Echocardiography in Weaning Right Ventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support: Are We Measuring the Right Stuff?

Technique for Weaning From Peripheral Venopulmonary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Combined Cardiopulmonary Failure

Venopulmonary (VP) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a mode capable of supporting both pulmonary and right ventricular (RV) functions. Weaning patients from VP ECMO requires careful assessment of both RV and respiratory system recovery, which may occur at different rates. The weaning strategy described herein begins with weaning of respiratory ECMO support, followed by discontinuation of RV support. We also discuss situations in which the standard weaning strategy may require modification.

Imaging in acute percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in adults: a clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) of the ESC, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (EuroELSO)

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) in cardiogenic shock patients has increased during the last decades with most management strategies relying on observational studies and expert opinion, including hemodynamic monitoring, device selection, and timing of support institution/duration. In this context, imaging has a pivotal role throughout the patient pathway, from identification to initiation, monitoring, and weaning. This manuscript summarizes the consensus of an expert panel from the European Society of Cardiology Association for Acute CardioVascular Care, the European Association of CardioVascular Imaging, and the European Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, providing the rationale for and practical guidance of imaging to tMCS based on existing evidence and consensus on best current practice.

Use of Intravascular Micro-Axial Left Ventricular Assist Devices as a Bridging Strategy for Cardiogenic Shock: Mid-Term Outcomes

Objectives: Patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) may be successfully bridged using intravascular micro-axial left ventricular assist devices (M-LVADs) for recovery or determination of definitive therapy. Methods: One hundred and seven CS patients implanted with M-LVADs from January 2020 to May 2024 were divided into four groups; group-1: 34 patients (transplant); group-2: 25 patients (LVAD); group-3: 42 patients (postcardiotomy CS (PCCS)); group-4: 6 patients (decision/recovery but excluded from analysis). Multivariable logistic regression and Multivariable Coxregression models identified predictors of early -hospital and late mortality, and Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with p < 0.05, respectively, were considered statistically significant. SPSS 29.0 and Python 3.11.1. were used for analyses. Results: Complications included device-malfunction (6%), gastrointestinal bleed (9%), long-term hemodialysis (21%), axillary hematoma requiring re-exploration (10%), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (4%) requiring heparin therapy cessation/initiation of argatroban infusion, and non-fatal stroke (11%). Early hospital mortality included 13 patients: 2 in group-1, 1 in group-2, 10 in group-3 (p = 0.02). In the Logistic-Regression model, category of CS requiring an M-LVAD was significant (OR = 4.7, p = 0.05). Patients were followed for 4.5 years (mean follow-up was 23 ± 17 months), and 23 deaths occurred; group-1: 3 patients, group-2: 5 patients, and group-3: 15 patients (p = 0.019). At 4.5 years, actuarial survival was 90.7 ± 5.1% in group-1, 79.2 ± 8.3% in group-2, 62.8 ± 7.7% in group-3 (p = 0.01). In the Cox-Regression model, M-LVAD category (HR = 3.63, p = 0.04), and long-term postoperative dialysis (HR = 3.9, p = 0.002) emerged as predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusions: In cardiogenic shock, mid-term outcomes demonstrate good survival with M-LVADs as bridge to transplant/durable LVADs and reasonable survival with M-LVADs as a bridge to recovery following cardiotomy, accompanied by reduced ECMO usage, and early ambulation/rehabilitation.

Perioperative Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Abnormalities of the Tricuspid Valve Apparatus in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction frequently occurs after cardiac surgery and is linked to adverse postoperative outcomes, including mortality, reintubation, stroke, and prolonged ICU stays. While various criteria using echocardiography and hemodynamic parameters have been proposed, a consensus remains elusive. Distinctive RV anatomical features include its thin wall, which presents a triangular shape in a lateral view and a crescent shape in a cross-sectional view. Principal causes of RV dysfunction after cardiac surgery encompass ischemic reperfusion injury, prolonged ischemic time, choice of cardioplegia and its administration, cardiopulmonary bypass weaning characteristics, and preoperative risk factors. Post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation RV dysfunction is common but often transient, with a favorable prognosis upon resolution. There is an ongoing debate regarding the benefits of concomitant surgical repair of the RV in the presence of regurgitation. According to the literature, the gold standard techniques for assessing RV function are cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and hemodynamic assessment using thermodilution. Echocardiography is widely favored for perioperative RV function evaluation due to its accessibility, reproducibility, non-invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Although other techniques exist for RV function assessment, they are less common in clinical practice. Clinical management strategies focus on early detection and include intravenous drugs (inotropes and vasodilators), inhalation drugs (pulmonary vasodilators), ventilator strategies, volume management, and mechanical support. Bridging research gaps in this field is crucial to improving clinical outcomes associated with RV dysfunction in the near future.

Right-Sided Mechanical Circulatory Support - A Hemodynamic Perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Right ventricular (RV) failure is increasingly recognized as a major cause of morbidity and mortality. When RV failure is refractory to medical therapy, escalation to right-sided mechanical circulatory support (MCS) should be considered. In this review, we begin by recapitulating the hemodynamics of RV failure, then we delve into current and future right-sided MCS devices and describe their hemodynamic profiles.

RECENT FINDINGS

The field of temporary right-sided MCS continues to expand, with evolving strategies and new devices actively under development. All right-sided MCS devices bypass the RV, with each bypass configuration conferring a unique hemodynamic profile. Devices that aspirate blood directly from the RV, as opposed to the RA or the IVC, have more favorable hemodynamics and more effective RV unloading. There has been a growing interest in single-access MCS devices which do not restrict patient mobility. Additionally, a first-of-its-kind percutaneous, pulsatile, right-sided MCS device (PERKAT RV) is currently undergoing investigation in humans. Prompt recognition of refractory RV failure and deployment of right-sided MCS can improve outcomes. The field of right-sided MCS is rapidly evolving, with ongoing efforts dedicated towards developing novel temporary devices that are single access, allow for patient mobility, and directly unload the RV, as well as more durable devices.