1
|
Ortoleva J, Dalia AA, Pisano DV, Shapeton A. Diagnosis and Management of Vasoplegia in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Narrative Review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:1378-1389. [PMID: 38490900 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Refractory vasodilatory shock, or vasoplegia, is a pathophysiologic state observed in the intensive care unit and operating room in patients with a variety of primary diagnoses. Definitions of vasoplegia vary by source but are qualitatively defined clinically as a normal or high cardiac index and low systemic vascular resistance causing hypotension despite high-dose vasopressors in the setting of euvolemia. This definition can be difficult to apply to patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A large body of mostly retrospective literature exists on vasoplegia in the non-MCS population, but the increased use of temporary MCS justifies an examination of vasoplegia in this population. MCS, particularly extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, adds complexity to the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia due to challenges in determining cardiac output (or total blood flow), lack of clarity on appropriate dosing of noncatecholamine interventions, increased thrombosis risk, the difficulty in determining the endpoints of adequate volume resuscitation, and the unclear effects of rescue agents (methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, and angiotensin II) on MCS device monitoring and function. Care teams must combine data from invasive and noninvasive sources to diagnose vasoplegia in this population. In this narrative review, the available literature is surveyed to provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of vasoplegia in the temporary MCS population, with a focus on noncatecholamine treatments and special considerations for patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, transvalvular heart pumps, and other ventricular assist devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamel Ortoleva
- Department of Anesthesiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
| | - Adam A Dalia
- Division of Cardiac Anesthesiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Alexander Shapeton
- Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suero OR, Park Y, Wieruszewski PM, Chatterjee S. Management of Vasoplegic Shock in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit after Cardiac Surgery. Crit Care Clin 2024; 40:73-88. [PMID: 37973358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Vasoplegic shock after cardiac surgery is characterized by hypotension, a high cardiac output, and vasodilation. Much of the understanding of this pathologic state is informed by the understanding of septic shock. Adverse outcomes and mortality are increased with vasoplegic shock. Early recognition and a systematic approach to its management are critical. The need for vasopressors to sustain an adequate blood pressure as well as pharmacologic adjuncts to mitigate the inflammatory inciting process are necessary. The rationale behind vasopressor escalation and consideration of adjuncts are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlando R Suero
- Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center, 6720 Bertner Avenue, Room 0-520, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yangseon Park
- Baylor St. Lukes Medical Center, 6720 Bertner Avenue, Room 0-520, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick M Wieruszewski
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, RO_MB_GR_722PH, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Subhasis Chatterjee
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brokmeier HM, Seelhammer TG, Nei SD, Gerberi DJ, Mara KC, Wittwer ED, Wieruszewski PM. Hydroxocobalamin for Vasodilatory Hypotension in Shock: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis for Comparison to Methylene Blue. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023:S1053-0770(23)00241-0. [PMID: 37147207 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Hydroxocobalamin inhibits nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation, and has been used in settings of refractory shock. However, its effectiveness and role in treating hypotension remain unclear. The authors systematically searched Ovid Medline, Embase, EBM Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection for clinical studies reporting on adult persons who received hydroxocobalamin for vasodilatory shock. A meta-analysis was performed with random-effects models comparing the hemodynamic effects of hydroxocobalamin to methylene blue. The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A total of 24 studies were identified and comprised mainly of case reports (n = 12), case series (n = 9), and 3 cohort studies. Hydroxocobalamin was applied mainly for cardiac surgery vasoplegia, but also was reported in the settings of liver transplantation, septic shock, drug-induced hypotension, and noncardiac postoperative vasoplegia. In the pooled analysis, hydroxocobalamin was associated with a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 hour than methylene blue (mean difference 7.80, 95% CI 2.63-12.98). There were no significant differences in change in MAP (mean difference -4.57, 95% CI -16.05 to 6.91) or vasopressor dosage (mean difference -0.03, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.06) at 1 hour compared to baseline between hydroxocobalamin and methylene blue. Mortality was also similar (odds ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.42-2.03). The evidence supporting the use of hydroxocobalamin for shock is limited to anecdotal reports and a few cohort studies. Hydroxocobalamin appears to positively affect hemodynamics in shock, albeit similar to methylene blue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Scott D Nei
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Kristin C Mara
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Patrick M Wieruszewski
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Blaha M, Blais M, Olson L. The Durability of Intravenous Hydroxocobalamin in Vasoplegia. Cureus 2023; 15:e38307. [PMID: 37255913 PMCID: PMC10226765 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Refractory distributive shock (vasoplegia) has been treated with intravenous (IV) hydroxocobalamin (B12), but its use is poorly characterized. The objective of this study was to quantify the duration of hemodynamic improvement after B12 administration. Materials and methods This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients who received IV B12 while on vasopressors in the intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups: responders (≥10% decrease in baseline vasopressor requirements within 60 minutes of B12 administration) and non-responders. Results A total of 16 patients were included, and five (31%) met the 'responder' criteria. The median time to respond was 15 minutes, and the response was maintained for a median of 210 minutes. The baseline median norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) rate was 32.9 mcg/min in responders and 24.7 mcg/min in non-responders. Responders' NEE requirements decreased to 16.7 mcg/min after 15 minutes and 14.8 mcg/min after 60 minutes. All responders and 10 (91%) non-responders were mechanically ventilated; both groups were mostly male (60% and 91%) and had a median age of 54 years and 58 years, respectively. A total of 4 (80%) responders and 10 (91%) non-responders died while hospitalized. IV B12 was administered as 5 g over 15 minutes in all but two patients (one responder and one non-responder), who each received 5 g of B12 over 360 minutes. Conclusion Vasopressor requirements decreased rapidly in 31% of patients after B12 administration and remained so for a median of 210 minutes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meghan Blais
- Department of Pharmacy, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, USA
| | - Logan Olson
- Department of Pharmacy, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Albertson TE, Chenoweth JA, Lewis JC, Pugashetti JV, Sandrock CE, Morrissey BM. The pharmacotherapeutic options in patients with catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:959-976. [PMID: 35920615 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2110067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Septic and vasoplegic shock are common types of vasodilatory shock (VS) with high mortality. After fluid resuscitation and the use of catecholamine-mediated vasopressors (CMV), vasopressin, angiotensin II, methylene blue (MB) and hydroxocobalamin can be added to maintain blood pressure. AREAS COVERED VS treatment utilizes a phased approach with secondary vasopressors added to vasopressor agents to maintain an acceptable mean arterial pressure (MAP). This review covers additional vasopressors and adjunctive therapies used when fluid and catecholamine-mediated vasopressors fail to maintain target MAP. EXPERT OPINION Evidence supporting additional vasopressor agents in catecholamine resistant VS is limited to case reports, series, and a few randomized control trials (RCTs) to guide recommendations. Vasopressin is the most common agent added next when MAPs are not adequately supported with CMV. VS patients failing fluids and vasopressors with cardiomyopathy may have cardiotonic agents such as dobutamine or milrinone added before or after vasopressin. Angiotensin II, another class of vasopressor is used in VS to maintain adequate MAP. MB and/or hydoxocobalamin, vitamin C, thiamine and corticosteroids are adjunctive therapies used in refractory VS. More RCTs are needed to confirm the utility of these drugs, at what doses, which combinations and in what order they should be given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Albertson
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Northern California Health System, Mather, CA, USA.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - James A Chenoweth
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Northern California Health System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Justin C Lewis
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Janelle V Pugashetti
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Northern California Health System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Christian E Sandrock
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Northern California Health System, Mather, CA, USA
| | - Brian M Morrissey
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, VA Northern California Health System, Mather, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|