief After Trans-Areolar Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: A Single Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus thoracis plane block (TTPB) combined with intermediate cervical plexus block (ICPB) in the early postoperative period after trans-areolar endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Patients and Methods

A total of 62 female patients undergoing trans-areolar endoscopic thyroidectomy were randomly classified to the TTPB combined with ICPB group with ropivacaine (block group) or superficial cervical plexus block group (control group). The primary outcome measures were resting visual analogue scale (VAS) in the chest area at 6 h after surgery. The secondary outcome measures included chest resting and movement VAS score, neck resting and movement VAS score within 24 h after surgery, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, postoperative analgesia rate and analgesic requirements and patient satisfaction score for pain management at discharge.

Results

Compared with the control group, the block group at rest showed consistently lower VAS scores in the chest area at 6 and 12 h after operation; the block group at rest showed lower VAS scores in the neck at 6, 12 and 24 h after operation. Regarding movement, the VAS scores of the chest and neck area at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after the operation were lower in the block group than in the control group. The consumption of remifentanil, rate of postoperative analgesic requirements, and consumption of postoperative rescue analgesia in the block group were lower than those in the control group. Satisfaction with pain treatment at discharge was higher in the block group than in the control group.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided TTPB combined with ICPB provides good analgesic effect in the early postoperative period after trans-areola endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Evidence Update and Technical Considerations

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery era, parasternal intercostal nerve block has been proposed to improve pain control and reduce opioid use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However current literature has reported conflicting evidence about the effect of this multimodal pain management, as procedural variations might pose a significant bias on outcomes evaluation. In this setting, the infiltration of the parasternal plane into 2 intercostal spaces, second and fifth, with a local anesthetic spread under or above the costal plane with ultrasound guidance, seem to be standardized in theory, but significant differences might be observed in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes and defines the optimal techniques for parasternal plane blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, considering both pectointercostal fascial block and transversus thoracic plane block. A total of 10 randomized trials have been published, in adjunct to observational studies, which are heterogeneous in terms of techniques, methods, and outcomes. Parasternal block has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and provide a more favorable analgesic profile, with reduced postoperative opioid-related side effects. A trend toward reduced intensive care unit stay or duration of mechanical ventilation should be confirmed by adequately powered randomized trials or registry studies. Differences in operative technique might impact outcomes and, therefore, standardization of the procedure plays a pivotal role before reporting specific outcomes. Parasternal plane blocks might significantly improve outcomes of cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, and should be introduced comprehensively in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols.

Regional analgesia for cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Regional anesthesia is gaining attention as a valuable component of multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia in cardiac surgery, where improving the patient's quality of recovery while minimizing the harms of opioid administration are key points of emphasis in perioperative care. This review serves as an outline of recent advancements in a variety of applications of regional analgesia for cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Growing interest in regional analgesia, particularly the use of newer "chest wall blocks", has led to accumulating evidence for the efficacy of multiple regional techniques in cardiac surgery. These include a variety of technical approaches, with results consistently demonstrating optimized pain control and reduced opioid requirements. Regional and pain management experts have worked to derive consensus around nerve block nomenclature, which will be foundational to establish best practice, design and report future research consistently, improve medical education, and generally advance our knowledge in this vital area of perioperative patient care.

SUMMARY

The field of regional analgesia for cardiac surgery has matured over the last several years. A variety of regional techniques have been described and shown to be efficacious as part of the multimodal, opioid-sparing approach to pain management in the cardiac surgical setting.

Use of Ultrasound-Guided Interfascial Plane Blocks in Anterior and Lateral Thoracic Wall Region as Safe Method for Patient Anesthesia and Analgesia: Review of Techniques and Approaches during COVID-19 Pandemic

Ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks performed on the anterior and lateral thoracic wall have become an important adjuvant method to general anesthesia and an independent method of local anesthesia and pain management. These procedures diminish the harmful effects of anesthesia on respiratory function and reduce the risk of phrenic nerve paralysis or iatrogenic pneumothorax. In postoperative pain management, interfascial plane blocks decrease the dosage of intravenous drugs, including opioids. They can also eliminate the complications associated with general anesthesia when used as the sole method of anesthesia for surgical procedures. The following procedures are classified as interfascial plane blocks of the anterior and lateral thoracic wall: pectoral nerve plane block (PECS), serratus anterior plane block (SAP), transversus thoracic muscle plane block (TTP), pectoral interfascial plane block (PIF), and intercostal nerve block (ICNB). These blocks are widely used in emergency medicine, oncologic surgery, general surgery, thoracic surgery, cardiac surgery, orthopedics, cardiology, nephrology, oncology, palliative medicine, and pain medicine. Regional blocks are effective for analgesic treatment, both as an anesthesia procedure for surgery on the anterior and lateral thoracic wall and as an analgesic therapy after trauma or other conditions that induce pain in this area. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks are safe alternatives for anesthesia in patients with symptoms of respiratory distress related to SARS-CoV-2 and appear to reduce the risk of COVID-19 infection among medical personnel.

Chest Wall Nerve Blocks for Cardiothoracic, Breast Surgery, and Rib-Related Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing chest wall procedures such as cardiothoracic and breast surgeries or analgesia for rib fracture trauma can be challenging due to several factors: the procedures are more invasive, the chest wall innervation is complex, and the patient population may have multiple comorbidities increasing their susceptibility to the well-defined pain and opioid-related side effects. These procedures also carry a higher risk of persistent pain after surgery and chronic opioid use making the analgesia goals even more important.

RECENT FINDINGS

With advances in ultrasonography and clinical research, regional anesthesia techniques have been improving and newer ones with more applications have emerged over the last decade. Currently in cardiothoracic procedures, para-neuraxial and chest wall blocks have been utilized with success to supplement or substitute systemic analgesia, traditionally relying on opioids or thoracic epidural analgesia. In breast surgeries, paravertebral blocks, serratus anterior plane blocks, and pectoral nerve blocks have been shown to be effective in providing pain control, while minimizing opioid use and related side effects. Rib fracture regional analgesia options have also expanded and continue to improve.  Advances in regional anesthesia have tremendously improved multimodal analgesia and contributed to enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. This review provides the latest summary on the use and efficacy of chest wall blocks in cardiothoracic and breast surgery, as well as rib fracture-related pain and persistent postsurgical pain.

Ultrasound-guided parasternal blocks: techniques, clinical indications and future prospects: a narrative review

Fascial plane blocks represent anesthetic procedures performed to manage perioperative and chronic pain. Recently, many fascial blocks techniques have been described increasing their field of applications. They offer anesthetic and analgesic efficacy, easy of execution and low risk of complications. The newest techniques recently described are the ultrasound parasternal blocks (USPSB) which provide analgesia to the antero-medial chest wall. In particular, the antero-medial chest wall blocks are performed to provide analgesia and anesthesia in several and different surgeries such as median sternotomy, breast surgery, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and in the management of acute and chronic pain. The nervous target for these blocks is represented by the anterior branches of the intercostal nerves which enter the intercostal (ICM) and pectoralis major (PMM) muscles innervating the antero-medial region of chest wall, the main cause of poststernotomy pain. Local anesthetic is injected deep to PMM and superficial to the ICM or between the internal thoracic muscle (IIM) and transversus thoracis muscle (TTM). So, essentially these blocks may be described as superficial or deep parasternal-intercostal plane blocks, based on where the target nerves are hunted. Even if they all provide analgesia to the antero-medial chest wall, the anatomical injection site represents the main peculiarity that differentiates these techniques. To date, a common nomenclature for antero-medial chest wall blocks or parasternal-intercostal plane blocks is not yet well defined and a standardized nomenclature is needed to ensure an adequate communication among anesthesiologists.