Pulmonary Complications in Esophagectomy Based on Intraoperative Fluid Rate: A Single-Center Study

Esophagectomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Initiative Results in Improved Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a procedure with high morbidity and mortality. This study developed a Multidisciplinary Esophagectomy Enhanced Recovery Initiative (MERIT) pathway and analyzed implementation outcomes in a single institution.

METHODS

The MERIT pathway was developed as a practice optimization and quality improvement initiative. Patients were studied from November 1, 2021 to June 20, 2022 and were compared with historical control subjects. The Wilcoxon rank sum test and the Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The study compared 238 historical patients (January 17, 2017 to December 30, 2020) with 58 consecutive MERIT patients. There were no significant differences between patient characteristics in the 2 groups. In the MERIT group, 49 (85%) of the patients were male, and their mean age was 65 years (range, 59-71 years). Most cases were performed for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Length of stay improved by 27% from 11 to 8 days (P = .27). There was a 12% (P = .05) atrial arrhythmia rate reduction, as well as a 9% (P = .01) decrease in postoperative ileus. Overall complications were reduced from 54% to 35% (-19%; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study successfully developed and implemented an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for esophagectomy. In the first year, study investigators were able to reduce overall complications, specifically atrial arrhythmias, and postoperative ileus.

Update on guidelines and recommendations for enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) has continued its growth in popularity over the past few years, and evidence for its utility is catching up to other specialties. This review will present and examine some of that accumulated evidence since guidelines sponsored by the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) were first published in 2019.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ERAS/ESTS guidelines published in 2019 have not been updated, but new studies have been done and new data has been published regarding some of the individual components of the guidelines as they relate to thoracic and lung resection surgery. While there is still not a consensus on many of these issues, the volume of available evidence is becoming more robust, some of which will be incorporated into this review.

SUMMARY

The continued accumulation of data and evidence for the benefits of enhanced recovery techniques in thoracic and lung resection surgery will provide the thoracic anesthesiologist with guidance on how to best care for these patients before, during, and after surgery. The data from these studies will also help to elucidate which components of ERAS protocols are the most beneficial, and which components perhaps do not provide as much benefit as previously thought.

Evolving Perspectives on Esophagectomy Care: Clinical Update

Recent changes in perioperative care have led to new perspectives and important advances that have helped to improve outcomes among patients treated with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Leading to Increased Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery for Pleural Empyema

OBJECTIVES

Surgery for pleural empyema carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality. The authors investigated the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and their effects on perioperative morbidity and mortality. Patient-specific, preoperative, procedural, and postoperative risk factors for PPCs were analyzed.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

A single, large university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 250 adult patients were included who underwent thoracic surgery for pleural empyema between January 2017 and December 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 250 patients with pleural empyema underwent thoracic surgery by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (49%; n = 122) or open thoracotomy (51%; n = 128). A proportion (42% [105]) of patients had ≥1 PPCs; 28% (n = 70) had to undergo resurgery; and 10% (n = 25) were re-admitted unexpectedly to the ICU. Preoperative respiratory failure (odds ratio [OR]: 5.8, 95% CI: 2.4-13.1), general anesthesia without regional analgesia techniques (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4-5.8), open thoracotomy and subsequent resurgery (OR: 3.9, 95% CI 1.5-9.9), surgery outside the regular working hours (OR: 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-8.2), and postoperative sepsis (OR: 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.8) were identified as independent risk factors for PPCs. Postoperative pulmonary complications were independent factors for unplanned intensive care unit admission (OR: 10.5, 95% CI 2.1-51 for >1 PPC), death within 360 days (OR: 4.5, 95% CI 2.2-12.3 for ≥2 PPCs), and death within 30 days for ≥1 PPCs (OR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PPCs is a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality after surgery for pleural empyema. Targeting the risk factors identified in this study could improve patient outcomes.

Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To find a reliable answer to the question in the title: Should fluid management in thoracic surgery be goal directed?

RECENT FINDINGS

'Moderate' fluid regimen is the current recommendation of fluid management in thoracic anesthesia, however, especially in more risky patients; 'Goal-Directed Therapy' (GDT) can be a more reliable approach than just 'moderate'. There are numerous studies examining its effects in general anesthesia; albeit mostly retrospective and very heterogenic. There are few studies of GDT in thoracic anesthesia with similar drawbacks.

SUMMARY

Although the evidence level is low, GDT is generally associated with fewer postoperative complications. It can be helpful in decision-making for volume-optimization, timing of fluid administration, and indication of vasoactive agents.

Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint

Objective

This review summarizes the peri-operative anesthesiological approaches to esophagectomy considering the best up-to-date, evidence-based medicine, discussed from the anesthesiologist’s standpoint.

Background

Esophagectomy is the only curative therapy for esophageal cancer. Despite the many advancements made in the surgical treatment of this tumour, esophagectomy still carries a morbidity rate reaching 60%. Patients undergoing esophagectomy should be referred to high volume centres where they can receive a multidisciplinary approach to treatment, associated with better outcomes. The anesthesiologist is the key figure who should guide the peri-operative phase, from diagnosis through to post-surgery rehabilitation. We performed an updated narrative review devoted to the study of anesthesia management for esophagectomy in cancer patients.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases from inception to May 2021. We used the following terms: “esophagectomy”, “esophagectomy AND pre-operative evaluation”, “esophagectomy AND protective lung ventilation”, “esophagectomy AND hemodynamic monitoring” and “esophagectomy AND analgesia”. We considered only articles with abstract written in English and available to the reader. We excluded single case-reports.

Conclusions

Pre-operative anesthesiological evaluation is mandatory in order to stratify and optimize any medical condition. During surgery, protective ventilation and judicious fluid management are the cornerstones of intraoperative “protective anesthesia”. Post-operative care should be provided by an intensive care unit or high-dependency unit depending on the patient’s condition, the type of surgery endured and the availability of local resources. The provision of adequate post-operative analgesia favours early mobilization and rapid recovery. Anesthesiologist has an important role during the peri-operative care for esophagectomy. However, there are still some topics that need to be further studied to improve the outcome of these patients.